Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Hydrological response surfaces in the Nordic Region for use in probabilistic assessment of climate change Phil Graham Sara-Sofia Hellström Fredrik Wetterhall Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute, Norrköping Our contribution to workpackage objectives • Hydrological rainfall-runoff models to investigate impacts of climate change on stream discharge • Using the climate change signal from RCMs Our contribution to workpackage objectives • Response surfaces for selected applications • Direct use of multiple regional model projections • Comparison of outcomes from the two methods What have we achieved since Lund? • In Lund, we showed some preliminary response surfaces • Now, we have produced many more • In Lund, we discussed the question of seasonality • Now, we have investigated the details of representing seasonality Response Surfaces – Annual Runoff Lake Vänern no seasonality Lake Vänern Response Surfaces – Annual Runoff Lake Vänern with seasonality Lake Vänern RS – Representing Seasonality Method 1 10 2 8 1.8 7 1.6 Precipitation change Temperature change 9 6 5 4 1.4 1.2 3 1 2 0.8 1 0.6 0 2 4 6 Month 8 Temperature 10 12 2 4 6 Month 8 Precipitation 10 12 RS - Extended Period with Maximum Lake Vänern Discharge Current regulation rules RS - Extended Period with Maximum Lake Vänern Discharge Current regulation rules Lake Vänern RS - Extended Period with Maximum Discharge with Modified Regulation Modified regulation can help reduce risk of high discharge Lake Vänern Response Surfaces – Monthly Runoff Lake Vänern Response Surfaces – Annual Runoff Lake Mälaren Response Surfaces – Annual Runoff seasonality 1 Lake Mälaren Response Surfaces – Annual Runoff seasonality 2 Lake Mälaren RS – Representing Seasonality Method 2 Precipitation change type 2 2 2 1.8 1.8 1.6 1.6 %-change precipitation %-change precipitation Precipitation change type 1 1.4 1.2 1 1.4 1.2 1 0.8 0.8 0.6 0.6 2 4 6 Month 8 Precipitation method 1 10 12 2 4 6 Month 8 Precipitation method 2 10 12 RS – Lake Levels Lake Mälaren Low levels RS – Lake Levels, seasonality 1 Lake Mälaren Low levels RS – Lake Levels, seasonality 2 Lake Mälaren Low levels Response Surfaces – Monthly Runoff Lake Mälaren Monthly Runoff – compared to previous results 400 400 Lake Mälaren 350 350 300 300 ctrl RCAO-EA2 runoff (m3/s) 250 250 RCAO-EB2 RCAO-HA2 200 200 RCAO-HB2 RCAO-EA2-rs 150 150 RCAO-EB2-rs RCAO-HA2-rs 100 100 50 50 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 month 8 9 10 11 12 RCAO-HB2-rs Some Conclusions • Seasonal differences not so apparent for annual runoff • Shows up in monthly results, and even more for thresholds, although not all basins are equally sensitive • Different methods for representing seasonality have an impact • Representation of evapotranspiration is problematic (as usual!) Coming Work • Contribution to del. 6.7 (RS Report) • Not too much more on response surfaces before data starts coming • Next major effort will be to work with direct modelling of RCM simulations (the “Matrix,” as soon as they are available) Questions for Discussion • Critical thresholds, we use experience from critical past events, better ideas? • What if there is widely differing seasonality from the climate models? • What will we actually get from the climate models (i.e. probabilistic info.)? • How many simulations will be available (perturbed vs. RCM results)?