Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Brachytherapy wikipedia , lookup
Center for Radiological Research wikipedia , lookup
Proton therapy wikipedia , lookup
Radiation therapy wikipedia , lookup
Positron emission tomography wikipedia , lookup
Neutron capture therapy of cancer wikipedia , lookup
Industrial radiography wikipedia , lookup
Radiosurgery wikipedia , lookup
Nuclear medicine wikipedia , lookup
Backscatter X-ray wikipedia , lookup
Image-guided radiation therapy wikipedia , lookup
21/03/60 MAHIDOL UNIVERSITY Wisdom of the Land Dosimetrymethodsfor ComputedTomography Napapong Pongnapang, Ph.D. Department of Radiological Technology Faculty of Medical Technology Mahidol University Why CT? Outline • CTTechnology • Currentissues • CTdosedescriptor • Dosimetrymethods • Patientdoseaudit Inside CT scanner • Fast • Multi plane imaging • Good spatial resolution • Good temporal resolution • Quantitative possible 1 21/03/60 CT Data Acquisition and Image Reconstruction CT Data Acquisition and Image Reconstruction X-ray beam intensity Detector number A CT Projection First CT Scan (1972) Simple Back-projection Filtered Back-projection Technological advances in CT Half second scanning Slip ring scanning 1s scan Dual slices scanning 8 slices scanning 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 256,320 slices scanning Helical scanning 16 slices scanning 4 slices scanning 80 x 80 matrix size, 4 min/rotation, 8 grey level, overnight reconstruction 640 slices scanning 64 slices scanning 111213141516 Dual Energy/Spectral CT Low dose CT 2 21/03/60 TRS-457Standard NewJointCommissionStandard (July2015) CTRadiationDose— DocumentingPatientDoseIndicesandAnalyzingDose Incidents TherevisedTJCrequirementsalsospecifythattheradiationdoseofeveryCT exammustberecorded,andthathighradiationdoseincidentsmustbe evaluatedagainstindustrybenchmarks: The[criticalaccess]hospitaldocumentsinthepatient’srecordthe radiationdoseindex(CTDIvol,DLP,orsize-specificdoseestimate[SSDE])on everystudyproducedduringadiagnosticcomputedtomography(CT) examination.Theradiationdoseindexmustbeexamspecific,summarizedby seriesoranatomicarea,anddocumentedinaretrievableformat. The[criticalaccess]hospitalreviewsandanalyzesincidentswhere theradiationdoseindex(CTDIvol,DLP,orsize-specificdoseestimate[SSDE]) fromdiagnosticCTexaminationsexceededexpecteddoseindexranges identifiedinimagingprotocols.Theseincidentsarethencomparedtoexternal benchmarks. CTDosimetryMethods • TLDMeasurement TLDMeasurement • isthedirectmethodbyusingananthropomorphicphysicalphantom • ComputerBasedSimulationMethod • DoseMeasurementusingIonizationChamber • dosesaremeasuredinthelocationof organsortissuesofinterestbyusingTLDs • effectivedosecanthenbecalculated 3 21/03/60 DoseMeasurementusingIonization Chamber • basedontheFDAdefinitionofCTDI • normallyusedforQAmeasurement • doesnotprovideadirectassessmentof therisktothepatient TLDMeasurementMethod ComputerBasedSimulationMethod • Doseestimatesarebasedon MCcalculationsfor anthropomorphicmathematical phantomsorusingdata previouslycollectedfromthe survey • Thephantomswerebasedon theoriginalMIRDphantomwith specificationofallorgans andweremodifiedasAdam and Evaincludingsex-specific characteristics Adam Eva TLDMeasurementMethod • DoseMeasurementinPhantom - insertedTLDsintoeachpointintheslicesofphantom andpointforscatteredradiation - scanthephantomforeachexaminationaccordingto theprotocols 4 21/03/60 TLDMeasurementMethod • DataAnalysis - theaveragedsignalreading(nC)fromeverypointof measurementarecorrectedforsensitivitybycorrectionfactor forsensitivity andthenmultipliedbycalibrationfactor for convertingthemtoabsorbeddose - DependsonhowyoucalibratetheTLD,iftheenergyor beamcharacteristicsaredifferent,correctionfactorfor energyresponseisthenapplied TLDMeasurementMethod • DeterminationofOrganorTissueDose - theeffectivedosewascalculatedfromtheorganor theorganortissuedosesaccordingtotheICRP103(2007) ET =DT,R xWR xWT whereET istheeffectivedosetoanorganortissuetypeT(Sv) DT,R istheabsorbeddosetoanorganortissueT deliveredbyradiationtypeR(Gy) WR istheradiationweightingfactorforradiationtypeR WTisthetissueweightingfactorforanorganortissuetypeT ComputerBasedSimulationMethod • DoseestimatesarebasedonMC calculationsforanthropomorphic ComputerBasedSimulation Method mathematicalphantoms • Thephantomswerebasedonthe originalMIRDphantomwith specificationofallorgansand weremodifiedasAdam andEva includingsex-specificcharacteristics Adam Eva 5 21/03/60 Softwarepackages ComputerBasedSimulationMethod • AllorgansconsideredinICRPPublicationsNo.26andNo.60(Most updatedisNO.113,released2007) • Foragivenscanrange,therespectivecontributionsoriginating fromeachirradiatedsectionhavetobesummedup • Theorgandoesvaluesperunitofprimaryradiationisspecified bythekermavalueinairattherotationaxis • Theyhavetobenormalizedtothescanner-specifickerma valueandtochosenscanparameters Softwarepackages 1.CT-Expo Consist of CT-ExpoisaMicrosoftExcelapplication writteninVisualBasicforpatientdose calculationinCTexamination. • WeightedCTDI(CTDIW) V2.3 • VolumeCTDI(CTDIvol) • Doselengthproduct(DLP) • Organdose • Effectivedose(accordingtoICRP60and103) 1. CT-Expo 2. ImpactMC 3. ImpactDose 4. XCATdose Softwarepackages • Calculationmodule 1.CT-Expo Consist of • Calculationmodule • Standardmodule • Standardmodule • ‘Light’module • ‘Light’module • Benchmarkingmodule • Benchmarkingmodule Allowsevaluatingdosefor patient-specificdatasuchas age,sex,andscanrangewith graphicalinputfacilities. 6 21/03/60 Softwarepackages Softwarepackages 1.CT-Expo Consist of • Calculationmodule 1.CT-Expo Consist of • Standardmodule • ‘Light’module • ‘Light’module • Benchmarkingmodule • Benchmarkingmodule canperformonlyinadult caseandscanrangeis automaticallydefined. Softwarepackages 1.CT-Expo Consist of • Calculationmodule • Standardmodule UsingofCTDIvol andDLP valuesfromthemachine tocalculate Softwarepackages • Calculationmodule 2.ImpactMC • Standardmodule • ‘Light’module • Benchmarkingmodule usingMonteCarloalgorithmsanditcan calculate3Ddosedistribution. • WeightedCTDI(CTDIW) Threedimensionalgridofvoxels • VolumeCTDI(CTDIvol) • Organdose • Effectivedose(accordingtoICRP26,60and103) enablesyoutobenchmark thescanprotocolsforthe entiresetof14standard CTexaminations Userdefinedspectrum 7 21/03/60 Softwarepackages Softwarepackages 3.ImpactDose 4.XCATdose usingtabulatedMonteCarlocalculationresults forthestandardanthropomorphicphantom (ImpactMC). isacalculatortopredicteddosetotheadult patientsforvarietyofroutinelyusedCT examinations,worksonmobileapplication whichavailableoniOS andAndroid. • WeightedCTDI(CTDIW) • VolumeCTDI(CTDIvol) • Doselengthproduct(DLP) • Organdose • SSDE • Effectivedose(accordingtoICRP60and103) ModifiedORNLmale/femalephantoms. • Organdose • SSDE(accordingtoAAPMreportNo.204) • Effectivedose ICRPmale/femalephantom. SoftwareComparison Software package Basis andAlgorithm Information provided 1.CT-ExpoV2.3 Calculatedbyacomputational methodonMicrosoftExcel application. • CTDIW,CTDIvol • DLP • Organdose • Effectivedose 2.ImpactMC MonteCarloalgorithms. • CTDIW ,CTDIvol • Organdose • Effectivedose 3.ImpactDose UsingtabulatedMonteCarlo calculationresultsforthe standardanthropomorphic phantom(ImpactMC). • CTDIW ,CTDIvol • DLP • SSDE • Organdose • Effectivedose 4.XCATdose Calculatedbyacomputational • SSDE • Organdose methodoniOS, Andriod. • Effectivedose RadiationProtectionDosimetryJournal,2011 Dependson… ü Scannerinuse ü%CV Sexes ü Bodypartofexamination ü Software’salgorithm CT-ExpoV.1.5 ImpactDose V.0.99x WinDose V.2.1a Exam %CVof SSCT %CVof MSCT female male female male Head 23.4 3.3 17.5 43.8 Chest 8.5 8.9 22.1 21.0 Abdomen 9.7 12.5 16.4 19.4 Pelvis 8.6 7.3 22.2 10.6 8 21/03/60 Flowchart Start Dose Measurement, fill in forms Make a copy of the form, keep in file (JKN) CTExpo– MalaysiaExample Send completed forms to MOH HQ Use CT Expo software to obtain CTDI and Effective Dose Analysis End Protocol 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Refertotheform:UNSCEAR:Forms/Diagnostic/CT/1.0. Fillinthehospitalnameandroomnumber/name. Fillindateandtypeofexamination,refertoTable4-3. RecordthepatientID,ethnicgroup,sex,age,weightandheight. RecordthestudyparametersasdisplayedontheCTconsolemonitor,suchasthescan area,kV,mA,Time(s)or(mAs),FieldofView(FOV),Matrixsize:eg.512x512,1024x1024, TableFeed/Rotation(TF)(mm),Pitch(P),Collimation/DetectorSelection(eg.16x0.625, 4x2.5),ReconSliceThickness(mm),ScanLength(cm),Spiralmode(YesorNo),Remark (eg.Numberofphasesformultiplescanswithsameparameters) Iftherewasmorethanonescanarea,recordalltheparameters(asmentionedabove)in thesametable. ThecollecteddatawillbesentbacktotheUNSCEARsecretariatforcomputationofthe CTDIandEffectiveDose. ThecalculationoftheCTDIandEffectiveDosewillbecarriedoutusingtheCTExpo software. RefertoexampleofthefilledUNSCEAR:Forms/Diagnostic/CT/1.0inappendix. Markthenumberofcasesdoneforeachtypeofexaminationonthe UNSCEAR:Forms/Diagnostic/Checklist/1.0. Type&No.ofcases Computed Tomography (CT) Brain 30 Spine/Musculo-skeletal (Cervical, thorax, lumbo-sacral spine) 30 Chest 30 Abdomen 30 Pelvis 30 Cardiac CT 30 9 21/03/60 DoseMeasurement usingPencilshapedChamber UNSCEAR:Forms/Diagnostic/CT/1.0. Measurement of CTDI and effective dose per study Hospital: Room: Date Type of examination Patient Data: Patient ID Ethnic Group Information: FOV Matrix Size TF (Table Feed) P Collimation/ Detector Selection M/C/I/O Sex Male / Female Age Weight kg Height cm No. of Phases Field of View (cm x cm) eg. 512 x 512 , 1024 x 1024 distance/rotation (mm) Pitch Eg. 16 x 0.625, 4 x 2.5. For single sliced CT, leave this empty. Number of scan with same parameters (only for multiple phases) *Study Parameters: Series No. Scan Area kV mA mAs Time (s) FOV Matrix size TF (mm) P Collimation/ Detector Selection Recon Slice Thickness (mm) Scan Length (cm) Spiral Mode (Y/N) Remark (e.g. No. of Phases) 1 2 3 4 5 *Do not record scout scan DEFINITIONSOFQUANTITIESFOR ASSESSINGDOSEINCT • • • • • • Computed Tomography Dose Index (CTDI) Weighted CTDI (CTDIW) Volume CTDI (CTDIVOL) Dose-Length Product (DLP) Limits to CTDI Methods Effective Dose (E) Computed Tomography Dose Index (CTDI) Averageabsorbeddose alongthez– axisfromseriesofcontiguousirradiation inoneaxialCTscanoronerotationofxraytubewithinthecentralregionofa scanvolume TRS457=CTairkermaindex,Ca,100(inair)or CPMMA,100(inphantom) 10 21/03/60 Computed Tomography Dose Index (CTDI, Ca,100orCPMMA,100) Computed Tomography Dose Index (CTDI, Ca,100or CPMMA,100) CTDI100 = 1 NT 50 mm ò D( z )dz -50 mm • D(z) = the radiation dose profile along the z-axis ComputedTomographyDoseIndex Weighted CTDI (CTDIW) • Appliestosingleaxialscanonly • AverageCTDIacrossfieldofview • Measuredonaxisofscannerusingpencil ionisationchamber • Usefulindicatorofscannerradiationoutput foraspecifickVpandmAs • CTDI twohigheratthesurfacethanatthe centerofFOV • Calculatedasintegralofairkermaalong chamberdividedbynominalslicethickness • Severaldifferentversions!! • TRS457=Cw CTDI w = 1 2 CTDI100,center + CTDI100,edge 3 3 11 21/03/60 Volume CTDI (CTDIVOL) • Absorbedradiationdoseoverthex,yandz directionwithinscanvolumeforstandardized Phantom,TRS=Cvol • Dosetostandardizedphantomforaspecific scanprotocol • Takegaporoverlapsbetweenthex-raybeam fromconsecutiverotationsofthex-raysource CTDI vol = N ´ T ´ CTDI w I I=thetableincrementperaxialscan(mm) Dose-Length Product (DLP) LimitationofCTDIVOL • Does not represent the average dose for objects ofdifferent - size - shape - attenuation • Does not indicate the total energy deposited into the scan volume because it is independent of the length of the scan DifferenceinCTDIvol andDLP Overall energy delivered by a given scan protocol, the absorbed dose integrated along the scan length , TRS = P KL,CT Air Kerma Length Product • Change in technique (mAs/rotation) affects the CTDIvol and DLP • Change in acquisition length (at the same technique) is only reflected by the DLP DLP (mGy - cm) = CTDI vol (mGy ) ´ scan length (cm) 12 21/03/60 Effective Dose (E) Effective Dose (E) Biologicaleffectsfromradiationdependon – Radiationdose – Biologicalsensitivity EstimationofdosetopatientsundergoingCTexams - Directmeasurementoforgandoseinphantom - CalculationbyMonteCarlomethod • Comparebiologicaleffectsbetween diagnosticexamofdifferenttypes • Communicationwithpatient regardingthe potentialharm E(mSv)=kxDLP k=conversionfactor error10-15% InSummary EffectiveDose AAPM Report No.96 • Diagnosticdoserangesbetween0.2-20mSv • Highdoseproceduresincludeinterventional radiologyandCT • Doseoptimizationisneededtoreduce stochasticrisksofradiation • PatientdosimetryinCTiscomplexbut manageable • NewJointCommissionstandardrequiresCT dosereporting,trackingandaudit 13 21/03/60 AnyQuestions? 14