Download Herpes Simplex Virus: New Testing, New Thinking

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Transmission (medicine) wikipedia , lookup

Public health genomics wikipedia , lookup

Prenatal testing wikipedia , lookup

Focal infection theory wikipedia , lookup

Pandemic wikipedia , lookup

Canine distemper wikipedia , lookup

Syndemic wikipedia , lookup

Infection wikipedia , lookup

Marburg virus disease wikipedia , lookup

Infection control wikipedia , lookup

Canine parvovirus wikipedia , lookup

Multiple sclerosis research wikipedia , lookup

Herpes simplex research wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
ILLUSTRATIVE CASE
Herpes Simplex Virus: New Testing,
New Thinking
Sheila Martineau Knerr, MD
CASE
A normally healthy, thriving, fully immunized 14-month-old twin girl with no history of eczema or
other medical problems presented with a 2-cm raised erythematous nonpurulent lesion on her right
shoulder, associated with a fever to 38.3°C. She was prescribed amoxicillin for a presumed bacterial
skin/soft tissue infection (SSTI). The fever resolved after 24 hours, and our patient completed a 10-day
course of amoxicillin. Her mother noted initial improvement, but then recurrence of the lesion
with the development of coalescing vesicles with clear drainage on the erythematous base.
Question 1 What is the differential diagnosis for a vesiculopustular skin lesion in a child?
SSTIs can develop after there is a break in the integrity of the skin. They are frequently caused by bacteria, with the
2 most common agents being Staphylococcus aureus and group A Streptococcus. These infections can manifest as
a superficial folliculitis; impetigo, which may have vesicles, crusting, or bullae; or a deeper cellulitis or abscess
formation. Fungal infections caused by dermatophytes usually present as focal round skin lesions with scaling but
can occasionally have vesicles. Scabies, a reaction to a mite infestation, would also be in the differential for a child
presenting with multiple papular lesions and pruritus. Finally, viruses including herpes simplex virus (HSV) types
1 and 2 (HSV-1 and HSV-2), and varicella zoster virus (VZV) may also present with vesicular skin lesions.
In a study published in 2013, 7585 children vaccinated against varicella between 1995 and 2009 were followed to
document breakthrough varicella and herpes zoster infections. Over the 14 years of the study, 1505 breakthrough
cases of varicella were reported ($6 weeks after initial vaccination). All cases were after the first dose. Seventy-four
percent of patients had mild illness with ,50 total lesions.1
HSV (types 1 and 2) is a DNA virus that commonly causes illness in humans. HSV is spread by direct contact with
an infected lesion and is highly contagious. HSV-1 is more common than HSV-2 in children older than neonates
because HSV-2 has a specific tropism for genital mucosa and most often presents as a sexually transmitted
infection or via vertical transmission around the time of delivery from mother to neonate.2
Usual presentations of primary infection with HSV-1 in immunocompetent children include herpetic
gingivostomatitis, an illness characterized by high fevers, irritability, and painful oral and perioral lesions, or
localized mucocutaneous vesicular lesions, such as herpetic whitlow or herpes labialis. Primary herpetic
infection may also be asymptomatic. Less commonly, HSV can present as widespread skin lesions such as
herpes gladiatorum, classically seen in wrestlers, and eczema herpeticum in patients with underlying eczema
or burn injuries. Eczema herpeticum can be especially severe, and systemic antiviral treatment is
recommended.3 The widespread skin lesions sometimes seen with HSV infection are thought to be due to
www.hospitalpediatrics.org
DOI:10.1542/hpeds.2015-0090
Copyright © 2015 by the American Academy of Pediatrics
Address correspondence to Sheila Martineau Knerr, MD, CHOP Care at Grand View Hospital, Pediatrics, 700 Lawn Ave, Sellersville,
PA 18960. E-mail: [email protected]
HOSPITAL PEDIATRICS (ISSN Numbers: Print, 2154-1663; Online, 2154-1671).
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: The author has indicated she has no financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose.
CHOP Pediatric Care at
Grand View Hospital,
Sellersville, Pennsylvania
FUNDING: No external funding.
POTENTIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST: The author has indicated she has no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.
HOSPITAL PEDIATRICS Volume 5, Issue 12, December 2015
639
spread of HSV from a primary site to
multiple areas with disrupted integrity of
the skin, that is, autoinoculation from a
primary site. Intact host defenses
(primarily T-cell-mediated immunity) are
usually enough to prevent spread to other
organs; however, rarely, disseminated
disease involving the liver, lungs, and
central nervous system can occur even in
immunocompetent individuals. Case
reports show patients presenting with
fever, sore throat, stomatitis, or, in 1 case,
acute otitis media. These patients all had
persistent fever and progressed within
days to fulminant hepatitis, liver failure,
renal failure, and death. No evidence of
T-cell immunodeficiency (HIV, malignancy,
thymic dysplasia) were found, and
immunosuppressive medications were not
being taken by the patients. Their ages
ranged from 11 months to 56 years.4,5
HSV is also the most common cause of
acute, nonepidemic viral encephalitis in the
United States and can be associated with
Bell’s palsy. Finally, ocular and genital
infections may occur.
Once primary infection resolves, the HSV virus
remains dormant in neurons and can
reactivate. Recurrences in immunocompetent
individuals are commonly less severe than
primary infection and are not usually
associated with systemic symptoms.2
unusual presentation with an evolving
outbreak after initial fever, persistent mild
systemic symptoms, and young age, a
concern was raised for disseminated
infection with its attendant high morbidity
and mortality. Complete blood count and HIV
tests were done to help rule out an
underlying immune issue, a serum HSV-PCR
was sent, and she was admitted for further
evaluation and treatment with intravenous
acyclovir while awaiting results. Our patient’s
viral culture from the original shoulder
lesion grew HSV-1. In addition, the HSV-PCR of
a secondary lesion was positive for HSV-1,
and the bacterial culture and VZV PCR were
both negative. Our pediatric infectious
disease colleagues felt the multiple lesions
were most likely due to autoinoculation;
however, her serum HSV-PCR was also
positive for HSV-1, indicating viremia present
at the time of her secondary outbreak.
They had no data to support a specific
recommendation for treatment with this
positive serum test and a conservative plan,
was made to treat with IV acyclovir until
there were no new lesions developing and
old lesions had crusted over (Fig 3).
FIGURE 2 An evolving lesion, now with more
obvious coalescing vesicles.
Testing for HSV via DNA-PCR has been
replacing the use of viral cultures.
This evolution of available testing requires
us to rethink what HSV “viremia” means.
Studies testing for HSV viremia using
culture methods have been negative for
immunocompetent patients with
gingivostomatitis6,7 or other
mucocutaneous lesions. 8 In addition,
treatment regimens and morbidity have
been defined by the presence of HSV
viremia or not in neonatal HSV with
FIGURE 1 An early papular lesion on
patient’s leg.
FIGURE 3 Crusted, healing lesion.
Question 2 What does a positive serum
HSV-PCR mean?
CASE CONTINUATION
Although inadequate treatment of a
staphylococcal impetigo may have been the
reason for our patient’s lack of resolution
on amoxicillin, the clear drainage prompted
the dermatologist to obtain a viral culture
and prescribe topical acyclovir. Over the
next few days, our patient proceeded to
develop multiple lesions on her face, finger,
and legs, and she was sent to the emergency
department for evaluation. The lesions all
began as papules (Fig 1), evolving over
24 hours to single or grouped vesicles on
an erythematous base (Fig 2) with copious
clear drainage. She was now afebrile but had
mild anorexia/malaise. The lesions were
neither painful nor pruritic. She had a total
of 10 lesions. A bacterial culture, HSV 1
and 2 polymerase chain reaction (HSV-PCR)
and VZV-PCR tests were all obtained from 1 of
the new lesions. Because of her somewhat
640
KNERR
distinctions made among skin/eyes/mouth,
central nervous system, and disseminated
disease. Disseminated HSV has been
associated with devastating disease and
high mortality in these and other
immunocompromised hosts.
Studies dating back to 1992 using the more
sensitive HSV-PCR testing have detected
the presence of HSV-DNA in the blood of 34%
of healthy children with primary HSV
gingivostomatitis,9 20% of healthy adults
with acute recurrent herpes labialis,8 and in
healthy infants from 4 to 36 months of age
with and without eczema presenting with
vesicles with or without fever.10 HSV DNA has
also been found in the brain tissue of
“healthy” adults at autopsy11 and in the
generalized cutaneous lesions of erythema
multiforme after a localized HSV infection.12
None of these patients progressed to
multiorgan disease, and none developed
evidence of immunodeficiency after
presentation.
These findings have implications both for
understanding how HSV causes disease and
reactivation as well as for treatment
regimens for patients who have this
“viremia.” These studies show that HSV
viremia, as defined by a positive serum
PCR, is in fact relatively common during an
HSV infection and may be responsible
for the spread of mucocutaneous infection
to distant sites. However, even in its
presence, HSV only rarely leads to true
disseminated disease. The DNA detected
may not be from productive replicating
virus,7,10 or the viral load may be low
enough for intact host defenses to
handle.13 Cantey et al noted in their
2012 study that it is their practice to
perform a blood HSV-PCR test to optimize
diagnosis of infected infants and children.
However, they end by noting that
“prospective evaluation of blood HSV-PCR
testing and assessment of HSV viral load
and duration of DNAemia are needed to
better understand their relationship to
pathogenesis, prognosis, and risk of
recurrence.”10. Thus, a positive serum HSVPCR may be diagnostic of an HSV infection,
but it is not necessarily a marker for more
severe disease.
CASE CONTINUATION
Our patient remained afebrile and well
appearing with a normal neurologic exam.
Her AST went from 33 U/L initially to 49 U/L
3 days later (normal range 0–32). Her other
liver function tests were all within normal
limits. She was continued on intravenous
acyclovir for 6 days. She was then
discharged from the hospital on oral
acyclovir for an additional 8 days. Her
complete blood count was normal, and an
HIV antibody was negative. She was seen in
the infectious disease clinic 1 month later
with no additional problems. Treatment of
recurrences with oral acyclovir was
recommended and immune workup planned
if there were recurrences at ,3-month
intervals. Of note, her twin sister developed
similar lesions 4 days into her sister’s
hospitalization. On day 1, her HSV PCR of
lesion and blood were both negative;
however, because of the similarity of the
lesions, she was treated with a course of
oral acyclovir.
Question 3 Did the patient benefit
from the diagnosis of HSV “viremia”?
(Was this patient well served?)
Our case illustrates the lack of utility of a
serum HSV-PCR test in an apparently
immunocompetent individual. Our initial
concern for dissemination due to her
widespread lesions without widespread skin
disruption should have been tempered by her
well appearance, lack of physical or laboratory
evidence of immunodeficiency, and her clinical
course. The serum test did not help us to
identify systemic spread and led to a longer
hospital stay and intravenous medication that
in retrospect were overtreatment.
Our case also reinforces the call to question
the distinctions made between various
categories of disease and their implications
for treatment. In neonates and other
immunocompromised hosts as well as in
critically ill immunocompetent hosts with
evidence of severe disease (encephalitis,
hepatitis, sepsis-like picture), a PCR of
lesion/serum/cerebrospinal fluid may be
sensitive enough to make a diagnosis
otherwise missed with tragic result. Cantey
et al10 reviewed the records of 45 patients
over 3 years at his institution who had a
positive serum HSV-PCR. Ten were older
HOSPITAL PEDIATRICS Volume 5, Issue 12, December 2015
immunocompetent children as noted earlier,
12 were immunocompromised older
children, and 21 were neonates. Six
neonates (2 with central nervous system
disease and 4 with disseminated disease)
had a serum PCR as their first positive test.
Two of these patients with disseminated
disease had a serum PCR as their only
positive test. The neonate ,21 days old is
certainly in a high-risk population that often
presents with nonspecific symptoms, lack of
skin lesions, and a negative maternal
history. However, Cantey also found positive
HSV-PCRs in 5 neonates with skin/eyes/
mouth disease only. Miller and Bennet also
recently reported on the increasing use of
HSV-PCR instead of viral culture in neonates
both in surface testing and for detection of
HSV in serum. They note that even in this
population, a positive serum HSV-PCR may
lead to overtreatment of localized disease.14
In older immunocompetent, well-appearing
children, including our patient, this
certainly seems to be the case.
Hospitalists, who are often in the position
of evaluating patients in the emergency
department and making treatment and
admission decisions, should understand the
difference in sensitivity between a viral
culture and an HSV- PCR. As we continue to
learn more about the transmission of HSV
and the meaning of viral DNA detection in the
serum, we may be better able to make
intelligent choices about both the indications
for the test and the interpretation of the
result. Our goal should be, as always, to
avoid both underdiagnosis of serious disease
and overtreatment of our patients.
CONCLUSIONS AND LEARNING
POINTS
1. Although bacteria are responsible for
many skin/soft tissue infections in
children, it is important to include other
agents including HSV in your differential.
2. Testing for HSV has evolved from viral
culture to the highly sensitive HSV-PCR
test, but the meaning of a positive result
for each test is not the same.
3. HSV viremia, defined as the presence of
viral DNA, is more common than previously
appreciated and may be responsible for
spread of the organism without leading to
true disseminated disease.
641
REFERENCES
1. Baxter R, Ray P, Tran TN, et al.
Long-term effectiveness of varicella
vaccine: a 14-Year, prospective cohort
study. Pediatrics. 2013;131(5).
Available at: www.pediatrics.org/cgi/
content/full/131/5/e1389
2. Klein RS. Clinical manifestations and
diagnosis of herpes simplex virus type
1 infection. UpToDate. 2014. Available at:
http://www.uptodate.com/contents/
clinical-manifestations-and-diagnosis-ofherpes-simplex-virus-type-1-infection
5. Miyazaki Y, Akizuki S, Sakaoka H, Yamamoto
S, Terao H. Disseminated infection of
herpes simplex virus with fulminant
hepatitis in a healthy adult. A case report.
APMIS. 1991;99(11):1001–1007
10. Cantey JB, Mejías A, Wallihan R, et al.
Use of blood polymerase chain reaction
testing for diagnosis of herpes simplex
virus infection. J Pediatr. 2012;161(2):
357–361
6. Buddingh GJ, Schrum DI, Lanier JC,
Guidry DJ. Studies of the natural history
of herpes simplex infections. Pediatrics.
1953;11(6):595–610
11. Fraser NW, Lawrence WC, Wroblewska Z,
Gilden DH, Koprowski H. Herpes simplex
type 1 DNA in human brain tissue. Proc
Natl Acad Sci USA. 1981;78(10):
6461–6465
7. Halperin SA, Shehab Z, Thacker D,
Hendley JO. Absence of viremia in
primary herpetic gingivostomatitis.
Pediatr Infect Dis. 1983;2(6):452–453
3. Klein RS. Treatment of herpes simplex
virus type 1 infection in immunocompetent
patients. UpToDate. 2014. Available at:
http://www.uptodate.com/contents/
treatment-of-herpes-simplex-virus-type-1infection-in-immunocompetent-patients
8. Brice SL, Stockert SS, Jester JD, Huff JC,
Bunker JD, Weston WL. Detection of
herpes simplex virus DNA in the
peripheral blood during acute recurrent
herpes labialis. J Am Acad Dermatol.
1992;26(4):594–598
4. Moedy JLA, Lerman SJ, White RJ. Fatal
disseminated herpes simplex virus
infection in a healthy child. Am J Dis
Child. 1981;135(1):45–47
9. Harel L, Smetana Z, Prais D, et al.
Presence of viremia in patients with
primary herpetic gingivostomatitis.
Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39(5):636–640
642
12. Brice SL, Krzemien D, Weston WL, Huff JC.
Detection of herpes simplex virus DNA in
cutaneous lesions of erythema
multiforme. J Invest Dermatol. 1989;
93(1):183–187
13. Zuckerman RA. The clinical spectrum of
herpes simplex viremia. Clin Infect Dis.
2009;49(9):1302–1304
14. Miller AS, Bennett JS. Challenges
in the care of young infants with
suspected neonatal herpes
simplex virus. Hosp Pediatr. 2015;5(2):
106–108
KNERR