* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Document
Geocentric model wikipedia , lookup
Spitzer Space Telescope wikipedia , lookup
Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems wikipedia , lookup
Perseus (constellation) wikipedia , lookup
Observational astronomy wikipedia , lookup
Cygnus (constellation) wikipedia , lookup
Planets beyond Neptune wikipedia , lookup
History of astronomy wikipedia , lookup
Kepler (spacecraft) wikipedia , lookup
Space Interferometry Mission wikipedia , lookup
Corvus (constellation) wikipedia , lookup
Planets in astrology wikipedia , lookup
Aquarius (constellation) wikipedia , lookup
Dwarf planet wikipedia , lookup
Astronomical naming conventions wikipedia , lookup
Drake equation wikipedia , lookup
Late Heavy Bombardment wikipedia , lookup
Astronomical spectroscopy wikipedia , lookup
Satellite system (astronomy) wikipedia , lookup
IAU definition of planet wikipedia , lookup
Formation and evolution of the Solar System wikipedia , lookup
Circumstellar habitable zone wikipedia , lookup
Definition of planet wikipedia , lookup
Nebular hypothesis wikipedia , lookup
Star formation wikipedia , lookup
Rare Earth hypothesis wikipedia , lookup
History of Solar System formation and evolution hypotheses wikipedia , lookup
Astrobiology wikipedia , lookup
Ancient Greek astronomy wikipedia , lookup
Exoplanetology wikipedia , lookup
Directed panspermia wikipedia , lookup
Fermi paradox wikipedia , lookup
Timeline of astronomy wikipedia , lookup
Life in the Universe • Where to search for life? • Exoplanets • Formation of planetary systems • Seach for intelligence • Are we visited? Where to search for life? In our solar system: there is a low probability that we can still find some form of primitive life on other planets or moons • Mars (in the past?) • Titan, Europa,…??? Search for evolved life forms → go further away What to look for? Only know life forms: on our Earth Possibility of exotic life forms (science fiction) but we wouldn’t know what to search for, and how… → search for life forms similar to ours → on planets: • with solid crust • with liquid water (excellent solvent) Where to search for life? - 2 Main phases of life on Earth t (GYr) h Event −4.6 0h Formation of Earth −4.5/−4.0 1h/3h −4.0? 3h? −1.3 17h −0.6 21h Formation of oceans Caution ! First unicellular organisms The adopted point of view in this First multicellular plants table (last lines) is very Cambrian explosion (1st animals) anthropomorphic ! −0.4 22h Life gets out of oceans −0.1 23h30m First mammals −0.0005 23h59m50s Homo Sapiens (−100 ans 23h59m59s.998 Invention of radio) Where to search for life? - 3 Habitable planets Habitable zone (HZ) = zone around the star where liquid water can be found L* increases during the main sequence phase → the habitable zone moves Ideal location: in the continuously habitable zone (CHZ) Complication by possible greenhouse effect → depends on the planet’s atmosphere Star Habitable zone at the beginning of star’s life Habitable zone at the end of star’s life Continuously habitable zone Where to search for life? - 4 Around which stars? • O, B, A, F stars: life too short < 3 GYr • M stars: very long life but low luminosity stars → (1) HZ very narrow and no CHZ (but 200 GYr not necessary) (2) HZ very close to the star → synchroneous rotation → deadly radiation from stellar corona? • G stars: good compromise • K stars: maybe same problems as M stars Non binary main sequence G stars are privileged targets, the case of K and M stars in open and under deep investigation → ~ 10 to 50% of stars in our Galaxy Exoplanets Exoplanet = extrasolar planet = planet orbiting a star that is not the Sun • Imagine a planetary system like ours around α Cen D (α Cen) = 4.2 LY = 260 000 AU θ = ang. Dist. = 5.2/260000 rad = 4″ d (Jupiter – Sun) = 5.2 AU Luminosity LP/L* ~ 10−9 • Other stars: further away → even tougher problem ex: ε Eri: D = 10.5 LY d (planet – star) = 3.2 AU θ = 3.2/650000 rad = 1″ → direct detection generally out of reach of present-day instruments → detection by indirect methods Exoplanets - 2 First discoveries • 1992: discovery of 2 planets around the pulsar PSR B1257+12 by Aleksander Wolszczan M = 4.3 & 2.8 ME d = 0.36 & 0.47 AU • 1995: discovery of the first exoplanet orbiting a `normal´ star by Michel Mayor and Didier Queloz 51 Peg: G2IV D = 48 LY 51 Peg b: M > 150 ME M = 1.05 M d = 0.05 AU T = 4 days Exoplanets - 3 Detection methods: direct imaging Only in peculiar cases and with the best instruments available (space, adaptive optics…) → nearby low luminosity stars massive planets wide orbits Examples: • 2M1207, brown dwarf at 50 pc 5 MJup planet at 40 AU • AB Pic, K2V at 46 pc 13 MJup planet at 275 UA Brown dwarf 2M1207 and its planet (ESO) Exoplanets - 4 Orbital motion generalized 3rd Kepler law: T2 4π 2 3 ( A a) G ( M m) (obtained by gravitational force = centripetal force for M and m) Velocity of star: MV 2 GMm A ( A a) 2 GmA 2 a A V 2 a A m Gm 2 2 V a M Ma V C M A a m v Exoplanets - 5 Detection methods: radial velocities 2 1 T2 4π 2 1 3 M >> m & a >> A → Kepler: K1T M 3 3 a GM a V 2 K2m T 2 2 3 M 4 Vrad K m sin i T 3 1 3 M 2 3 i = angle between orbital plane and sky V in km/s T in years m in MJup M in M V C Vrad 28.4 m sin i T 1 3 M 2 M A a m 3 v → more sensitive to large planet masses and short periods Exoplanets - 6 Detection methods: gravitational microlensing Amplification of a background star by a star crossing the line of sight (deflection of light with pseudo-focussing) If a star and its planet cross the line of sight: → secondary maximum in the light curve Detection of low mass planets (ex: 5.5 ME) but no further check possible Low probability events → necessary to observe a large number of sources Exoplanets - 7 Detection methods: transits If the planet passes in front of its star → partial eclipse Apparent luminosity drop: ΔL/L~ (RP/R*)2 → requires high precision + favors large planets orbiting small stars Prob(transit) ~ R*/a + necessary to observe several transits → favors short periods Low probability events → need to observe a large number of sources Exoplanets - 8 Detected exoplanets October 2016: ~3500 planets discovered ~2600 planetary systems Method Planets Systems 2692 2015 687 518 Microlensing 51 49 Imaging 72 67 Pulsars 23 18 Transits Radial velocities Source: www.exoplanet.eu Exoplanets - 9 Hot Jupiters The first exoplanets discovered were very massive planets orbiting close to their stars → they have been called Hot Jupiters (M > ~MJup, d < 0.05 AU) Their discovery came as a surprise and forced astronomers to Reconsider their planetary systems formation theories However, these planets were the easiest to detect: • large Vrad, short period • deep and frequent transits → observational bias Formation of planetary systems Contraction of protostellar nebula → star at the center, surrounded by a disk of gas and dust Collisions between dust grains → aggragates → size increases and may reach a few km: planetesimals Gravitation starts to play a role → even more collisions with: • fusion and size increase • or destruction of aggregates • eccentric orbits → even more collisions Formation of planetary systems - 2 Protoplanets • The most massive planetesimals tend to grow further by capturing bodies on similar orbits • Size ~ 1000 km → protoplanets • The most massive can be surrounded by a disk of matter that will give birth to their satellites • Perturbation of the orbits of small bodies by the most massive planets → heavy bombardment et big cleaning of the planetary system Formation of planetary systems - 3 Planetary differentiation • Gravitational contraction of the star → luminosity maximum soon after its formation • In the inner system: – vaporisation of ices contained in dust grains – radiation pressure → pushes gases away from the star (→ only ~ 2% of initial matter remains) → planetesimals composed of rocks + metals → telluric objects Formation of planetary systems - 4 Planetary differentiation • In the outer system: – planetesimals of rocks + metals + ices → ganymedian objects – mass of ices ~ 3 or 4 times mass of rocks + metals → much more massive protoplanets and lower temperature → possibility to capture gas (H, He) → jovian planets • How to explain the existence of hot Jupiters? – formation in the outer system followed by migration towards the inner system (gravitational interactions in the disk or with other planets) – during migration: probable ejection of smaller planets → probably no telluric planets in these systems Formation of planetary systems - 5 Our solar sytem: representative or peculiar? Exoplanets: – significant proportion of hot Jupiters (~ 10%) – many high eccentricities (→ ejections) → what is the frequency of solar systems similar to ours? → consequences for life in the Universe? Formation of planetary systems - 6 Atmosphere and oceans of telluric planets The components of atmospheres (and oceans) of telluric planets were in the ices of the protoplanetary disk → how to explain their presence today? 2 hypotheses: • outgassing of a small fraction of ices that might have survived in the planetary interiors (gases ejected by volcanoes) • heavy rain: after the solar luminosity maximum, impact of ice-rich comets: – originating from outer regions – deflected by jovian planets Search for intelligent life We estimated that ~ 10 to 50 % of stars in our Galaxy can provide an adequate environment for life 1960: Frank Drake tries to estimate the number of technological civilisations in our Galaxy Rate of formation of suitable stars R*: ~2 1011 stars in our Galaxy ~1011 suitable stars Age of Galaxy ~ 1010 years → birth of 10 suitable stars per year (on average) Frank Drake and `his´ equation Search for intelligent life - 2 Fraction of stars with planets fp: Most recent searches indicate that most stars have planets → fp ~ 1 → 10 stars per year Number of habitable planets per star with planets ne: Telluric planets in the HZ, massive enough to retain an atmosphere, and no hot Jupiter in the system → let us assume this happens in 10 % of the systems: ne ~ 0.1 → 1 star per year (10 billion habitable planets!) Search for intelligent life - 3 Fraction of habitable planets on which life emerges fl: Life appeared quite fast on Earth when the conditions were adequate → we can assume fl ~ 1 (say 0.5) → one star every 2 years Fraction of planets where life evolves towards intelligence fi: We don’t really have any information… Probability that life evolves towards multicellular organisms? Probability that a complex life form develops intelligence? What is intelligence? → I assume fi ~ 0.01 → one star every 200 years Search for intelligent life - 4 Fraction of intelligent life forms that develop a technological civilisation fc: Personally, I find that quite probable → I assume fc ~ 1 (say 0.4) → one star every 500 years Our galaxy is ~ 10 billion years old → according to my estimate, ~ 107 technological civilisations could have emerged in our galaxy [and the nearest could have been at ~ 100 L.Y.] How many civilisations could be out there right now? It depends on the mean lifetime L of a technological civilisation (if L < 500 ans, we are probably alone) Search for intelligent life - 5 First SETI programme SETI = Search for ExtraTerrestrial Intelligence = search for radio signals emitted (deliberately or not) by extraterrestrial intelligences 1960: Frank Drake points the Green Bank radiotelescope towards: – τ Ceti: no signal – ε Eridani: strong signal but non reproducible (in fact, signal emitted by an U-2 spy airplane flying 20 000 m above USSR) Search for intelligent life - 6 Difficulties of SETI programmes • At which frequency searching? • Discard parasitic signals (mostly emitted by humans) • How to separate artificial signals from natural ones? • Reproducibility t Opposite: an apparently artificial signal detected in 2002 (= unusual interference between a GPS satellite and a ground station?) ν Search for intelligent life - 7 Most ambitious SETI programme Starts in 1992 (500th anniversary of discovery of America) Uses the Arecibo radiotelescope (300 m) on Porto Rico Aimed at analyzing signals from 1000 stars similar to the Sun Interrupted one year later by the Congress, after having been ridiculed by two senators Continued thanks to private funding Enormous quantity of data to be analyzed → SETI@home Search for intelligent life - 8 Results of SETI programmes • Detections of artificial signals • Often identified (human sources) • Sometimes unidentified but still not securely confirmed • Sometimes reproducible (2 – 3 detections) • Strict methodology: no announcement before sufficient confirmation (way of proceeding in sharp contrast with ufology) Search for intelligent life - 9 Types of detectable signals • Signal intentionally emitted towards us → powerful and structured But what would be the motivation? • Radio communications escaping into space → weaker (3D) and more confuse → would we be able to detect it and to recognize its `intelligent´ structure? • Would a technological civilisation necessarily use radio communications? Search for intelligent life - 10 And us, what did we send? • 16/11/1974: 169 seconds message sent by the Arecibo radiotelescope towards globular cluster M13 at 25000 L.Y.: – numbers from 0 to 10 binary coded – atomic numbers of H, C, N, O, P (elements on which terrestrial life is mostly based) – chemical formulae of the 4 DNA bases – spatial structure of DNA – little man – position of Earth in the solar system –Arecibo telescope… Search for intelligent life - 11 Are we alone? The Fermi `paradox´ Among all extraterrestrial civilisations, if only one of them has an expansionary policy, our Galaxy should already be fully colonized How? Let us assume that they send space missions to 10 habitable planets and that each of the 10 colonies, when ready, sends missions to 10 new planets, and so on… It can take a very long time, but it doesn’t matter Let us assume that it takes 100 000 years to reach a new planet, settle, build a new civilisation and send 10 new missions → in ~ one million years, the whole Galaxy is colonized Search for intelligent life - 12 Time it would take to colonize the Galaxy In 100 000 years, 10 planets are colonised In 200 000 years, 100 planets In 300 000 years, 1000 planets … (exponential growth) En 1 100 000 years, 10 billion habitable planets = the whole Galaxy Yet, stars more than 5 billion years older than the Sun should have habitable planets → among the ET civilisations, some could be several billions of years more advanced than we are → these ET should already be here Fermi’s conclusion: as the ETs are not here, we are alone!!! Search for intelligent life - 13 Solution proposed by Fermi • To solve his `paradox´, Fermi suggest that, when a civilisation gets the proper technology for space travel, it also gets the power for selfdestruction (cold war context at the time of Fermi) • If the mean lifetime of a technological civilisation is lower than the mean time it takes for such a civilisation to appear in the Galaxy (~ 500 years in my estimate) many technological civilisations may appear but, on average, there is only one technological civilisation at a time in the Galaxy civilisation Are we visited? Are we really sure the ETs are not here? Many people pretend that: – not only extraterrestrial civilisations exist – we do not need SETI programmes to detect them because they visit is: ETs are among us! Are we visited? - 2 Proofs of extraterrestrial visits? • Unidentified Flying Objects • Crop Circles • Ancient Astronauts • Contacts • Abductions → until now, none of these `proofs´ has even resisted a serious exam → encounters with extraterrestrials = modern version of ancient myths → Are we visited? Probably not… Are we visited? - 3 Possible solutions to the Fermi paradox 1. Huge distances With a modern rocket (~20 000 km/h) it takes: 1 day to reach the Moon, 1 year to reach Mars or Venus, 20 years to cross the solar system, 200 000 years to reach the nearest star, 4 billion years to cross the Galaxy Even if ~10 million ET civilisations existed in our galaxy, il would take ~ 2 million years to reach the nearest one! Are we visited? - 4 Possible solutions to the Fermi paradox 1. Huge distances (continued) If we could multiply by 4000 the speed of our rockets (0.1c), it would take: 40 years to reach the nearest star, 1 million years to cross the Galaxy Even with ~ 107 ET civilisations in the Galaxy, it would take: ~ 500 years to reach the nearest one → distances too large, travels too long and too risky! Are we visited? - 5 Possible solutions to the Fermi paradox 2. Low probability of intelligent life • Life seems to appear quite easily in favorable conditions • But maybe it needs very special conditions for intelligence to emerge (= to become an asset in natural selection) • On Earth, it took more than 2 billion years for life to go from unicellulars to more complex cratures! → our Galaxy is full of life, but not of intelligence And on Earth?… Are we visited? - 6 Possible solutions to the Fermi paradox 3. Short lifetime of technological civilisations • Darwin: the best adapted species survive • In a 1st step, intelligence has been a favorable factor for the human species survival on Earth of the mankind story: has become its own ennemy, and • But, from a `Moral´ certain stage, by far the most dangerous We have only one Earth to live on and it is probably not tomorrows that weon? will have → how will natural selection play from now others → extrapolation: → we should take care of it Technological civilisations do not survive long enough to colonize the Galaxy