* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Stability-Improvement-Analysis-of-Wind-Farm-by-SVC-in
Electric machine wikipedia , lookup
Variable-frequency drive wikipedia , lookup
Power inverter wikipedia , lookup
Audio power wikipedia , lookup
Wireless power transfer wikipedia , lookup
Power over Ethernet wikipedia , lookup
Power factor wikipedia , lookup
Three-phase electric power wikipedia , lookup
Wind turbine wikipedia , lookup
Stray voltage wikipedia , lookup
Electrical substation wikipedia , lookup
Buck converter wikipedia , lookup
Electrification wikipedia , lookup
Electric power system wikipedia , lookup
Amtrak's 25 Hz traction power system wikipedia , lookup
Life-cycle greenhouse-gas emissions of energy sources wikipedia , lookup
Electrical grid wikipedia , lookup
Power electronics wikipedia , lookup
History of electric power transmission wikipedia , lookup
Voltage optimisation wikipedia , lookup
Distributed generation wikipedia , lookup
Intermittent energy source wikipedia , lookup
Switched-mode power supply wikipedia , lookup
Power engineering wikipedia , lookup
Stability Improvement Analysis of Wind Farm by SVC in Matlab/ Simulink during Fault Priyanka Sharma1, Abhishek Jain2, Kamal Kumar Ranga3, Vikas Yadav4, Sandeep Ranga5 1 M. Tech. Scholar, Department of Electrical Engineering, Ganga Institute of Technology and Management, Kablana, Jhajjar, Haryana, INDIA 2 Assistant Professor, Department of Electrical Engineering,, Ganga Institute of Technology and Management, Kablana, Jhajjar, Haryana, INDIA 3 Assistant Professor, Department of Computer Science & Engineering, Ganga Institute of Technology and Management, Kablana, Jhajjar, Haryana, INDIA 4 Assistant Professor, Department of Electrical Engineering,, Ganga Institute of Technology and Management, Kablana, Jhajjar, Haryana, INDIA 5 Lab Instructor, Department of Electrical Engineering,, Ganga Institute of Technology and Management, Kablana, Jhajjar, Haryana, INDIA Abstract : This paper studies the use of a Static Var Compensator (SVC) with wind farms for the purpose of stabilizing the grid voltage after a grid-side disturbance viz., a three phase short circuit fault. System stability of wind farms based on squirrel cage induction generators (SCIG) are investigates. Due to the nature of asynchronous operation, system instability of wind farms based on SCIG is largely caused by the excessive reactive power absorption by SCIG after fault due to the large rotor slip gained during fault. To analyze the performance of the SVC, an induction generator based wind farm has been considered. The complete digital simulation of the SVC incorporated into the power system is performed in the MATLAB/SIMULINK environment and the results are presented to validate the feasibility of the proposed topology. सार:यह पत्र एक ग्रिड ओर अशाांति अर्ााि के बाद ग्रिड वोल्टे ज स्थर्र करने के प्रयोजन के लिए पवन फार्मों के सार् एक स्थर्र वार कम्पेसाटर (एसवीसी) के उपयोग का अध्ययन करिा है ., एक िीन चरण शॉटा सर्काट गििी. ग्रगिहरी पपांजरे प्रेरण जनरे टर (SCIG) के आधार पर पवन फार्मों की प्रणािी की स्थर्रिा की जाांच कर रहे हैं. अिुल्यकालिक आपरे शन की प्रकृति के कारण, SCIG के आधार पर पवन फार्मों की प्रणािी अस्थर्रिा बडे पैर्माने पर होने के कारण गििी के दौरान प्राप्ि की बडी रोटर पची को गििी के बाद SCIG द्वारा अत्यग्रधक प्रतिर्ियाशीि शस्ति अवशोषण के कारण होिा है . एसवीसी के प्रदशान का पवश्िेषण करने के लिए, एक प्रेरण जनरे टर आधाररि हवा खेि र्में र्माना गया है . बबजिी व्यवथर्ा र्में शालर्मि एसवीसी का परू ा डडस्जटि अनक ु रण 1 MATLAB / simulink वािावरण र्में र्कया जािा है और पररणार्म प्रथिापवि टोपोिॉजी की व्यवहायािा को र्मान्य करने के लिए प्रथिुि कर रहे हैं Keywords: Induction Generator, Wind farm, SVC, System Stability, Flexible AC Transmission Systems (FACTS). I. INTRODUCTION With the Asynchronous wind generators as research object, this paper analyzes the problems of the voltage stability and the generation mechanism of the reactive power compensation during the wind farms connected operation. The wind farms supply the active power to the grid when the wind turbines are connected to the grid, but at the same time, the reactive power is absorbed from grid, which would bring the reactive burden to the grid. Therefore, it is necessary to compensate the reactive power for gridconnected wind farm to eliminate the effects of voltage fluctuations which is caused by reactive power loss in grid and would lead to tripping operation of turbines. And the sufficient amount of reactive power compensation is needed to improve the safety and stable operation of the power grid. Currently, the method of connecting the asynchronous generator and capacitor banks in parallel permits is mostly used for wind farm reactive power compensation. However, with the rapid development of power electronics technology, this traditional reactive power compensation shows some obvious drawbacks and connecting the Flexible AC Transmission System (FACTS) to the wind farm to improve the operation characteristics become a necessity. And in this paper, the method with Static Synchronous Compensator (SVC) is proposed to compensate the reactive power in dynamic process to improve the operation condition of wind farm [3]. II. AN OUTLINE OF FACTS DEVICES Eventually FACTS devices found applicability in the wind power industry. It was found that providing earlier Wind Power Plants with some external reactive compensation devices such as SVC or STATCOM, the grid compliance can be met, and thus the Wind Power Plants could remain connected to the power system without stability risks [4]. III A Static VAR Compensators (SVC) SVC’s being dated from early 70’s, have the largest share among FACTS devices. They consist of conventional thyristors which have a faster control over the bus voltage and require more sophisticated controllers compared to the mechanical switched conventional devices. SVC’s are shunt connected devices capable of generating or absorbing reactive power. By having a controlled output of capacitive or inductive current, they can maintain voltage stability at the connected bus [4]. Fig. 1 shows these configurations: the Thyristor Controlled Reactor (TCR), the Thyristor Switched Reactor (TSR) and the Thyristor Switched Capacitor (TSC) or a combination of all three in parallel configurations. The TCR uses firing angle control to continuously increase/decrease the inductive current whereas in the TSR the inductors connected are switched in and out stepwise, thus with no continuous control of firing angle [4]. Usually SVC’s are connected to the transmission lines, thus having high voltage ratings. Therefore the 2 SVC systems have a modular design with more thyristor valves connected in series/ parallel for extended voltage level capability [4]. Fig. 1: svc configurations and its i-v characteristics. To provide the needed reactive power generation/consumption in the network SVC’s adjust the conduction periods of each thyristor valve. For an SVC consisting of one TCR and one TSC, assuming that both reactor and capacitor have same pu ratings then the following scenarios can occur: Reactive power is absorbed when the thyristor valve on the reactor leg is partially or fully conducting and the capacitor leg switch is off. Reactive power is generated when the thyristor valve on the reactor leg is in partial or no conduction mode and the capacitor leg switch is on. No reactive power is generated/absorbed if both the thyristor valve is not conducting and the capacitor switch is off. The voltage-current (V-I) characteristic of an SVC with the two operating zones is shown in Fig.1. A slope around the nominal voltage is also indicated on the V-I characteristic, showing a voltage deviation during normal operation, which can be balanced with maximum capacitive or inductive currents. As the bus voltage drops, so does the current injection capability. This linear dependence is a significant drawback in case of grid faults, when large amount of capacitive current is needed to bring back the bus nominal voltage [4]. The technology of SVC with thyristor valves is becoming outdated mainly due to the slow time responses, of injected current dependence on bus voltage and low dynamic performance. IV. TEST SYSTEM The single line diagram of a test system employed in this study is shown in fig. drawn below. The network consists of a 33 kV, 50 Hz, grid supply point. A wind farm of 110 kW is integrated with a power grid of 33 kV by a three phase transformer of 400V/33 kV, 110 kVA. There are two loads in the system; one load of 50 kW which is connected to 33 KV grids through another step down transformer of 33 kV/400 V, 250 kVA and another load of 2 kW at 6 KM away from each other. The 33 KV, 6 KM long line is modeled as line. Used generator in this model is squirrel cage induction generators and stator windings are directly connected to the grid. This grid is used to study and analyze machine and wind farm stability. Dynamic compensation of reactive power is provided by a SVC located at the point of wind farm connection. Here we study using MATLAB Simulation: 1. Induction generator stability conditions study without using SVC. 2. Induction generator stability conditions study with using SVC. In this study, initially, Induction generators required reactive power is considered by capacitor bank connected to 400V terminals at 400 KVAR rate. It's obvious that in system different conditions more reactive power demand is provided by grid. A 3- Phase short circuit is occurred at 1.0 seconds to 3.5 seconds. 3 Fig.2: Single Line Diagram Of Test System SIMULATION MODEL Fig 3: Simulink Model Of Wind Farm With Svc V. RESULTS AND ANALYSIS When we consider the above model under fault condition the system become unbalance and uncontrolled in case of normal operating condition the output waveform is as shown in Fig. 4 during fault condition without use of SVC. 4 Fig.4: Output Waveform Under Fault Condition When Capacitor Bank In Use Fig. 5 shows the voltages at Bus-1 and Bus-2 (voltage vs time) during the operation of without SVC located at the point of wind farm connection. Fig. 5: voltages at bus-1 and bus-2 without svc Fig. 6: active and reactive power at bus-2 without svc To overcome the difficulties arrives in case of power control by only use of capacitor bank the following model is structured by using SVC. The comparative result i.e. rotor current vs time, stator current vs time, rotor speed vs time & electromagnetic torque vs time (sec) has been shown in Fig. 9 for the system. Fig.7: Power Flow Output Waveform Under Fault Condition When Svc In Use 5 Fig. 8 shows the voltages at Bus-1 and Bus-2 (voltage vs time) during the operation of with SVC located at the point of wind farm connection. It is shown that the voltage at Bus-2 drops to very low value of 0.62 pu due to insufficient reactive power but this voltage get improved to 1.0 pu when SVC is incorporated in system. Thus the voltage and hence Power Quality Improvement/ Stability with Static Compensator on Grid Integration of Wind Energy System is improved. Fig. 8: voltages at bus-1 and bus-2 with svc Fig. 9: active and reactive power at bus-2 without svc The following results has been observed: RATED POWER 110 KW STATOR VOLTAGE 400 V Rs (stator resistance) 0.01481 pu Rr (rotor resistance) 0.008464 pu Ls (stator inductance) 0.04881 pu Lr (rotor inductance) 0.04881 pu Lm(mutual inductance) 2.241 pu Number of pole pairs 2 Inertia constant 0.258 SVC 110 KVA 6 Table 1. Parameters of simulated induction generator VI. CONCLUSION In our study we consider the squirrel cage induction generator based wind turbine. We consider the four parameters of it i.e. rotor current, stator current, rotor speed and electromagnetic torque and the effect of three phase fault is consider by using MATLAB SIMULATION. As we know the important characteristics of induction generator that it gives active power to grid and absorbs reactive power from the grid. So to fulfill the needs of reactive power the most suitable candidate of FACTS devices is SVC. Results clearly show that SVC improve the stability of the wind farm system. निष्कर्ष: हमारे अध्ययि में हम गिलहरी प ज िं रे प्रेरण जिरे टर आधाररत वि टरबाइि र पवचार करें . हम MATLAB सिमल ु ेशि का उ योि करके र पवचार कर रहा है इिके बारे में चार मा दिं डों यािी रोटर वतषमाि, स्टे टर वतषमाि, रोटर िनत और पवद्युत टोक़ और तीि चरण िलती के प्रभाव र पवचार करें . हम यह गिड को िक्रिय शक्तत दे ता है और गिड िे प्रनतक्रियाशील शक्तत अवशोपर्त क्रक प्रेरण जिरे टर की महत्व ूणष पवशेर्ताओिं जािते हैं. इिसलए तथ्यों उ करणों के िबिे उ युतत उम्मीदवार एिवीिी है प्रनतक्रियाशील बबजली की जरूरतों को रू ा करिे के सलए. ररणाम स् ष्ट रू िे एिवीिी हवा खेत प्रणाली की क्स्िरता में िध ु ार बताते हैं. REFERENCES [1] Lie Xu, Liangzhong Yao, and Christian Sasse “Comparison of Using SVC and STATCOM for Wind Farm Integration”, 2006 International Conference on Power System Technology. [2] K.MALARVIZHI, K.BASKARAN “Enhancement of Voltage Stability in Fixed Speed Wind Energy Conversion Systems using FACTS Controller”, International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Vol. 2(6), 2010. [3] Wang Xiao ming, Mu xing xing “Simulation Study on Dynamic Reactive Power Compensation of Grid-Connected Wind Farms”, Proceedings of the 2012 2nd International Conference on Computer and Information Application (ICCIA 2012). [4] Bindeshwar Singh “Introduction to FACTS Controllers in Wind Power Farms: A Technological Review”, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RENEWABLE ENERGY RESEARCH Bindeshwar Singh, Vol.2, No.2, 2012. [5] S. M. Shinde, K. D. Patil, and W. Z. Gandhare “Dynamic Compensation of Reactive Power for Integration of Wind Power in a Weak Distribution Network”, INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON “CONTROL, AUTOMATION, COMMUNICATION AND ENERGY CONSERVATION -2009, 4th-6th June 2009 [6] Z. Chen, Y. Hu, “STATCOM’s effects on stability improvement of induction generator based wind turbine systems” 2009 IEEE. [7] W. G. He.ron and R. A. Phillips, “E.ect of a Modern Amplidyne Voltage Regulator on Under Excited Operation of a Large Turbine Generator,” AIEE Transactions (Power Apparatus and Systems), vol. 71, pp. 692-697, 1952. 7 [8] ] C.R. Fuerte, Esquivel, E. Acha, H. Ambriz-Prez, “A thyristor controlled series compensator model for the power flow solution of practical power networks.” IEEE Transaction on Power System vol. 15 no.1 Feb. 2000. [9] H. M. Haque, “Power Flow Control and Voltage Stability Limit: Regulating Transformer versus UPFC”, IEE Porc. Gener. Transm. Distrib. 151(3)(2004), pp. 299–304. [10] M. Z. Al-Sadek, M. M. Dessouky, G. A. Mahmoud, and W. I. Rashed, “Enhancement of Steady State Voltage Stability by Static VAR Compensators”, Electric Power Systems Research, 43(2)(1997), pp. 179–185. [11] K. Visakha, D. Thukaram, and L. Jenkins, “Applications of UPFC for System Security Improvement under Normal and Network Contingencies”, Electric Power Systems Research, 70(1)(2004), pp. 46–55. A. Sannino, J. Svensson, and T. Larsson, “Power Electronic Solutions to Power Quality Problems”, Electric Power Systems Research, 66(1)(2003), pp. 71–82. [12] J. Sun, D. Czarkkowski, and Z. Zabar, “Voltage Flicker Mitigation Using PWM-Based Distribution STATCOM”, IEEE Power Engineering Society Summer Meeting, 2002. 8