* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download ANTIBIOTIC`S SENSITIVITY IN PATIENT`S DIABETIC FOOT
Staphylococcus aureus wikipedia , lookup
History of virology wikipedia , lookup
Urinary tract infection wikipedia , lookup
Microorganism wikipedia , lookup
Trimeric autotransporter adhesin wikipedia , lookup
Phospholipid-derived fatty acids wikipedia , lookup
Horizontal gene transfer wikipedia , lookup
Traveler's diarrhea wikipedia , lookup
Quorum sensing wikipedia , lookup
Human microbiota wikipedia , lookup
Disinfectant wikipedia , lookup
Triclocarban wikipedia , lookup
Hospital-acquired infection wikipedia , lookup
Marine microorganism wikipedia , lookup
Carbapenem-resistant enterobacteriaceae wikipedia , lookup
Magnetotactic bacteria wikipedia , lookup
Bacterial cell structure wikipedia , lookup
ANTIBIOTIC’S SENSITIVITY IN PATIENT’S DIABETIC FOOT ULCER OF Pseudomonas aeruginosa Pratiwi Apridamayanti1, Khairunnisa Azani Meilinasary1 dan Rafika Sari1 1 Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medical, Universitas Tanjungpura, Jalan Prof. Dr. H. Hadari Nawawi, Pontianak 78124, Indonesia Email : [email protected] Abstract Diabetes Mellitus (DM) patients are at risk to have the diabetic ulcer. A main reason for DM’s patient with ulcer complication to be treated and healed in hospital is caused by bacterial infection. One of many bacteria that infects diabetic ulcer is Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The effort to treat this infection is by using antibiotic. The use of antibiotic unfortunately, is often found in accurate causing the microbe resistance to occur. To choose the right antibiotic, it needs to test the antibiotic’s sensitivity towards Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The aim of this study is to determine the sensitivity of antibiotics against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Sample used was taken from diabetic ulcers swab with grade III and IV Wagner. The identification of bacteria was managed using the biochemical test and staining Gram test. Antibiotic sensitivity was determined by Kirby Bauer method. Antibiotic found still sensitive towards Pseudomonas aeruginosa included ciprofloxacin, norfloxacin, imipenem, levofloxacin, meropenem, ceftriaxone, and cefotaxime. Whereas cefadroxil and amikacin were resistant towards Pseudomonas aeruginosa in diabetic ulcer grade III and IV Wagner. Antibiotics that can be used on the bacteria Pseudomonas aeruginosa in diabetic foot ulcer patients are ciprofloxacin norfloxacin, imipenem, levofloxacin, meropenem, ceftriaxone, and cefotaxime. Keywords : antibiotic, diabetic ulcer, Pseudomonas aeruginosa Federation predicts will increase the number BACKGROUND of diabetics in Indonesia in 2030 reached 21.3 Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a dangerous million patients (Wid et al., 2004). disease that is often called the silent killer. Patients with diabetes are at risk for Diabetes mellitus is one of the degenerative diabetic ulcers. DM patients are estimated to diseases handling. experiencing diabetic ulcers by 15% and 3- Indonesia is at the fourth position as the 4% exposed to severe infections (Frykberg et country with the highest number of people al., 2006). The treatment of diabetic ulcers with 8.4 million people with the cases of can be given by reducing the pressure on the diabetes skin. Surgery and the use of antibiotics are that require mellitus. careful International Diabetes deemed important also for the treatment of streptomycin, ampicillin, and erythromycin. infected ulcers. Antibiotics are a class of On the other hand, there are few antibiotics drugs often used to treat the infection. that are still sensitive to P. aeruginosa such as However, the use of antibiotics is often meropenem, cefotaxime, and amikacin. imprecise, adverse drug reaction (ADR) and leads to microbial resistance. Based on the above background this research has been conducted to determine the Diabetic ulcers are open sores on the sensitivity of antibiotics against Pseudomonas skin surface. It is possible for complications aeruginosa bacteria as found in diabetic makroangiopati vascular ulcers Wagner stage III and IV to help direct insufficiency and neuropathy, the more there the administration of antibiotics in patients is a wound on a patient which can develop with diabetic ulcers. causing into an infection caused by aerobic and anaerobic bacteria. (Tambunan, 2007). In Objectives patients with ulcers of diabetic Gram-negative The aim of this study is to determine the bacteria are identified at most, which is 7 antibiotic sensitivity class of aminoglycoside times more compared with gram-positive (amikacin), class of cephalosporin (cefadroxil, bacteria (Aulia, 2008). ceftriaxone, Based on research Sari and the gram-negative levofloxacin such as cefotaxime), class of carbapenem (imepenem and meropenem), and Apridamayanti (2015) it has been found that bacterium, and class of quinolones and (ciprofloxacin, norfloxacin) against Pseudomonas aeruginosa is one of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa at the foot ulcers of bacteria that have the highest percentage in diabetic degrees III and IV Wagner. It also patients with diabetic ulcers. It is also included the resources for the promotion of reinforced in research Manisha (2012) that the the prevention of antibiotic resistance on Gram-negative bacterial pathogens in diabetic patients with diabetic ulcers degrees III and ulcers mostly is Pseudomonas aeruginosa 48 IV. (30.57)%, Klebsiella spp 35 (22.29), Escherichia coli 26 (16.56%) and Proteus sp 8 METHOD (4.37%). As revealed in the research of Aulia Sampling (2008) Pseudomonas aeruginosa has the Samples of bacteria were taken from diabetic highest levels of resistance to doxycycline, ulcer swab degrees III and IV Wagner using a sterile swab, then stored in a sterile transport Clinical Laboratories and Standards Institute medium and sealed. The number of ethical (2014). clearence is 4270/ UN 22.9/ DT/ 2015. Bacteria contained in a sterile swab planted in RESULT AND DISCUSSION the media blood agar and Mac-Conkey. Isolation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa The bacteria grown in two media Isolation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa The bacteria are grown on media blood agar included Mac-Conkey Agar (MCA) and and Mac-Conkey. Planting bacteria were Blood Agar Plate (BAP). This planting used performed directly on solid agar media and the scratch method that has been selected for incubated for 24 hours in an incubator at a being more practical, economical and not time temperature of 32-40 °C (Aulia, 2008). consuming as compared to the casting method Identification of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Identification has been performed with the Gram stain test and biochemical tests. Biochemical test was conducted on the test fermentation of sugars, fermentation of carbohydrates, motility, indole, H2S production, urea, oxidase, and fermentativeoxidative. method used antibiotic disks. Media used was Mueller Hinton Agar (MHA). Meanwhile, the antibiotic disk used included ciprofloxacin, imepenem lubricated on both media, and then looped round heated to glow aside some time after being etched in a zigzag pattern on both media. Planting bacteria were carried on solid agar medium and incubated for 24 hours in an incubator at a temperature of 32-40 oC. Once bacteria grew on both media. Tests performed using the Kirby-Bauer cefadroxil, First of all, a sterile swab in amies media was morphological observation was completed Antibiotic Sensitivity Testing norfloxacin, requiring longer time and more materials. levofloxacin, ceftriaxone, and amikacin, cefotaxime, meropenem. The determination of antibiotic sensitivity was performed based upon the guidelines of Mac Conkey (MC) is a selective differential medium used to see the ability of bacteria to ferment glucose. P.aeruginosa colonies when grown will not be coloured because it is not able to ferment lactose as shown in Figure 1. The blood agar media is a differential medium that can differentiate bacteria based on their ability to lyse red blood cells. P.aeruginosa colonies formed are round, convex, transparent and uneven edges. P.aeruginosa experience replaced by safranin red. Safranin got into the haemolysis Beta (β) or so-called haemolysis cells of bacteria and replaced crystal violet so total, defined as the entire lysis of red blood that the colours seen are red. cells. A clear zone, close to the colour and Bacterial biochemical test is a method transparency of a basic media, surrounded the or treatment performed to identify and colony as seen in Figure 2. determine a pure culture of the isolated bacteria through the properties of physiology. Identification of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Table 1 shows that the bacteria Pseudomonas The identification of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in motility test was positive in this aeruginosa was performed using Gram case as shown by the spread of white as the staining and biochemical tests. Biochemical roots around the inoculation. This showed the tests included the fermentation of sugars, movement of bacteria inoculated, indicating fermentation motility, that these bacteria had flagella. The bacteria indole, H2S production, urea, oxidase, and were also positive in the test Simmon citrate fermentative-oxidative. as indicated by a colour change from green to of carbohydrates, As seen in figure 3, Gram staining test results showed that the bacterium blue.It shows that these bacteria utilize citrate as a carbon source. P.aeruginosa was a Gram-negative bacterium Oxidase test is a biochemical reaction for showing some results in red. The results carried out to see their cytochrome oxidase, were obtained in accordance with the an enzyme that is usually called indophenol description stating oxidase. Test oxidative/fermentative was that P.aeruginosa has been shaped gram- conducted with an aim to know the nature of negative oxidation or fermentation of bacteria to Mayasari bacterium aeruginosa is a (2006) bacillus, Pseudomonas Gram-negative bacteria glucose by using two tubes, one of which was because bacteria are in red cells. The red as media to use paraffin. Pseudomonas colour as seen in bacterial cells was due to the aeruginosa results of discoloration on one of release of the dye crystal violet for leaching the tubes from green to yellow indicate the using alcohol. The cell wall of Gram-negative bacteria from oxidative. bacteria that have a peptidoglycan layer is The results showed that the bacterium thinner than Gram-positive bacteria. Gram- was identified as the bacterium Pseudomonas negative bacteria with a thin peptidoglycan aeruginosa. These results are consistent with layer would be more easily dislodged and Sulistiyaningsih (2010) showing that the bacteria Pseudomonas biochemical tests aeruginosa in of glucose, be ongoing. This separation will always result lactose, in the excessive twisting double helix of DNA mannitol, maltose, sucrose, indole, urea, prior to the point of separation. This H 2 S showed a negative result on the test, mechanical barriers can be overcome with the while motile, oxidase and Simmons citrate help showed positive ones. (topoisomerase II). Whereas levofloxacin of bacteria DNA gyrase enzyme antibiotics work by inhibiting topoisomerase II and IV in bacteria. Topoisomerase II Antibiotic Sensitivity Test Antibiotic was enzyme function causing relaxation of the samples DNA strands are experiencing excessive at Pseudomonas aeruginosa and was selected the time of transcription in the DNA randomly. Media test using Mueller Hinton replication Agar (MHA). The disk shaped antibiotics function in the separation of the newly formed were used so that unnecessary antibiotic DNA after bacterial DNA replication process suspensions is complete (Setiabudy, 2011). carried out sensitivity on the testing positive manufacture antibiotics. Antibiotics were tested i.e. cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, norfloxacin, meropenem, levofloxacin, imepenem, amikacin, cefadroxil, and ciprofloxacin. process. Topoisomerase IV Amikacin is an aminoglycoside class of antibiotics. The mechanism of aminoglycosides, is when aminoglycosides have been entered into the bacterial cell, and Based on the test results of sensitivity the aminoglycosides bind to the 30S ribosome as seen in Table 2, the sensitive antibiotics and inhibit protein synthesis. The binding of included ciprofloxacin, norfloxacin, aminoglycosides in this ribosome accelerates meropenem, levofloxacin, the aminoglycoside transport into the cell, ceftriaxone and cefotaxime while cefadroxil followed by a cytoplasmic membrane damage and amikacin-resistant bacteria P. aeruginosa. and imipenem, Ciprofloxacin, norfloxacin subsequent cell death. It occured and allegedly and is a genetic mutation that results levofloxacin are the quinolone class of in the disruption of protein synthesis. In this antibiotics. The mechanisme of ciprofloxacin case, the wrong types of amino acids in a and norfloxacin was by inhibiting the enzyme polypeptide chain spliced to form a type of DNA gyrase in bacteria. Double helix shape protein that is wrong. While the decline in the of DNA must be separated into two chains of antimicrobial activity of amikacin was caused DNA during replication and transcription will by the modification of enzymes, efflux pumps and increased activity as occurred 16S rRNA also bind to beta-lactam antibiotics causing methylation. Modification enzymes that occur this enzyme not able to catalyse the cell wall can enzyme transpeptidation although still continuing to by be formed. The cell walls that form does not nukleotidiltranferase and phosphorylation by have a crosslinking and peptidoglycan formed fosforiltranferase. Increased efflux pumps is not perfect making it weaker and easily may occur because of the XY gene Mex - degraded. In OPR M which encodes the activation of difference in osmotic pressure within the efflux pump. Methylation 16S rRNA gene can cell Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteria in the occur because RmtA, RmtB, ARMA and environment and will make the occurrence of RmtD which encodes bacteria (Setiabudy, cell lysis. In addition, the complex protein 2011). transpeptidase and beta-lactam antibiotic will be acetylated acetyltransferase, by the adenylation Cefotaxime and ceftriaxone are third generation cephalosporin antibiotics. As with class other of beta-lactam a normal condition, the stimulate autolysin compounds that can mendigesti cell walls bacteria Pseudomonas aeruginosa, of and antibiotics, the mechanism of action is a then Pseudomonas aeruginosa lose cell wall cephalosporin antibiotic inhibits bacterial cell or through lysis will die (Setiabudy, 2011). wall synthesis, which inhibited the reaction Cefadroxil is a first generation trans-peptidase is the third stage in the cephalosporin class of antibiotics. This class reaction of antibiotics is more effective for Gram- sequence cell wall formation (Setiabudy, 2011). positive bacteria. Cefadroxil resistance is Imipenem and meropenem are a class caused by the formation of beta-lactamase of carbapenem antibiotic as the large class of enzymes. This enzyme is produced from gene beta-lactamase. Beta-lactamase antibiotics TEM1, TEM2, and SHV1 and can inhibit the work to kill the bacteria in a way of inhibiting action of cefadroxil namely by hydrolysing the cell wall synthesis. In the process of the the beta-lactam ring contained in cefadroxil so formation of cell walls, transpeptidation that this drug can not bind to its receptor reaction was catalysed by the enzyme (Meletis and Bagkeri, 2013). transpeptidase and produced a crosslinking between two Transpeptidase peptide enzyme chains-glucan. located on the cytoplasmic membrane of the bacteria can CONCLUSION Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates were sensitive to the antibiotic levofloxacin, norfloxacin, cefotaxime, Development and Treatment Options. Greece: Licensee Intech. ceftriaxone, Mayasari E. (2006) Pseudomonas aeruginosa: ciprofloxacin, imipenem, meropenem while Karakteristik, Infeksi dan Penanganan. the bacteria Pseudomonas aeruginosa are Medan: USU Repository. resistant to antibiotic cefadroxil and amikacin. PERKENI. (2011). Konsensus Pengelolaan dan Acknowledgments Pencegahan Diabetes Mellitus Tipe 2 di Indonesia. Jakarta : FKUI The authors are thankful to DIPA Tanjungpura University for research about the RSCM. Sari R, Apridamayanti P. (2015) Identifikasi Identification of Bacteria ESBL Producing Bakteri Diabetic Ulcer in Grade III and IV Wagner. Penderita Ulkus Diabetikum Derajat Penghasil ESBL pada III dan IV Wagner. Pontianak : Bibliography Laporan Penelitian DIPA Universitas Aulia F, N. (2008) Pola Kuman Aerob dan Tanjungpura. Sensitifitas Gangren Diabetik. Thesis. Medan: Repository FK USU; 2008. Frykberg R.G, Zgonis T, Armstrong D.G, Setiabudy R. Farmakologi dan Terapi. (2011) Jakarta: Department Pharmacology and Driver V.R, Giurini J.M, Kravitz R.M, Medical et al. (2006) Diabetic Foot Disorders Indonesia. of Therapeutic of Faculty Universitas A Clinical Practice Guideline. The Sulistiyaningsih. Journal of Foot an Ankle; 45(5): 1-49. Beberapa Manisha J, Mitesh PH, Nidhi SK, Modi DJ, Terhadap Bakteri Pseudomonas Vegad MM. (2012) Spectrum of aeruginosa Dan Pseudomonas Microbial Flora in Diabetic Foot Ulcer aeruginosa Multi Resisten (PAMR). And Antibiotic Sensitivity Pattern in Jatinangor: Tertiary Care Hospital in Ahmedabad, Report. Gujarat : National Journal of Medical. Research. Vol 3: 354-57. Meletis G, Bagkeri M. (2013) Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Multi-Drug-Resistance (2010) Uji Sediaan Kepekaan Antiseptik Independent Research Tambunan M. Perawatan Kaki Diabetes. (2007) Dalam: Soegondo S, dkk : Penatalaksanaan Terpadu. FKUI. Diabetes Jakarta: Balai Melitus Penerbit Wid S, Roglic G, Green A, Sicree R, King H. (2004) Global Prevalence of Diabetes. Edinburgh: 1050-1051. Diabetes Care; 27(5):