* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download attach_12_1
Survey
Document related concepts
Immunity-aware programming wikipedia , lookup
Telecommunications engineering wikipedia , lookup
Pulse-width modulation wikipedia , lookup
Power inverter wikipedia , lookup
Stray voltage wikipedia , lookup
Voltage optimisation wikipedia , lookup
Fault tolerance wikipedia , lookup
Surge protector wikipedia , lookup
Opto-isolator wikipedia , lookup
Alternating current wikipedia , lookup
Mains electricity wikipedia , lookup
Transcript
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN LIGHTENING TEST STANDARDS FOR AIRCRAFT AND AVIONICS NICHOLAS WRIGHT1, SWITZERLAND, EOIN SUGRUE2, IRELAND, MAXIM ERMAKOV3, RUSSIA 1 EMC Partner AG, 2 Amideon Systems Ltd, 3 ZAO “Energopromimport” Abstract. There is a general movement towards synchronisation of the many diverse standards applicable to avionics and aircraft testing in both the civilian and military fields. Foremost of these and widely accepted as an ‘international’ standard is the new edition of RTCA/DO160D. The latest additions are embodied in change No. 3 from December 2002. This paper provides an overview of the new standard focusing on the Lightening Test part and differentiates between special requirements, outlining the impact on test equipment and test load and the authors experience in carrying out these tests. 1. Introduction The lightening induced transient susceptibility of aircraft and avionics is a major element of RTCA/DO160D. This standard includes statements which are not self explanatory and require experience with these test types to interpret the correct meaning. 2. Background The external lightning environment can be simplified into four waveform components A, B, C & D as shown in Figure 1. These interact with an aircraft’s structure to induce voltage and current transients on the internal cabling and equipment. through several coupling path. For practical purposes, these can be narrowed down to two basic mechanisms: aperture coupling and resistive coupling. 2.1 Resistive coupling This mechanism produces voltages in loops existing between cables and an aircraft structure. If the structure is highly conductive, the voltages may have the waveshape associated with the external environment. Because of this, the most common transient voltage is that associated with component A. This translates to the waveform 4 definition 6.4/70µs. This waveform can also be present in cable shields derived from the shield current and transfer impedance. Low resistance cables, connected at both ends to the airframe structure will be subject to a current transient, derived from the external lightning event, galvanically coupled between the low inductance airframe and the relatively high inductance cables. An aluminium airframe presents a low impedance path so the transients will be long but relatively low in amplitude. Structures comprising insulation material such as carbon fibre give rise to long transients with higher amplitudes than aluminium structures. Figure 1 Lightening Waveform Components These different transfer characteristics have resulted in two waveforms being employed. Waveform 5A (40/120µs) models resistive coupling through an aluminium structure. Waveform 5B (50/500µs) models resistive coupling through a carbon fibre structure. Component (A) represents the initial stroke of a lightning event with amplitudes up to several hundred kiloamps this component carries the highest energy level. Component (B) is an intermediate current of some tens of kiloamps reducing to component (C) which represents current flowing in the lightning channel. This can last for some milliseconds with currents in the hundreds of amperes range. Component (D) corresponds to restrikes on the airframe with peak amplitudes in the tens of kiloamp range. There are several mechanisms over which the external lightning event is coupled into an aircraft’s systems. In reality, most transients are induced as complex waves 2.2 Aperture coupling Where the aircraft structure is not homogeonous, EM waves can penetrate and transients will be induced in the internal electronic systems. The single largest event is the initial stroke (component A), this can be coupled as a magnetic field, penetrating the structure and inducing currents with the waveform 1 (6.4/70µs) shape. Electric and / or magnetic fields penetrating the structure will excite resonances in cables having the damped sinusoidal form and ranging in frequency from 1MHz to 10MHz. These are modelled by the waveform 3 1MHz & 10MHz transients. Voltages between cables and the structure exhibiting the component A waveform (6.4/70µs) will drive a waveform defined as waveform 2 (0.1/6.4µs). 3. Applicability Test transients have been derived from measurements performed on aircraft systems under lightning strike condition as outlined in the Table 1. (current). PIN injection test requirements are shown in the following Table 3. Level Waveforms 3 1 MHz 4 6.4/70 µs 5A 40/120 µs Voc/Isc Voc/Isc Voc/Isc 1 100/4 50/10 50/50 2 250/10 125/25 125/125 3 600/60 300/60 300/300 4 1500/60 750/150 750/750 5 3200/128 1600/320 1600/1600 5B 50/500 µs 1 2 3 6.4/70µs 0.1/6.4µs 1MHz/10MHz Current Voltage Voltage/Current 4 5A 5B 6.4/70µs 40/120µs 50/500µs Table 3 PIN Injection Test Requirements Voltage Voltage/Current Voltage/Current 4.1.2. Cable Bundle Single Stroke Cable bundle tests are performed using an injection probe to couple transients. Tests are performed on fully configured functioning equipment to determine equipment survivability. Voltage and current levels have to be monitored during the test process to ensure the test limit is not exceeded and/or the test level is reached. Table 1 Test Transients 1 to 5 Two transient types are specified under waveform 5. The waveform 5A is intended to be used for aircraft with primarily metallic structures and 5B to be used for aircraft with more composite material in the structure. Impulses are applied to the test object by either: - Direct injection on the cable or pins (PIN Injection) - Indirect injection on cables with an injection clamp - Ground injection where the impulse is connected onto the equipment or cable ground. Test levels specify the internal aircraft environment. - Level one, is applied to equipment and wiring in a well protected environment - Level two, is applied to equipment and wiring in a partially protected environment - Level three, is intended for equipment and wiring in a moderately exposed environment - Levels four and five are intended for equipment and wiring in a severe electromagnetic environment. Level Waveforms 1 6.4/70 µs I 2 0.1/6. 4 µs 3 1 MH z 3 10 MHz 4 5A 6.4/70 µs 40/ V 120 µs 5B 50/500 µs Vlimit/Itest Vtest/Ilimit Vtest/Ilimit Vlimit/Itest 1 50/100 100/20 50/100 50/150 2 125/250 250/50 125/250 125/400 3 300/600 600/120 300/600 300/1000 4 750/1500 1500/300 750/1500 750/2000 5 1600/3200 3200/640 1600/3200 1600/5000 Table 4 Cable Bundle Test Requirements Single stroke events are used for damage assessment on avionic sub-systems and equipment. They can be divided into two categories: Note: Inductance of the EUT cable primarily limits waveform 3 current. For example, a cable length of 50 cm has an inductance of approximately 0.5 µH and as a consequences the impedance at 10MHz Z = 2f x L = 31 Ohm. To attain current limits for the Single Stroke, a driving voltage from the generator would need to be: - at level 4 300A x 31 Ohm = 9.3 kV - at level 5 640 A x 31 Ohm = 19.8 kV These voltage levels are unrealistic and can never be reached. Using this example it can be demonstrated that the limits of waveform 3 are maybe applicable at 1 MHz but never at 10 MHz. To be more precise, the waveform 3 column should be divided into two with current limits at 10 MHz 10 times lower than for 1MHz. 4.1.1 PIN injection The transient is applied directly to the system interface circuits and is used to assess the dielectric withstand voltage of the interface components. PIN injection waveforms are defined in terms of the test signal measured in an open circuit (voltage) and a short circuit 4.2. Multiple Stroke Multiple Stroke waveforms are applied to determine the Electro-Magnetic Compatibility (EMC) of systems, subsystems and equipment. The multiple stroke waveform set (Figure 2) comprises a series of 14 transients the first of which represents the initial stroke (component A), 4. Transient Requirements Three transient events are specified in Table 2: SS MS MB Test Designations Single Stroke Multiple Stroke Multiple Burst Table 2 Transient Requirements 4.1 Single Stroke followed by 14 transients at 50% of the first which correspond to restrikes (component D) on the airframe. Multiple Stroke transients are applied to cable bundles only using an injection probe. The pulses are most intense at the time of initial lightning attachment to the aircraft structure. The predominant waveform responses are the damped sinusoidal waveforms in a frequency range from 1MHz to 10MHz. Figure 2 Multiple Stroke Waveform Level 1 2 3 4 5 1 6.4/µs I 2 0.1/6.4 µs 3 1/10MHz Vlimits/Itest Vtest/Ilimits Vtest/Ilimits First 50/506) 50/50 100/20 Subseq. 25/25 25/25 50/10 First 125/125 125/125 250/50 Subseq. 62.5/62.5 62.5/62.5 125/25 First 300/300 300/300 600/120 Subseq 150/150 150/150 300/60 First 750/750 750/750 1500/300 Subseq. 375/375 375/375 750/300 First 1600/1600 1600/1600 3200/640 Subseq. 800/800 800/800 1600/320 4 6.4/70 µs V 5A 40/120 µs 5B 50/500 µs Vtest/Ilimits Vlimits/ITest First 25/506) 20/606) Subseq. 12.5/25 10/30 First 62.5/125 50/160 Subseq. 31.25/62.5 25/80 First 150/300 120/400 Table 6 Damped Sinusoidal Test Levels Subseq 75/150 60/200 First 375/750 530/800 Subseq. 187.5/375 150/400 First 800/1600 640/2000 In relation to the comments made earlier about waveform 3 (Figure 4) current limits, it is clearly evident that the limits of the Multiple Burst requirement are significantly (approximately ten times) lower. Subseq. 400/800 320/1000 Level 1 2 3 4 5 Table 5 Multiple Stroke Test Requirements 4.3 Multiple Burst Multiple Burst waveforms are also used to determine the Electro-Magnetic Compatibility (EMC) of systems, subsystems and equipment. The multiple burst waveform set is characterised by randomly spaced groups of 20 low amplitude current transients. Each impulse contains rapidly changing currents. Multiple burst transients are derived from lightning leader progression or branching. Figure 3 Multiple Burts Waveform Figure 4 Damped Sinusoidal V/I Waveform Levels Waveform 3H 1 MHz 3H 10 MHz VTest/ILimit 1 60/1 2 150/2.5 3 360/6 4 900/15 5 1920/32 5. Important Points to note when using DO 160D DO160D includes statements which are not self explanatory and require experience with these test types to interpret the correct meaning. a) The waveforms can only be guaranteed in the calibration set-ups because cable bundle impedances are unknown and will affect voltage and current transients. b) Within the calibration set-up, the waveform should be verified in Voc (open circuit) or Isc (short circuit) conditions only. c) d) e) f) A test system should be able to reach the levels (current or voltage amplitudes VTest, ITest or VLimit, ILimit) defined for induced cable bundle test or ground injection. NB: the waveform in the real test conditions may differ from the waveform in the calibration set- up. For cable bundle tests only VTest or ITest waveforms are defined, for VLimit or Ilimit the waveform is not clearly defined. Therefore only the absolute value should be noted. Waveform 2 carries a notice that: ‘Ideally, the waveform 2 generator will produce waveform 1 in the short circuit calibration loop of Fig 22-16’. Our experience is the opposite; the waveform 1 generator produces an approximate waveform 2 at open loop conditions. It is a fact that neither a waveform 1 generator can be designed to generate waveform 2 in an open loop, nor can a waveform 2 generator be designed to generate waveform 1 into a short circuit. DO160D, despite this misleading notice, does actually define two distinct waveforms (1) and (2) both must be applied separately. For PIN injection the generator impedance is defined as Voc/Isc, see table 22-2 of DO160D. These values define the generator virtual impedance. For all other tables 22-3, 22-4, 22-5 and waveforms the ITest or VTest values represent the test level (voltage or current) and the Vlimit or Ilimit values represent the limits intended to prevent overstressing the EUT. These are often misinterpreted as the generator source impedance. This is incorrect. In order to reach test levels or test limits, it may be necessary to vary the coupling technique changing the effective test impedance (generator plus coupler). 6. Test Equipment Requirements Avionics testing to DO 160D requires distinct impulse test types, with very diverse waveform characteristics and energy content. Waveforms 2 and 3 can be incorporated into a single test instrument as can waveforms 1, 4 and 5. equipment. As there was no single source for all the equipment required, the emphasis was placed on the skill and technical competence of the test engineer, needless to say, equipment assembly and set-up times were extremely long and test repeatability was a constant challenge. Today the multiple stroke and multiple burst are mandatory, meaning the previous approach is no longer an option. Specialist test equipment with a high level of computing power, designed as a single system including generators, injection probes and calibration jigs, is the only way to ensure compliance with the DO160D requirements. 7. DO 160D compatibility with other avionics Standards The waveforms from DO160D are used as the basis for many other standards both in the civilian and military environments. Some examples of current standards are the NH 90 GRS helicopter standard, Airbus A380, Boeing D6-16050-4C, EUROCAE ED-84 (SAE ARP5412), FAA AC 20-136 and ISO 7137. All waveforms used in these standards are the same, the differences lie mainly in the Multiple Stroke (MS) and Multiple Burst (MB) definitions. 8. Conclusion Experience dealing with users of avionic test systems has shown that only 10% of applications require a level 5 ability. As previously discussed, the need for level 5 testing is only for equipment that will be fitted in a severe electromagnetic environment. Test equipment to meet this much higher test level is priced significantly higher than equipment for level 3 or 4. Having said that, should the need for level 5 testing become real, then clearly a level 4 test system that can be extended to cover this is a distinct advantage against the purchase of new equipment. The latest information from research and test experience, shows that frequencies other than the 1MHz and 10MHz can be present in civilian aircraft. In reality, platform resonances at many frequencies up to 17MHz have been encountered. This and other information is currently being compiled into a revision for the DO-160 standard. 9. References RTCA/DO-160D Environmental conditions and test procedures for airborne equipment. Section 22: Lightning Induced Transient Susceptibility. December 5 2002 (change No. 3) EMC requirements for avionics: RTCAI DO-160D change 1 and 3 ITEM 2002, Erik Borgstrom, In the past, it was typical that only single stroke testing would be carried out. This was because the multiple stroke and multiple burst tests were not mandatory and single stroke testing could be performed using a variety of readily available (but largely ill suited) test 10 Information about the Authors Nicholas Wright, Currently International Sales Manager for EMC Partner based in Switzerland Eoin Sugrue, Managing Director of Amideon Systems Ltd, based in Ireland and Moscow have worked in the EMC market for over fifteen years, [email protected] Maxim Ermakov, Currently Commercial Manager of ZAO “Energopromimport”, Moscow, [email protected]