* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Clinical and Therapeutics - CPT Course Review
Survey
Document related concepts
Transcript
Review of Year 4 Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics course • Course occurs in Feb of Year 4 • Course Director – Drs. Nierenberg and Lewis • Course has 47 curricular hours • Course was last reviewed in May 2013 Action Plan from Prior Review • Action Plan from 2013 Review: – Student concerns about Pass/Fail vs H/HP/P/F • Move to Pass/Fail next year as an experiment, but with detailed feedback to students on papers continued, and personal notes to students in top 10% – Done in 2014 and 2015 – New administrative assistant who communicated directly with class, always with good intent, but sometimes with unintended adverse consequences • All communications will come through Dr. Nierenberg, as in all previous years – Done in 2014 and 2015 – Student concerns about classmates being “too competitive” or “over the top” in preparation of their group presentations • Reinforce time limit of 12 min per group presentation • Remind student to focus on “core issues” – Discontinued in 2015 Action Plan from Prior Review – This class had less class discussion and participation than we have seen in prior years • We will incorporate more ARS as well next year for shy students – Done and Peer Small Group Sessions started 2015 – Provide greater clarity about written assignments: • We will continue to describe written assignments in class, answer questions, and give an example of each from prior year • We will write out description of each written assignment in the syllabus, at the beginning of the course – Done, now on canvas – Some cases or figures were outdated: • We will continue to provide examples using mostly recent drugs and recent data • We will continue to refer to older information about older drugs when the educational point can’t be made as well with newer drugs (e.g. example about enzyme induction) Action Plan from Prior Review – Too much focus on review of pathophysiology material and basic pharmacology material • We feel it is important to build our new, more complex material upon this foundation • This review was helpful to many but perhaps not all students • We will shift more review material into the “prework” for specific sessions, thereby allowing us to focus more time “in class” on working through problems and cases, which we already do – Done – Students became “too competitive” in their group presentations to the class: • Changing to P/F next year should help reduce this competition • We still want to obtain best work from student groups • More strictly enforce 12 min time limit on group presentations • Dr. Lewis and I felt that overall these group presentations were superb, and we plan to continue them: excellent peer-to-peer teaching, good problem-solving skills – Group presentation discontinued, new group format devised Action Plan from Prior Review – Students going into Peds and Ob felt that some topics were less relevant to them: • We believe that the large majority of these topics are relevant to all students regardless of choice of specialty • We will make special effort to incorporate more case examples into each lecture dealing with pediatric and ob-gyn patients and issues • Next year, we will again give separate lectures on pediatric clinical pharmacology, and issues related to pregnant and breastfeeding women; these were combined this year due to loss of 4 hours of contact time (a one-year issue) – Done, separate lectures in both – Lack of clarity up front on grading policy, written assignments: • These were explained during the first hour of class • Next year, we will add written material to the orientation packet addressing both of these issues right on day one – Done, available on canvas – “General topics” (e.g. drugs and the kidney) not as useful as specific emergency therapeutics topics (e.g. management of shock) • We continue to seek balance between these two areas • A general approach to addressing therapeutics problems will remain of value even as new drugs are continuously developed into the future Course Objectives • The following objectives are grouped by Geisel Competencies • The column on the left shows the old objectives and the column on the right shows the new proposed objectives. Course Objectives Objective 2014 Objective 2015 Medical Knowledge Medical Knowledge Review basic pharmacology of a number of common drugs Describe basic principles of biostatistics as it applies to studies of drugs (both observational and interventional) 1a 3 Review common serious diseases (e.g. MI), common medical emergencies (e.g. anaphylaxis) and their treatment 1c 4 Describe how clinical pharmacology bridges basic pharmacology and clinical medicine, and utilizes knowledge from new areas such as pharmacogenetics 1d 5 Describe the clinical pharmacology of drugs used to treat pain, for palliative care, etc. Explain medical-legal issues related to drug development and prescribing, ethics of clinical and translational research, ethics of relationships with drug companies 1e Explain medical-legal and ethical 1e issues related to drug development and prescribing, clinical and translational research, and drug advertising and promotion 6 Explain the various ways that drug therapy plans need to be individualized to fit the needs of the unique patient 1f Explain the various ways that drug therapy plans need to be individualized to fit the needs of the unique patient 1 2 1b Dropped Describe basic principles of biostatistics as they apply to studies of drugs (both observational and interventional studies) Review optimal drug therapy of common serious diseases (e.g. MI) and medical emergencies (e.g. anaphylaxis) 1b 1c Dropped 1f Clinical Skills 2014 Objective 7 8 9 10 Course Objectives Discuss the importance of the therapeutic contract or alliance 2015 Objective 2a,3d Explain all of the parts of the complete drug and ADR history 2b Demonstrate how to document a complete drug history, and history of prior ADRs 2d Demonstrate the importance of developing an expanded differential diagnosis for each patient 2e Describe the importance of the therapeutic contract or alliance 2a, 3d Explain all of the parts of the complete drug and ADR history 2b Demonstrate the ability to recognize, understand, and work to prevent drug interactions 2d, 2e Demonstrate numerical skills necessary to estimate GFR, calculate appropriate loading dose, calculate appropriate maintenance dose 11 Understand common and simple clinical procedures (i.e. venipuncture, catheterization, simple suturing) and be able to perform these procedures under appropriate supervision 2f 12 Demonstrate how to use sophisticated electronic database about drugs 2g 13 Explain how therapeutic drug monitoring can be usefully applied to specific drugs 2h Explain how therapeutic drug monitoring can be usefully applied to specific drugs 14 Understand and participate in the performance of common operative procedures (i.e. appendectomy, laparotomy, pelvic surgery, complicated labor and delivery) 2i 2f 2h Course Objectives Interpersonal Communication 2014 Objective 15 16 17 2015 Objective Demonstrate how to 3a counsel patients about their choices for drug therapy Explain all of the important 3b parts of the complete drug history Discuss the importance of 3c printing up drug information for patients 18 Communicate effectively in all media with physician colleagues 3d 19 Create a complete, unambiguous, and legal drug prescription Participate actively in case discussions and problem sets 3e 20 3f Demonstrate how to counsel patients about their choices for drug therapy Write a complete, unambiguous, and legal drug prescription Participate actively in group and class case discussions 3a 3e 3f Developing Professional Identity 2014 Objective 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Demonstrate respectful behavior during class discussions Show responsibility by meeting all class deadlines for written assignments 2015 Objective 4a 4b Participate actively in the discussion about 4c potential physician conflicts of interest in prescribing medications Develop your own personal approach to dealing 4d with pharmaceutical representatives in an honest and responsible manner in the future Discuss ways to relate to patients who have questions about alternative medical treatments, and their potential interactions with prescription drugs Accept responsibility for all of your written assignments and grades Discuss how concerns about patient confidentiality affect how you write prescriptions Develop your own personal plan for keeping up with changes in the pharmacopeia each year 4e Demonstrate personal responsibility by meeting all class requirements and written assignments in a timely fashion 4b Develop your own personal approach to dealing 4d with pharmaceutical representatives in an honest and responsible manner in the future Discuss ways to relate to patients who have questions about alternative medical treatments, 4e and their potential interactions with prescription drugs 4f 4g 4h Discuss the risks of substance abuse in residents 4i and physicians Discuss the financial implications, pros, and cons 4k of generic vs branded drug products Develop your own personal approach to keeping up with changes in the pharmacopeia each year 4h Discuss the financial implications, pros, and cons of generic vs. branded drug products, direct to 4c Lifelong inquiry/improvement 31 32 2014 Objective Demonstrate ability to find accurate, up-to-date 5a resources for drug information for two required papers Analyze recent primary papers about drug therapy for accuracy, validity, and statistical rigor Evaluate and assess clinical care processes and outcomes in the practice environment in which they particpate, and understand how this measurement relates to the improvement of care for groups of patients 5b Utilize the technique of root cause analysis to discover how serious medication errors occurred, and to identify opportunities for improving the healthcare delivery system for drug therapy 5d 35 Describe where you will look in the future to obtain unbiased and accurate information about new drugs that are approved by the FDA 5e 36 Create a learning environment within one's own practice 5f 33 34 2015 Objective Demonstrate ability to find accurate, up-to-date resources for drug information 5a Analyze recent primary papers about drug 5b therapy for accuracy, validity, and statistical rigor 5c Utilize the technique of root cause analysis to discover how serious medication errors occurred, and to identify opportunities for improving the healthcare delivery system for drug therapy Describe where you will look in the future to obtain unbiased and accurate information about new drugs that are approved by the FDA 5d 5e Systems based Practice 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 2014 Objective Describe how CP On Line can be utilized in daily decisions about drug therapy, and to optimize drug prescribing Describe how accurate communication with nurses and pharmacists leads to better and safer patient care Describe when and how generic drugs should be prescribed over branded drugs Discuss the relationship between prescribing physician, nurse, and pharmacist, with emphasisis of medication errors and their causes Describe the role of physician, drug companies, pharmaceutical reps, and advertising in affecting prescribing practices Explain how the concept of a "core formulary" can relate to providing the most cost-effective care to a population of patients, when inadequate funding is a real concern Discuss how various outcome studies, including meta-analyses, are useful in ascertaining optimal drug management of various conditions 6a 6b 2015 Objective Demonstrate how CP Online can be utilized in daily decisions about drug therapy, and to optimize drug prescribing Describe how accurate communication with nurses and pharmacists leads to better and safer patient care 6a 6b, 6d 6c 6d Was redundant with 38 6e 6f 6h Describe the importance of the physician as 6i prescriber to serve as a catalyst for safer, more effective, and less costly patient care emphasized through many examples Describe how you will work to individualize the 6j drug therapy plan that you develop for each individual patient, taking into account the many variables that make each patient unique Describe the importance of the physician as prescriber to serve as catalyst for safer, more effective, and less costly patient care 6i Describe how you will work to individualize the drug therapy plan that you develop for each individual patient, taking into account the many variables that make each patient unique 6j Course Objectives – Geisel Competencies There are 24 course objectives that fulfill Geisel competencies as follows: • • • • • • 4 address knowledge 5 address clinical skills 4 address communication skills 5 address components of professionalism 4 address personal improvement 4 address systems based practice Course Objectives – Geisel Program Objectives The course objectives fulfill the program objectives as follows: • Course objectives address 4 of the 6 program objectives for Geisel competency 1 • Course objectives address 6 of the 9 program objectives for Geisel competency 2 • Course objectives address 4 of the 8 program objectives for Geisel competency 3 • Course objectives address 5 of the 12 program objectives for Geisel competency 4 • Course objectives address 4 of the 6 program objectives for Geisel competency 5 • Course objectives address 5 of the 10 program objectives for Geisel competency 6 Course Objectives – Geisel Program Objectives Comment here about information on previous slide. • Are there subdomains that need greater emphasis? – No • Are there subdomains that aren’t addressed at all? If yes, it is appropriate for this course? – Yes Course Objectives – Format/Distribution • Do they provide course objectives in the syllabus? – Yes • Are they written in the correct format? – Yes • Do the course objectives distributed in the course match the ones in Ilios? – No, new ones need approval Course Objectives – AAMC • Comment on correlation between course objectives and what is available in a national discipline-oriented organization, if applicable – AAMC MSOP - Report X - 2008 • Contemporary Issues In Medicine: Education In Safe and Effective Prescribing Practiced – Cover all but: » Understand how cultural background can alter patient views of drug therapy and disease causation » Know role of hospital pharmacy and therapeutics (P&T) committees » Understand how the system can support or hinder complex prescribing, such as for substance abuse, palliative care, and home treatment with antibiotics Session Objectives – Format/Distribution • Do they provide session objectives in the course materials? – Yes, within power-point slides • Are they written in the correct format? – Yes • Does each session objective map back to a course objective (Ilios) – Yes • Do the session objectives match what is listed in Ilios? – No Vertical Integration – Prescription writing – “prescription” searched in Ilios • Course Objective – Year 2 Pharm 217: Explain what is required to write a complete, unambiguous, and legal prescription and also what is required to insure the patient is fully counseled about medications, their drug history is comprehensively evaluated and they have printed drug information • Course session – Year 2 Pharm 217: H-10 Nierenberg - Approach to Prescription Writing 8-May 8:00am - Summarize the eight critical parts of a complete, non-ambiguous, and safe outpatient prescription • Course session – Year 3 PSCH 302: Psychopharm: Drug Prescriptions • Essential Skill – Year 3 PEDI: Write a pediatric prescription, dosing by weight, for a medication Vertical Integration • Pain Management – Course objective • SBM 210 apply knowledge of pain management to clinical problem solving in MSK medicine • ICE, OBGYN, Surgery – Year 3: Apply knowledge of pain management to clinical problems • Neurology Year 4: same as above – Session • Phar 217: Opioids and Pain Management • Phar 217: Principles of Pain Management • Surgery: Abd Pain small group • ICE: Pain management • Medicine Essential Condition: Acute Pain • AMS: Managing GI Crises • CPT: Approach to Pain management Vertical Integration • Drug Allergies – Session Objective • Immunology and Virology: Hypersensitivity 1 • Peds: Diagnostic reasoning: Illustrate complete history including allergy history • CPT: Emergency Therapeutics 1: Drug Allergies Special Topics • Inter-professional Education – Session 22: View from Pharm and RN Vantage • Cultural Awareness – Session 42: Genetics??? Summary regarding Objectives • Considerable effort made to decrease number and streamline course objectives all of which seemed appropriate to the subcommittee Summary regarding Objectives • Last year’s action plan was implemented. • Course and session objectives require updating to the 2014-2015 academic year. • Competency subdomain mapping should be reviewed as detailed in previous slides. • Current course objectives overlap significantly with AAMC and BJCP objectives. • No redundancies were noted between the Year 2 and Year 4 pharmacology courses. Course Learning Opportunities • 47 total hours – – – – Lecture (didactic and case based with ARS) 36 hrs. (77%) Small Group Conferences 4 hrs. (9%) Large Group Conference 4 hrs. (9%) Test 3 hrs. (6%) Course Learning Opportunities • Comments about pedagogy (e.g. are they doing anything unique? how much active learning?) – Small groups assigned problem sets then discussed in large group format with small groups being called upon to give answers (MBA model) – Case based assessments – Session with Pharm. D and RN Summary regarding Pedagogy • Several unique sessions – Small group MBA style – Session lead by Pharm D and RN Assessment • Does each Course Objective have an Assessment? – Unclear • Course is Pass/Fail (for past 2 years) • Must obtain 70% score in 3 areas – Knowledge/application • ~3 MCQ after each learning session (replaced old MCQ final) – Case Analysis/Writing • 1 page paper case analysis of possible drug/drug interactions • 5 page paper – student prepared case and analysis of clin therapeutic question – Final Exam (open book/computer) • Apply learned general approaches to 2 real complex cases Assessment • Do the questions correlate well with session objectives? – Yes • Is the emphasis of the exam balanced (i.e. not too many questions on any particular topic) – Yes Assessment • Other activities that are assessed? – No • Are students provided with narrative feedback? – Papers have written feedback Summary regarding Assessment • Improvement made with regards to Pass/Fail format and open-endedness of assignments. • Content of quizzes were not always matched to session objectives or material covered in lecture. • Clarity of quiz questions and/or format needs to be improved. Measures of Quality – Course Reviews scale [1=poor; 2=fair; 3=good; 4=very good; 5=excellent] CPT 2012 (%)* CPT 2013 (%)* CPT 2014 (%)* CPT 2015 (95%)* Overall satisfaction of course* 3.59 Overall usefulness of lectures 3.85 Overall usefulness of small groups 3.61 Overall usefulness of large groups 3.88 *student participation rate on course evaluation Measures of Quality – Course Reviews • Strengths: instructor enthusiasm; real clinical cases; open-ended essay; daily quizzes sample comments: • • • • “Great, entertaining, and informative lectures.” “Loved the examples!” “Clinical cases helped focus in the material.” “Daily quizzes kept me on top of the material and got me to review the ppt after lecture…” Measures of Quality – Course Reviews • Strengths: small group discussions; ethical issues, emergency therapeutics lectures, drug interactions, prescription writing sample comments: • “Great team based learning and fun to interact with classmates.” • “The specialist’s powerpoints were very helpful, such as Dr. Bensen’s GI lecture and Dr. Duncan’s psychiatric emergency lecture.” Measures of Quality – Course Reviews • Suggestions for Improvement: organization of cases for small group, timing of small vs. large group sample comments: • “Please compile cases for Friday discussion.” • “…there could have been less time given to individual groups to discuss and more time to discuss as a whole class, since we kept running out of time.” Measures of Quality – Course Reviews • Suggestions for Improvement: assessments; electrolyte management; women’s health; MI lecture; consider apps for pharmacology sample comments: • “Quizzes or final exams in this setting seems to be unnecessary and a waste of time.” • “Prescriptions related to women’s health (not only during pregnancy)” • “There should be a simplified lecture about treating acute MI.” Measures of Quality – Course Reviews • Suggestions for Improvement: written assignment grading, time points of assignments/final exam sample comments: • “Grading criteria were not at all clear, and many students feel that grades differed significantly based on whether Dr. Nierenberg or Dr. Lewis were grading…” • “The final exam was announced on Oasis as 9-12pm, which is why quite a few students weren’t aware of the 11am actual end time.” Measures of Quality – Course Reviews • Post and pre-op perspective – “Perhaps a lecture from a surgeon’s point of view on managing common post-op complications medically.” • Scheduling of course – “No student enjoys having a three hour gap in the middle of the day.” • Reference document? – “A brief compiled summary of the most important topics would be nice. Something we could print out and reference for the future.” Summary regarding Measures of Quality • Emergency therapeutics/acute crises management material well-received. • Improvements were made in regards to assessment. • Guest lectures offered specialty-focused material, although room for improvement in Surg/OB. • Written directions and deadlines of written assignments may need to be clarified. • Scheduling of course may need to be coordinated with HSP to increase attendance. Recommendations • Continue with revised course objectives as written for 2015 with exception of maintaining 1st objective with the wording… – “Review basic pharmacology of a number of NEW drugs” • Consider adding session objective for “core formulary” as this was removed from course level objective but felt to be a very important concept • Provide grid showing new objectives and the assessments that match them • More clearly designate and provide cases to be discussed in small group sessions • Explore option to include discussion on how a patient’s culture may effect drug choice • Work with OB and Cardiology to improve quality of their lectures Action Plan