Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
4th International Symposium on Stem Cell Therapy and Applied Cardiovascular Biology Madrid (Spain), April 26 – 27, 2007 Preclinical session Hüseyin Ince MD, PhD University of Rostock Department for Internal Medicine, Cardiology [email protected] What is stem cell therapy? What is stem cell therapy? Stem cells in cardiomyopathy Antoni-Bayes Genís Ultrastructural findings of idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (IDCM): Myocyte atrophy and myofilament loss Main epicardial coronary arteries are shorter and smaller Microvascular density is reduced in the epicardium Moreover, this defective vascularization is associated with reduced myocardial expression of vascular -catenin, an important angiogenic regulator This study shows that both vasculogenesis and angiogenesis are altered in IDCM LC Guarita-Souza Simultaneous autologous transplantation of co-cultured stem cells (SC) and skeletal myoblasts (SM) in an experimental model of Chagas disease Seven Wistar rats received autologous transplant of 5,4x106 and 8,0x106 cells into the LV wall Control group (n=8) received culture medium After 4 weeks, cell transplantation significantly improved EF and reduced LVEDV No change has been observed in the control group. Conclusion: the co-transplant of SC and SM is functionally effective in Chagas disease (at least in Wistar rats) MiHeart The Multicenter Randomized Cell Therapy Trial in Cardiopathies (MiHeart) is composed of four independent clinical trials each one dealing with a specific cardiomyopathy: Chagasic cardiomyopathy Dilated cardiomyopathy Acute myocardial infarction Chronic ischemic heart disease MiHeart All trials are multicenter, randomized, double-blind and placebo controlled. In each trial 300 patients will be enrolled. Additionally, half of the patients will receive the autologous bone marrow cells while the other half will receive placebo (saline with 5% autologous serum). The method for cell delivery is intramyocardial for the chronic ischemic heart disease and intracoronary for all others. Primary endpoint for all studies will be the difference in ejection fraction six and twelve months after intervention in relation to the basal ejection fraction. MiHeart saftey endpoints Incidence of arrhythmias and conduction disturbances Number of ventricular extra systoles in six months and one year. Number of sustained ventricular tachycardia episodes in six months and one year. Number of non sustained ventricular tachycardia episodes in six months and one year. Incidence of atrial fibrillation in six months and one year. New-onset of atrioventricular or intraventricular conduction disturbances. Need for artificial pacemaker implantation. Wojciech Wojakowski SDF-1 (ligand of CXCR4 receptor) is a crucial factor involved in progenitor cell mobilization and homing There is an increase of SDF-1 production and release from ischemic myocardium generating the SDF-1 gradient towards the heart in AMI In patients with acute myocardial infarction the absolute number of CD34+CXCR4+, CD34+c-kit+ and c-met+ cells was significantly higher in comparison to patients with stable angina and healthy subjects Homing of tissue committed stem cells is also dependent on leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) - LIF receptor and hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) - c-met axis G-CSF in AMI Firstline-AMI Direct effects of G-CSF on cardiac function after ischemia reperfusion injury • Langendorff perfusion model w/wo 300 ng/ml G-CSF • early contraction with G-CSF in reperfusion • improved hemodynamics • less myocardial necrosis Harada et al., Nature Medicine 2005;11:305-11 Firstline-AMI Angiographic and AMI related characteristics G-CSF group (n = 25) Control group (n = 25) 13 9 3 13 8 4 293 ± 115 299 ± 123 ns PCI plus stent, % 100 100 ns Abciximab (adjusted dose), % 100 100 ns Clopidogrel (300 mg loading) 100 100 ns TIMI III flow post PCI, % 100 100 ns Creatine kinase max, U/l 3706 ± 1818 3660 ± 2204 ns 385 ± 240 361 ± 204 ns 89 ± 35 - na Infarct related artery, LAD RCA CFX Onset of AMI to PCI, min Creatine kinase MB max, U/l Time from PCI to first G-CSF injection, min p AMI = acute myocardial infarction; PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention; Ince et al. Circulation 2005; 112:3097-3106 Functional echocardiographic parameters Firstline-AMI LVEF G-CSF (n=25) Control (n=25) LVEF (%) LVEF (%) 60 p < 0.002 p < 0.001 55 60 p < 0.002 59 7 56 4 55 54 8 50 54 5 47 5 53 5 51 5 50 51 4 48 4 45 p < 0.001 51 8 45 46 4 43 5 40 40 35 35 30 30 Baseline 35 days Rest 4 months Baseline 35 days 4 months Low dose Dobutamine Ince et al. Circulation 2005; 112:3097-3106 Firstline-AMI 6 months angiographic results Restenosis parameters (in segments) G-CSF (n=25) Control (n=25) Restenosis Late lumen loss ns ns MLD 20 20 18 16 14 ns 0,64 0,62 16 0,6 12 2 0.61 0.18 0.60 0.23 1,98 0,58 10 1,96 1.96 0.50 1.95 0.38 0,56 8 1,94 6 0,54 4 1,92 0,52 2 1,9 0,5 0 6m binary restenosis rate (%) 6m late lumen loss (mm) 6m MLD (mm) Ince et al. Circulation 2005; 112:3097-3106 G-CSF and Restenosis Bone marrow mobilization strategies after the MAGIC trial. Control (n=33) p 2.73±0.49 2.61±0.36 0.25 12.3±9.5 10.3±8.5 0.32 2.27±0.61 2.04±0.44 0.07 19.5±9.8 20.9±11.0 0.51 0.46±0.37 0.57±0.28 0.11 post PCI MLD, (mm) Stenosis, (%) No risk of restenosis G-CSF (n=60) QCA (median 6 months) MLD, (mm) Stenosis, (%) LLL, (mm) Delta-EF after G-CSF in AMI 10 8 6 4 G-CSF Control 3D-Säule 3 2 0 G-CSF -2 Control -4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Firstline-AMI G-CSF early after MI • G-CSF improves cardiac function • Dose and time sensitive effects Harada et al., Nature Medicine 2005;11:305-11 Myoblasts in CHD Skeletal Myoblast Transplantation : Steps of the Procedure 10 g Biopsy GMP Cell Expansion Felipe Prosper Two months after induction of myocardial infarction (MI), Goettingen miniature pigs underwent autologous SkM transplant either by direct surgical injection (n=6) or percutaneous access (n=6) Control animals received media alone (n=4) Animals received a median of 407.55±115x106 BrdU labeled autologous SkM Functional analysis was performed by 2D echocardiography Myoblast transplant was associated with a significant increase in LVEF (p<0.01), increased vasculogenesis, decreased fibrosis (p<0.05) as compared with control animals No differences were found between groups receiving SkM by percutaneous or surgical access Myoblast Tx : Phase I Surgical Trials Author No. Pts No. Cells CABG LV Function FU + cells Global Cell-Tx Herreros 12 221 x 106 + Eur Heart J 2003 Siminiak 10 EF : 35% to 53% at 3 mo. WMSI : 2.64 to 1.64 4 x 105 -5 x 107 + Am Heart J 2004 Dib 24 Circulation 2005 3 mo. 12 mo. EF : 35% to 42% at 4 mo. 4/10 segments improved 1 x 107 -3 x 108 + NA 45 mo. EF : 28% to 36% at 2 yrs Myoblast Tx : Phase I Interventional Trials Author No. Pts No. Cells LV Function FU Global Cell-Tx Smits 5 220 x 106 6 mo. JACC 2003 EF : 36% to 41% Ince 6 220 x 106 12 mo. JEVT 2004 EF : 24% to 32% Patricia Lemarchand Possible Mechanisms of Myoblast-Related Arrhythmias Lack of coupling between grafted myoblasts and host cardiomyocytes Impulse propagation Resting state Peak of action potentials Embryonic myosin Connexin 43 of conduction, No Slowing action potentials wave break & reentry Abraham al.PNAS, Circ Res 2005;97:159-67. Léobon etetal. 2003;100:7808-11. Delayed cardiac Stretch activation by repolarization contracting myotubes Itabayashi et al.Cardiovasc Res 2005;67:561-70. Probability of Discharge of a First Shock in the ICD-Implanted Patients of the PATCH Trial Actuarial incidence of first discharges : 50% at 1 year and 57% at 2 years Bigger et al. New Engl J Med 1997;337:1569-75. Implantation of Skeletal Myoblasts : Lessons from Phase I Trials Efficacy Data Inability to draw meaningful conclusions from early studies because of : The small sample sizes The lack of control groups The confounding effect of associated CABG The dissociation between improved LV function and achievement of true myocardial regeneration Only randomized double-blind placebo-controlled adequately powered trials will provide a meaningful assessment of the risk-benefit ratio (In MAGIC the high dose cell group demonstrated a significant decrease in LV enddiastolic and endsystolic volumes) Concept of stent-induced “Aortic Reconstruction” Diagnosis Occlusion of proximal Entry Treatment Reconstruction of TL before stentgraft 1 year after stentgraft Antoine Lafont Aortic aneurysm formation is associated with matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) activity Gingival healing is embryo-like in contrast to arterial healing This could be attributed to the gingival fibroblast Concept of using gingival fibroblast healing properties in arteries Gingival fibroblasts reduce MMP-9 expression by increasing TIMP-1 synthesis Vascular transfer of gingival fibroblasts could be a promising approach to treat aortic aneurysms Kai Pinkernell Preclinical evaluations of adipose derived stem and regenerative cells (ADRCs) have been carried out in acute and chronic cardiac diseases showing an improvement of cardiac function as well as a reduction in remodeling The PRECISE trial in patients with chronic myocardial ischemia has been started The APOLLO trial in patients with AMI is scheduled to follow soon in order to investigate the safety and feasibility of ADRC therapy in patients Both trials are designed as prospective, double blind, randomized, dose escalating trials Conclusions 1. Find the best stem cell types or cytokines for repair of cardiovascular disease. 2. Identify cardiovascular stem cells among circulating stem cells; adipose tissue; epithelial cells; bone marrow-derived stem cells and compare their capabilities in cardiovascular repair in relevant experimental animal models. 3. Identify roles of specific stem cell types or cytokines in reparative medicine and in cardiac regeneration and vascular repair. Conclusions 4. Identify optimal cell numbers and methods of administration of stem cells in cardiovascular repair. 5. Identify clinical problems most susceptible to stem cell or cytokine treatments. Patients Acute MI Chronic IDCM Angina HF EPCs, CD34+, AC133+ Subsets AGE CM (Parenchyma) Stroma (MSCs) Organ specific-Heart EMBRYONIC Fat MNC Gender Mb, Fb, SP cells BM, Blood, UCB ADULT STEM CELLS Muscle Comparison of REPAIR-AMI versus ASTAMI Invasion activity Healthy Controls 140 * 120 REPAIR ASTAMI 100 80 *+ 60 40 20 Invasion (x10E3) /10E6 BMC Invasion (x10E3) /10E6 BMC REPAIR CAD-Patients ASTAMI * 80 70 60 50 40 30 + 20 10 0 0 basal SDF-1 basal SDF-1 basal SDF-1 basal SDF-1 Phase I Study Design Phase I Trial Objectives To determine the safety and tolerability of 3 different intravenous doses of Provacel compared to placebo in subjects with AMI To evaluate the effect of Provacel on exploratory efficacy endpoints Design Multi center study, randomized, double-blind, placebocontrolled, dose escalation study 48 adult subjects with AMI (powered to show safety and preliminary efficacy) 3 dose escalated cohorts and 1 safety cohort at the highest tolerated dose in a 2:1 ratio of active to placebo