Download central issue in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is the

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Management of acute coronary syndrome wikipedia , lookup

Electrocardiography wikipedia , lookup

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia wikipedia , lookup

Cardiac contractility modulation wikipedia , lookup

Quantium Medical Cardiac Output wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
3083
HOW TO SELECT THE APPROPRIATE CANDIDATES FOR CARDIAC
RESYNCHRONIZATION THERAPY
M. Haghjoo
Department of Pacemaker and Electrophysiology, Rajaie Cardiovascular Medical and
Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
A central issue in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is the identification of
patients most likely to respond that is patients with significant atrioventricular (AV)
and/or inter- and/or intraventricular mechanical dys-synchrony (DYS) who would most
likely benefit from CRT. Almost all prospective, controlled studies on CRT have been
conducted on patients with severe congestive heart failure (CHF) presenting with a wide
QRS complex. In the original hypothesis of CRT, a wide QRS complex, a marker of
electrical DYS, was correlated with mechanical ventricular DYS. While this may
generally be correct, it is worth mentioning that some patients with a wide QRS do not
have marked mechanical ventricular DYS and, conversely, that some patients with a
narrow QRS may be candidates for CRT due to significant mechanical DYS. On the
other hand, although short-term experimental studies have shown that patients with wider
QRS complexes have a greater immediate mechanical response to CRT, most long-term
studies have shown that QRS duration does not predict a response to CRT; and QRS
narrowing does not predict a functional improvement following CRT, although the
opposite has been observed in some studies in which the right ventricular (RV) lead was
positioned at the RV septum. This may explain the relatively high percentage of
nonresponder (NR) patients who have been selected for CRT based on QRS duration as a
surrogate for mechanical ventricular DYS. We review recent studies on the predictors of
long-term response, and their impact on patient selection for CRT.