Download ANAL CANCER Original Date - National Imaging Associates

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
National Imaging Associates, Inc.
Clinical guidelines:
ANAL CANCER
Radiation Oncology
Guideline Number: NIA_CG_125
Responsible Department:
Clinical Operations
Original Date:
June 2013
Page 1 of 6
Last Review Date:
October 2014
Last Revised Date:
Implementation Date : October 2014
INTRODUCTION:
Anal carcinoma is a relatively rare cancer, with an estimated 5,000 new cases diagnosed
per year and an estimated annual death rate of 700 cases in the United States. The
incidence, however, has been increasing secondary to an association with the human
papilloma virus. Anal carcinoma is divided into tumors arising within the anal canal and
the distal anal margin. Anal cancers may present with rectal bleeding, pain, or the
sensation of a rectal mass. Assessment of tumor extension is primarily performed through
rectal examination, whereas evaluation of lymph nodes is by imaging (CT/MRI) and FNA
biopsy of suspicious nodes. The method of treatment for anal carcinoma has changed.
Previously, an abdominoperineal resection was performed; however, the results revealed a
high local recurrence rate. Current standard of care is concurrent chemoradiation therapy
using 5-Fluorouracil and Mitomycin-C (5-FU and MMC). The exception is tumors of the
anal margin that are ≤2 cm in the greatest dimension, well-differentiated, that can be
treated with margin-negative local excision alone.
GOAL OF THE GUIDELINE:
This guideline outlines methods suitable for delivering anal carcinoma radiation therapy.
The optimal doses scheduled for radiation therapy, together with chemotherapy, has been
evaluated in a number of clinical trials. Combined therapy to this area of the body can
result in significant toxicity. Meticulous attention to radiation delivery techniques is useful
to both reduce treatment-related toxicity and reduce/eliminate treatment interruptions that
can have a significant effect on control rates. Techniques such CT simulation, conformal
approach and intensely modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) have shown promising results
in ongoing clinical trials. IMRT use requires expertise in defining appropriate target
volume over conventional conformal beam irradiation. As in most cancers, a
multidisciplinary approach is preferred for treating patients with anal carcinoma.
GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS
Cancer of the anal canal is typically treated with concurrent chemoradiation, with the
exception of T1, N0 well-differentiated anal margin lesions that can be treated with local
excision alone.



5-FU plus Mitomycin is typically given with concurrent radiotherapy.
Radiotherapy delivered to a minimum of 45 Gy in 25 fractions using multifield
technique and photon energies of >6 MV is recommended.
Dose of 54 Gy to 59 Gy is recommended for T3-4, node positive disease.
1—Anal Cancer
Proprietary



Radiation fields typically include not only the anal canal, but the pelvis, perineum
and inguinal nodes, with modification after 30.6 Gy to the superior edge of the field,
and at 36 Gy on node negative inguinal nodes.
Anterior electron boost is commonly used to treat the inguinal nodes. A direct
perineal boost (electrons/photons) can be used.
3D CRT and/or IMRT may be used in the treatment of anal cancer.
Treatment interruptions/breaks should be avoided as it can compromise treatment
effectiveness. Radiation induced toxicity can be reduced by judicious use of planning and
limiting dose to normal surrounding tissue. Techniques such as IMRT have demonstrated
reduced toxicity in multiple studies. Inverse planning and dose constraints for normal
tissue are required.
MEDICALLY NECESSARY
TREATMENT OPTIONS:
INDICATIONS
FOR
RADIATION
THERAPY
AND
2D, 3D-CRT and IMRT are all appropriate techniques for treatment of anal cancer.
Electron beam or photon beam are the most commonly used techniques for delivering boost
radiotherapy.


Primary Treatment
o Anal Canal (T1-2, N0):
 45-50.4 Gy to include pelvis, perineum, and inguinal nodes
 Radiation therapy delivered with chemotherapy
o Anal Canal (T3-4, N0 or Any T, N+):
 Conformal beam irradiation (54-59 Gy) with chemotherapy
o Anal Canal Metastatic Disease
 Conformal beam irradiation with chemotherapy
Post Operative
o Anal Margin/Anal Skin:
 Consider local radiation therapy 45-50.4 Gy if inadequate margins
(close/positive) and re-excision is not an option.
-----------------------
Unless otherwise indicated standard radiation fractionation
consists of 1.8 Gy to 2.0 Gy per day
TREATMENT OPTIONS REQUIRING ADDITIONAL CLINICAL REVIEW:
Proton Beam Radiation Therapy
Proton beam is not an approved treatment option for anal cancer. Proton beam has not
been proven superior treatment to conventional radiation therapy.
Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT)
Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy is not a standard treatment option for the treatment
of bone metastasis. A peer review is required with a radiation oncologist.
2—Anal Cancer
Proprietary
REFERENCES
Ajani, J.A., Winter, K.A., Gunderson, L.L., et al. (2008). Fluorouracil, Mitomycin, and
radiotherapy vs. fluorouracil, cisplatin, and radiotherapy for carcinoma of the anal
canal: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 299, 1914-1921. doi:
10.1001/jama.299.16.1914.
Ben-Josef, E., Moughan, J., Ajani, J.A., et al. (2010). Impact of Overall Treatment Time on
Survival and Local Control of Patients with Anal Cancer: A Pooled Data Analysis of
Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Trials 87-04 and 98-11. J Clin Oncol. 28, 5061-5066.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.29.1351.
Chen, Y.J., Liu, A., Tsai, P.T., et al. (2005). Organ sparing by conformal avoidance
intensity-modulated radiation therapy for anal cancer: dosimetric evaluation of
coverage of pelvis and inguinal/femoral nodes. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 63, 274-281.
doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.05.052.
Cotter, S.E., Grigsby, P.W., Siegel, B.A., et al. (2006). FDG-PET/CT in the evaluation of
anal carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 65, 720-725.
doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.01.009.
Crehange, G., Bosset, M., Lorchel, F., et al. (2007). Combining cisplatin and mitomycin with
radiotherapy in anal carcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum. 50, 43-49. doi:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10350-006-0761-5.
Czito, B.G., & Willett, C.G. (2009). Current management of anal canal cancer. Curr Oncol
Rep. 11, 186-192. Retrieved from
http://www.google.com/search?q=Willett,+C.G.,+%26+Gunderson,+L.L.+(2007).+Perez+a
nd+Brady%E2%80%99s+principles+and+practice+of+radiation+oncology,+5th+ed.+Lipp
incott+Williams+%26+Wilkins.+1318-1335.&safe=active&rls=com.microsoft:en-us:IEAddress&rlz=1I7ADBF&ei=6TKkUdu6LpLk8gTKs4CIDA&start=10&sa=N
Ferrigno, R., Nakamura, R.A., Dos Santos, Novaes PER, et al. (2005). Radiochemotherapy
in the conservative treatment of anal canal carcinoma: retrospective analysis of results
and radiation dose effectiveness. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 61, 1136-1142. doi:
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.07.687.
Hong, T.S., Tsai, H.K., Coen, J., et al. (2010). Dose-painted intensity-modulated radiation
therapy for anal cancer: A multi-institutional report of acute toxicity and response to
therapy [abstract]. J Clin Oncol. 28(May 20 suppl), 4144. doi:
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.09.030.
Jemal, A., Siegel, R., Xu, J., & Ward, E. (2010). Cancer statistics 2010. CA Cancer J Clin
60, 277-300. doi: 10.3322/caac.20073.
Kachnic, L.A., Tsai, H.K., Coen, J.J., et al. (2010). Dose-painted Intensity-modulated
Radiation Therapy for Anal Cancer: A Multi-Institutional Report of Acute Toxicity and
3—Anal Cancer
Proprietary
Response to Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 82(1), 153-8. doi:
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.09.030.
Kachnic, L.A., Winter, K.A., Myerson, R.J., et al. (2010). RTOG 0529: A phase II study of
dose-painted IMRT (DP-IMRT), 5-fluorouracil, and mitomycin-C for the reduction of
acute morbidity in anal cancer [abstract]. Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium. 405.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.09.023.
Konski, A., Garcia, M. Jr., John, M., et al. (2008). Evaluation of planned treatment breaks
during radiation therapy for anal cancer: Update of RTOG 92-08. Int J Radiat Oncol
Biol Phys. 72, 114-118. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.12.027.
Lin, A., & Ben-Josef, E. (2007). Intensity-modulated radiation therapy for the treatment of
anal cancer. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 6, 716-719. Retrieved from
http://dx.doi.org/10.3816/CCC.2007.n.041.
Milano, M.T., Jani, A.B., Farrey, K.J., et al. (2005). Intensity-modulated radiation therapy
(IMRT) for the treatment of anal cancer: Toxicity and clinical outcome. Int J Radiat
Oncol Biol Phys. 63, 354-361. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.02.030
Mitchell, S.E., Mendenhall, W.M., Zlotecki, R.A., et al. (2001). Squamous cell carcinoma of
the anal canal. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 49(4), 1007-1013. doi:10.1016/S03603016(00)01518-2.
Myerson, R.J., Garofolo, M.C., Naqa, I.E., et al. (2009). Elective clinical target volumes for
conformal therapy in anorectal cancer: A Radiation Therapy Oncology Group
Consensus Panel Contouring Atlas. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 74, 824-830. doi:
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.08.070.
Northover, J., Glynne-Jones, R., Sebag-Montefiore, D., et al. (2010). Chemoradiation for the
treatment of epidermoid anal cancer: 13-year follow up of the first randomized
UKCCCR Ana Cancer Trial (ACT I). Br J Cancer. 102, 1123-1128. doi:
10.1038/sj.bjc.6605605.
Ortholan, C., Ramaioli, A., Peiffert, D., et al. (2005). Anal canal carcinoma: Early-stage
tumors < or =10 mm (T1 or Tis): Therapeutic options and original pattern of local failure
after radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 62, 479-485.
doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.09.060.
Pepek, J.M., Willett, C.G., & Czito, B.G. (2010). Radiation therapy advances for treatment
of anal cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 8, 123-129. Retrieved from
http://www.jnccn.org/content/8/1/123.long.
Salama, J.K., Mell, L.K., Schomas, D.A., et al. (2007). Concurrent chemotherapy and
intensity-modulated radiation therapy for anal canal cancer patients: A multicenter
experiences. J Clin Oncol. 25, 4581-4586. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.12.0170.
4—Anal Cancer
Proprietary
Sandhu, A.P., Symonds, R.P., Robertson, A.G., et al. (1998). Interstitial iridium-192
implantation combined with external radiotherapy in anal cancer: Ten years experience.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 40(3), 575-581. Retrieved from
http://www.redjournal.org/article/S0360-3016(97)00814-6/abstract.
5—Anal Cancer
Proprietary