Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
2004/2005 LAKE MACQUARIE ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH GRANTS RESEARCH ABSTRACT PROJECT TITLE: An assessment of the vegetation occurring on coastal sands at Pelican Flats PROJECT PERSONNEL: Researcher: Stephen Bell East Coast Flora Survey P.O Box 216 KOTARA NSW 2289 [email protected] PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Pelican Flats occurs on an area of mainly Holocene sands (old beach landscapes) between Belmont and Swansea. The vegetation in this area has been over-simplified in all regional and sub-regional classifications, yet it supports a diverse range of vegetation communities. This research aimed to classify and map the vegetation of Pelican Flats, with particular regard to assessing the significance of areas characterised by Bangalay (Eucalyptus botryoides). This conspicuous canopy species is rare in the region, and occupies highly restricted habitats. In the Gosford and southern Sydney districts, vegetation communities dominated by this species are protected through endangered ecological community listings on the NSW Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995, and it is expected that Lake Macquarie vegetation supporting this species is equally threatened. PROJECT FINDINGS: Sixteen vegetation communities have been mapped and defined through numerical and intuitive classification for Pelican Flats, within Lake Macquarie local government area. This area, occupying 768 ha between Belmont and Swansea, is comprised almost exclusively of Holocene sand deposits which have developed a diversity of vegetation communities dependent on drainage and proximity to oceanic onshore winds. Due to a long history of human occupation in this area, only 29% (or 225 ha) of this area currently supports native vegetation. The diversity of vegetation communities present at Pelican Flats includes one grassland (Beach Spinifex), one saltmarsh (Saltmarsh), two rushlands (Estuarine Juncus Rushland, Phragmites Rushland), seven scrubs and heaths (Coastal Sand Banksia Scrub, Coastal Sand Bottlebrush Wet Heath, Coastal Sand Foredune Scrub, Coastal Sand Wallum – Heath, Mangrove – Estuarine Complex, Tomago Clay Wallum Scrub, Bitou Bush Scrub), two dry forests (Lake Macquarie Spotted Gum Forest, Pelican Bangalay Forest), and three swamp forests (Coastal Sand Swamp Forest, Swamp Mahogany – Livistonia Swamp Forest, Swamp Oak – Rushland Forest). Detailed descriptions of each of these communities is provided, and their distributions mapped. Nearly all are present elsewhere in the local government area and region; the exceptions are Tomago Clay Wallum Scrub (which also occurs in Port Stephens LGA) and Pelican Bangalay Forest (endemic to Lake Macquarie). The latter is floristically related to three other regional communities; a focused numerical analysis of these four communities has shown that Pelican Bangalay Forest is 2004/2005 Environmental Research Grants Proudly sponsored by: Date submitted: April 2016 Project ID: 2004/2005-01 [F2004/12183] DISCLAIMER: Council has published this grant funded research abstract for information only. The findings and opinions in the research abstract are those of the researcher, not those of Council. Publication is no indication that the research has been subject to peer review by Council, that the findings are endorsed by Council or are a commitment to any particular course of action by Council. Whilst the Environmental Research Grants Committee considers project design and the qualifications of the researcher when awarding grants, the research is carried out independently from Council with the accuracy and academic rigour of the findings remaining solely those of the independent researcher and supervisor. The reader should use their own discretion in interpreting the findings and direct requests for further information to the researcher. 2004/2005 LAKE MACQUARIE ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH GRANTS RESEARCH ABSTRACT significantly different (p<0.001) to the Umina Coastal Sandplain Woodland from Gosford LGA (a listed Endangered Ecological Community under the NSW Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995), Pearl Beach Sand Forest (Gosford LGA) and Tomago Apple-Banksia Forest (Port Stephens LGA). Vegetation present at Pelican Flats is representative of three Endangered Ecological Communities (Coastal Saltmarsh,Swamp Oak Floodplain Forest, Swamp Sclerophyll Forest on Coastal Floodplains), incorporating six of the defined communities for the area. Although not currently listed as such, the highly restricted Pelican Bangalay Forest meets the IUCN criteria for a Critically Endangered ecosystem, based on an estimated 72% loss of geographical distribution since 1750 (32 ha down to 9 ha), a current-day Extent of Occurrence of 145 ha (1.45 km2), and an Area of Occupancy of just one single 10 x 10 km grid cell. It follows, therefore, that Pelican Bangalay Forest qualifies as Critically Endangered under the NSW Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995, and it is suggested that a nomination to this effect be prepared. PROJECT RECOMMENDATIONS: It is recommended that a nomination be prepared for listing of Pelican Bangalay Forest as a Critically Endangered Ecological Community under the NSW Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995. 2004/2005 Environmental Research Grants Proudly sponsored by: Date submitted: April 2016 Project ID: 2004/2005-01 [F2004/12183] DISCLAIMER: Council has published this grant funded research abstract for information only. The findings and opinions in the research abstract are those of the researcher, not those of Council. Publication is no indication that the research has been subject to peer review by Council, that the findings are endorsed by Council or are a commitment to any particular course of action by Council. Whilst the Environmental Research Grants Committee considers project design and the qualifications of the researcher when awarding grants, the research is carried out independently from Council with the accuracy and academic rigour of the findings remaining solely those of the independent researcher and supervisor. The reader should use their own discretion in interpreting the findings and direct requests for further information to the researcher.