* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download The use of uterotonic drugs during caesarean section
Non-specific effect of vaccines wikipedia , lookup
Maternal physiological changes in pregnancy wikipedia , lookup
Women's medicine in antiquity wikipedia , lookup
Breech birth wikipedia , lookup
Prenatal testing wikipedia , lookup
Fetal origins hypothesis wikipedia , lookup
Caesarean section wikipedia , lookup
10 May 2013 No. 16 USE OF UTEROTONIC AGENTS AT CAESAREAN DELIVERY Onke Nqala Commentator: P Gokal Moderator: S Bechan Descipline of Anaesthetics CONTENTS INTRODUCTION............................................................................................... 3 OXYTOCIN ....................................................................................................... 3 Mechanism of Action .................................................................................... 4 Pharmacokinetics ......................................................................................... 5 Physiological Effects .................................................................................... 5 Adverse effects ............................................................................................. 6 MECHANISMS TO OBTUND HAEMODYNAMIC EFFECTS OF OXYTOCIN 7 Use of Smaller Doses ................................................................................... 7 Bolus vs. Infusion ......................................................................................... 8 Effects of the Second Dose of Oxytocin .................................................... 8 Co-Administration of Oxytocin with Phenylephrine.................................. 8 ADMINISTRATION OF OXYTOCIN ................................................................. 9 Oxytocin Infusion .......................................................................................... 9 Infusion vs. Bolus & Infusion ...................................................................... 9 Timing and Route of Administration of Oxytocin .................................... 10 OXYTOCIN DOSES FOR DIFFERENT PATIENTS ....................................... 10 Elective C/S with No Risk Factors ............................................................. 10 Emergency C/S with Risk Factors for Uterine Atony .............................. 11 Patients with Pre Eclampsia ...................................................................... 12 Patients with Cardiac disease ................................................................... 12 CARBETOCIN ................................................................................................ 13 ALTERNATIVES TO OXYTOCIN................................................................... 13 Ergot alkaloids ............................................................................................ 13 Prostaglandins ............................................................................................ 14 SUMMARY ...................................................................................................... 15 RECOMMENDATIONS .................................................................................. 16 CONCLUSION ................................................................................................ 17 REFERENCES................................................................................................ 18 2 Use of Uterotonic Agents at Caesarean Delivery INTRODUCTION Clinicians performing obstetric anaesthesia require a good understanding of the drugs used by obstetricians and the effects that these drugs have on the parturient and the fetus. Uterotonic agents are mainly used post delivery and during caesarean section for prevention and treatment of post partum haemorrhage (PPH). They are also used during induction and augmentation of labour. In South Africa, during the period 2008-2010, there were 688 maternal deaths as a result of obstetric hemorrhage, and it continues to be the most common avoidable cause of maternal deaths.1,2 Obstetric hemorrhage 688 % Bleeding after C/S Abruption without HPT Retained placenta Ruptured uterus without previous C/S Abruption with hypertension Uterine atony PPH not specified 150 63 62 61 47 44 103 21.8 9.2 9 8.9 6.8 6.4 15 Saving Mothers 2008-2010. The fifth report of the National Committee for Confidential Enquiry into Maternal Deaths in South Africa. The uterotonic agents available for use in South Africa are oxytocin, alkaloid derivatives (ergometrine, syntometrine) , and prostaglandins. OXYTOCIN Oxytocin was discovered by Sir Henry Dale.3 It was the the first polypeptide to be synthesized and this occurred in 1953. It is a polypeptide hormone synthesized in the paraventricular nuclei of the hypothalamus and stored in the posterior pituitary gland.3,4 Oxytocin is secreted mainly from the posterior pituitary gland and other sites namely, the corpus luteum, Leydig cells, pancreas, adrenal medulla and retina. Oxytocin binds to oxytocin receptors, which are found in the uterus, breast, central nervous system, heart and osteoblastic tissue. Oestrogen stimulates an increase in oxytocin receptors after 20 weeks gestation.4 3 Mechanism of Action: It binds to the G-protein coupled oxytocin receptor on the surface of the myocyte, leading to the activation of phospholipase C, which cleaves phosphatidyl-inositol bisphosphate to Diacylglycerol (DAG) and inositol triphosphate (IP3). IP3 in turn stimulates release of calcium (Ca2+) from endoplasmic reticulum, whereas DAG stimulates prostaglandin synthesis. Ca2+ released from the endoplasmic reticulum binds to and activates calmodulin, this calcium-calmodulin complex then binds to myosin light chain kinase (MLCK), enabling the phospharylation of the short chain of myosin and causing formation of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) and muscle contraction.3,5 OXYTOCIN OXYTOCIN RECEPTOR Phospholipase C DAG IP3 PIP2 Release of Ca2+ from ER PG Synthesis UTERINE SMOOTH MUSCLE CONTRACTION 4 Oxytocin is administered via the parenteral route. It also is absorbed by the buccal and nasal mucosa. When administered orally, oxytocin is rapidly inactivated by trypsin, therefore parenteral route is preferred. It is then distributed into the extracellular fluid and has no protein binding. A steadystate plasma concentration is reached in 20-30 minutes duration. It has an onset of 1-2 minutes and half-life of 10-12 minutes. The metabolic clearance rate in men and women (pregnant or non-pregnant) is 20-27 ml/kg/minute. This similarity of the metabolic clearance rate between men and pregnant females is interesting, in view of the increase that occurs during pregnancy suggesting a corresponding increase in factors responsible for the degradation of oxytocin. Pharmacokinetics5 The plasma concentration of oxytocin is similar during pregnancy and during labor; however, there is a significant increase in the plasma concentration during the last part of the second stage of labor. The highest concentration however during labor is found in umbilical cord blood, indicating that there is a significant production of oxytocin by the fetus during labor. Physiological Effects 3,4,5 1. Uterine contraction followed by relaxation–pharmacological doses can cause incomplete relaxation of uterine musculature 2. Contraction of myoepithelial cells in the breast causing milk ejection 3. Enhances sexual and maternal nurturing behaviour (love hormone) 4. Impairment of Memory and learning functions 5. Regulation of food and drink intake 5 6. Anti-inflammatory effects-modulation or decreasing cytokines 7. Transient relaxation of vascular smooth muscle causing hypotension 8. Protective role to the fetus induces a switch from release of excitatory to inhibitory neurotransmitter in the fetal brain, thereby reducing its vulnerability to hypoxic damage during delivery.6 Adverse effects Cardiovascular Effects: a) Hypotension This maybe due to transient relaxation of vascular smooth muscle cells via calcium-dependant stimulation of the nitric oxide pathway or, the effect of its preservative chlorbutanol on atrial myocytes in vitro which also causes the release of Atrial Natriuretic Peptide and Brain Natriuretic Peptide.3 7Ola P. Rosaeg and colleagues performed an in vitro study to investigate the effect of pure oxytocin, chlorobutanol alone and commercial oxytocin solution (containing chlorobutanol) on contractile force of human atria trabeculae. The results showed that chlorobutanol, and oxytocin with chlorobutanol, inhibit myocardial contractility. There was no difference between chlorbutanol alone versus oxytocin with chlorbutanol in the magnitude of negative ionotropic effect in the atrial preparation. Oxytocin didn’t cause negative ionotropism. The conclusion was that chlorobutanol exhibits negative ionotropic properties in the human in vitro atria preparation, whereas Oxytocin alone does not have a direct negative effect on the contractile force of human atrial myocardium.7One limitation of this study was that they used right atrial tissue samples from relatively old nonpregnant subjects. b) Myocardial Ischaemia A double-blind RCT compared the incidence of ST depression between 5 IU and 10 IU Oxytocin in 103 healthy women, undergoing elective C/S under spinal anaesthesia. It also compared the effect of these doses on chest pains, BP, HR, Troponin I levels and blood loss. The results showed an incidence of myocardial ischaemia of 21.6% in the 10 IU group and 7.7% in the 5 IU group. The average decrease in non-invasive mean blood pressure at 2 min after oxytocin administration in the high dose group was 17mmHg versus 9mmHg in the lower dose group. The decrease in MAP and ST depression were comparable. There was no significant difference in chest pain, Troponin I levels and blood loss. 6 The study concluded that the ST depression is possibly a consequence of hypotension and that interventions to reduce hypotension may reduce the occurrence of ST depression.8 Another RCT used invasive BP measurement and vector cardiography to compare the occurrence of myocardial ischaemia in healthy patients given either 10 IU bolus or 0.2 mg methylergometrine during C/S under spinal anaesthesia and a control group consisting of non-gravid, not anaesthetised women who also received 10 IU IV bolus. Methylergometrine group had mild hypertension without significant ECG changes. 10 IU oxytocin bolus induced chest pains, tachycardia, hypotension and sings of MI on ECG. Conclusion these effects were solely due to oxytocin administration rather than pregnancy, C/S or spinal induced sympathetic blockade.9 c) Arrhythmias (tachycardia)3 d) Elevation of pulmonary artery pressures3 Other Adverse Effects: a) Nausea3,12 (29%), vomiting3,12 (9%), headache and flushing3 b) Water retention (due to structural similarities with vasopressin) - causing dilutional hyponatraemia, seizure and coma3,5 c) Death: Oxytocin has been a contributing factor to at least one of the maternal deaths in both South African and UK based Confidential Enquiry into Maternal Deaths.10,11 Thereafter the Food & Drug Administration (FDA) has placed a black box warning restricting oxytocin use to medical indications and the Institute for Safe Medication Practices added oxytocin to a list of high alert medications.3 d) Fetal and neonatal adverse events: Decrease in SaO2 related to neonatal seizures and uterine contraction frequency. Hyperbilirubinemia or retinal hemorrhages are other effects of oxytocin on the neonate.3,6 MECHANISMS TO OBTUND HAEMODYNAMIC EFFECTS OF OXYTOCIN Use of Smaller Doses Sartain and colleagues compared the hemodynamic and side effects in two groups of patients administered either 5 IU or 2 IU of oxytocin followed by oxytocin infusion of 10 IU/ hr. The 2 IU group showed less marked increase in HR, and decrease MAP and had a decreased incidence of nausea and vomiting compared to 5 U group. However there was no difference in uterine tone, blood loss and the requirement for additional uterotonic agents.13 7 Bolus vs. Infusion A single blinded study by Thomas et al compared the effects of the 5 IU of oxytocin when given as an iv bolus or as an infusion over 5 min in 30 women undergoing elective C/S. The study measured heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP) and estimated blood loss between the two groups. In the bolus group HR increased by 17 beats/min compared to 10 beats/min in the infusion group. MAP decreased by 27mmHg in the bolus group and a steady decline by 8mmHg was noted in the infusion group. There was no difference in estimated blood loss. The author recommended that bolus should be used cautiously.14 The limitation of this study is that it is small study and single blinded. Interestingly both groups used 12mg ephedrine. Effects of the Second Dose of Oxytocin Langesaeter et al studied the hemodynamic effects of second dose of Oxytocin in 20 healthy women during spinal anaesthesia caesarean delivery. They demonstrated that a second dose of oxytocin produced the same hemodynamic effects but significantly smaller than the effects of the first dose and suggests that these findings could be explained by oxytocin induced desensitization phenomenon.15 Laboratory work collaborated those findings of oxytocin receptors loss during oxytocin induced/ augmented labour. Concentration of oxytocin receptors decreased more than 3 fold and oxytocin receptor mRNA concentration decreased 60 fold (augmented) and 300 fold (induction of labour). Prior exposure of rat myometrium to oxytocin suggests that efficacy falls as concentration increases and this is independent of time3,16,17,18 Co-Administration of Oxytocin with Phenylephrine Dyer’s DB - RCT randomized 20 patient to receive oxytocin or a mixture of oxytocin and 80mcg phenylephrine. The primary outcome of the study was to compare Cardiac Output (CO) changes between ephedrine and phenylephrine. The results were as follows: The oxytocin group showed an increase in stroke volume, heart rate and cardiac output whereas systemic vascular resistance and mean arterial pressure decreased. The oxytocin + phenylephrine group displayed a decrease in stroke volume, heart rate, cardiac output and an increase in systemic vascular resistance and mean arterial pressure. The percentage change of HR and CO was lower in the group that received phenylephrine & Oxytocin and SVR and MAP were significantly higher in that group. Times to peak were also different in the two groups except for SV and CO. In all these patients uterine contraction was assessed by 8 obstetrician as good. The study concluded that the hemodynamic response to oxytocin were obtunded by phenylephrine but not abolished19 ADMINISTRATION OF OXYTOCIN Oxytocin Infusion There little evidence for the optimal rate of infusion following the initial bolus of oxytocin. George et al investigated the ED90 of an oxytocin infusion for adequate uterine contraction at 3 min after cord clamping, in 40 patients undergoing elective Caesarean section using a biased coin sequential allocation scheme. Seven of the forty patients had uterine tone deemed unsatisfactory and required additional uterotonics. The infusion range was between 0.1 -0.4 IU/ min.The study concluded that the ED90 was 0.29 IU/min (i.e. approximately 15 IU of Oxytocin in 1 L of fluid running over an hour) to prevent uterine atony and PPH after elective Caesarean section.26Of note, however, after that 1 hour, an infusion of 30 IU/1L oxytocin was administered at 150 ml/hr while in PACU Infusion vs. Bolus & Infusion King et al. did a RCT on patients undergoing elective and emergency C/S with at least one risk factor for PPH. One group received 5 IU oxytocin bolus followed by continuous high dose oxytocin infusion, and the other group received placebo followed by continuous high dose oxytocin infusion (40 IU in 500ml of saline over 30 min). Initially there was better uterine tone in the group that received the bolus. There was no difference in the need for additional uterotonic agents in the first 24 hours and there were no differences in blood loss and transfusion requirements. They concluded that there was no benefit of oxytocin bolus before an infusion even in women at high risk for PPH.27 The Elective C/S Syntocinon Infusion Trial (ECSSIT) was a multi centre double blind placebo controlled randomized trial involving 2000 women which set out to determine the effects of adding an oxytocin infusion after a bolus of oxytocin during an elective C/S. The intervention group received 5 IU IV oxytocin over 1 min followed by 40 IU in 500ml N/S solution over 4hrs whilst the placebo group received the same oxytocin bolus followed by a placebo infusion. The study found that the addition of an oxytocin infusion after C/S significantly reduces the need for additional uterotonic agents. It did not affect the overall occurrence of major obstetric haemorrhage.28 9 McLeod et al. used routine standard monitors and thoracic bioimpedance technology for haemodynamic measurements and found that an infusion of 30 IU oxytocin in 500ml Hartmann solution over 4 hours after initial bolus of 5 IU at elective C/S given over 3 min, did not adversely affect maternal haemodynamics compared with a placebo infusion either during or after surgery. They suggested that even in haemodynamically unstable parturients oxytocin as an infusion can be given safely.29 With regard to general vs regional anaesthesia, there is no evidence that one has an advantage over the other in terms of oxytocin dosing. Timing and Route of Administration of Oxytocin The timing of oxytocin administration remains debatable. Oxytocin can be administered before placental separation or after expulsion. Optimal timing is unclear. This has not been evaluated much in the literature. Most randomized trials administered oxytocin before placental separation.30 There seems to be geographic variation: a survey of Canadian obstetricians reported 52% give it before delivery of the placenta.31 In Texas, USA only 15% administer Oxytocin before delivery of the placenta.32 My practice is to administer it before expulsion of the placenta. A RCT comparing the different timing of administration did not find any difference between the groups in terms of blood loss or retained placenta.33 Oxytocin maybe administered intravenously (IV), intramuscular (IM) or via the umbilical vein. The IV route has been questioned because of hemodynamic effects. The comparative efficacy of IM and IV has not be studied in a randomized trial. However observational data and clinical experience indicate that the IM route is an effective alternative to IV, however the onset is slower.34 Injection into the umbilical vein has been shown in a systemic review of RCTs to be ineffective for prevention of PPH.34 OXYTOCIN DOSES FOR DIFFERENT PATIENTS Elective C/S with No Risk Factors A number of dose finding studies have been conducted to elucidate the correct dose of oxytocin. Carvalho’s study in 2004 randomized 40 healthy patients at term for elective C/S under regional anaesthesia20. Patients with risk factors for uterine atony were excluded. Three patients received 0 IU, 31 patients received 0.5IU and 6 patients received 1IU of oxytocin according to the sequential allocation scheme. 10 They primarily looked at uterine response to initial intravenous bolus of oxytocin, as rated by the obstetrician. There was no difference between 0.5 IU and 1 IU with respect to response time for adequate uterine tone. ED90 for oxytocin was found to be 0.35 IU. Therefore they concluded that satisfactory uterine contraction can be achieved by IV dose not more than 1 IU.20 The search for the effective bolus dose during elective caesarean delivery to produce adequate uterine tone continued. In 2010 Butwick et al randomly selected patients to receive 0, 0.5 IU, 1 IU, 3 IU, and 5 IU over a 15 second period following cord clamping21. Nearly 50% of patients who received placebo required rescue oxytocin during the study period. Hypotension was significant in the 5 IU group compared to the 0 IU. There was no difference in the incidence of hypotension in 0.5 IU to 3 IU groups, and no difference in estimated blood loss. Other side effects rarely occurred.21 Authors concluded that routine use of 5 IU Oxytocin during elective C/S is no longer recommended because adequate uterine contraction can be achieve with lower doses i.e. 0.5 – 3 IU 21 Emergency C/S with Risk Factors for Uterine Atony There have been no studies which specifically investigated the dose of oxytocin in patients at high risk of uterine atony, such as those with multiple pregnancies, grand multiparity and antepartum haermorrhage. The following studies look at labour arrest as a risk factor for uterine atony. Balki’s group set out to determine the minimum effective dose of oxytocin to produce uterine contraction after C/S for labor arrest in women who had received oxytocin during labour22. Twenty patients were recruited who had labour epidural analgesia which was topped up with 2% lignocaine for surgical anaesthesia. Oxytocin was administered according to a biased coin up-and down sequential allocation scheme. They used 0.5IU increments depending on the response from the previous patient. A three minute interval was allowed to pass before the next intervention, and then an infusion of 40mU/min (20 IU/L at the rate of 120ml/h) was started and continued at the same rate for up to 8 hours. The outcomes which were assessed were uterine response to initial intravenous bolus of oxytocin, and estimated blood loss. Side effects were also recorded. Most patients had effective uterine contraction within 3 min with 2-5 IU of initial oxytocin dose. 11 The study found the ED90 of oxytocin to be 2.99IU in patients with labour arrest (approximately 9 times higher than for patients not in labour). The conclusion was that Caesarean delivery for labour arrest requires a loading dose of 3 IU oxytocin followed by 20IU/L @ 120ml/hr infusion.22 Patients with Pre Eclampsia In an observational study using cardiac output monitoring, Dyer at el studied the haemodynamic effects of spinal anaesthesia in 15 patients with severe preeclampsia23. The study determined that cardiac output remained stable during Caesarean delivery until the period of oxytocin administration. Oxytocin (2.5IU) administration was associated with significant hypotension, increase in heart rate, cardiac output and every little change in stroke volume. This response was more pronounced compared to another study of healthy parturients where they used 5 -10 IU as rapid bolus of Oxytocin.23 Langesaeter and colleagues investigated the haemodynamic effects of oxytocin in women with severe pre-eclampsia24. All 18 patients who were given 5 IU, demonstrated a decrease in systolic arterial pressure, systemic vascular resistance, and an increase in heart rate. Six patients had a decrease in CO due to a decrease in stroke volume. This paradoxical effect could be explained by low plasma volume or associated relative diastolic dysfunction in these patients. They concluded that the haemodynamic effect in response to oxytocin is less predictable.24Therefore, healthy parturients given the same dose have a larger increase in CO, SV and HR compared to their counterparts with severe preeclampsia.24 Patients with Cardiac disease Use of oxytocin in this group is controversial. Some authors avoid oxytocin in pregnant women with cardiac disease and others administer it as an infusion. Langesaeter and colleagues looked at 103 patients with whole range of cardiac diseases (cardiomyopathy, myocardiatis, valvular heart diseases, intracardiac shunt disease, pulmonary hypertension, ischaemic heart disease and severe arrthymias)25. The study outcomes looked at mode of delivery, anaesthetic technique during C/S, use of phenylephrine, use of oxytocin, Haemoglobin levels pre and post delivery, bleeding, the need for transfusion and, maternal and fetal outcomes at 6 months postpartum. The results showed that with boluses of 0.05 – 0.5 IU IV, haemodynamic changes were minor and transient. Cardiac symptoms were not aggravated. Uterine tone was sufficient. In keeping with Carvalho and colleagues 12 findings, an ED95 of 0.35 IU in elective C/S and 3 IU in patients with prior oxytocin stimulation was found. No subsequent infusion is recommended as it may lead to volume overload. However prophylactic B-lynch suture was offered in some patients. The conclusion was that use of ultra-low doses of oxytocin (i.e. 0.05-0.5 IU) administered extremely slowly is recommended in cardiac patients.25 CARBETOCIN Carbetocin is a synthetic analogue of oxytocin. It has a similar mechanism of action, and side effect profile, but the duration of action is 4-10 times longer.3 It produces titanic uterine contraction 2 minutes after an intravenous dose, which lasts for 60 -120 seconds. It is contraindicated in preeclampsia, and is licensed for use only with regional anaesthesia.40 Carbetocin is not available in South Africa. The dosage of Carbetocin is unclear. One RCT comparing carbetocin to oxytocin during Caesarian Section suggests 100 mcg IV35. A double blinded RCT compared the impact of carbetocin (100mcg) and oxytocin (5IU) on maternal haemodynamic parameters for women undergoing elective C/S. The authors concluded that both have similar hemodynamic effects and side effect profile, but could not confirm reports that carbetocin has a slightly better uterotonic effect.35 ALTERNATIVES TO OXYTOCIN Ergot alkaloids Fungus extract (Claviceps purpurea) was the first uterotonic agent used and was originally known as ‘pulvis ad partum’ (powder of birth), but later came to be known as “pulvis ad mortem’( powder of death) . Its use was reviewed as it was associated with titanic and sustained uterine contraction, leading to fetal asphyxia, stillbirth and uterine rupture. Today these agents are used in the postpartum period, as prophylaxis for postpartum bleeding and treatment for uterine atony.3 Ergometrine is a natural occurring alkaloid and methylergometrine is semisynthetic. Their mechanism of action is not clear, but they may act via calcium channels or alpha adrenoceptors in the myometrium. Ergometrine is also a partial agonist at alpha1 adrenoceptor, 5HT-1 and dopamine receptors. It has been associated with a mean arterial pressure increase of 11%, increase in pulmonary arterial pressure of 30%, and a 46% incidence of nausea and vomiting.3,5 13 Other side effects include CNS effects, psychosis, reversible cerebral arteriopathy; cardiovascular effects - Hypertension, Coronary spasm and myocardial infarction; and renal artery spasm. It has a half life of 120 min and no desensitization phenomenon. RCOG guideline recommends an IV injection of 0.5 mg slowly while WHO recommends 0.2mg IV/IM to be repeated as necessary every 15 min to max of 1 mg.38,39 A systemic review comparing Oxytocin and Ergot alkaloids found no significant difference in blood loss, but Oxytocin was associated with side effects and manual removal of placenta.36 Syntometrine is a combination of 5 IU Oxytocin and 0.5mg Ergometrine.3 A systemic review comparing Syntometrine and Oxytocin alone showed a small but statistically significant reduction in the risk of blood loss with the syntometrine group but no difference in risk of PPH, however maternal side effects such as hypertension, nausea and vomiting were higher with syntometrine than Oxytocin group37 Prostaglandins Prostaglandins have specific receptors that increase in concentration at the beginning of labour. Their mechanism of action is activation of G-protein and calcium channels which in turn increase intramyometrial calcium concentration and enhanced uterine contraction. Prostaglandins can be classified into 3 groups. The first generation prostaglandin F2α (dinoprost) was described in 1976. Second generation 15-methyl prostaglandin F2α (carboprost) was shown to have an extended half-life, fewer GIT and vasopressor effects, good uterotonic effects but, associated with bronchospasms, V/Q mismatch and hypoxaemia. A recommended dosage of 500mcg may be administered intramyometrially. There are two third generation prostaglandins: Sulprostene synthetic prostaglandin E2 is associated with a marked decrease in SVR and hypotension. The recommended dose is 250 mcg IM repeated every 15min to a maximum of 8 doses. Intravenous dosing has been used: 500mcg in 50ml N/S, commence @ 10ml/hr and increase every 15 min as necessary. Contraindications include asthma, coronary artery disease, hypertension, heart failure, glaucoma, epilepsy and uncontrolled DM Misoprostol E1 is cheap, widely available, does not require refrigeration and is administered either orally, sublingually or rectally for management of uterine atony. 14 Sublingual route has quicker time of onset, highest peak concentration and greatest bioavailability of all routes of administration. Oral route has the highest side effects whereas the rectal route has slower onset of action, lower peak levels and fewer side effects. Other side effects include fever, diarrhea, nausea and vomiting especially with oral route. There is conflicting evidence. Small studies have concluded that buccal misprostol may reduce the need for additional uterotonic agent at C/S, while others concluded that oral misoprostol is as effective as IV oxytocin in reducing intraoperative blood loss.42 However systemic review of its use to prevent PPH has been shown to be less effective than oxytocin or ergometrine. A RCT has shown that preoperative treatment with 400mcg of rectal misoprostol just prior to skin preparation and draping for repeat elective C/S signicantly reduce intraoperative and postpartum blood loss41(29). SUMMARY Clinical Trials of Elective Caesarean Delivery Author Patient No. Study Design/ Methodology Primary Outcome Uterine Massage Saran 1997 Carvalho 2004 Sartain 2008 George 2010 Butwick 2010 40 5,10,15 or 20IU @ 1 IU/min ?? 40 Biased coin up-down allocation: slow bolus @ 0.5 IU/5/s 2 or 5 IU over 5- 10 sec No difference in the uterine tone ED=0.35 IU Change in HR 24 vs 32 b/min ED90 = 0.29 IU/min ?? 80 40 Biased coin up and down allocation; infusion 0, 0.5,1,3 and 5 IU over 15 sec 75 No signicant difference in uterine tone @ 2 min no If needed at 3 min yes Clinical Trials for Labouring Caesarean Section Munn 2001 Balki 2006 Dyer 2008 0.33 vs 2.7 IU/min infusion for laboring women 30 Biased coin up-down allocation at 0.5 IU/5.s for women with labour arrest, Oxytocin augmentation and epidural analgesia Clinical Trials for Pre Eclampsia 15 2.5 IU in 10 ml of H2O over 30sec Langesaeter 2010 321 18 5 IU bolus under invasive monitoring 15 yes ED90 = 2.99 IU If needed at 3 min Hemodynamic Effects of SA in Preeclapmsia and secondary effects of Oxytocin: ↓BP,↓SVR,↑HR and ↑CO but SV unchanged ↓MAP,↓SVR, ↑HR but five had↓ CO due to ↓SV ?? ?? RECOMMENDATIONS Based upon current evidence PROPHYLAXIS AGAINST UTERINE ATONY 1st line agents 2nd line agents Healthy patient low risk uterine atony Pre-eclampsia patient Uncomplicated cases of labour arrest Oxytocin bolus 13IU over 30s with phenylephrine 80µg rescue dose within 3 min Seldom needed Oxytocin 3 IU slowly+ infusion slowly(fluid overload) Oxytocin 3 IU bolus slowly “Rule of 3” remember receptor down-regulation Carbetocin and ergot derivatives are contraindicated Ergometrine 0.05-.0.5 IV slowly/IMI Preop Prostaglandin E1 400µg or Prostaglandin F2α 250µg intramyometrially Cardiac patient esp. with pulmonary HPT Ultra small doses oxytocin 0.1-0.5 IU slowly. No infusionfluid overload No suggestion The use of uterotonic drugs during caesarean section R.A. Dyer, D. van Dyk, A. Dresner Department of Anaesthesia, University of Cape Town, South Africa International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia (2010) 19, 313–319 International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia (2010) 19, 243–245 ESTABLISHED UTERINE ATONY AND PPH 1st line 2nd line in view of oxytocin receptor down regulation Uncomplicated Labour arrest cases with PPH 3IU-5IU over 30sec followed by 40IU/500ml @125ml/hr over 4 hours WHO 0.2 mg IV slowly RCOG 0.5 mg IV slowly Pre-eclampsia Oxytocin 3IU slowly + infusion 40IU/100ml@ 25ml/hr over 4 hrs to minimize risk of fluid overload Misoprostol dose not clear 400µg sublingually or 1000µg PR Or Prost E2 20mg PR 2 hourly Misoprostol dose not clear 400µg sublingually or 1000µg PR Or Prost E2 20mg PR 2 hourly The use of uterotonic drugs during caesarean section R.A. Dyer, D. van Dyk, A. Dresner Department of Anaesthesia, University of Cape Town, South Africa International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia (2010) 19, 313–319 SA Perinatal Practice Guideline: Chapter 102a Syntocinon®: prophylaxis for third stage of labour and pph management review 17 July 2012 16 CONCLUSION Uterotonic agents after Caesarean delivery are an important medical intervention to prevent and treat PPH. In patients undergoing an elective C/S, a ‘ceiling effect’ of oxytocin 3 IU is seen, beyond which, no further improvement in uterine tone and blood loss is observed. A small dose of oxytocin (ED 90 = 0.35IU) has been determined to be sufficient in producing adequate uterine contraction during elective Caesarean delivery in patients not in labour. However a similar low loading dose (ED90=2.99 IU) is required in parturient in labour, followed by infusion 10 IU in 1L of fluid over 4-6 hours during and after the C/S .The phenomenon of receptor desensitization is a reality so other uterotonic agents with different mechanism of action to oxytocin should be considered. Issues which have not been covered in this review include: Oxytocin dosing in normal vaginal delivery vs C/S Oxytocin dosing in stenotic vs regurgitant heart lesions Oxytocin dosing in regional vs. general anaesthesia Objective measure of uterine contractility or tone 17 REFERENCES 1. National committee on Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths.The Saving Mother 2008-2010: Fifth Report on the Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in South Africa. Department of Health,2012 2. Fawcus S, Moodley J. Haemorrhage associated with caesarean section in South Africa--be aware. South African Medical Journal = SuidAfrikaanse Tydskrif Vir Geneeskunde. 2011;101(5):306. PubMed PMID: 21837869. Corporate Author: National Committee on Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths. Language: English. Date Revised: 20111031. Date Created: 20110815. 3. Dyer RA, van Dyk D, Dresner A. The use of uterotonic drugs during caesarean section. International journal of obstetric anesthesia. 2010 Jul;19(3):313-9. PubMed PMID: 20627531. Epub 2010/07/16. eng. 4. Stephens LC, Bruessel T. Systematic review of oxytocin dosing at caesarean section. Anaesthesia & Intensive Care. 2012;40(2):247-52. PubMed PMID: 74608678. 5. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology: Issue: Volume 43(3), September 2000, pp 455-468 6. Tyzio R, Cossart R, Khalilov I, Minlebaev M, Hübner CA, Represa A, Ben-Ari Y, Khazipov R (December 2006). "Maternal oxytocin triggers a transient inhibitory switch in GABA signaling in the fetal brain during delivery". Science 314 (5806): 1788–92. (20, 23, 30, 31) 7. Rosaeg OP, Cicutti NJ, Labow RS. The effect of oxytocin on the contractile force of human atrial trabeculae. Anesth Analg 1998;86:40– 4.g 1998: 86:40-4 8. Jonsson M, Hanson U, Lidell C, Norden-Lindeberg S. ST depression at caesarean section and the relation to oxytocin dose. A randomised controlled trial. BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology. 2010 Jan;117(1):76-83. PubMed PMID: 19781043. 9. Svanstrom MC, Biber B, Hanes M, Johansson G, Naslund U, Balfors EM. Signs of myocardial ischaemia after injection of oxytocin: a randomized double-blind comparison of oxytocin and methylergometrine during Caesarean section. Br J Anaesth. 2008 May;100(5):683-9. PubMed PMID: 18385263. 10. Thomas TA, Cooper GM. Maternal deaths from anaesthesia. An extractfrom why mothers die 1997–1999, the confidential enquiries into maternal deaths in the United Kingdom. Br J Anaesth 2002;89:499–508. 18 11. Rout CC, Farina Z. Anaesthesia related deaths in SA 2008-2010. SoAfr Anaesth Analg 282 2012;18(6) 12. Balki M, Carvalho JC. Intraoperative nausea and vomiting duringcesarean section under regional anesthesia. Int J Obstet Anesth 2005;14:230–41. 13. Sartain JB, Barry JJ, Howat PW, McCormack DI, Bryant M. Intravenous oxytocin bolus of 2 units is superior to 5 units during elective Caesarean section. BJA: The British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2008;101(6):822-6. PubMed PMID: 35291697. 14. Thomas JS, Koh SH, Cooper GM. Haemodynamic effects of oxytocin given as i.v. bolus or infusion on women undergoing Caesarean section. Br J Anaesth. 2007 Jan;98(1):116-9. PubMed PMID: 17142825. 15. Langesaeter E, Rosseland LA, Stubhaug A. Haemodynamic effects of repeated doses of oxytocin during Caesarean delivery in healthy parturients. Br J Anaesth. 2009 Aug;103(2):260-2. PubMed PMID: 19502285. 16. Phaneuf S, Rodríguez Liñares B, TambyRaja RL, MacKenzie IZ, López Bernal A. Loss of myometrial oxytocin receptors during oxytocininduced and oxytocin-augmented labour. Journal Of Reproduction And Fertility. 2000;120(1):91-7. PubMed PMID: 11006150. 17. Plested CP, Bernal AL. Desensitisation of the oxytocin receptor and other G-protein coupled receptors in the human myometrium. Experimental Physiology. 2001;86(2):303-12. PubMed PMID: 11429648. 18. Balki M, Cristian AL, Kingdom J, Carvalho JC. Oxytocin pretreatment of pregnant rat myometrium reduces the efficacy of oxytocin but not of ergonovine maleate or prostaglandin F 2 alpha. Reprod Sci. 2010 Mar;17(3):269-77. PubMed PMID: 20124553. 19. Dyer RA, Reed AR, van Dyk D, Arcache MJ, Hodges O, Lombard CJ, et al. Hemodynamic effects of ephedrine, phenylephrine, and the coadministration of phenylephrine with oxytocin during spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean delivery. Anesthesiology. 2009. 20. Carvalho JC, Balki M, Kingdom J, Windrim R. Oxytocin requirements at elective cesarean delivery: a dose-finding study. Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Nov;104(5 Pt 1):1005-10. PubMed PMID: 15516392. Epub 2004/11/02. eng. 21. Butwick AJ, Coleman L, Cohen SE, Riley ET, Carvalho B. Minimum effective bolus dose of oxytocin during elective Caesarean delivery. Br J Anaesth. 2010 Mar;104(3):338-43. PubMed PMID: 20150347. 19 22. Balki M, Ronayne M, Davies S, Fallah S, Kingdom J, Windrim R, et al. Minimum Oxytocin Dose Requirement After Cesarean Delivery for Labor Arrest. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2006;107(1):45-50. PubMed PMID: 19524671. 23. Dyer RA, Piercy JL, Reed AR, Lombard CJ, Schoeman LK, James MF. Hemodynamic changes associated with spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery in severe preeclampsia. Anesthesiology. 2008 01/01/;108(5):802-11. 24. Langesaeter E, Rosseland LA, Stubhaug A. Haemodynamic effects of oxytocin in women with severe preeclampsia. International journal of obstetric anesthesia. 2011 Jan;20(1):26-9. PubMed PMID: 21224021. 25. Langesaeter E, Dragsund M, Rosseland LA. Regional anaesthesia for a Caesarean section in women with cardiac disease: a prospective study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2010 Jan;54(1):46-54. PubMed PMID: 19764910. 26. George RB, McKeen D, Chaplin AC, McLeod L. Up-down determination of the ED(90) of oxytocin infusions for the prevention of postpartum uterine atony in parturients undergoing Cesarean delivery. Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie. 2010 Jun;57(6):578-82. PubMed PMID: 20238255. 27. King KJ, Douglas MJ, Unger W, Wong A, King R. Five unit bolus at Caesarean delivery in women at risk of atony: a randomised doubleblind, controlled trial. Anesth Analg 2010; 111: 1460-6 28. Murphy DJ, Carey M, Montgomery AA, Sheehan SR. Study Protocol. ECSSIT – Elective Caesarean Section Syntocinon® Infusion Trial. A multi-centre randomised controlled trial of oxytocin (Syntocinon®) 5 IU bolus and placebo infusion versus oxytocin 5 IU bolus and 40 IU infusion for the control of blood loss at elective caesarean section. BMC pregnancy and childbirth. 2009;9(1):36. 29. McLeod G, Munishankar B, MacGregor H, Murphy DJ. Maternal haemodynamics at elective caesarean section: a randomised comparison of oxytocin 5-unit bolus and placebo infusion with oxytocin 5-unit bolus and 30-unit infusion. International journal of obstetric anesthesia. 2010 Apr;19(2):155-60. PubMed PMID: 20194013. 30. Soltani H, Hutchon DR, Poulose TA. Timing of prophylactic uterotonic for the third stage of labour after vaginal birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010; CD00673 20 31. Bskerr, T. Management of the third stage of labour: a survey of practice among Canadian obstetricians. J Soc Obstet Gynecol Can 1992; 14:61 32. Phillips CA, Kinch RA. Management of the third stage of labour: a survey of practice among Texas obstetricians. Tex Med 1994; 90:44 33. Jackson KW Jr, Albert JR, schemer GK, et al. A randomized controlled trial comparing Oxytocin administration before and after placental delivery in the prevention of postpartum hemorrhage. Am j Obstet Gynecol 2001; 185:873 34. Mori R, Nardin JM, Yamamoto N.et al. Umbilical vein injection for the routine management of third stage of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;3: CD0006176 35. Attilakos G, Psaroudakis D, Ash J, Buchanan R, Winter C, Donald F, et al. Carbetocin versus oxytocin for the prevention of postpartum haemorrhage following caesarean section: the results of a double-blind randomised trial. BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology. 2010 Jul;117(8):929-36. PubMed PMID: 20482535. 36. Elborne DR, Prendiville WJ, Carrolli G et al : Prophylactic use of Oxytocin in the third stage of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001; CD001808 37. McDonald S, Abbott JM, Higgins SP. Prophylactic ergometrine-oxytocin versus Oxytocin for the third stage of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004; CD000201 38. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Prevention and treatment of postpartum haemorrhage Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists’ Green-top Guideline no.52, 2009. 39. World Health Organisation. WHO Guidelines for the Management of Postpartum Haemorrhage and Retained Placenta, 2009. 40. Rath W. Prevention of postpartum haemorrhage with the oxytocin analogue carbetocin. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology & Reproductive Biology. 2009;147(1):15-20. PubMed PMID: 44699182. 41. Elsedeek MS. Impact of preoperative rectal misoprostol on blood loss during and after elective cesarean delivery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2012 Aug;118(2):149-52. PubMed PMID: 22698700. 42. Anaesthesia refresher course Part 2 University of Cape Town: 2012 21 43. Tsen LC, Balki M. Oxytocin protocols during cesarean delivery: time to acknowledge the risk/benefit ratio? International journal of obstetric anesthesia. 2010 Jul;19(3):243-5. PubMed PMID: 20570503. 44. Dyer RA, Butwick AJ, Carvalho B. Oxytocin for labour and caesarean delivery: implications for the anaesthesiologist. Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology. 2011. 22