* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Sample HTPD article for RSI - Narodowe Centrum Badań Jądrowych
Variable-frequency drive wikipedia , lookup
Chirp spectrum wikipedia , lookup
Spectral density wikipedia , lookup
Chirp compression wikipedia , lookup
Time-to-digital converter wikipedia , lookup
Current source wikipedia , lookup
Power MOSFET wikipedia , lookup
Electromagnetic compatibility wikipedia , lookup
Oscilloscope history wikipedia , lookup
Voltage regulator wikipedia , lookup
Stray voltage wikipedia , lookup
Schmitt trigger wikipedia , lookup
Pulse-width modulation wikipedia , lookup
Alternating current wikipedia , lookup
Analog-to-digital converter wikipedia , lookup
Power electronics wikipedia , lookup
Buck converter wikipedia , lookup
Wien bridge oscillator wikipedia , lookup
Surge protector wikipedia , lookup
Switched-mode power supply wikipedia , lookup
Resistive opto-isolator wikipedia , lookup
Mains electricity wikipedia , lookup
Performance of the prototype LaBr3 spectrometer developed for the JET Gamma-ray Camera Upgradea) D. Rigamonti,1,2,b) A. Muraro,2 M. Nocente,1,2 V. Perseo,1 G. Boltruczyk,3 A. Fernandes,4 J. Figueiredo,4,5 L. Giacomelli,2 G. Gorini,1,2 M. Gosk,3 V. Kiptily,5 S. Korolczuk,3 S. Mianowski,3 A. Murari,5 R. C. Pereira,4 E. P. Cippo,2 I. Zychor,3 M. Tardocchi,2 and JET. Contributors* Dipartimento di Fisica “G. Occhialini”, Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca, Milano, Italy Istituto di Fisica del Plasma “P. Caldirola”, CNR, Milano, Italy 3 Narodowe Centrum Badań Jądrowych (NCBJ), 05-400 Otwock-Swierk, Poland 4 Instituto de Plasmas e Fusão Nuclear, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal 5 Culham Centre for Fusion Energy, Culham, United Kingdom * See the Appendix of F. Romanelli et al., Proceedings of the 25th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference 2014, Saint Petersburg, Russia 1 2 (Presented XXXXX; received XXXXX; accepted XXXXX; published online XXXXX) (Dates appearing here are provided by the Editorial Office) In this work we describe the solution developed to improve the spectroscopic properties of the existing γ-ray camera of JET, enabling gamma-ray spectroscopy in JET deuterium-tritium plasmas. A dedicated pilot spectrometer based on a LaBr3 crystal coupled to a Silicon Photo-Multiplier has been developed. A proper pole zero cancellation network able to shorten the output signal to a length of 120 ns has been implemented allowing spectroscopy at MHz count rates. The system has been characterized in the laboratory showing an energy resolution of 5% at Eγ=0.662 MeV, which extrapolates favorably in the energy range of interest for the observation of 4.44 MeV gamma-rays. I. INTRODUCTION Gamma-ray spectroscopy is a plasma diagnostic technique investigating the behaviour of fast ions in high temperature fusion plasmas, as demonstrated at JET1-4. In particular, it plays a key role in the study of alpha particle confinement, which is crucial for plasma self heating in a high power discharge. Gamma-ray emission in thermonuclear plasmas is mainly due to reactions between fast particles and fuel ions or impurities. Of particular relevance is the detection of 4.44 MeV gamma-rays from the 9Be(α,nγ)12C reaction, as it gives information on alpha particles in deuterium-tritium plasmas. At JET, a horizontal and a vertical neutron/γ camera provide information on the radial profile of the neutron/γ emission source by collimated measurements along 19 channels. The Gamma-ray Camera Upgrade project aims to improve the spectroscopic properties of the existing γ-ray camera of JET in terms of energy resolution and high counting rate capability in order to operate in the deuterium-tritium (DT) campaign. The required target values from the project are: energy resolution of 5% (En.Res. = FWHM/En) at 1.1 MeV and count rate capability exceeding 500 kHz. An important constraint is the limited available space. Silicon Photo-Multipliers (SiPMs) can represent a good alternative to photo-multiplier tubes, given their high photon detection efficiency, high internal gain, insensitivity to magnetic field and an extremely compact size. SiPMs, which have experienced great improvements in the last years, still show voltage-temperature dependence and a limited linearity but both can be corrected. In particular, gain shifts due to temperature changes can be compensated by a voltage adjustment while the non-linearity, due to the limited available number of APD pixels, can be corrected off-line. In this work we describe the solution developed to meet the requirements. Our choice fell on a LaBr3 scintillator cystal (25.4 x 16.9 mm2) coupled to a Silicon PhotoMultiplier (12x12 mm2). the final design with the electronic readout circuit of the pilot spectrometer will be presented together with the laboratory measurements at low count rate with radiation sources and at high count rate with a LED pulse. II. SILICON PHOTO-MULTIPLIER ELECTRONIC READ-OUT CIRCUIT AND Silicon Photo-Multiplier detectors, also known as MPPC, are a relatively novel solid state photo-sensors. they are made up multiple Avalanche Photo-Diode (APD) pixels connected in parallel and operating in Geiger mode which allow an internal gain depending to the operational condition. For each APD cell, the Geiger mode is activated when a reversed bias above the electrical breakdown voltage (Vbd) is applied. The chosen SiPMs are 12x12 mm2 in size, made by 16 channels with 3464 pixels each and they are manufactured by Hamamatsu. In Fig. 1 the characteristic I-V curve of the device shows a sharply increase of the current in correspondence of the breakdown voltage which is roughly 65 V. In order to achieve high counting rate capability, a short output signal is necessary. For this purpose, a dedicated read-out circuit for the MPPC has been developed in Milano by implementing a CR differential circuit able to shorten the signal length up to 120 ns. In Fig. 2, an example of the output signal achieved are shown. FIG. 1. Current vs. Voltage curve measured for the 12x12mm2 SiPM. FIG. 3. Pulse Height Spectrum recorded with 137Cs and 60Co sources. IV. LABORATORY TESTS AT HIGH COUNTING RATE WITH A LED PULSE FIG. 2. Output signal from the LaBr3 crystal coupled to the SiPM with the pole zero cancellation network. III. LABORATORY TESTS WITH 137Cs AND 60Co SOURCES Some standard tests have been performed in order to characterize the MPPC response with the dedicated electronic readout circuit. The MPPC was coupled with a LaBr3 crystal (25.4 x 16.9 mm2) and it was powered by a TTi EX752M voltage supply. Finally, the output signal was fed into a CAEN digitizer DT5730. This is a 14 bit and 500 MHz sampling rate digitizer equipped with CAEN software able to perform on-line measurements of the pulse area. In Fig. 3 the pulse height spectrum with a 137Cs and 60Co sources is shown. In order to characterize our pilot spectrometer, several measurements with a 137Cs source (0.661 MeV) have been performed with different applied voltage and each measurement lasted 120 seconds to limit the temperature changes. The best energy resolution (En.Res. ≈ 5 %) was obtained at 67.5 V (roughly 2.5V over V bd) as shown in Fig. 6. As exhibited in Fig. 4, the trend of the energy resolution is well fitted by the curve 1/√(E) and this extrapolates favorably in the energy range of interest (<2.5% in the range 3 – 5 MeV) for the observation of 4.44 MeV gamma-rays from the 9Be(α,nγ)12C reaction. In order to simulate the high rate environment at JET, high count rate measurements have been performed in laboratory with a blue LED connected to a pulse generator (Keysight 81150A). With this kind of generator, it is possible to have signal with arbitrary amplitude and frequency. All the measurements have been done with the MPPC coupled to a LaBr3 crystal of 25.4 mm diameter and 16.9 mm height, covered with teflon. The MPPC has been placed in a lightproof box with a small 137Cs source (used as reference) and an optical fiber. Basically, two types of measurements have been performed: 1) by using the 137Cs as reference source and the LED pulse as perturbation source (with amplitude and frequency variables). These measurements lasted 120 seconds. 2) By using two LED pulses, one as reference (LED2: amplitude and frequency fixed) and the other one as perturbation source (LED1). In these tests it was possible to run short measurements (2 seconds), in order to be immune from temperature effects. The measurements allowed investigating and reducing the deviation of the peak position in the pulse height spectrum. The main reason of the shift is due to the voltage drop across the resistor R1 (see Fig.) which is bigger when the current flowing through the MPPC is higher, therefore, when the counting rate is higher. Another factor which affects the deviation of the peak position is the supply voltage of the MPPC and the amplitude of the perturbation source. In fact, by increasing the input voltage, the deviation increases. Therefore, by choosing a suitable resistor R1 (10Ω) and suitable supply voltage (65.6V; ≈ 0.6V over the breakdown voltage) we obtained very good results in terms of peak shift reduction. As shown in the pulse height spectra in Fig., which represent two measurements of a 137Cs source with and without the use of the LED pulse, a deviation of the cesium peak position less than 5% occurs when the LED is on at 500 kHz. All these measurements lasted 120 seconds and this can introduce temperature changes which increase the peak shift. It is worth noticing that, in this test, the amplitude of the LED pulse induces a signal which is roughly three times bigger than the cesium one, therefore, corresponding to a gamma energy higher than 2 MeV (considering the MPPC non-linearity). V. JET-LIKE MEASUREMENTS By using again the two LEDs, it was possible to do some the eff ect can be reduced by decreasing the input voltage at 65.8V (≈0.5 V over the breakdown voltage), reaching about 5.5% of maximum shift at 1MHz in the JET-like measurements (1 minute of measurement with only 10 seconds at high rate). Moreover, it is clear that the MPPC warms up if the high rate measurement lasts more than a few seconds. VI. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This work has been carried out within the framework of the EUROfusion Consortium and has received funding from the Euratom research and training programme 2014-2018 under grant agreement No 633053. The views and opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those of the European Commission. 1 FIG. 4. MPPC energy resolution versus energy. The black points are obtained by analyzing the full energy peaks. measurements lasting one minute but with only a window of 10 seconds at high counting rate, in order to mimick the experimental conditions of a JET shot. Again, LED1 was the perturbation and LED2 was the reference. LED2 was chosen to have an amplitude five times bigger than 137 Cs amplitude and a frequency fixed at 10 kHz. LED1 was chosen to have the same amplitude of 137Cs and a variable frequency: in the first 20 seconds it was 10 kHz, in the next 10 seconds it was 500 kHz or 1MHz and from 30 seconds to 60 seconds it was again 10 kHz. The measurement was repeated at two different input voltage, 65.8 V and 66.2 V. An example of the obtained spectrum is shown in figure 12. From figure 13, it can be seen that when the perturbation at 500 kHz or 1 MHz is on, the peak is shifting on the left and, after the end of the perturbation, it does not go back in its exact previous place because of a change in the MPPC temperature. FIG. 4. Pulse Height Spectra of a 137Cs source with and without the LED pulse V. CONCLUSIONS After these tests, we can conclude that the pilot spectrometer is working properly showing a very good energy resolution, i.e. between 5% and 6% at 662 keV. The measurements with LEDs have demonstrated that the MPPC has a gain loss at high rate, producing a peak shift on the left in the spectra. This shift can however be minimized by substituting the resistor after the voltage supply (R1). The phenomenon is certainly related to the current that flows in the circuit but probably it is not the only reason, as temperature effects may also play a role. In any case, M. Tardocchi et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 205002 (2011). M. Nocente et al., Nucl. Fusion 52, 063009 (2012). 3 M. Nocente et al., Nucl. Fusion 52, 094021 (2012). 4 M. Tardocchi, M. Nocente, and G. Gorini, Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion 55, 074014 (2013). 5 M. Nocente et al., Review of Scientific Instruments 85, 11E108 (2014); doi: 10.1063/1.4886755. 2