* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Cat-scratch disease osteomyelitis from a dog scratch
Periodontal disease wikipedia , lookup
Osteochondritis dissecans wikipedia , lookup
Kawasaki disease wikipedia , lookup
Transmission (medicine) wikipedia , lookup
Infection control wikipedia , lookup
Rheumatoid arthritis wikipedia , lookup
Eradication of infectious diseases wikipedia , lookup
Ankylosing spondylitis wikipedia , lookup
Behçet's disease wikipedia , lookup
Germ theory of disease wikipedia , lookup
Schistosomiasis wikipedia , lookup
Signs and symptoms of Graves' disease wikipedia , lookup
Management of multiple sclerosis wikipedia , lookup
Globalization and disease wikipedia , lookup
Pathophysiology of multiple sclerosis wikipedia , lookup
Multiple sclerosis signs and symptoms wikipedia , lookup
Cat-scratch disease osteomyelitis from a dog scratch David Keret, Mihael Giladi, Yehudith Kletter, Shlomo Wientroub From the Dana Children’s Hospital and the Tel-Aviv Medical Centre and the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Israel steomyelitis is a rare manifestation of cat-scratch disease in patients who do not have AIDS. The clinical presentation and non-specific subacute course of the disease make diagnosis difficult. We present a child with osteomyelitis of a metacarpal following a dog scratch. Bartonella henselae was found to be the aetiological agent. The bone healed after treatment with antibiotics. Increased awareness and a comprehensive medical history are needed to identify patients with suspected Bartonella henselae osteomyelitis. O J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1998;80-B:766-7. Received 10 February 1998; Accepted 3 March 1998 Cat-scratch disease (CSD) is benign, self-limiting regional lymphadenopathy. Bartonella (B.) henselae is considered 1 the principal aetiological agent. Contact with a cat, usually in the form of a scratch or bite, has been reported in most cases. About 10% of patients with CSD may present with atypical manifestations, including encephalopathy, neuro1 retinitis, erythema nodosum, arthritis, and osteomyelitis. The last is rare but when present is usually in the form of 2 osteolytic lesions. The diagnosis of CSD is difficult since the clinical presentation and histopathological examination of the involved tissue are non-specific. The CSD skin test lacks standardisation and carries a potential risk of transmitting infectious agents. Cultures and Warthin Starry silver stain have low levels of sensitivity. Polymerase chain-reaction analysis of pus or lymph nodes is not available in most laboratories. Serological assays, particularly an indirect fluorescent antibody (IFA) test, have become the principal 1 method of diagnosis. D. Keret, MD, Senior Orthopaedic Surgeon S. Wientroub, MD, Professor and Head Department of Pediatric Orthopaedics, Dana Children’s Hospital M. Giladi, MD, Senior Infectious Diseases Consultant Y. Kletter, PhD, Clinical Microbiologist The Bernard Pridan Laboratory for Molecular Biology of Infectious Diseases Tel-Aviv Medical Centre, 6 Weizmann Street, Tel-Aviv 64239, Israel. We present a case of CSD metacarpal osteomyelitis from a dog scratch. Diagnosis was confirmed by the detection of anti-B. henselae IgG by an enzyme immunoassay (EIA). Case report A nine-year-old boy was seen with a two-week history of pain and swelling in the dorsal aspect of the left hand. He did not recall any previous injury and denied exposure to cats or kittens. Two months earlier he had been given a Maltese puppy which frequently scratched, but did not bite his hands. Physical examination revealed a tender swelling over the third metacarpal, with limited movement of the metacarpophalangeal joint and multiple scratches on both hands (Fig. 1). The total leucocyte count, the ESR and the C-reactive protein level were within normal limits. Plain radiographs showed a periosteal reaction along the neck and shaft of the third 99m Tc bone scan showed increased metacarpal (Fig. 2). A uptake in the third metacarpal consistent with osteomyelitis. A presumptive diagnosis of haematogenous osteomyelitis was made and treatment with intravenous cloxacillin started. Due to a severe allergic reaction this was changed to intravenous clindamycin followed by oral clindamycin on discharge from hospital. Review after three weeks of antibiotic therapy revealed no clinical improvement. The possibility of Bartonella infection was raised by the association with animal scratches, the lack of fever and toxicity, the normal values for the leucocyte count, ESR and C-reactive protein which are characteristically elevated in pyogenic osteomyelitis, and the lack of response to anti-staphylococcal therapy. The serum EIA was positive for anti-B. henselae IgG, and treatment was changed to oral suspensions of trimethoprim (10 mg/kg/day) plus sulphamethoxazole (50 mg/kg/day) and rifampin (20 mg/ kg/day). Marked clinical improvement was apparent within two weeks which progressed further until six weeks when the antibiotics were discontinued. The swelling of the left hand resolved completely by six months. Review at one year showed normal function and appearance with complete resolution of the radiological findings. Discussion Correspondence should be sent to Professor S. Wientroub. ©1998 British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery 0301-620X/98/58823 $2.00 766 Osteomyelitis is a rare complication of CSD. Only 11 cases have been described in the English literature among THE JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY CAT-SCRATCH DISEASE OSTEOMYELITIS FROM A DOG SCRATCH 767 Fig. 1 Four weeks after the first clinical symptoms, the third ray of the left hand shows considerable swelling in the metacarpophalangeal region. There are dog scratches on the right hand. Fig. 2 Radiograph of the left hand showing a periosteal reaction along the neck and shaft of the third metacarpal. patients who do not have AIDS, mainly in children and young adults. The involved sites were the vertebrae in five cases, and the skull, sternum, femur, humerus, ilium and 2 metatarsal in one case each. In contrast to the acute presentation with fever, systemic toxicity, a leucocytosis and a high ESR typically found in haematogenous pyogenic osteomyelitis in this age group, CSD osteomyelitis is characterised by a subacute presentation with mild constitutional symptoms. Radiological findings are available in only eight of the 11 previously reported cases; six had osteolytic lesions, one an osteolytic lesion with marginal 2 sclerosis and one marginal sclerosis only. Our case has several unique features. It is the first report of CSD osteomyelitis in the metacarpal bone, and the first showing a periosteal reaction instead of the more common osteolytic lesions. The association between dog scratches and B. henselae osteomyelitis in the absence of contact with a cat strongly implicates the dog as responsible for trans3 mitting the infection. This has very rarely been reported. VOL. 80-B, NO. 5, SEPTEMBER 1998 While B. henselae has never been cultured from a dog, a new strain of Bartonella, B. berkoffii, was detected in the 4 blood and heart valves of a dog with endocarditis. This is also the first report of the use of serum EIA to diagnosis B. henselae osteomyelitis. In the 11 previously published cases the diagnosis was based on the clinical presentation, a history of contact with a cat and either a positive skin test and/or a lymph node or 2 bone biopsy. At present, serology is the most commonly used method for the diagnosis of CSD. The IFA test is specific and sensitive, but EIA is reported to have compara5 ble sensitivity and specificity, the latter reaching 97%. EIA technology is available in a larger number of clinical microbiology laboratories than the IFA test. It is less observer-dependent and less labour-intensive, and can be an effective alternative to the IFA test for the diagnosis of CSD. Increased awareness and a comprehensive medical history are needed to identify patients with clinically suspected B. henselae osteomyelitis. Accurate diagnosis has therapeutic and prognostic implications and the currently available serological tests make confirmation of the diagnosis easier than in the past. No benefits in any form have been received or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article. References 1. Anderson BE, Neuman MA. Bartonella spp. as emerging human pathogens. Clin Microbiol Rev 1997;10:203-19. 2. Wilson JD, Castillo M. Cat scratch disease: subtle vertebral bone marrow abnormalities demonstrated by MR imaging and radionuclide bone scan. Clin Imaging 1995;19:106-8. 3. Fischer GW. Cat scratch disease. In: Mandell GL, Bennett JE, Dolin RD, eds. Mandell, Douglas and Bennett’s principles and practice of infectious diseases. Fourth edition, New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1995:1310-2. 4. Breitschwerdt EB, Kordick DL, Malarkey DE, et al. Endocarditis in a dog due to infection with a novel Bartonella subspecies. J Clin Microbiol 1995;33:154-60. 5. Giladi M, Slater LN, Kletter Y, et al. Serodiagnosis of cat scratch disease. 33th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 1997.