* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Waste Reduction, Recycling and Climate Change
Climate change, industry and society wikipedia , lookup
Climate change feedback wikipedia , lookup
Climate change and poverty wikipedia , lookup
Surveys of scientists' views on climate change wikipedia , lookup
Public opinion on global warming wikipedia , lookup
Politics of global warming wikipedia , lookup
IPCC Fourth Assessment Report wikipedia , lookup
Mitigation of global warming in Australia wikipedia , lookup
Waste Reduction, Recycling and Climate Change The use of the Life Cycle Analysis tool WRATE Dr Peter Olsen Scottish Environment Protection Agency UCCCfS: Climate Change Action Plans – Planning & Implementation Dundee College Dundee 11th May 2009 Life Cycle Assessment Life cycle assessment (LCA) is a methodology for assessing the potential environmental impacts of a product or service across its entire life cycle, or cradle to grave It’s Life Cycle Assessment LCA Using LCA has many advantages: Often its an ‘eye opener’, providing an insight into systems and their alternatives It can confirm expected environmental impacts and reveal completely unexpected impact LCA However, the results of LCA should not be used in isolation to decide on one option over another LCA is one of many decision-support tools. LCA It is also necessary to consider economic and social factors, as well as those environmental factors that cannot be quantified using LCA WRATE The software SEPA use to undertake the LCA of waste management options is called WRATE (Waste and Resource Assessment Tool for the Environment). WRATE was developed for the Environment Agency to replace the tool used to assess the Area Waste Plans when they were first developed, WISARD WRATE LCA of waste management systems is different from a product LCA, in that the cradleto-grave approach is applied only to the waste management infrastructure. WRATE Product A Product A Product B Product C Product D Extraction of Raw Materials Extraction of Raw Materials Extraction of Raw Materials Extraction of Raw Materials Extraction of Raw Materials Transport Transport Transport Transport Transport Manufacturing Manufacturing Manufacturing Manufacturing Manufacturing Use Use Use Use Use End of Life End of Life End of Life End of Life End of Life System Boundary for a Product System Boundary for Waste Management WRATE Wrate does not include the life cycle of the products that are now being treated as waste, they are only included in the system once they become waste WRATE Designed to model household waste but can be adapted for single waste streams. WRATE WRATE models: Non renewable resource Depletion Freshwater Ecotoxicity Acidification Eutrophication Global warming Human toxicity Land use WRATE When a waste management process generates a useable output, such as recycling or energy from waste, there are environmental impacts from the treatment of those materials, emissions etc. There is also avoided impacts, i.e. where the requirement for the production of energy from more conventional sources is avoided. This is accounted for by subtracting impacts of e.g. generating energy from waste from the impact of generating energy from coal or gas WRATE A key aspect of interpreting the results from WRATE is to understand the concept of avoided impacts negative numbers mean that the burden of waste management system is effectively avoided Typical WRATE analysis of different waste management options Scenario comparisons A College collects the following: 100 tonnes of paper 1000 tonnes of food waste 100 tonnes of drink cans 500 tonnes of glass 100 tonnes of plastic Which treatment will have the biggest impact in terms of global warming Landfill it all ? Burn it all in an energy from waste plant? Recycle it all? All to landfill All to Energy from Waste Full recycling Equivalencies WRAT can report impacts in two ways CO2 equivalents This takes into account the Global Warming impact of different elements and display them as kgs of Carbon Dioxide EUr person equivalents converts the impact to the amount of CO2 an average European person would emit Global Warming Potential Where are the burdens? Where are the burdens? Landfill, collection, treatment and transportation have direct impacts whereas recycling see’s the biggest avoided impact Where are the burdens in the landfill? Landfill burdens around 250 tonnes CO2 eq, is associated with construction and operation of the landfill Where are the burdens in the landfill collection? 202 tonnes from the production of large skips Where are the avoided burdens in Recycling? Aluminium Aluminium Almost 800 tonnes of fossil CO2 (or 62 Eur. Persons) is avoided by recycling 75 tonnes of aluminium Waste Reduction, Recycling and Climate Change The use of the Life Cycle Analysis tool WRATE Dr Peter Olsen Scottish Environment Protection Agency UCCCfS: Climate Change Action Plans – Planning & Implementation Dundee College Dundee 11th May 2009