Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Currency war wikipedia , lookup
Foreign exchange market wikipedia , lookup
Bretton Woods system wikipedia , lookup
Purchasing power parity wikipedia , lookup
Foreign-exchange reserves wikipedia , lookup
Exchange rate wikipedia , lookup
International monetary systems wikipedia , lookup
Reinventing Export-led Growth: Sweden in the 1930s Preliminary Version - Please do not cite without permission Alexander Rathke∗, Tobias Straumann, and Ulrich Woitek IERE, University of Zurich European Historical Economics Society (EHES) The 8th biennial Conference, Geneva, September 3-6, 2009 Abstract Our main focus in this paper is the role of Sweden’s exchange rate policy in Sweden’s early and strong recovery after the Great Depression. We estimate a small-scale, structural general equilibrium model of a small open economy using Bayesian methods. We find that indeed terms of trade movements are the mayor driving force for the strong recovery, suggesting that Sweden’s exchange-rate policy aimed at maintaining the krona at an undervalued level significantly contributed to the growth miracle in the 1930s. This finding is supported by archival sources of the Swedish central bank (Riksbank). They show that the Riksbank governor was predominantly concerned about two issues, namely the level of foreign exchange reserves and the performance of Swedish exports. Corresponding author; Institute for Empirical Research in Economics, Winterthurerstrasse 30, CH-8006 Zurich, Switzerland, [email protected] ∗ 1 This finding is relevant for the interpretation of the 1930s from a long-term perspective. Export-led growth is not a typical phenomenon of the post-1945 monetary system as Dooley et al. (2003) claim, but started shortly after the end of the gold-exchange standard in 1931. 2 1 Introduction Although a small country, Sweden has always been a preferred object of research for scholars interested in innovative macroeconomic policies. In the early 1990s, Sweden was among the first countries to introduce inflation targeting after abandoning the ecu peg of the krona (Bernanke et al., 1999). Currently, the restructuring of the banking sector in the 1990s has found new attention (Reinhart and Rogoff, 2008). And in the era of the Great Depression, Sweden was widely admired for its early and strong recovery from the deepest crisis of the 20th century (Fisher, 1935). In fact, the increase of industrial production from 1933 to 1939 was higher than anywhere else in Europe. Accordingly, the 1930s are not only remembered as a decade of crisis, but also of renewal (Schön, 2000). Despite of this admiration, however, the reasons for this impressive recovery have not entirely been understood yet. The crucial question is still the same Charles Kindleberger asked 25 years ago in his classic account of the Great Depression. He observed that “[t]he more significant issue is the extent to which Sweden recovered through its own efforts, and especially through developing a public works policy to accompany cheap money, and to what extent the recovery represented simple exchange depreciation in excess of that of the pound, plus spillover from the British building and later armament boom.” (Kindleberger, 1973, p. 182) In this paper we try to give a new answer to this old question by going beyond Lundberg (1983) who was the first to study the implications of an undervalued krona. To assess the effects of an undervalued currency, we estimate a dynamic stochastic general equilibrium (DSGE) model for a small open economy. Our interest is not only historical, however. Inspired by the ongoing discussion on Bretton Woods II, we ask whether Sweden pioneered the strategy that some East-Asian countries have pursued in recent times (Dooley et al., 2003). Our empirical results suggest that this was in fact the case. By consciously keeping the currency undervalued the Swedish authorities fostered growth in a unprecedented way. Of course, export-led growth had been a familiar pattern under the classical gold standard before 1914. 3 Sweden, to take the same example, also knew periods during which growth was mainly driven by export. But by consciously keeping the exchange rate undervalued in order to boost exports Sweden invented a new kind of growth strategy that had been impossible under the gold standard. The paper is structured as follows. Section 2 provides a brief summary of the historical setting and the literature. Section 3 sketches Sweden’s exchange rate policy on the basis of narrative and statistical evidence. The model is explained in Section 4, and Section 5 outlines the estimation approach and the empirical findings. The paper ends with a conclusion. 2 Recovery from the Great Depression It is well established that those countries which abandoned the gold standard in the early 1930s enjoyed the most rapid recovery from the crisis (Eichengreen and Sachs, 1985; Eichengreen, 1992). Sweden was among those lucky countries. In late September 1931, a week after the fall of the British pound, the Swedish authorities abandoned the gold standard and let the krona depreciate. Denmark and Norway took the same step and enjoyed a fast recovery as well. By contrast, the countries of the gold bloc (Belgium, France, Italy, Netherlands, Poland, Switzerland) which maintained the gold standard until 1935/36 suffered from a protracted economic depression. Yet Sweden not only experienced a shorter crisis, but enjoyed a particularly strong industrial recovery after 1932. In 1938, Sweden’s index of industrial production amounted to 153 (1929 = 100) while the index in Denmark, Norway and the UK was at 135, 130 and 127 respectively (Figure 1). Thus, there seems to be a particularly favorable link making Swedish production exceptionally competitive during the 1930s. 4 Figure 1: Industrial Production Sweden /. . *- + , + * ) $" ( # ' &$% "#! Denmark Norway UK To what extent was this growth miracle due to economic policies? Schön (2000) provides a useful survey of the Swedish literature. In the postwar decades, the heyday of Keynesian economics, the most popular explanation highlighted fiscal policy. Supposedly, the Swedish Social Democrats who came to power in 1932 revived the depressed economy by pursuing a model counter-cyclical policy, based on the teachings of the younger generation of the Stockholm school (Gunnar Myrdal and Bertil Ohlin). The figures, however, show that the fiscal deficit was too small to account for the recovery. The Social Democrats did not implement a new fiscal regime. This explanation is therefore hard to maintain. A second important explanation, advocated by Jonung (1984), focuses on monetary policy. By leaving the gold standard, the Swedish central bank (Riksbank) was able to free itself from the deflationary train set in motion in 1930 and to implement a more expansionary monetary policy. In particular, the newly gained freedom enabled the Riksbank to act as lender of last resort in the aftermath of the Kreuger crash in March 1932 and to avert a major banking crisis. Moreover, the Riksbank adopted a new monetary policy framework, the so-called price level targeting, based on the seminal work of the eminent Swedish economist Knut Wicksell. 5 A third possibility is offered by Lundberg (1983). He highlights the importance of a weak krona throughout the major part of the 1930s and investigates why the undervaluation did not cause inflation at an earlier stage of the expansion. His answer is twofold. First, the demand elasticity was rather high, i.e. foreign customers of Swedish products strongly reacted to the lowering of prices after the end of the gold standard in 1931. Second, the access to natural resources was relatively cheap since they were provided by domestic producers (wood, iron ore). Which policy was more important for Sweden’s growth miracle, monetary policy or exchange-rate policy? Jonung’s claim that leaving the gold standard allowed the Riksbank to save the banking system from collapsing and to pursue a more expansionary policy can hardly be disputed (Bernanke and James, 1991). However, whether the Riksbank contributed to the Swedish growth miracle by adopting a modern monetary policy framework is an open issue. Straumann and Woitek (2009) show that the Riksbank did not adopt price level targeting after 1931, but continued to peg the krona to sterling as in the times of the classical gold standard and the gold exchange standard of the 1920s. Statistical evidence (Bayesian VAR) shows that there was no regime break in the early 1930s. In addition, statements by Riksbank governor Ivar Rooth suggest that the Riksbank was primarily concerned about the competitiveness of the exporting sectors. It is therefore important to examine the contribution of both monetary and exchange-rate policy by using econometric tools. Before we present the model we provide some descriptive statistics and narrative evidence. 3 The Exchange-Rate Policy of the Riksbank At first sight, it appears that the exchange-rate policy of the Riksbank vis-àvis the British pound, then by far the most important trading and financial partner, can be divided into two phases (Figure 2). In the period ranging from the suspension of the gold standard in late September 1931 to the official pegging to sterling in July 1933, the rate of the krona/£ appears to 6 fluctuate relatively freely. A closer look, however, reveals that there were two major attempts to stabilize the krona at the old parity of 18.16 kronor per £ (Jonung, 1979). In November 1931, shortly after the end of the gold standard, the Riksbank tried to prevent the krona from rising above the old parity of 18.16 kronor per £. The attempt failed, the exchange rate fell to 19.40 kronor per £. In late 1932, the Riksbank tried to bring the krona rate back to this level. Again, the plan did not materialize. Thus, in the first phase the Swedish central bank only seemingly embraced flexible exchange rates. It is more appropriate to suppose the same policy orientation for the whole period from September 1931 to the outbreak of the Second World War. 50 Figure 2: Nominal Exchange Rate SKr/£ 56 MLJK I 04 03 02 01 0470 0475 0477 0478 0479 :;<=>?@ABCDEFGCH 0471 0472 0473 That the Riksbank gave priority to exchange rate stabilization over price level stabilization (Fregert and Jonung, 2004) is revealed in a number of letters written by governor Ivar Rooth. In late September 1933, he explained to O.M.W. Sprague, Harvard professor of economics and temporary assistant to the United States Secretary of the Treasury: “My personal opinion is that it is of the utmost importance to the whole economic life of a nation which like Sweden for its standard 7 of living is to such a great extent depending upon foreign trade, to have fairly stable quotations. I think that I dare say that also in order to get a rising price-level, stable foreign exchanges are better than the erratic movements of these rates which the world has suffered from ever since September 1931.”1 In early 1936, Roth argued that Sweden pegged the krona rate pegged to sterling because foreign business was for the most part invoiced in sterling: “It was particularly important for a small country like Sweden depending so strongly on its foreign trade to inspire trade and industry with trust in our currency.”2 In a further statement in February 1938, Rooth wrote to Randolph Burgess, Vice-President of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York: “Some American professors, e.g. Professor Irving Fisher, believe that it is an achievement by us in the Riksbank that prices have been fairly steady up to the middle of 1936. I have told Professor Fisher before and I am sorry to have to tell you now that what we have done is merely that we have carried out a fairly conservative central banking policy. In fact we have never tried to do anything directly with regard to prices.”3 In short, the Riksbank was determined to serve the interests of the exporting sectors by keeping the exchange rate as stable as possible right after the suspension of the gold standard. Stabilising the exchange rate is one thing. But did the Riksbank, as Lundberg argues, also maintain the krona rate at an undervalued level? The steep rise of reserves suggests that this may have been the case. In the first six months of 1929, that is before the beginning of the world economic crisis, gold and foreign exchange reserves amounted to 350 mio. SKr.; by the end of 1935, they had reached 1000 mio. SKr. 1 Archives Bank of England, OV 29/26 (26 September 1933). Archives Bank of England, OV 29/4 (January 1936). The text is in German, the English summary attached to the document is not very accurate. 3 Archives Sveriges Riksbank, Rooth papers, Box 129 (10 February 1938). 2 8 SONN Figure 3: Gold and Foreign Exchange Reserves of Riksbank SNNN RNN mj l kj QNN hi g PNN ONN N STOT nopqrstquvwxtsqpqyqpzqy {o|}pqyqpzqy STUN STUS STUO STUU STUP STUV XYZ[\]^_`abcdeaf STUQ STUW STUR (Figure 3). The increase of reserves was so steep that the Bank of England observed in a memo in January 1936 that “the Riksbank is still holding an abnormally large share of Sweden’s abnormally large foreign reserves”.4 The dramatic improvement of the trade balance after 1931 is another sign that the Swedish currency was presumably undervalued. In 1931/32, the trade balance was highly negative, since Sweden as a small open economy was immensely suffering from the collapse of world trade (figure 4). By 1933/34, the trade deficit had disappeared, partly because exports had recovered. In 1932, the worst year of the depression, they amounted to 947 million kronor, two years later to 1302 million kronor. In the same period, imports rose from 1155 to 1305 million kronor. 4 Archives Bank of England, OV 29/26: ’Purchases of gold by Sveriges Riksbank’. 9 Figure 4: Current Account, Visibles and Invisibles of Sweden (in mio. kronor) 400 300 200 Mio kronor 100 0 -100 -200 Overall balance Trade balance -300 -400 1929 1930 1931 1932 1933 1934 1935 1936 1937 1938 Source: Mitchell (2003). As British prices were rising in 1936/37 and Sweden was concerned about importing inflation, the exchange rate policy was put to a test. Swedish economists such as Gustav Cassel and Bertil Ohlin were publicly suggesting a revaluation of the krona in order to contain the import of inflation, and investors began exchanging their pounds and dollars in kronor. As a result, the foreign exchange reserves of the Riksbank dramatically increased starting in the summer of 1936. The Swedish authorities, however, maintained the parity in order to keep the competitive advantage of their exporting sectors. When British prices began to fall in the second half of 1937, investors began selling their krona assets. 10 Figure 5: Change in real exchange rate ~ ~ ~ ¡¢ £¤ ¥ ¦§¨© Source: Riksbank A straightforward approach would be to calculate the real exchange rate of the krona against sterling on the basis of foreign and domestic prices and the nominal exchange rate. Yet, as it is hardly possible to detect the equilibrium of the real exchange rate, we do not pursue this approach any further. Instead, for a first approximation, we consider only the percentage changes of the real exchange rate. The results in figure 5 of this simple PPP exercise are quite clear. In 1933 and 1935/36, when the nominal exchange rate was fixed, the Swedish inflation rate was lower than the British one, implying a strong devaluation of the Swedish real exchange rate. 4 The Basic New Open Economy Model To support the evidence from Section 3 we estimate a small-scale, structural general equilibrium model of a small open economy. Our theoretical framework is based on the New Open Economy Macroeconomics (NOEM). This 11 strand of the literature can be regarded as an extension of the New Keynesian paradigm, which has been used extensively in recent theoretical and applied work exemplified for instance, by Clarida et al. (2000) or Woodford (2003).5 These models start from the optimizing behaviour of representative agents and feature monopolistic competition and nominal rigidities. The basic New Keyenesian DSGE model has been adopted to the small open economy setting by Galı́ and Monacelli (2005) and Monacelli (2005). The following section briefly describes the basic NOEM model. 4.1 Households Consider a small open economy populated by a infinitely-lived continuum of households. The households try to maximize their utility defined over a composite consumption good Ct and leisure (1 − Nt ), U = E0 ∞ X β t t=0 Ct1−σ Nt1+η − 1−σ 1+η , (1) where β is the discount factor, σ −1 is the intertemporal elasticities of substitution and η is the labor supply elasticity. The composite good Ct consists of a Dixit-Stiglitz aggregate of domestic goods Cth and of foreign goods Ctf , a a−1 a−1 a−1 1 1 a f h Ct = (1 − γ) a Ct a + γ a Ct and Cth = Z 1 C(j)ht θ−1 θ dj 0 θ θ−1 , j ∈ [0, 1]. (2) (3) The elasticity of substitution between domestic and foreign goods is measured by the parameter a, and γ measures the degree of home bias in consumption and is therefore a natural indicator for the openness of the economy. Choosing the optimal allocation between foreign and domestic goods for each level 5 An overview over the New Open Economy literature starting with Obstfeld and Rogoff (1995, 1996) can be found in Lane (2001). 12 of the composite consumption goods implies the following demand functions Cth = (1 − γ) Pth Pt −a Ct , Ctf =γ Ptf Pt !−a Ct , (4) 1 1−a 1−a 1−a where Pt = (1 − γ)P h + γP f denotes an appropriate defined consumer price index. The optimal allocation for domestic intermediate goods is given by !−θ h P jt (5) Cth , Cth (j) = h Pt 1 1−θ R 1−θ 1 where Pth = 0 Pjth dj is the appropriate price index for the domestic good. The period budget constraint can be written as Pt Ct + Et (Qt,t+1 Bt+1 ) = Wt Nt + Bt + Tt . (6) Note that Pt Ct = Pth Cth + Ptf Ctf . The households have also access to a full set of state contingent claims traded internationally denominated in the domestic currency. Bt is the nominal payment in period t from a portfolio of assets held at the end of period t − 1. Therefore, Et Qt,t+1 Bt+1 corresponds to the price of portfolio purchases at time t. The nominal wage is given by Wt , and Tt is a lump-sum transfer or tax. The remaining optimality conditions can be rewritten in the convenient form Ntη Wt , −σ = Pt Ct −σ Ct+1 Pt Qt,t+1 = β . Ct Pt+1 (7) where the first describes the optimal labor/leisure choice and the second can be rewritten as a conventional stochastic Euler relation by taking conditional expectations on both sides and rearranging 1 = βRt Et Ct+1 Ct 13 −σ Pt , Pt+1 (8) where Rt = Et Q1t,t+1 is a riskless nominal return of a one period bond paying one unit of the domestic currency in period t + 1.6 4.2 Domestic and CPI inflation, Terms of Trade and Real Exchange Rate We assume that the law of one price holds at all times Ptf = St Pt∗ , (9) where Pt∗ is is foreign currency price of the foreign produced good and St the exchange rates expressed as foreign currency in terms of domestic currency. The terms of trade (the price of foreign goods in terms of domestic goods) are defined as ∆t ≡ St Pt∗ Ptf = . Pth Pth (10) Note that ∆ is equal to 1 in the steady state (PPP holds). To study the effect of an undervalued currency, we treat log ∆t as an unobservable exogenous AR(1) process which allows us to estimate the time path of the terms of trade, log ∆t = ρδ log ∆t−1 + ǫδt , ǫδ ∼ N (0, σδ ). The real exchange rate is defined as Pf St Pt∗ Φt ≡ t = . (11) Pt Pt 4.3 Domestic Firms There exists a continuum of monopolistic competitive firms. Each firm produces a differentiated good with an identical constant returns to scale production function Yt (j) = Zt Nt (j), (12) where Zt is a autoregressive technology shock that is assumed to be identical across firms, log Zt = ρz log Zt−1 + ǫzt . ǫz ∼ N (0, σz ). We analyze the optimal 6 For more details see Galı́ and Monacelli (2005) and Gali (2008). 14 behavior of the firms in two steps. First note that minimizing the cost of production PWht Nt (j) subject to (12) implies t M Ct = Wt /Pth , Zt (13) where M C is the real marginal cost of production and Wt /Pth the real wage. In the second step we describe the optimal price setting behavior. We assume staggered price setting as in e.g. Calvo (1983) and Yun (1996). A proportion (1 − ω) of firms per period receive the random signal that they can reset prices. The probability of a newly chosen price being effective in period t + k is ω k , which means an average duration of a price of (1 − ω)−1 . There is domestic and foreign demand for the intermediate good j. Firm j faces the the overall demand Cth (j) = Pth (j) Pth −θ Yt , (14) ∗ with Yt = Cth + Cth , where the superscript ’∗’ denotes foreign demand for domestic goods. Since all firms face identical demand curves and have the same production technologies, all firms which are allowed to reoptimize, choose the same price P̄th in order to maximize the current value of the profits generated while the price stays effective: P̄th = arg max Et Pth (j) ∞ X ω τ Qt,t+τ (Pth (j) − h Pt+τ M Ct+τ ) τ =0 Pth (j) h Pt+τ −θ Yt+τ , (15) subject to the demand curves (14). Note that Qt,t+τ is the appropriate discount factor. The first order condition for the choice of P̄th is ∞ X (ω)τ Qt,t+τ Yt+τ Et τ =0 (1 − θ) P̄th h Pt+τ −θ +θ P̄th h Pt+τ −θ−1 M Ct+τ ! = 0. (16) The other firms have to keep the price from the last period. Using the 15 definition of the domestic price index implies h . Pth = (1 − ω)P̄th + ωPt−1 (17) Combining the log-linearized version of the last to equations yields the forward looking version of the new Keynesian Phillips-curve h πth = βEt πt+1 + κmct , (18) with κ = (1 − ω)(1 − βω)/ω.7 4.4 Market clearing and international consumption risk sharing To aggregate over the firms, equate the demand and production functions for Cth (j) and integrate both sides, which yields the following aggregate production relation Yth = where ςt = R 1 Pth (j) −θ 0 Pt Zt Nt , ςt (19) dj. Market clearing requires ∗ Yth = Cth + Cth . (20) The foreign country is assumed to be large relative to the home country. Therefore, we do not need to distinguish between foreign changes in consumer prices and overall inflation and foreign consumption and production.8 Consumption of the domestic good in the foreign country (export demand) 7 The Keynesian Phillips-curve is one of the main building blocks of the New Keynesian Synthesis, see e.g. Clarida et al. (2000). 8 More precisely think of the domestic country as one of a continuum of infinitesimally small countries which make up the world (foreign) economy. This means that the domestic economy has zero mass in the foreign economy, see Galı́ and Monacelli (2005) for a more detailed description. 16 is given by ∗ Cth =γ Pth St Pt∗ −a Ytf , (21) if the foreign households have the same preferences as the domestic households. We assume that the log Ytf follows an exogenously given stable AR(1) process: f log Ytf = log(1 − ρf )Y f + ρf log Yt−1 + ǫft , ǫf ∼ N (0, σ f ). The existence of complete financial markets has implications for movement of the marginal utilities in the two countries and real exchange rate. Noting that the internationally traded securities are denominated in the domestic currency, the optimal portfolio choice of the foreign households can be characterized by the following Euler equation Qt,t+1 = β ∗ Ct+1 Ct∗ −σ Pt∗ St ∗ Pt+1 St+1 . (22) Combining (22) with the optimal choice of the domestic households (7) the following condition can be derived:9 C0∗ C0 −σ 1 Φ0 Ct∗ Ct −σ = µΦt , (23) where µ = is a constant that depends on the initial distribution of wealth across countries. Note that in the case of symmetric initial conditions µ equals 1. Hence the existence of complete security markets leads to a simple relation linking the level of domestic consumption to the level of foreign consumption and the real exchange rate. This is an alternative way to state the uncovered interest parity condition, which can also be derived combining the first order conditions of foreign and domestic consumer for the optimal portfolio choice. For the further analysis we log linearize the system around the determin9 See also Chari et al. (2002) and Galı́ and Monacelli (2005). 17 istic steady state values. The log linearized equations can be found in the Appendix. 5 Empirical Analysis To gain deeper insight we estimate the structural small new open economy model outlined above for the Swedish data in the 1930s. We add to a recent strand of the literature that deals with the estimation new open economy models. Different empirical strategies have been applied, for example Ghironi (2000) applied non-linear least squares at the single-equation level to estimate the structural parameters of such a model. Smets and Wouters (2002) based their estimation on matching model implied impulse responses to those of an an identified VAR, while Bergin (2003, 2006) and Dib (2003) applied maximum likelihood estimation. Following the contributions of Lubik and Schorfheide (2005, 2007), Ambler et al. (2004), Justiniano and Preston (2004, 2006) and Adolfson et al. (2007a,b), we use Bayesian methods for the estimation.10 This allows to base our estimation not only on the likelihood function. It also allows to incorporate additional information in coherent way via prior distributions, which can help to add curvature to the posterior in regions where the likelihood is flat. To arrive at the posterior distribution of the parameters, we use Gibbs sampling to generate draws from the posterior. First we solve the linearized system with the technique of King and Watson (2002). The following state-space representation mapping the unobservable states into the observable data vector vt is derived: ! yt , vt = L xt yt = Lyy yt−1 + Lyx xt−1 , (24) xt = Axt−1 + ǫt . 10 The programs used to solve and estimate the model were written from first principles in Matlab Version R2007a. 18 The vector xt is a collection of the structural shocks of the model consisting of the technology shock zt , the terms of trade shock δt and the foreign output shock ytf and yt contains the remaining state variables. Hence the matrix A is equal to diag([ρz , ρδ , ρf ]) and the covariance matrix of ǫ is given by Σ = diag([σz2 , σδ2 , σf2 ]). To account for potential measurement error and model misspecification11 we add a vector autoregressive measurement error et for the estimation as proposed by Ireland (2004). The empirical model is thus given by yt vt = L xt ! + et , (25a) yt = Lyy yt−1 + Lyx xt−1 , (25b) xt = Axt−1 + ǫt , (25c) et = Det−1 + ξ t , (25d) where D is a matrix of VAR parameters of the measurement error and ξ t is a zero mean vector of disturbance with covariance matrix Υ, ξ t ∼ N (0, Υ). 5.1 Data and Prior Choice To estimate the empirical implications of the model, we use monthly data on industrial production and inflation. Seasonally adjusted industrial production is from the League of Nations, and covers the period January 1928 - December 1939. Following Rabanal and Rubio-Ramirez (2005) we calculated log deviation from a quadratic trend. Inflation is based on a consumer price index (League of Nations), and covers January 1928 - December 1939. Inflation is calculated as seasonal first differences of the price index in logs and is demeaned. The vector of observable variables for which we derive the state-space representation consists of vt = [yt , πt ]′ . As already emphasized by Sims (1980) strong a priori restrictions are necessary to identify rational expectation models. To overcome identification 11 Del Negro et al. (2004) show that misspecification is also an issue for larger scale models. See also Schorfheide (2000) for a loss function based comparison of potentially misspecified models. 19 problems a number of parameters is usually calibrated (infinitely strict priors are used).12 We set the discount factor to the conventional 0.99. Adolfson et al. (2007b) have estimated a small open economy model for Sweden from 19802004. We follow their lead and calibrate the preference parameters σ and η to one. Adolfson et al. (2007b) find a posterior mode for the substitution elasticity between local and foreign goods of 22. Using macro level data the estimated values are typically lower, but the micro evidence is in the range of 5 to 20, see the evidence cited in Obstfeld and Rogoff (2000). We adopt a more conservative value of 5, which conforms to their prior mean and the value used by Adolfson et al. (2007a). The Calvo pricing parameter is set to their posterior mode of 0.82. Finally, we set the long run share of imports in consumption γ to the sample (yearly data) average of 0.25. The remaining priors are chosen among others to ensure stability of the transition equation. The persistence parameters of the structural shocks are normally distributed with mean 0.6 and fairly large standard deviations. The prior means for all autoregressive parameters of the measurement error are all set to 0.4 with standard deviations of 0.2. All nuisance parameters are centered over 0.1. The chosen degree of freedom parameters ensure that the conditional posterior distributions of all variance/covariance parameters have proper pdfs. All priors are assumed to be independent and the choice of prior is summarized as dij ∼ N (0.4, 0.22 ), i, j = 1, 2, Υ ∼ IW (4 × 0.12 I2 , 7), ρk ∼ N (0.6, 0.22 ), k ∈ (z, δ, f ), (26) σk2 ∼ IG(0.12 , 3), k ∈ (z, δ, f ). 5.1.1 Estimation Strategy Given the choice of our calibrated parameters we can apply the Gibbs sampling algorithm. Defining a new state vector αt = (yt′ , x′t , e′t )′ the model in 12 For more on identification problems associated with the estimation of New Keynesian models, see e.g. Beyer and Farmer (2004) or Lubik and Schorfheide (2005). 20 (25) has the following state-space representation: yt vt = L I2 xt ; et ! 0 0 Lyy Lyx 0 yt−1 yt ǫ t . A 0 xt−1 + I3 0 xt = 0 ξt 0 I2 et−1 0 0 D et This allows to apply multi-move Gibbs Sampling as introduced by Carter and Kohn (1994). In the first step the state vector αT is generated conditional on A, Σ, D, Υ and the calibrated parameters. Given that αT is observable eT is also observable and (25d) is a simple VAR model. Using the independent normal-inverse Wishart prior from above, draws for d = vec(D′ ) and Υ can be generated as described e.g. in Hamilton (1994, chapter 12)13 . A similar argument holds for the structural shocks. Given that αT is observable xT is known and (25c) consists of three independent univariate autoregressive processes. Note that in the univariate specialization of the inverse Wishart distribution is called inverse Gamma distribution.14 Using an independent inverse Gamma prior, analogue to the multivariate case above, draws for the free elements of A and the variance parameters can be generated. We use the steps above repeatedly to generate 50 000 draws and discard the first 10 000 for burn-in. All performed convergence diagnostics were satisfactory. 13 14 See also Canova (2007, chapter 4). For the inverse Gammma the standard parameterization, (see e.g. Greenberg, 2008) is f (y|α, β) ∝ y −(α+1) exp (−β/y) We use analog to the multivariate (inverse Wishart) case υ = 2α and T = 2β. 21 5.2 Empirical results The parameter estimates are summarized in table 1. The table shows prior and posterior means together with 90 percent probability intervals. Overall the priors are considerably updated by the information in the likelihood. The terms of trade shock turns out to be be most persistent shock. The variance parameters are estimated precisely, the posterior mean being 70 to 80 percent smaller than the prior mean. The posterior distribution of the VAR parameters is largely dominated by the sample information. In one case the 90 percent interval of the posterior and prior do not even overlap. Table 1: Parameter Estimation Results Prior Posterior Parameter Median 90% Interval Median 90% Interval Technology ρz 0.60 [0.344 , 0.856] 0.54 [0.336 , 0.792] Terms of trade ρδ 0.60 [0.344 , 0.856] 0.60 [0.446 , 0.918] Foreign output ρf 0.60 [0.344 , 0.856] 0.50 [0.362 , 0.714] sd technology σz 0.10 [0.041 , 0.131] 0.03 [0.024 , 0.046] sd terms of trade σδ 0.10 [0.041 , 0.131] 0.02 [0.013 , 0.038] sd foreign output σf 0.10 [0.041 , 0.131] 0.03 [0.024 , 0.082] ME par d11 0.40 [0.144 , 0.656] 0.89 [0.570 , 0.980] ME par d21 0.40 [0.144 , 0.656] 0.18 [-0.132 , 0.444] ME par d12 0.40 [0.144 , 0.656] -0.04 [-0.170 , 0.061] ME par d22 0.40 [0.144 , 0.656] 0.48 [0.207 , 0.626] sd ME output υy 0.10 [0.061 , 0.135] 0.15 [0.144 , 0.182] sd ME inflation υπ 0.10 [0.061 , 0.135] 0.02 [0.021 , 0.033] cov ME υyπ 0.00 [-0.005 , 0.005] 0.00 [0.000 , 0.001] Our main interest concerns the role of the exchange rate in the strong Swedish recovery after 1932. Figure 6 depicts the estimated terms of trade for Sweden in the 1930s. As for the crucial period from 1932 to 1934, when Swedish 22 exports increased and introduced the recovery, we can observe a strong depreciation of the Swedish real exchange rate. From early 1934 until 1938 the mean and nearly all probability mass of the estimated terms of trade lies in region of undervaluation, indicating a lasting undervalued Swedish krona up to 4 percent. These results strongly suggest that Sweden’s exporting sectors were profiting to a large extent from the exchange-rate policy of the Riksbank. They are also highly compatible with the narrative evidence presented in section 3. Repeatedly, the Riksbank expressed its concern over exchange rate stability. Its goal was to keep the krona undervalued in order to boost exports. Figure 6: Estimated Terms of Trade 0.1 Terms of Trade − Deviations from Steady State 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 0 −0.02 −0.04 −0.06 −0.08 −0.1 1930 1931 1932 1933 1934 1935 1936 1937 1938 1939 1940 Year Notes: Posterior mean, 16-th and 84-th percentiles of estimated terms of trade in percentage deviations from the steady state. 23 Variance decomposition can be use to infer the role of the the different shocks in driving output and inflation. The forecast error decompositions shown in figure 7 confirms our claim. At all horizons the terms of trade shock plays a dominant role in explaining output. It accounts for about half of the overall forecast error variance. The other most important factors associated with variation in output turn out to be the measurement error and the foreign demand shock, each contributing about 10 percent to the explained variance. Unfortunately, inflation is mostly captured by the measurement error, and to a smaller degree by the terms of trade shock. This may be due to the strong persistence of the series. The other shocks do not have a lot of explanatory power. Figure 7: Forecast Error Decomposition Forecast Error Decomposition Output 100 Percent of FEV 80 60 40 20 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 14 16 18 Horizon Forecast Error Decomposition Inflation 100 Percent of FEV 80 60 40 20 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Horizon Technology Terms of trade Foreign output 24 ME Inflation ME Output 6 Conclusion In their influential essay on the revived Bretton Woods System, Dooley et al. (2003) claim that since 1945 the periphery countries have always chosen the same development strategy. This strategy consists of four elements: undervalued currencies, controls on capital flows and trade, reserve accumulation, and the use of the center region as a financial intermediary that lent credibility to their own financial systems. In the immediate postwar years, Western Europe and Japan pursued such a strategy, since 1990 Eastern Europe and Asia. In this paper we ask whether we can use this insight for a better understanding of Sweden’s economic policies in the 1930’s. Building on Lundberg (1983) who claimed that Sweden consciously kept its currency undervalued vis-à-vis the British pound we apply a DSGE model for a small open economy to study the effects of an undervalued currency. Our results suggest that the insight of Dooley et al. (2003) is in fact useful to understand the 1930’s. Our finding also suggests that the development strategy as they described it was not an invention of the postwar world, but came out of the discussion on the optimal exchange-rate policy in the wake of the Great Depression. The Dynamic System In the following, log deviations from steady state values are denoted by small letters H = log HHt . 25 1. Static equations ηnt + σct = wt − pht − γδt mct = wt − pht − zt , yt = zt + nt yt = (1 − γ)ct + γa(2 − γ)δt + γytf 2. Dynamic equations f σEt (ct+1 − ct ) = σEt (yt+1 − ytf ) + (1 − γ)Et (δt+1 − δt ) πt = πth + γ(δt − δt−1 ) h + κmct , πth = βEt πt+1 zt = ρz zt−1 + ǫzt f ytf = ρs yt−1 + ǫft δt = ρδ δt−1 + ǫδt References Adolfson, Malin, Stefan Laséen, Jesper Lindé, and Mattias Villani, “Bayesian estimation of an open economy DSGE model with incomplete pass-through,” Journal of International Economics, July 2007, 72 (2), 481– 511. , , , and , “Evaluating An Estimated New Keynesian Small Open Economy Model,” Working Paper Series 203, Sveriges Riksbank (Central Bank of Sweden) February 2007. Ambler, Steve, Ali Dib, and Nooman Rebei, “Optimal Taylor Rules in an Estimated Model of a Small Open Economy,” Working Papers 04-36, Bank of Canada 2004. 26 Bergin, Paul R., “Putting the ’New Open Economy Macroeconomics’ to a test,” Journal of International Economics, May 2003, 60 (1), 3–34. , “How well can the New Open Economy Macroeconomics explain the exchange rate and current account?,” Journal of International Money and Finance, August 2006, 25 (5), 675–701. Bernanke, B. and H. James, “The Gold Standard, Deflation, and Financial Crisis in the Great Depression: An International Comparison,” in R.G. Hubbard, ed., Financial Markets and Financial Crises, Chicago, London: University of Chicago Press, 1991, pp. 33–68. , Th. Laubach, F. Mishkin, and A. Posen, Inflation Targeting: Lessons from the International Experience, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1999. Beyer, Andreas and Roger E. A. Farmer, “On the indeterminacy of New-Keynesian economics,” Working Paper Series 323, European Central Bank 2004. Calvo, Guillermo A., “Staggered prices in a utility-maximizing framework,” Journal of Monetary Economics, September 1983, 12 (3), 383–398. Canova, Fabio, Methods for Applied Macroeconomic Research, Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2007. Carter, C. K. and R. Kohn, “On Gibbs Sampling for State Space Models,” Biometrika, 1994, 81, 541–553. Chari, V V, Patrick J Kehoe, and Ellen R McGrattan, “Can Sticky Price Models Generate Volatile and Persistent Real Exchange Rates?,” Review of Economic Studies, July 2002, 69 (3), 533–63. Clarida, Richard, Jordi Gali, and Mark Gertler, “Monetary Policy Rules and Macroeconomic Stability: Evidence and some Theory,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2000, 115, 147–180. 27 Del Negro, Marco, Frank Schorfheide, Frank Smets, and Raf Wouters, “On the fit and forecasting performance of New Keynesian models,” Working Paper 2004-37, Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta 2004. Dib, Ali, “Monetary Policy in Estimated Models of Small Open and Closed Economies,” Working Papers 03-27, Bank of Canada 2003. Dixit, Avinash K and Joseph E Stiglitz, “Monopolistic Competition and Optimum Product Diversity,” American Economic Review, June 1977, 67 (3), 297–308. Dooley, M. P., D. Folkerts-Landau, and P. Garber, “An Essay on the Revived Bretton Woods System,” 2003. NBER Working Paper 9971. Eichengreen, B. and J. Sachs, “Exchange Rates and Economic Recovery in the 1930s,” Journal of Economic History, 1985, 45, 925–946. Eichengreen, Barry, Golden Fetters. The Gold Standard and the Great Depression 1919-1939, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992. Fisher, Irving, Stabilized Money, London: Allen & Unwin, 1935. Fregert, K. and L. Jonung, “Deflation Dynamics in Sweden: Perceptions, Expectations, and Adjustment During the Deflations of 1921-1923 and 1931-1933,” in R. Burdekin and P. Siklos, eds., Deflation: Current and Historical Perspectives, Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004, pp. 91–128. Gali, Jordi, Monetary Policy, Inflation, and the Business Cycle: An Introduction to the New Keynesian Framework, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008. Galı́, Jordi and Tommaso Monacelli, “Monetary Policy and Exchange Rate Volatility in a Small Open Economy,” Review of Economic Studies, 07 2005, 72 (3), 707–734. 28 Ghironi, Fabio, “Towards New Open Economy Macroeconometrics,” Boston College Working Papers in Economics 469, Boston College Department of Economics 2000. Greenberg, Edward, Introduction to Bayesian Econometrics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008. Hamilton, James D., Time Series Analysis, Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1994. Ireland, Peter N., “A method for taking models to the data,” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, March 2004, 28 (6), 1205–1226. Jonung, Lars, “Knut Wicksell’s Norm of Price Stabilization and Swedish Monetary Policy in the 1930’s,” Journal of Monetary Economics, 1979, 5, 459–496. , “Swedish Experience under the Classical Gold Standard, 1873-1914,” in Michael D. Bordo and Anna J. Schwartz, eds., A Retrospective on the Classical Gold Standard, 1821-1931, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984, pp. 361–399. Justiniano, Alejandro and Bruce Preston, “Small Open Economy DSGE Models - Specification, Estimation, and Model Fit,” Manuskript, International Monetary Fund and Department of Economics, Columbia University 2004. and , “Can Structural Small Open Economy Models Account for the Influence of Foreign Disturbances?,” Technical Report, Columbia University 2006. Kindleberger, Charles P., The World in Depression. 1929-1939, London: Allen Lane The Penguin Press, 1973. King, Rober G. and Marc W. Watson, “System Reduction and Solution Algorithms for Singular Linear Difference Systems under Rational Expectations,” Computational Economics, 2002, 20, 57–86. 29 Lane, Philip R., “The New Open Economy Macroeconomics: A Survey,” Journal of International Economics, 2001, 54, 234–266. Lubik, Thomas A. and Frank Schorfheide, “Do central banks respond to exchange rate movements? A structural investigation,” Journal of Monetary Economics, May 2007, 54 (4), 1069–1087. Lubik, Thomas and Frank Schorfheide, “A Bayesian Look at New Open Economy Macroeconomics,” in Marc Gertler and K. Rogoff, eds., NBER Macroeconomics Annual, number 521, MIT Press, 2005. Lundberg, E., Ekonomiska kriser förr och nu, Stockholm: SNS, 1983. Monacelli, Tommaso, “Monetary Policy in a Low Pass-Through Environment,” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 2005, 37, 1047–1066. Obstfeld, Maurice and Kenneth Rogoff, “Exchange Rate Dynamics Redux,” Journal of Political Economy, June 1995, 103 (3), 624–60. and , Foundations of International Macroeconomics, Cambride, Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 1996. and , “The Six Major Puzzles in International Macroeconomics: Is There a Common Cause?,” NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 2000, 15 (0012003), 339–390. Rabanal, Pau and Juan F. Rubio-Ramirez, “Comparing New Keynesian models of the business cycle: A Bayesian approach,” Journal of Monetary Economics, 2005, 52 (6), 1151–1166. Reinhart, C. and K. Rogoff, “This Time is Different. A Panoramic View of Eight Centuries of Financial Crises,” 2008. NBER Working Paper 13882. Schön, Lennart, A Modern Swedish Economic History: Growth and Transformation in Two Centuries, Stockholm: SNS, 2000. Schorfheide, Frank, “Loss function-based evaluation of DSGE models,” Journal of Applied Econometrics, 2000, 15 (6), 645–670. 30 Sims, Christopher A., “Macroeconomics and Reality,” Econometrica, 1980, 48, 1–48. Smets, Frank and Raf Wouters, “Openness, imperfect exchange rate pass-through and monetary policy,” Journal of Monetary Economics, July 2002, 49 (5), 947–981. Straumann, Tobias and Ulrich Woitek, “A Pioneer in Monetary Policy? Sweden’s Price Level Targeting of the 1930s Revisited,” European Review of Economic History, 2009, 13, 251–282. Woodford, Michael, Interest and Prices: Foundations of a Theory of Monetary Policy, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2003. Yun, Tack, “Monetary Policy, Nominal Rigidity, and Business Cycles,” Journal of Monetary Economics, 1996, 37, 345–370. 31