Download physicianlecture day 2015

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

History of intersex surgery wikipedia , lookup

Anatomical terminology wikipedia , lookup

Anatomical terms of location wikipedia , lookup

Anatomy wikipedia , lookup

History of anatomy wikipedia , lookup

Vertebra wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
TEXT
PATRICK MCKENNA
▸ Consultant Spinal Surgeon
▸ Fellowship trained
▸ Scope of work
PATRICK MCKENNA
▸ Wrong job
THE SPINAL BIT
▸ www.spinaldoctor.co.uk
BONY ANATOMY
OUTLINE
▸ Anatomy of the spine
VERTEBRAL COLUMN
15
15
20
30
20
20
▸ Cervical Spine:
▸ Lordotic curvature
▸ Neuroanatomy
▸ Greatest ROM
▸ The Normal Spine
▸ Most vulnerable to injury
▸ Trauma
▸ Degenerative conditions of the spine
▸ Clinical assessment
▸ Thoracic Spine:
ANATOMY OF THE SPINE
▸ Spinal emergencies
▸ Greatest protection
▸ Least ROM
▸ Lumbar Spine:
▸ Balance between protection/ROM
TEXT
VERTEBRAL COLUMN: MAJOR SUPPORTING LIGAMENTS
VERTEBRAL COLUMN: MAJOR SUPPORTING LIGAMENTS
FUNCTIONS OF THE SPINE
ANTERIOR LONGITUDINAL LIGAMENT
POSTERIOR LONGITUDINAL LIGAMENT
▸ Transmits weight of the
trunk to the lower limbs
▸ Surrounds/protects spinal
cord
▸ Attachment point for the
ribs and muscles of neck
and back
▸ Anterior Longitudinal Ligament –
runs vertically along anterior
surface of vertebral bodies
▸ Neck - Sacrum
▸ Attaches strongly to both vertebrae
and intervertebral discs (very wide)
▸ Prevents back hyperextension
▸ runs vertically along posterior
surfaces of vertebral bodies
▸ Narrower, weaker
▸ Attaches to intervertebral discs
▸ Prevents hyperflexion
VERTEBRAL COLUMN: SUPPORTING LIGAMENTS
VERTEBRAL COLUMN: SUPPORTING LIGAMENTS
LIGAMENTUM FLAVUM
POSTERIOR LIGAMENTS
BONY ANATOMY
▸ strong ligament that connects the laminae
of the vertebrae
▸ Interspinous ligament
▸ body
▸ Protects the neural elements and the spinal
cord
▸ Supraspinous ligament
▸ Intertransverse ligament
▸ Stabilizes the spine to prevent excessive
vertebral body motion
▸ weight bearing 85%
▸ Vertebral arch
▸ formed by pedicle and laminae
▸ Forms the posterior wall of the spinal canal
with the laminae
▸ 2 pedicles
▸ Stretches with forward bending / recoils in
erect position
BONY ANATOMY
▸ anterior
▸ posterior part
▸ Strongest of the spinal ligaments
CLINICAL ANATOMY
CLINICAL ANATOMY
▸ 2 laminae
BONY ANATOMY
BONY ANATOMY
CERVICAL VERTEBRA
▸ Transverse Processes:
▸ Project laterally from each
pedicle-lamina junction
▸ Attachment site for intrinsic
ligaments and muscles
▸ Spinous Processes:
▸ Prominent posterior projections
▸ Attachment site for intrinsic
ligaments and muscle
BONY ANATOMY
BONY ANATOMY
BONY ANATOMY
Lumbar vertebra
BONY ANATOMY
BONY ANATOMY
BONY ANATOMY
FACET JOINTS
PARS INTERARTICULARIS
INTERVERTEBRAL FORAMEN
▸ Articulations between superior
articular facet (bottom vertebrae)
and inferior articular facet (above
vertebrae)
▸ Area between the superior and
inferior facets
▸ Space where spinal nerve roots
exit the vertebral column
▸ Common site for stress fractures
(lumbar spine)
▸ Size variable due to placement,
pathology, spinal loading, and
posture
▸ Contribute to ROM
▸ ↓ Weight-bearing stress through
vertebral body and disc
▸ Synovial joints
▸ Spondylolysis - refers to the defect
(black arrows) present when the
pars interarticularis (green arrow) is
fractured
BONY ANATOMY
BONY ANATOMY
VERTEBRAL ANATOMY
THORACIC VERTEBRA
▸ Can be occluded by arthritic
degenerative changes and spaceoccupying lesions (tumors, spinal
disc herniations)
BONY ANATOMY
THORACIC ARTICULATIONS
Costovertebral joint
Costotransverse joint
▸ Articulation between vertebral
bodies and ribs
▸ Superior and Inferior Costal Facets
BONY ANATOMY
BONY ANATOMY
BONY ANATOMY
SACRUM
SACROILIAC JOINT
SIJ
▸ Curved, triangular shaped
▸ Between the sacrum (base of the spine) and the ilium of the pelvis
▸ 5 fused vertebrae
▸ Strong, weight bearing synovial joints (2)
▸ Fixes the spinal column to
the pelvis
▸ Stabilizes the pelvic girdle
▸ Covered by 2 different kinds of cartilage
▸ Sacral surface (hyaline cartilage)
▸ Iliac surface (fibrocartilage)
▸ Functions:
▸ Shock absorption (spine)
▸ Allows the transverse rotations (lower extremity) to be transmitted up the spine.
▸ Motions:
▸ limited
BONY ANATOMY
BONY ANATOMY
BONY ANATOMY
SACROILIAC LIGAMENTS
SACROILIAC LIGAMENTS
COCCYX
▸ Posterior Sacroiliac Ligament:
▸ Anterior Sacroiliac
Ligament:
▸ Forms the chief bond of
union between the bones
▸ Connects the anterior
surface of the lateral part of
the sacrum to the ilium
▸ Upper part: (short PSL)
▸ Nearly horizontal in
direction
▸ Ilium to upper sacrum
▸ Consists of 4 (in some
cases 3 or 5) vertebrae
fused together
▸ Attachment site for
muscles of pelvic floor
and sometimes
portions of gluteus
maximus
▸ Lower part: (long PSL)
▸ Oblique in direction
▸ Lower sacrum to PSIS
THE
DISC
DISCS
INTERVERTEBRAL DISCS
▸ Nucleus Pulposus: Core
▸ Gelatinous, acts like a
rubber ball (enables spine
to absorb compressive
forces)
▸ 60-70% water
▸ Annulus Fibrosus: Outer rings
▸ Multilayered fibers (cross
from opposite directions)
▸ Rings absorb compressive
forces themselves
DISCS
DISCS
INTERVERTEBRAL DISCS
INTERVERTEBRAL DISCS
▸ Intervertebral Discs:
▸ Functions:
▸ 23 intervertebral discs
▸ Shock absorbers
▸ No disc between skull and C1 or
between C1-C2
▸ walking, jumping, running
▸ Discs are thickest in the lumbar
vertebrae and cervical regions
(enhances flexibility)
▸ Allow spine to bend
▸ At points of compression, the
discs flatten out and bulge out
a bit between the vertebrae
DISCS
MUSCLES
INTERVERTEBRAL DISCS
ERECTOR SPINAE
▸ Iliocostalis:
▸ Intervertebral Discs: Dehydration Process
▸ Collectively, the discs make up about 25% of the height of the
vertebral column
▸ Nucleus pulposus becomes dehydrated during course of day
▸ Flattens out (height is 1-2 centimeters less at night than when we
awake in morning)
▸ Aging Process = Permanent dehydration (ages 40 – 60)
▸ Iliocostalis Lumborum
▸ Iliocostalis Thoracis
▸ Iliocostalis Cervicis
▸ Longissimus:
▸ Longissimus Thoracis
▸ Longissimus Cervicis
▸ Longissimus Capitis
▸ Spinalis:
▸ Decreased ROM
▸ Spinalis Thoracis
▸ Narrowing intervertebral foramen
▸ Spinalis Cervicis
▸ Spinalis Capitis
MUSCLES
NEURO
TRANSVERSO SPINAL MUSCLES
LUMBAR AND SACRAL PLEXUS
▸ Lumbar:
▸ Deep intrinsic layer
▸ Formed by 12th thoracic nerve and L1L5 nerve roots
▸ Fibers run from 1 transverse
process to the spinous process
superior to them
▸ Innervation:
▸ Anterior and medial muscles of thigh
▸ Group formed by:
▸ Semispinalis
▸ Multifidus
▸ Rotators
NEUROANATOMY
NEURO
NEURO
LUMBAR PLEXUS
LUMBAR AND SACRAL PLEXUS
▸ Dermatomes of medial leg and foot
▸ Femoral Nerve – formed by branches
of L2, L3, L4 nerve roots
▸ Obturator Nerve – anterior branches of
L2, L3, L4
NEURO
SACRAL PLEXUS
▸ Sacral:
▸ Formed by L4, L5 and lumbosacral
trunk
▸ Innervation:
▸ Muscles of buttocks, posterior
femur, and lower leg
▸ Sciatic Nerve – gives rise to
▸ Tibial nerve
▸ Common peroneal nerve
NEURO
TEXT
SACRAL PLEXUS
SAGITTAL BALANCE
▸ harmony between the gravity line and
the spinal plumb line
NORMAL SPINAL
BALANCE
▸ when out of balance
▸ c7 plumb line runs anterior to
the gravity line
▸ fighting to keep balances
▸ compensation
▸ symptoms
TEXT
TEXT
TEXT
SAGITTAL BALANCE
SAGITTAL BALANCE
SAGITTAL BALANCE
KYPHOSIS
KYPHOSIS
▸ pelvic incidence
▸ lumbar lordosis
▸ sacral slope
▸ pelvic tilt
AETIOLOGY
▸ Tumour
▸ Degenerative
▸ Iatrogenic
▸ Congenital
▸ failure of formation
▸ failure of segmentation
KYPHOSIS
CLINICAL ASSESSMENT
▸ Postural
▸ combined
▸ post- laminectomy
▸ post-radiation
▸ history
▸ examination
▸ imaging
▸ Infective
▸ TB
▸ Sherman’s disease
▸ Traumatic
KYPHOSIS
KYPHOSIS
KYPHOSIS
POSTURAL
DEGENERATIVE CHANGE
CONGENITAL
▸ Parents concerned with postural roundback deformity
▸ age
▸ Clinical gentle rounding of the back rather than gibbus
▸ hereditary
▸ Xray required to rule out Sheurman’s or Congenital
▸ moulding associated with BMD
▸ disc degeneration
▸ sagittal imbalance
▸ physiotherapy
▸ spinal muscular weakness and
attenuation
▸ failure of sagittal compensatory
mechanisms
KYPHOSIS
KYPHOSIS
KYPHOSIS
SCHEUERMANN’S DISEASE
SURGERY
SURGERY
KYPHOSIS
KYPHOSIS
KYPHOSIS
COSMESIS
TRAUMATIC KYPHOSIS
INSUFFICIENCY FRACTURE
▸ 3 consecutive VB
▸ 5 degrees
▸ ?lumbar
▸ without neurology
▸ presentation
▸ compression fracture
▸ examination findings
▸ distraction/ Chance fracture
▸ investigation
▸ bone or ligamentous
▸ ?biopsy/screen
▸ management
▸ mobilise if stable
▸ brace if necessary
▸ vertebrolasty/kyphoplasty
▸ surgical stabilisation and correction
KYPHOSIS
KYPHOSIS
KYPHOSIS
VERTEBROLASTY/ KYPHOPLASTY
COMPRESSION FRACTURES
FIXATION
▸ Type A fractures
▸ posterior open
▸ Sagittal balance
▸ >30 degrees (?20)
▸ Surgical correction be required
▸ Monitor
▸ ?brace
▸ uss fracture fixation
KYPHOSIS
KYPHOSIS
FIXATION
FIXATION
▸ Posterior percutaneous fixation
▸ anterior column reconstruction
▸ low morbidity
▸ low physiological hit
▸ early mobilisation
▸ powerful restoration of sagittal
balance
▸ direct decompression
▸ early stability
▸ physiologically demanding
KYPHOSIS
KYPHOSIS
X-CORE DESIGN
TEXT
▸ Cylindrical cages
▸ Strut graft
▸ TCP
▸ Mesh
▸ Stackable carbon fibre
KYPHOSIS
THORACOTOMY
▸ Major procedure
▸ Shark bite
▸ Lung deflation
▸ Chest drain
▸ Complications
▸ Pain
TEXT
TEXT
TEXT
ANTERIOR SUPPORT VERSUS POSTERIOR ONLY
CORPECTOMY
TECHNIQUE TIPS
▸ Better maintenance of alignment
▸ Access to pathology
▸ Coagulation of segmentals
▸ Reduced collapse
▸ Decompression of cord
▸ Extrapleural
▸ Small approach with limited
comorbidity
TEXT
RETRACTOR PLACEMENT
▸ Perpendicular
▸ Clear position proven orthogonally
▸ Use the retractor as a guide to
perform corpectomy
TEXT
TIPS
▸ Bold removal
seems to reduce
blood loss
▸ AP flouroscopy to
burr down to the
pedicle medial
wall
▸ See the cord
laterally first
KYPHOSIS
CORPECTOMY
▸ What supplemental fixation?
▸ Hyperacute surgery - ?blood loss diminished with MIS
techniques
MISS NH
POST TRAUMATIC KYPHOSIS AND
SAGITTAL IMBALANCE
TRAUMA
ASIA SCALE
ASIA SCALE
TRAUMA
TRAUMA
WITH NEUROLOGICAL
DEFICIT
TRAUMA
TRAUMA
MANAGEMENT OF SPINAL CORD INJURY
MANAGEMENT OF SPINAL CORD INJURY
▸ HOSPITAL MANAGEMENT
▸ NGT to suction
▸ Immobilization
▸ Prevents aspiration
▸ Rigid collar
▸ Decompresses the abdomen (paralytic ileus is
common in the first days)
▸ Sandbags and straps
▸ Spine board
▸ Foley
▸ Urinary retention is common
▸ Log-roll to turn
▸ Methylprednisolone (Solu-Medrol) ???????
▸ Prevent hypotension
▸ Only if started within 8 hours of injury
▸ Pressors: Dopamine, not Neosynephrine
NEUROLOGICAL EXAMINATION
TIME!
▸ Exclusion criteria
▸ Fluids to replace losses; do not overhydrate
▸ Cauda equina syndrome
▸ Maintain oxygenation
▸ O2 per nasal canula
▸ If intubation is needed, do NOT move the neck
ATLS
▸ GSW
▸ Pregnancy
▸ Age <13 years
▸ Patient on maintenance steroids
TRAUMA
SPINAL COLUMN INJURY WITH NEUROLOGICAL DEFECIT
▸ Functional spinal unit
TRAUMA
TRAUMA
INSTABILITY
INSTABILITY
▸ Clinical Instability
▸ physiological loads - those which are incurred during
normal activity
▸ the loss of the ability of the spine under physiological
loads to maintain its pattern of displacement so that there
is no initial or additional neurological deficit, no major
deformity, and no incapacitating pain
▸ incapacitating pain - unable to be controlled by nonnarcotic drugs
▸ incapacitating deformity - gross deformity that the patient
finds intolerable
▸ How do we decide on whether a fracture is unstable?
TRAUMA
TRAUMA
TRAUMA
DECIDING ON STABILITY
COLUMNS
STABILLITY
▸ discuss with spinal surgeon
▸ HOLDSWORTH
▸ AO classification
▸ mechanism of injury may suggest for further imaging
▸ DENIS
▸ plain radiographs may suggest need for further imaging
▸ MRI
▸ If fails trial of mobilisation, i.e. clinically unstable, leave for a few days and try
again
▸ spinal board unnecessary
▸ if fails after a few days, diagnosis is instability
▸ indication to consider fixation
TRAUMA
TEXT
STABILITY
▸ thoracolumbar injury classification and severity scale
▸ Approximately 50% of flexionextension motion occurs at occiputC1.
▸ Approximately 50% of rotation
occurs at C1-C2.
CERVICAL SPINE FRACTURES
▸ Lesser amounts of flexion-extension,
rotation, and lateral bending occur
segmentally between C2-C7.
TRAUMA
TRAUMA
TRAUMA
CERVICAL SPINE ANATOMY
CERVICAL SPINE ANATOMY C1
CERVICAL SPINE ANATOMY C2
‣ Atypical cervical vertebra C2 (axis)
‣ Odontoid process or dens
‣ Vertebral canal/foramen
‣ Facet joints
Occipital condyles
‣ Transverse process
Foramen magnum
‣ Transverse foramen
‣ Bifid spinous process
‣ Lamina
TRAUMA
TRAUMA
TRAUMA
CERVICAL SPINE ANATOMY C1/2 ARTICULATION
C1/2 ARTICULATION
BONY ALIGNMENT
The odontoid process of the
axis (C2) extends cranially to
form the axis of rotation with
atlas (C1)
TRAUMA
▸ alignment
▸ C1-C2 segment
▸ The primary motion at the C1-C2
joint is rotation
TRAUMA
TRAUMA
SOFT TISSUE
TRANSVERSE AND ALAR LIGAMENTS
▸ Nasopharyngeal space (C1) - 10
mm (adult)
▸ Transverse ligament of the atlas
is a thick, strong band, which
arches across the ring of the
atlas, and retains the odontoid
process in contact with the
anterior arch of C1.
▸ Retropharyngeal space (C2-C4) 5-7 mm
▸ Retrotracheal space (C5-C7) - 14
mm (children), 22 mm (adults)
▸ Extremely variable and nonspecific
▸ The alar ligaments connect the
sides of the dens to tubercles
on the medial side of the
occiptal condyle.
▸ ‘Check’ side-to-side
movements of the head
when it is turned.
TRAUMA
TRAUMA
TRAUMA
UPPER CERVICAL PARAMETERS
OCCIPITAL CONDYLE FRACTURE
ATLANTOOCCIPITAL DISSOCIATION
▸ 2% of all cervical fractures.
▸ Disruption of the cranial vertebral junction.
▸ Hypoglossal nerve injury.
▸ Subluxation or complete dislocation of occipto-atlantal
facets.
▸ TYPE 1 – STABLE
▸ Mechanism poorly understood
▸ Severe flexion or distraction injury.
▸ Comminution of occipital condyle.
▸ Typically fatal.
▸ TYPE 2 – STABLE
BC/OA >1
ANTERIOR SUBLUXATION
▸ Can be very difficult to diagnose.
▸ Basillar skull fracture with occipital
condyle involvement.
▸ Calculation of Powers ratio
▸ Normal ratio = 1
▸ TYPE 3 – UNSTABLE
▸ Ratio > 1 is suggestive of anterior dislocation.
▸ ALWAYS CONSIDERED UNSTABLE.
▸ Avulsion of alar ligament with tip of
condyle
▸ Halo ineffective longterm, once patient stable then fusion.
TRAUMA
TRAUMA
TRAUMA
ATLAS (C1) FRACTURES
JEFFERSON FRACTURE
JEFFERSON FRACTURE
▸ Mechanism of injury is axial
compression +/-extension force.
▸ C1 ring fracture classification –
anatomical location and fragments.
▸ Diagnosed typically on plain
radiography.
▸ Odontoid peg view
▸ STABLE
▸ Posterior Arch #
▸ First described in 1920.
▸ Widened predens space.
▸ Transverse process #
▸ Most common C1 fracture.
▸ Neurological deficits
uncommon.
▸ Simple Lateral Mass # - STABLE
▸ UNSTABLE
▸ Anterior arch #
▸ Comminuted lateral mass #
▸ Three-Four Part Burst #
(JEFFERSON)
▸ Usually bilateral breaks in
ant/ post arches.
▸ Vertical compression/ axial
load injury.
▸ Widened lateral masses of
C1 on open-mouth odontoid
view.
▸ Associated with:
▸ Fractures of C7 (25%)
▸ Fractures of C2 pedicle
(15%)
▸ Extraspinal fractures (58%)
TRAUMA
C1 FRACTURE MANAGEMENT
▸ Isolated posterior arch or anterior arch
▸ Cervical Orthosis 8 weeks.
▸ Comminuted & Jefferson #
▸ If ADI>4mm or offset >7mm transverse ligament gone.
▸ If intact Orthosis.
▸ If gone traction, reduction and Halo Vest.
▸ Flexion Extension views at 3-4 months
▸ If signs of instability, then fusion
TRAUMA
TRAUMA
ATLANTAXIAL ROTATORY SUBLUXATION
INJURY?
TRAUMA
TRAUMA
TRAUMA
DISRUPTION OF THE TRANSVERSE LIGAMENT
DISRUPTION OF THE TRANSVERSE LIGAMENT
ODONTOID PEG FRACTURE
▸ CT scanning to categorise injury types
▸ Incidence: 6% of cervical spine fractures.
▸ Transverse Ligament
(Primary) and Alar
Ligament (Secondary).
▸ Flexion injury mechanism.
▸ Diagnosis on lateral
radiographs
▸ Constraints to anterior
displacement of C1 on
C2.
▸ Can occur with atlas # or
atlanto-axial subluxation.
▸ TYPE 1 – Disruption in substance of TL –
▸ Normal ADI < 3mm.
▸ If >4mm and dens
intact – transverse
ligament injury.
▸ Associated with atlas fractures (8%).
▸ C1/C2 arthrodesis.
▸ TYPE 2 – Avulsion # of insertion on lateral mass.
▸ Flexion Mechanism in majority of cases.
▸ 74% success rate with trial of rigid immobilisation
TEXT
TRAUMA
TRAUMA
ANDERSON D’ALONZO
ODONTOID PEG FRACTURE
INJURY?
TRAUMA
TRAUMA
TRAUMA
TRAUMATIC SPONDYLOLISTHESIS OF C2 / HANGMAN’S FRACTURE
HANGMAN’S FRACTURE
INJURY?
▸ Type I STABLE (5-8%)
▸ Avulsion of tip of odontoid
▸ ? – treat in orthosis.
▸ Type II UNSTABLE (54-67%)
▸ # through base of odontoid at junction with body of
axis
▸ Complication: non-union, esp if >60yrs,displaced and
angulated.
▸ Management – Immobilisation vs Anterior screw
fixation.
▸ Type III RELATIVELY STABLE(30-33%)
▸ # through body of axis–Prognosis: good with high rate
of union.
▸ Halo traction / Halo vest immobilisation.
▸ Described by Schneider in 1965.
▸ Usually through fall or RTA.
▸ type 1 - stable
▸ <3mm displaced no angulation
▸ type 2 - potentially unstable
▸ Neurological injury unusual
▸ High ratio of spinal canal diameter to cord diameter.
▸ Fracture line through neural arch.
▸ Stress concentrated through here.
▸ Classification scheme by Levine and Rhyne
▸ Based on anatomic factors and mechanism.
▸ >3mm displacement with
angulation
▸ type 3 -unstable
▸ disc distraction injury
▸ type 4 - highly unstable
▸ facet fracture dislocation
TRAUMA
TRAUMA
TRAUMA
UNILATERAL FACET JOINT DISLOCATION
INJURY?
BILATERAL FACET DISLOCATION
▸ Distractive Flexion Injury.
▸ Distractive Flexion Injury.
▸ Diagnosis confirmed on plain radiographs
▸ Lateral: Anterior subluxation of one vertebrae by 25% at affected level.
▸ Anterior dislocation of one vertebral body by 50% on lateral view.
▸ Facet may be ‘perched’ or dislocated.
▸ UNSTABLE.
▸ Stable if anterior displacement on lateral less than ½ width of VB.
▸ 40% have a disc injury.
▸ Only 30% associated with neurologic defect.
▸ Neurologic deficits common
▸ Seen in up to 85%
▸ Treatment – Achieve anatomic alignment and restore stability.
▸ Closed reduction and immobilisation.
▸ Closed reduction and immobilisation is feasible.
▸ If not possible – then open reduction with fusion
▸ However early fusion recommended as high percentage of late instability.
CES
CES
▪ Two case presentations.
▪ Thirty-six year old female – Retail manager.
th
▪ Private referral to physiotherapy – 25 June 2009.
▪ Back pain and left sided sciatica for 4-5 weeks.
▪ Discussion about Cauda Equina Syndrome.
▪ Associated numbness in leg and genitalia.
▪ ‘When I laugh and cough I wet myself’.
▪ Had attended A/E Dept at RBH twice over a two week period in the middle of June
2009.
CAUDA EQUINA SYNDROME
▸ Reassured, analgesia, has a referral to Spinal clinic at end of August 2009.
▪ Patient self funds for MRI.
CES
CES
CES
▪ Review by same physiotherapist (1st July 2009) – MRI results
noted and faxed to GP, who planned to forward to surgeons.
▪ Urgent Left L5/S1 Microdiscectomy (10 July 2009)
▪ Then seen by different physiotherapist (9th July 2009).
▪ “Sensation in leg improving”
th
▸ Large Disc Fragments removed
▪ Mobilising on ward independently
▪ Discussed with Mr. Mckenna
▸ review in clinic at RBH the following day.
▸ plan for admission and surgery.
th
▪ Seen in clinic 27 July 2009
▸ Persistent symptoms of incontinence, left leg pain and numbness.
CES
CES
CES
st
▪ Revision Decompression L5/S1 (1 August 2009).
▪ 30 year PhD student.
▪ Developed back pain and left sided sciatica in August 2009.
▪ Persistent numbness across left buttock /leg and perineal region.
▪ Episodic incontinence of bowel and bladder.
▪ Altered sexual function
▪ Referred to Professor Fowler at Queens’ Square, London
▸ To help manage residual neuro-urological symptoms.
CES
CES
▪ History as noted
▪ Seen in the spinal clinic on 13 November 2009.
▸ Positive left SLR, power of grade 4 for EHL.
th
▸ Remains insensate but continent of urine.
▸ Numbness down left leg and left perineal/saddle region.
▸ Altered sexual function.
▸ Examination finding not really changed.
▪ Diagnosis of Cauda Equina Syndrome.
▪ Emergency MRI of Lumbar spine.
▪ Urgent spinal clinic review to be arranged.
▪ Surgical decompression of cauda equina within 4 hours of clinic review.
CES
TEXT
▪ No clear definition.
▪ Structure at the lower end of the spinal column of most vertebrates –
resembles a horse’s tail.
▪ Complex of clinical symptoms and signs that results from the dysfunction of
multiple sacral and lumbar nerve roots in the lumbar vertebral canal.
▪ Spinal cord stops development in infancy while the vertebral bones continue
to grow.
▸ In adults spinal cord ends at L1/L2 vertebral level.
▪ Incidence of 1 in 33000 to 1 in 100 000.
▪ Term reserved when there is:
▪ GP refers the following day to A/E - ? Cauda Equina Syndrome
▸ Pain in leg continues but settling.
▸ Anal Tone = Normal
▪ Patient advised to monitor for urinary retention/incontinence.
▪ Wakes up that night with severe left leg pain, numbness around
genitalia, insensate of urine.
CES
▸ altered sensation : left L4, L5, and perineal area.
▪ Analgesic provisions.
▪ Late October 2009 – flare up of back and leg symptoms.
th
▪ Consults Chiropractor on 5 November 2009.
▸ ‘No feeling or pleasure’.
▪ Examination
▪ Improved after 5-6 weeks with medical/conservative measures.
▪ At the base of the Cauda Equina there are approximately 10 nerve pairs
▸ Dysfunction of bladder, bowel or sexual dysfunction
▸ 5 Lumbar. 5 Sacral
▸ Perineal or ‘saddle’ anesthesia
▸ 1 Coccygeal
CES
CES
CES
CES
▪ Several theories postulated.
▪ Detrusor and Internal sphincter – Smooth Muscles
▪ Mechanical compression
▪ PARASYMPATHETIC – Via S2, S3, S4
▸ Cauda equina nerve roots especially susceptible.
▸ Only have single protective layer – Endoneurium.
▸ Promotes emptying of bladder
▪ Ischaemia
▸ Contracts Detrusor and relaxes internal sphincter
▸ relative area of hypovascularity below level of conus
▪ SYMPATHETIC – Hypogastric plexus (T11-L3)
▸ Promotes storage of urine
▸ Relaxes Detrusor and contracts internal sphincter.
▪ Impaired nutrition of neural tissue.
▸ Both via blood supply and diffusion from surrounding CSF.
▪ ‘Closed compartment syndrome’
▪ Unable to sense bladder as it fills up.
▪ Urinary Retention and Overflow incontinence
▸ Direct mechanical pressure causes intraneural oedema
CES
CES
CES
▪ LUMBARDISCHERNIATION
▪ Tandon and Sankaran described three classical presentations:
▪ BLADDER/BOWEL/SEXUALDYSFUNCTION
▸ Massive central/paracentral
▸ Acutely
▪ PERIANAL/SADDLEANASTHESIA
▸ First symptom of lumbar disc prolapse (TYPE 1).
▸ Late sign of established CES and may indicate poor potential for recovery of normal bladder function.
▸ Endpoint of chronic back pain +/- sciatica (TYPE 2)
▪ Spinal stenosis
▸ Chronically
▪ Tumours
▸ Slow progression eventually leading to visceral impairment and urinary retention (TYPE 3).
▪ Trauma
▪ Infection
▪ Spinal epidural
▪ Spinal haematoma
CES
▪ Neurological examination of lower limbs
▪ OTHERS:
▸ Back pain
▸ Sciatica
▪ Two clinical categories :
▸ CESR:
Cauda Equina Syndrome with urinary Retention
▸ CESI: Cauda Equina Syndrome Incomplete with urinary
retention.
CES
▸ Sensory changes in lower limbs
and overflow incontinence.
▸ Lower limb weakness
symptoms other than
▪ Can be unilateral or bilateral.
CES
▪ The need for urgent investigation is vital.
▸ Motor weakness
▸ Sensory deficit
▸ Hyporeflexia, Areflexia
▪ Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI).
▪ Remember it is a lower motor lesion.
▪ Perineal sensation – Light touch and pin prick
▪ Anal tone – Tone and voluntary contraction
▪ Bulbocavernous reflex
▪ CT Myelogram if contraindicated.
CES
CES
▪ Surgical exploration and decompression of any compressive lesions.
CES
Shapiro S (2000). Medicalrealitiesofcaudaequinasyndromesecondarytolumbardisc.
Retrospective review of 44 cases with CES.
▸ Microdiscectomy
▸ Laminectomy
Ahn UM et al (2000).Cauda equina syndrome secondary to lumbar disc
▸ Discectomy
herniation: A meta-analysis of surgical outcomes.
Todd N.V (2005).Cauda Equina Syndrome: timing of surgery probably
does influence outcome
Meta-analysis of 6 studies reporting the effect of early/late
decompression upon the likelihood of recovery of bladder function.
Largest meta-analysis of 322 patients with lumbar disc prolapse.
▪ Although the above decision is not questionable, great controversy surrounding
overall management remains.
▪ Statistically significant difference in outcomes measures between patients decompressed < 48 hrs
to those decompressed > 48 hrs.
▪ The optimal timing of surgery following the diagnosis of cauda equina remains a
topic of great controversy.
▪ Repeat analysis by Kohles of Ahn’s meta-analysis showed that intervention less than 24hrs has
significantly better outcome than between 24-48hrs.
CES
CES
Qureshi A and Sell P (2007). Cauda equina syndrome treated by surgical decompression:
the influence of timing on surgical outcomes.
Prospective longitudinal cohort study of 33 patients.
Measures:
ODI, VAS for leg/back pain and Incontinence
Outcome
questionnaire.
▪ Outcomes in patients continent and incontinent of urine at presentation.
▪ Gleave JW and Macfarlane R (2002). Cauda equina syndrome: what is the
relationship between timing of surgery and outcome?
▪ Reiterate the need to distinguish between patients with CESR and CESI
▪ Patients treated <48 hrs of onset of are more likely to recover function
than those treated beyond (p=0.005).
CES
▪ What is a reasonable delay in performing investigation/surgery?
▪ Does it make a difference if it is CESI ?
▸ Improvement in Median VAS scores for leg (p =0.03) and back pain (0.002)
▸ Median score for impact of urological dysfunction on quality of life (p = 0.002),
▸ Satisfaction with current urological symptoms (p = 0.015).
▪ Bladder outcome almost always favourable in patients with CESI that undergo
early decompressive surgery.
▪ No statistically significant difference in any of the outcomes measures comparing those
that underwent decompression within 24 hrs, 24-48hrs and greater than 48hrs.
▪ However only 50% of patients with CESR will have acceptable bladder function.
CES
CES
▪ Persistent symptoms of cauda equina have a devastating impact on
personal and social life.
▪ Relevant and thorough history.
▪ Major cause of litigation in spinal surgery.
▪ Complete Examination.
▪ NHS Litigation Authority dealt with 107 cases (1997-2006).
▪ Urgent Imaging.
▸ 35% of cases: primary complaint against emergency department.
▸ 52% of cases: primary complaint against inpatient management team.
▪ Should cauda equina syndrome surgical emergency?
▪ Liaise with spinal team early.
▪ Best medical practice is important.
▸ 52% of cases the responsible clinician was in orthopaedics.
▪ Medical Negligence reports will take into account delay in diagnosis
and delay to treatment.
▪ Should this be done in the middle of the night?
▪ LACK OF PROOF OF BENEFIT DOES NOT NECESSARILY EQUATE TO PROOF OF LACK
OF BENEFIT.
DISC HERNIATION
HERNIATION
HERNIATION
HERNIATION
DISC HERNIATION
WHICH NERVE?
ASSESSMENT
▸ http://www.spine-health.com/video/herniated-disc-video
▸ Cervical
▸ History
▸ C5/6 foramen = C6 nerve
▸ exiting only - no
traversing nerve
▸ Examination
▸ Lumbar
▸ L4/5 disc - L4 exits
▸ L5 nerve traverses
▸ Investigations
HERNIATION
RADICULOPATHY
RADICULOPATHY
CENTRAL DISC HERNIATION
NATURAL HISTORY
TREATMENT OF BRACHIALGIA:
▸ Cervical
• Generally benign, self-limiting conditions.
▸ cervical myelopathy
• Few long term sequelae.
• Can be very painful and distressing .
▸ Lumbar
• Danger of over treatment.
• Treatment is a balance between close monitoring of
clinical progress and appropriate intervention when
required.
• Conservative – analgesia and non-steroidals
RADICULOPATHY
RADICULOPATHY
RADICULOPATHY
CERVICAL RADICULOPATHY RCT - BMJ. 2009;339:B3883
CERVICAL “NERVE BLOCK”
RESULTS OF CERVICAL NERVE BLOCKS
1.5 YEARS N=150
▸ cauda equina syndrome
• Kuijper 250 patients randomised between treatment and
no treatment.
• Collar
1 or more blocks – 48% better
• Short term benefits in treatment group – collar or physio.
compared to non-treatment group .
• All improved by 6 months – No difference
• Physiotherapy
Less than 20% needed operations – usually cervical disc
replacement.
Foraminal injections Steroids
and L.A. –
x-ray guided.
Injection complications – None.
Dabasia H and Ramos-Galvez I 2010.
RADICULOPATHY
RADICULOPATHY
RADICULOPATHY
CERVICAL DISC HERNIATION
SURGICAL TREATMENT OPTIONS
ACDF PLATE AND BONE GRAFT
• Anterior Cervical Decompression +/- Fusion
Size of disc hernia does not correlate with
the need for treatment.
RADICULOPATHY
C5-6 PRESTIGE DISC REPLACEMENT
RADICULOPATHY
PRESERVATION OF MOVEMENT
RADICULOPATHY
FDA RCT PRODISC C VS. FUSION
• Disc replacement equal or superior to fusion at 2 years.
• Similar results for Bryan Disc.
• Medtronic Prestige Disc studied .
RADICULOPATHY
RADICULOPATHY
RADICULOPATHY
BUT REMEMBER ACD ALONE WORKS
POSTERIOR CERVICAL FORAMINOTOMY
LUMBAR DISC HERNIATION
• Common
• Previous RCT showed ACD gave equivalent results to ACDF and
had fewer complications.
(White et al.)
• Posterior surgery reported as successful
• Benign course usual – 80-90% settling rapidly.
• Minimally invasive techniques.
Try nerve blocks or epidurals in refractory cases.
• potential for pain and instability
(Evidence of temporary benefit).
• More proof and comparison with TDR needed.
long term results of arthroplasty and meta-analysis suggests
superior outcomes with arthroplasty over ACDF
Operate when pain persists or when there is deteriorating
neurology.
RADICULOPATHY
RADICULOPATHY
TEXT
LUMBAR FORAMINAL INJECTION
RESULTS OF LUMBAR ROOT BLOCKS
N=107, 1YEAR
EVIDENCE FOR DISCECTOMY
• Lumbar disc prolapse – 64% better 26% ops.
• Weber – Surgery better at 1 and 4 years .
• Spinal stenosis – 60% better 25% ops.
• Far lateral disc – 54% better 46% ops.
• Lytic spondylo. - 50% better. 50% ops.
• Recurrent disc - 23% better! 61% ops.
No difference at 10 years.
SPORT trial Weinstein et al Spine 2008 – Surgical treatment
improved all outcomes except return to work – Results at 4
years.
Peul et al. BMJ – 2008 – Surgery provided more rapid relief
but 1 and 2 year outcome similar.
Surgery cost effective.
RADICULOPATHY
STENOSIS
MICRODISCECTOMY
SPINAL STENOSIS
▸ Presentation
▸ History
▸ Examination
▸ Investigations
SPINAL STENOSIS
STENOSIS
STENOSIS
STENOSIS
SPINAL STENOSIS
SPINAL STENOSIS MRI
SPINAL STENOSIS SPORT STUDY
• Spine June 2010 Weinstein et al.
• Multicentre randomised n = 654
• Operated patients had better function and less pain sustained at 4 years.
STENOSIS
STENOSIS
STENOSIS
LAMINECTOMY, LAMINOTOMY OR MICRODECOMPRESSION
L4-5 DEGENERATIVE SPONDYLOLISTHESIS
THE JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY (AMERICAN). 2009;91:1295-1304
Surgical Compared with Nonoperative Treatment for Lumbar
Degenerative Spondylolisthesis
Four-Year Results in the Spine Patient Outcomes Research
Trial (SPORT) Randomized and Observational Cohorts James N. Weinstein et al.
STENOSIS
Conclusions: Compared with patients
who are treated nonoperatively,
patients in whom degenerative
spondylolisthesis and associated spinal
stenosis are treated surgically maintain
substantially greater pain relief and
improvement in function for four
years
STENOSIS
STENOSIS
PROSPECTIVE TRIAL
RESULTS (HERKOWITZ)
Excel Good Fair Poor
Herkowitz and Kurz JBJS 73-A 1991: 802-808.
• 50 patients stenosis and spondylolisthesis.
• 63-65Yrs.
Laminectomy :
2
9
But :
Pseudarthrosis in 36%
Did not affect result.
2
• L4/5 in 41, L3/4 in 9.
• F.U. 3 years.
Fusion & Lam. : 11
13
• 25 laminectomy / 25 laminectomy & fusion.
STENOSIS
12
STENOSIS
STENOSIS
INSTRUMENTED FUSION
L4-5 INSTRUMENTED FUSION
• Fischgrund et al. (Herkowitz II) Spine 1997 2807-2812.
• RCT in 76 patients.
• Inter-transverse fusion v Pedicle screws.
• Pedicle screws – 76% success – 82% fused.
• Inter-transverse- 82% success – 45% fused.
• No benefit from higher fusion rate.
1
0
STENOSIS
STENOSIS
FORAMINAL STENOSIS – LYTIC SPONDYLOLISTHESIS
LATERAL INTERBODY FUSION
TEXT
▸
TLIF
TEXT
TEXT
TEXT
TEXT
TEXT
TEXT
TEXT
TEXT
TEXT
TEXT
TEXT
TEXT
TEXT
TEXT
PERFECTION!
STENOSIS
SCOLIOSIS
CONCLUSIONS
CLASSIFICATION
▸ Congenital
▸ failure of formation or segmentation
▸ Idiopathic
• Conservative treatment appropriate initially
▸ infantile, juvenile, adolescent
▸ Neuromuscular
• Operations are effective when required.
• Monitor clinical progress carefully.
SCOLIOSIS
▸ myopathic, neuropathic
▸ Others
▸ NF, trauma, tumour, marfan
▸ Degenerative
SCOLIOSIS
SCOLIOSIS
SCOLIOSIS
SCOLIOSIS
CLINICAL FEATURES
ADAM’S TEST
▸ abnormal lateral curvature >10
degrees
▸ obvious deformity
▸ bend forward
▸ rib hump
▸ scoliometer
▸ vertebral rotation
▸ asymmetry of hips
▸ skin pigmentation
▸ angle of true rotation
▸ congenital abnormalities
▸ scapular level
▸ lower limb length
▸ cardiopulmonary function
SCOLIOSIS
SCOLIOSIS
IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS
TREATMENT
▸ 80% of all scoliosis
▸ Bracing
▸ no identifiable cause
▸ Surgical correction using rods
and pedicle screws
▸ infantile/juvenile/ adolescent
▸ VEPTR
▸ Magic rods
▸ early / late onset
▸ puberty or lung development
ADULT DEFORMITY