* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download PEQWS_Mod04_Prob04_v05 - Courses
Immunity-aware programming wikipedia , lookup
Integrating ADC wikipedia , lookup
Operational amplifier wikipedia , lookup
Josephson voltage standard wikipedia , lookup
Valve RF amplifier wikipedia , lookup
Negative resistance wikipedia , lookup
Schmitt trigger wikipedia , lookup
Power electronics wikipedia , lookup
Electrical ballast wikipedia , lookup
Switched-mode power supply wikipedia , lookup
Voltage regulator wikipedia , lookup
Opto-isolator wikipedia , lookup
Two-port network wikipedia , lookup
Resistive opto-isolator wikipedia , lookup
Rectiverter wikipedia , lookup
Current source wikipedia , lookup
Surge protector wikipedia , lookup
Current mirror wikipedia , lookup
Dave Shattuck University of Houston © Brooks/Cole Publishing Co. Practice Examination Questions With Solutions Module 4 – Problem 4 Filename: PEQWS_Mod04_Prob04.doc Note: Units in problem are enclosed in square brackets. Time Allowed: 35 Minutes Problem Statement: The device in Figure 1 can be modeled with a voltage source in series with a resistance. The current and voltage for the device are related as shown in the plot in Figure 2. The device has been connected in a circuit shown in Figure 3. Find iX. A iT in [mA] + 5 vT Device -2 2 0 vT in [V] iT - -5 B Figure 1 Figure 2 iX A R1= 1[kW] Device + - B vS1= 7[V] R2= 1.8[kW] Figure 3 Page 4.4.1 iS1= 8[mA] Dave Shattuck University of Houston © Brooks/Cole Publishing Co. Problem Solution: The device in Figure 1 can be modeled with a voltage source in series with a resistance. The current and voltage for the device are related as shown in the plot in Figure 2. The device has been connected in a circuit shown in Figure 3. Find iX. A iT in [mA] + 5 vT Device -2 2 0 vT in [V] iT - -5 B Figure 1 Figure 2 iX A R1= 1[kW] Device + - B vS1= 7[V] R2= 1.8[kW] iS1= 8[mA] Figure 3 The first step in the solution is to find the model for the device. As noted in the problem, it should be clear that the device can be modeled with a Thevenin equivalent, that is, a voltage source in series with a resistor. So, we need to start by finding this Thevenin equivalent. Page 4.4.2 Dave Shattuck University of Houston © Brooks/Cole Publishing Co. To get this we can find the open-circuit voltage and the short-circuit current. In this case, that is a fairly straightforward process, using the plot in Figure 2. However, it is very important that we take care about the polarities of the voltage and current. Let’s take our time and do this carefully. Let’s begin by defining an open-circuit voltage. We have the circuit that follows. A + vT + vOC Device iT - - B We have chosen to define the open-circuit voltage, vOC, so that it will be in the same polarity as vT. Thus we can look at the plot in Figure 2, and look at the point where the current iT is zero. This will be the open-circuit voltage value, which is also the Thevenin voltage. Thus, we have vOC 2[V]. Next, we define the short-circuit current, iSC, so that it will be in the same polarity as iT. Page 4.4.3 Dave Shattuck University of Houston © Brooks/Cole Publishing Co. A + vT Device iSC iT - - B Again, we can get the value from the plot in Figure 2, looking at the point where the voltage vT is zero. This will be the short-circuit current value. We have iSC 5[mA]. The next step is very important. The Thevenin resistance will be the ratio of the open-circuit voltage to the short-circuit current. However, to get the sign correct, we need the proper relationship between the polarities of these two quantities. We showed in the DPKC files that if we define the open-circuit voltage at A with respect to B, and then define the short-circuit current from A through the short to B, then the equivalent resistance will be REQ vOC 2[V] 400[W]. iSC 5[mA] If we don’t do this carefully, we will obtain the wrong sign for the equivalent resistance, and get the wrong answer. An alternative approach is sometimes followed to get the equivalent resistance. This equivalent resistance will be the inverse of the slope of the line in Figure 2. However, we will again need to be careful to be able to determine the proper sign for this resistance. The sign that you obtain is a function of the sign convention used for the device in Figure 1. Note that we have used the active sign convention for the relationship between vT and iT in Figure 1. That is why the equivalent resistance is the negative of the value of the inverse of the slope. To show why, we will take a brief side trip. Page 4.4.4 Dave Shattuck University of Houston © Brooks/Cole Publishing Co. The Thevenin equivalent is shown in the figure that follows. Notice that we have inserted the open-circuit voltage with the proper polarity and value, but have not yet found the equivalent resistance, REQ. REQ A + vT + vOC = 2[V] iT - - B Now, let’s write KVL around the loop in this circuit. We have vT vOC iT REQ 0. If we solve this for iT , we get iT vT vOC vT vOC . REQ REQ REQ This is an equation for a straight line on the iT vs vT axes. Notice that the slope of this line is the coefficient of vT. Thus, we have that m 1 , REQ where m is the slope. Since the slope is Page 4.4.5 Dave Shattuck University of Houston © Brooks/Cole Publishing Co. m 5[mA] 1 , then it is clear that 2[V] REQ REQ 2[V] 400[W]. 5[mA] This is exactly what we said earlier. When we use the active sign convention for vT and iT, we have equivalent resistance equal to the negative of the inverse of slope of the iT vs vT plot. You can follow a similar process to show that if you use the passive sign convention for vT and iT, the equivalent resistance will be equal to the inverse of slope of the iT vs vT plot. Now we are ready to solve for iX. We can now insert our model, the Thevenin equivalent, for the device in Figure 3. We do this in the circuit that follows. iX REQ = -400[W] A R1= 1[kW] + + vOC = 2[V] - - vS1= 7[V] R2= 1.8[kW] iS1= 8[mA] B We want to find iX, and this is pretty straightforward, now. We can write that iX vOC vS1 2[V] 7[V] , or REQ R1 400[W] 1[kW] iX 8.33[mA]. Page 4.4.6 Dave Shattuck University of Houston © Brooks/Cole Publishing Co. It might be noted that the values of the resistor R2 and the current source iS1 have no effect on the solution to this problem. This is because these two components are in parallel with the voltage source, and thus have no effect on the rest of the circuit. Yet another way to find the value of the equivalent resistance is to draw the equivalent circuit, as shown in the figure that follows. REQ A + vT + vOC = 2[V] iT - - B Now, we know from the plot in Figure 2 that when vT 0, then iT 5[mA]. This occurs when the two terminals, A and B, are shorted. When this is true, then we know from KVL around that loop that vOC iT REQ , or 2[V] 5[mA]REQ , which can be solved to give REQ 400[W]. This is yet a third way that gives us the proper sign for the equivalent resistance. Problem adapted from ECE 2300, Exam 2, Problem 1, Summer 2000, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Cullen College of Engineering, University of Houston. Page 4.4.7