Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Beat AML Umbrella Study A new effort to rapidly transition effective new patient friendly therapeutics for AML therapy that greatly impact patient’s lives AML: The Disease Most common adult leukemia (20,830 cases in 2015, median age 67 years) Diagnosis – – Average age of patient with AML is 67 years old Symptoms include bruising, fatigue, infections, and/or headache with sub-acute presentation Standard therapy (7/3 cytarabine/daunorubicin followed by consolidation or allogeneic stem cell transplant) resulting in hospitalization 1-6 months; has not changed Until recently, classified predominately by metaphase cytogenetics and select mutations with some potentially targetable [MLL rearrangements and CBF leukemia] Growing number of gene mutations identified that offer potential for targeted therapy - Relatively small number per case (average 7 with approximately 100 common variants) - Significant differences between cases with co-mutational patterns - Groups of mutations converge on common mechanisms of transformation (TET/IDH/WT1) Relapse represents more complex mixture of disease - Presence of pre-existence and/or evolution of resistant subsets within single AML patient making ability to target “one disease” unlikely Outcome for ALL AML Patients with Standard Therapy Not Good Age 60 and > worse 10 yr DFS Byrd JC and Bloomfield CD: unpublished Alliance data 3 Two Pt Groups with Extended Overall Survival With Chemotherapy Shorter Follow Up CBF AML Sherif S. Farag et al. Blood 2006;108:63-73 4 NPM1 Mutated/FLT3 WT Heiko Becker et al. JCO 2010;28:596-604 Little Change in AML Treatment: How Can We Accelerate This? • Lack of change in treatment options is not due to a lack of resources or interest although NO agents approved by FDA for AML since 2nd generation athracyclines • Heterogeneous disease with a growing number of mutations makes it difficult to develop treatments which work for all AML patients regardless of genotype (i.e. herceptin story) with rare exception (we are not giving up on the gleevac or ibrutinib for AML) • AML until recently has lead sequencing efforts, although clinical translation of this is still needed. Low frequency of mutations does allow more sophisticated assessment of driver clone and subclones for choice of therapy • Majority of patients with AML relapse and at this time have impaired immune system and also sequencing studies show much more diversity in driver and subclones • Drug development in AML has often focused on AML as a common disease and also in the setting of relapse • History tells us that even active drugs (azacitidine, decitabine, clofarabine) have minimal or no activity in relapse Lets do something different 5 RATIONAL FOR MASTER TRIAL CONCEPT IN AML • Overall intent to yield measurable efficiencies in terms of • Improving genomic screening of AML patients at the time of clinical trial entry • Feasibility of 7 day waiting period while genomic studies completed • Assign therapy on basis of molecular marker targetable with a novel agent • Different from other studies, also incorporate a marker negative arm so all patients are offered a opportunity to gain benefit • Improved timelines for drug biomarker testing of targeted agent and adaptation • Use chemotherapy only when benefit demonstrated (NPM1 mut/FLT3 wt; CBF AML) • Multi-arm master protocol • Each arm independent from one another with consistent eligibility • Provide network for junior and senior AML clinical investigators to lead trials • Window design allows for testing of “large effects” • Focus initially on age >60 years as this group does poorly with 7/3 chemotherapy • 6 Designed to facilitate FDA approval of new drugs where big effects are observed Schematic Study Design Phase 2, newly diagnosed AML patients, > 60 yrs Assign Treatment by Marker Targeted Agent→ Add HM (decitabine or azacitidine) if no response or Targeted agent + HM Patient Registration Consent Bone Marrow Sample Chemo Responsive Definitely: CBF AML Maybe: NPM1+/FLT3- Genomic Screening < 1 Week (7 days) Less Responsive Other groups Primary Endpoint: CR, CRp, PR with establishment of normal cts Durability important 7 + 3 chemotherapy and Targeted agent Co-primary Endpoint: CR; 2-yr DFS Extensive correlative studies 7 Potential Treatment Groups and How To Get Involved Genetic Group* CBF NPM1 only mut MLL re-arrangement or MLL-PTD IDH1 mut IDH2 mut TP53 mut/Complex karyotype FLT3 ITD/TKD ut TET2, WT1 and IDH1/2 mutant (hypermethylation group) RAS/PTPN11/PTEN mut Marker Neg Other Groups may be added 8 The Leukemia & Lymphoma Society (LLS) is seeking clinical sites to participate in a Master Clinical Trial for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients based on a personalized medicine approach. If your institution is interested, contact Amy Burd. [email protected] Along the Way to a Trial (Jan 2015-current) • • • • • • Establish purpose of WHY we are doing this study Partnership with FDA on how best to proceed (multiple interactions) Identifying AML patients that are appropriate for (NCTN Group data) Listening to what patients want (FDA and LLS patient meeting) Identifying molecular vendor for testing Attracting and collaborating with industry partners in novel trial design and cost model relative to industry standards Identifying a CRO to coordinate novel study Compiling both master protocol and also sub-protocols Identifying an ideal biorepository Identifying second generation of clinical sites Fundraising to fulfill LLS commitment to this effort • • • • • 9 What We Have Learned • Attitude in disease field to this type of study is mixed but NCI, ASH, FDA, and industry have been highly cooperative and collaborative • Biomarker assessment and group stratification is not straight forward – Variant allele frequency prioritization versus targetable lesion? – When variant allele frequency not easy (FLT3-ITD)? – Desire to be inclusive to most patients by marker negative group versus having a true distinct molecular group – Incorporation of different technologies often difficult (NGS, mRNA, cytogenetics) • Obtaining single central IRB oversight outside of an NCI study not always easy but essential to assure appropriate transition of study • Model of de-emphasizing credit to any individual as part of bylaw has helped this move forward at quick pace (Jan 2015-current) • As study develops, more targets for specific arms become apparent 10 Acknowledgement • Principals – Amy Burd PhD – – – Ross Levine MD Brian Druker MD John C. Byrd MD • Clinical Investigators – – – – – – – – – William Blum MD Alice Mims MD, MS Martin Tallman Eytan Stein MD Richard Stone MD Jacqueline Garcia MD Amir Fathi MD, PhD Uma Borate MD Elie Traer MD, PhD • Statisticians – – Abigail Shoben, Abigail PhD Amy Stark MS Investors in A New Vision for Acute Myeloid Leukemia Treatment Food and Drug Administration American Society of Hematology Industry Collaborators and vendors