* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Anterior and posterior left ventricular sarcomere lengths behave
Cardiac contractility modulation wikipedia , lookup
Coronary artery disease wikipedia , lookup
Heart failure wikipedia , lookup
Cardiac surgery wikipedia , lookup
Electrocardiography wikipedia , lookup
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy wikipedia , lookup
Myocardial infarction wikipedia , lookup
Mitral insufficiency wikipedia , lookup
Quantium Medical Cardiac Output wikipedia , lookup
Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia wikipedia , lookup
Anterior lengths and posterior left ventricular sarcomere behave similarly during ejection J. M. GUCCIONE,l ‘Department Baltimore, San Diego, W. G. O’DELL,’ A. D. McCULLOCH,2 Guccione, J. M., W. G. O’Dell, A. D. McCulloch, and W. C. Hunter. Anterior and posterior left ventricular sarcomere lengths behave similarly during ejection. Am. J. Physiol. 272 (Heart Circ. Physiol. 41): H469-H477, 1997.-Previous studies of regional differences in myocardial deformation between the anterior and posterior walls of the canine left ventricle were based on strain, which is not an absolute measure of deformation. We thus compared sarcomere lengths at anterior and posterior sites during ejection in isolated dog hearts. Cineradiographic imaging of regional deformation with radiopaque markers implanted near the midwall in five hearts and just below the epicardium in six hearts, combined with postmortem histology, allowed sarcomere length reconstruction throughout the cardiac cycle. The amount of sarcomere shortening accompanying left ventricular ejection was similar in both walls of the left ventricle for sarcomeres located at epicardial and midwall sites. The mean sarcomere length (taken at the middle of the ejecting range) was also similar between the anterior and posterior sites when averaged over all hearts. The similarity of sarcomere function held not only at end systole but throughout ejection and over wide ranges of ventricular pre- and afterloads. Hence functional measurements of relative myocardial shortening may not be indicative of regional sarcomere length heterogeneity. strain; myocardium; AND W. C. HUNTER1 of Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, The Johns Hopkins Maryland 21205-2195; and “Department of Bioengineering, University La Jolla, California 92093-0412 ventricular function DIFFERENCES in the patterns of myocardial deformation between the anterior, lateral, and posterior walls of the canine left ventricle have been observed (3, 17). This is not surprising because the beating heart is a complex three-dimensional (3-D) and fiber-wound structure with mechanical properties that are nonlinear, anisotropic, time varying, and probably spatially inhomogeneous. These previous studies were based on a description of deformation in a limited region of the wall by means of strain tensors. A tensor description of strain provides information on relative stretches in any direction. However, strain is not an absolute measure of deformation because it is measured relative to an arbitrary reference configuration such as end diastole. Recently, our laboratory developed a method that allows the “reconstruction” of absolute sarcomere lengths (SLs) and orientations at any transmural layer in the left ventricular wall during any phase of the cardiac cycle (11). It is not possible with current techniques to observe directly the in vivo behavior of sarcomeres in the beating heart. Until this method was developed, the only techniques used for measuring SLs transmurally involved histological procedures on hearts fixed at specific left ventricular pressures so as to simulate different nonsystolic states in the cardiac REGIONAL 0363-6135/97 $5.00 Copyright I:C 1997 University, of California, cycle. Relative strain analyses in the anterior and posterior walls of the left ventricle were correlated with histological measurements by Villarreal and Lew (17) and Fann et al. (31, who measured the fiber orientations and related these fiber directions to the direction of maximum strain. These studies did not, however, attempt to measure absolute SLs or correct precisely for any artifactual deformation arising from the histological procedures. We thus examined the canine left ventricle for potential regional differences in sarcomere function during ejection. We compared SLs reconstructed at posterior and anterior sites at different transmural depths in beating canine hearts operating under a wide range of hemodynamic loads. SL was reconstructed by combining cineradiography of local deformations with postmortem histology of the same region. METHODS Reconstruction of sarcomere deformation (as the component in the myofiber direction of 3-D deformation> in the isolated beating canine heart was accomplished by cineradiography of local wall deformation calibrated to SL by postmortem histology. The main stages of the procedures were sterile implantation of radiopaque marker beads, preparation of the isolated heart, recording of the bead motion for a series of pressure and volume excursions in the isolated beating heart, reconstruction of 3-D strains in the region of the implanted markers, histological analysis of the geometric relationship between the local sarcomere vector and the bead positions, and reconstruction of strain in the direction of the sarcomeres. These methods follow closely those described by Rodriguez et al, (11); only a brief summary is given here. Analysis of Regional Deformation Bead implantation. The initial stage involved implantation of arrays of stainless steel beads to mark local points within the ventricular wall for the subsequent cineradiographic imaging. Mongrel dogs (B-20 kg) were anesthetized with pentobarbital sodium (30-40 mg/kg), and a left lateral thoracotomy was performed under sterile conditions. Anterior and posterior sites in the left ventricular free wall were selected that were free of large vessels and near the equator (one-third of the distance from base to apex). The anterior site was located just lateral to the left anterior descending coronary artery. The posterior site was located just lateral to the posterior descending coronary artery. At each site, sets of three beads each were placed into roughly equilateral triangles (1 cm on a side) at -6 and 0.5 mm from the epicardial surface. We will refer to data collected at these two depths as “midwall” and “epicardial,” respectively. The mean depths below the epicardium actually obtained at the anterior and posterior midwall sites were 4.8 t 0.1 (SE) and 6.0 t 0.9 mm, respectively. This difference in depth was not significant the American Physiological Society H469 H470 ANTERIOR-POSTERIOR LV SARCOMERE according to a one-way repeated-measures analysis of variance (P > 0.23) (5). Surgical attachment of mitral ring. After a 7- to IO-day recovery period, the implanted dog was reanesthetized as before, and its heart was isolated and metabolically supported by cross circulation from a second anesthetized dog (14). Oxygenated blood from the support dog was supplied directly to the coronary bed of the isolat!ed heart, and coronary venous blood was collected through a vent in the right ventricle for return to the support dog. After cutting all mitral chordae tendineae, a Teflon support ring was sewn into the fibrous ring surrounding the mitral valve. The rigid support ring allowed the insertion of a water-filled latex balloon into the left ventricle and secured the heart to a servo pump apparatus (Vivitro Systems, Superpump System, Victoria, BC). Hear-t suspension. The heart was positioned with its apexbase axis horizontal, supported by a pericardial “cradle” consisting of a plastic sheet. The heart was oriented such that the anterior bead site was toward the most elevated aspect of the heart. This placed the posterior site generally below the central left ventricular axis in a lateral view. There was a concern that the gravitational weight of the heart could deform the left ventricle and thereby alter the anteriorposterior mechanical relationships. To test this, in two hearts, we rotated the heart-pump system around its long axis and compared the local deformations of the anterior and posterior sites at two angular orientations -45’ apart. During systolic ejection, strain data at each site showed negligible differences as a function of volume. During passive filling, however, an effect of heart orientation was noted. Thus, for the subsequent analysis, we focused on the systolic strain data. Loadirzg conditions. Biplane tine-X-ray imaging (at 90 frames/s > was performed to track anterior-posterior bead positions over a wide range of cavity volumes and pressures in the beating isolated heart. Even though the heart was isolated, the cardiac cycle followed realistic pressure-volume loops. Computer feedback with simulated arterial loading and venous filling conditions governed the servo pump to provide physiological patterns of hemodynamic loading ( 15 1. End-diastolic volumes ranged from 20 to 50 ml, stroke volumes ranged from 7 to 30 ml, and ejection fractions were 20-607~. Rwonstmcting 3-D deformations fi-om cirwfilms. An automated image-analysis system was used to transform the bead positions recorded from the two orthogonal sets of tine-X-ray films into 3-D position coordinates for each time frame. From the 3-D trajectories of each bead, a local measure of the 3-D deformation was computed individually for each layer in both the anterior and posterior sites based on the relative motions of neighboring beads. With the use of the method of Rodriguez et al. ( II), a hybrid deformation gradient tensor was used to compute the deformation on the plane defined by the three beads implanted in any one layer. One or more beads from an adjacent layer were used to compute the out-of’-plane deformation components. Histological Analysis L and Sam~mez-c Rccorzstmctim The next step involved sectioning the fixed heart for histological analysis of the local sarcomere pool. Thin (3-pm) sections were cut at the location of each transmural bead triangle. Within each section, average SLs and orientations were observed from multiple sites within the bead plane with light microscopy ( X 100 objective). Analysis of orthogonal sections provided the average orientation of myocardial fibers out of the plane of the beads. While the section at low power was viewed, the coordinates of the centers of the three bead LENGTHS implant locations were determined with respect to the coordinate system used to measure sarcomere orientation within the bead plane. A transformation matrix was computed to relate the sarcomere orientation and length, the “sarcomere vector,” at the locations of the bead planes at the epicardial surface and midwall to those in the intact fixed heart before the hearts were sectioned. This transformation involved mapping the histological bead locations to those in the intact heart before fixation. Combining this transformation with the out-of-plane angle from the orthogonal sections allowed reconstruction of the average sarcomere vector in the intact fixed heart. The description of the evolution of the sarcomere vector over time throughout the cardiac cycle was then accomplished by applying to this sarcomere vector the deformation between the intact fixed heart and that observed from the 3-D trajectories of neighboring beads during the various loading cycles. Statistical Methods for Sarcomere Deformation Analysis L Experimental results in this study were from eight mongrel dogs. Five other dogs were excluded from the analysis: three hearts had weak contractile strength and two showed contracture banding when viewed histologically. Of the eight valid experiments, six hearts yielded epicardial deformation data that could be compared between the anterior and posterior sites, and five provided midwall deformation data at both sites. Unfortunately, in only three hearts did bead implantation yield deformation data simultaneously at both depths and both sites. Because comparison between depths was possible in only three hearts, we focused our analysis on a comparison of sarcomere dynamics between the anterior and posterior walls. We also focused our analysis on the behavior of SLs during the systolic ejection phase. To obtain a strictly objective criterion for determining the beginning and the end of ejection phase, we used only data from the period when the volume was decreasing over the central 90% of the volume range covered in that cardiac cycle. Data were pooled together from all ejections of the same heart, covering a wide range of preload and afterload. The chamber volume strongly affects SL, but the relationship between SL and volume (VI may vary at different sites (anterior vs. posterior) or between different hearts tested. We therefore performed a two-way repeated-measures analysis of covariance (5 ). We used the following regression equation: SL r Constant + Volume + Wall + Heart + Volume. Wall + Wall. Heart + Volume Heart + Volume. Wall Heart, where Volume is a continuous factor (i.e., a regressor) and Wall is a discrete factor (anterior vs. posterior). The regression coefficient for the term Volume *Heart indicates the average effect of the anterior vs. posterior site on the SL-V relationship. By combining the coefficients for the terms Volume and Volume. Heart, we obtained the average amount of sarcomere shortening accompanying ejection (-1%/N). The mean SL during ejection (SL,,, > was obtained at each site by combining the regression coefficients for the terms Constant and Wall. So that this calculation represented an SL in the middle of the ejecting range, the mean volume averaged over all ejections for a single heart was subtracted from the raw volume data for that heart before applying the regression. Data for ML/N and SL,,, are presented as means -+ SE. P < 0.05 was accepted as statistically significant. A preliminary analysis of a subset of the data was performed previously (7 ). l l ANTERIOR-POSTERIOR LV SARCOMERE RESULTS Changes in ventricular volume during the cardiac cycle are clearly expected to be strongly coupled with changes in the local SL. Thus we plotted SL as a function of left ventricular volume and compared the behavior of the sarcomeres at anterior and posterior sites. Figure I shows epicardial (A) and midwall (B) data throughout the cardiac cycle in which the stroke volume was maximal. For example, midwall sarcomeres at the anterior site (Fig. 1B) began their cardiac cycle a t the maximal SL (upper right corn er of loop) before shortening somewhat during the isovol umic cant raction phase. During the ejection phase (thick line and arrow), the midwall anterior sarcomeres shortened steadily as volume fell so that the trajectory was nearly linear throughout ejection. During isovolumic relaxation, these sarcomeres were elongated slightly, and, A E 2.42.32.22.1 - 2.01.9 1.8 1 f 25 I 30 I 35 I 40 LV E 2.4- r^ 5 s i!i 2.3- Volume, I 45 I I 1 50 55 60 ml xi !! E 2.22.1- 0 2 ss 3 3 a.I 1 2.01.91.8 IO I 15 I 20 I I 25 30 LV Volume, ml I 35 I 40 I 45 Fig. 1. Typical epicardial (A) and midwall (B) sarcomere length vs. left ventricular (LV) volume loops. Each loop traces simultaneous progression of sarcomere length and volume throughout a cardiac cycle. Solid lines, trajectory of changes in anterior sarcomere lengths; dashed lines, posterior sarcomere lengths; thick lines, ejection phase. Arrows, sequence in time of progression around loop. These data correspond to hemodynamic loading state in which stroke volume was maximal. A and B were taken from different hearts. LENGTHS H471 subsequently, they were restretched to their enddiastolic length during filling. The data shown in Fig. 1 are typical in that sarcomeres at all sites and depths shortened steadily during ejection (see arrows and the thick sections of each trace). At either depth, the &SW& (i.e., the slope of the approximately linear trajectory during ejection) was similar between the anterior and posterior sites. Moreover, the mean SL+ (taken at the middle of the ejecting range) was also similar between the anterior and posterior sites. On the other hand, we observed no consistent effect of site on the relationships between SL and cavity volume during the other phases of the cardiac cycle, i.e., during filling and the isovolumic phases. Note that the loops in Fig. 1 all have different shapes, with different relationships between trajectories during ejection and filling. Some of the diastolic differences may have been related to differential effects of gravitational forces between the anterior and posterior sites. In our experiments, the heart was situated with its long axis approximately horizontal and oriented such that the anterior site faced upward and the posterior site was located at approximately four o’clock. If we were to rotate the left ventricle around its long axis, we would then have altered the differential offset of the gravitational field at the two sites. As seen in Fig. 2, such rotation did indeed affect that portion of the trajectories relating SL to volume during diastolic filling, but there was no significant effect during systolic ejection. Thus, for the remainder of the data analysis, we focused exclusively on the relationship between SL and V during ejection. The results presented so far were for cardiac cycles in which stroke volume was maximal, but we also compared regional SLs in hearts operating under a wide range of hemodynamic loads. At any myocardial site, the relationship between SL and V during ejection was consistent irrespective of the hemodynamic loading conditions that brought the left ventricle to that volume. This result is reminiscent of the strain-volume relationship that Douglas et al. (2) also found to be approximately independent of hemodynamic loads. Both at the epicardium (Fig. 3) and at midwall (Fig. 4), the relationships between SL and V during ejection for different preloads and afterloads were approximately linear, had similar slopes, and had comparable SLs at matching volumes. All ejections of the same heart were pooled together to obtain a slope (ZSL/UQ and intercept (SL,j >for each site. XSL/SV values at the epicardial and midwall sites were not significantly different between the anterior and posterior walls (P > 0.28 and 0.44, respectively; Table 1, Fig. 5). When averaged over all hearts, XSL/AV was 7.3 rim/ml at the anterior epicardium and 8.3 rim/ml at the posterior epicardium. Individually, ilSL/lV was 2.2-2.8 rim/ml greater at the posterior epicardium than at the anterior epicardium in three hearts, differed less than 0.6 rim/ml between the two walls in two hearts, and was 2.5 m-n/ml greater at the anterior epicardium than at the posterior epicardium in one heart. On average, XSLIAV was 8.9 rim/ml at the H472 ANTERIOR-POSTERIOR LV SARCOMERE LENGTHS A Fig. 2. Effect of gravity on anterior epicardial (A), posterior epicardial (B), anterior midwall (C), and posterior midwall (II) sarcomere length vs. IX volume throughout cardiac cycle in which stroke volume was maximal. At all 4 sites, relationship between sarcomere length and volume before (solid lines) and after (dashed lines) rotating heart by 45’ about LV long axis is not significantly affected during ejection phase (thick lines). Filling phase of cardiac cycle was affected to the greatest extent, especially at anterior epicardium. 25 B 30 35 40 45 LV Volume, 50 55 60 25 30 ml C 35 40 45 50 LV Volume, ml 35 50 55 60 55 60 D E 2.37 2 AC %2.2f ml E 2.33, 2 g)2.2s 84 2 2.1- 25 30 35 40 45 LV Volume, anterior midwall and 9.7 rim/ml at the posterior midwall. ASL/AV was 2.9-3.4 rim/ml greater at the posterior midwall than at the anterior midwall in two hearts, differed less than 0.8 rim/ml between the two walls in two hearts, and was 1.4 rim/ml greater at the anterior midwall than at the posterior midwall in one heart. Similarly, there was no consistent anterior-posterior difference in the mean SL, (P > 0.33 at the epicardium and P > 0.96 at the midwall; Table 1, Fig. 6). When the SL, was averaged over all hearts, it was 2.00 urn at the anterior epicardium and 2.06 urn at the posterior epicardium. Individually, SL, was 0.11-O. 17 urn longer at the posterior epicardium than at the anterior epicardium in three hearts, was 0.07-0.10 urn shorter at the 50 ml 55 60 25 30 40 45 LV Volume, ml posterior epicardium than at the anterior epicardium in two hearts, and differed less than 0.03 urn between the two walls in one heart. On average, SL, was 2.01 urn at the anterior midwall and 2.01 urn at the posterior midwall. SL, was 0.03-0.05 urn shorter at the posterior midwall than at the anterior midwall in two hearts, differed less than 0.01 urn between the two walls in two hearts, and was 0.07 urn longer at the posterior midwall than at the anterior midwall in one heart. Hence we observed similar SL, values between the anterior and posterior walls despite potential regional differences in the myofiber strain. To maintain such comparable systolic lengths, sarcomeres in regions of high systolic fiber stretch (relative to an unloaded ANTERIOR-POSTERIOR LV SARCOMERE ‘- 2.4 5 F 2.3 3 Q) 2.2 z g 2.1 w” _ Posterior / Anterior 10 20 30 40 LV Volume, 50 ml 60 70 8 O- H473 LENGTHS anterior epicardium in one heart. On average, the SLUnl was 1.96 urn at the anterior midwall and 1.94 urn at the posterior midwall. The SL,nl was 0.04-0.12 urn shorter at the posterior midwall than at the anterior midwall in two hearts, differed less than 0.02 urn between the two walls in two hearts, and was 0.04 urn longer at the posterior midwall than at the anterior midwall in one heart. A more revealing analysis would be to compare the changes in SL between S1,,,, and average SL,j. At the epicardium, the difference (SL,j - SL,nI > was significantly greater in the posterior wall than in the anterior wall (P < 0.04; Table 1, Fig. 6). In fact, this was the case in all six hearts studied (Fig. 6A). Moreover, SL, SL Lln1was greater at the posterior epicardium than at the anterior epicardium both before and after rotation of the left ventricle around its long axis. At the midwall (Fig. 6B), however, there was no consistent anteriorposterior difference in SL,j - SL,nj (P > 0.55). In contrast to the “unlo’aded” diastolic state, we also compared anterior vs. posterior end-diastolic SLs at the maximal volume (EDSL,,,,) we achieved in each heart. The EDSL,,,,, values at both the epicardial and midwall 6 O- A 4 oE 2 onu 2.4 z!L n n I I IO 20 30 I LV 40 Volume, I 50 ml I 60 5 2.3 z 1.8 1 1 70 Fig. 3. Epicardial sarcomere lengths on anterior and posterior walls during ejection (A) and corresponding LV pressures (B) plotted as functions of LV volume for a wide range of end-diastolic and stroke volumes in a typical heart (same heart as Fig. 1A ). A: dashed lines, linear regressions for all ejections; solid symbols, mean sarcomere length during ejection; open symbols, sarcomere length at middle of filling at lowest preload; circles, anterior wall; squares, posterior wall. B: 0, pressure-volume data point at middle of filling at lowest preload. ventricular configuration) require shorter sarcomeres when the left ventricle is unloaded than do sarcomeres in regions of low-systolic fiber stretch. For an approximately unloaded ventricular state, we chose the configuration at the middle of filling at the lowest preload of each heart. The SL in this state is called SL,,,]. Note that left ventricular pressure in this state was -4 mmHg, so that it does not represent a completely unloaded reference state. However, this state does represent the lowest load in terms of pressure available in our data. SL unl values at the epicardial and midwall sites were not significantly different between the anterior and posterior walls (P > 0.11 and 0.39, respectively; Table 1, Fig. 6). When the SL,nI was averaged over all hearts, it was 2.01 urn at the anterior epicardium and 1.94 urn at the posterior epicardium. Individually, the SL,nl was 0.04-0.14 urn shorter at the posterior epicardium than at the anterior epicardium in five hearts and was 0.08 urn longer at the posterior epicardium than at the IO I I 15 20 I I I 25 30 LV Volume, ml 25 30 Volume, ml I 1 35 40 4 5 35 40 45 160 E 100 !f ; 80 ii-i k 60 10 15 20 LV Fig. 4. Midwall sarcomere lengths on anterior and posterior walls during ejection (A) and corresponding LV pressures (B) plotted as functions of LV volume for a wide range of end-diastolic and stroke volumes in a typical heart (same heart as Fig. 1B). Symbols same as in Fig. 3. H474 ANTERIOR-POSTERIOR LV SARCOMERE Table 1. Comparison of sarcomere lengths and shortening between anterior and posterior sites Significance 2&L I N Epicardial (n = 6) Anterior, run/ml Posterior, r-m-i/ml Midwall (12 = 51 Anterior, r-m/ml Posterior, rim/ml Posterior SL,, Epicardial, urn Midwall, pm SLmI Epicardial, urn Midwall, urn SL, - %nl E‘picardial, urn Midwall, urn EDSL,,,, Epicardial, urn Midwall, urn 7.3 i 1.1 8.3 t 0.5 NS 8.9 + 1.5 9.7? 1.0 NS -anterior 0.05 -+ 0.05 0.00 -e 0.02 -0.06 -0.03 t 0.03 t 0.03 NS NS NS NS 0.12 5 0.04 0.03 + 0.04 P < 0.05 NS 0.02 -+ 0.04 0.02 + 0.06 NS NS Values are means -+ SE; n2, no. of hearts. XSL/.W, sarcomere shortening per ejected volume; SL,,, mean sarcomere length during ejection; SL,,,ll, mean sarcomere ‘length during filling at lowest preload; SL,, - SL,,,,,, difference between SL,,, and SL,,,,,; EDSL,,,,,, , end-diastolic sarcomere length at greatest preload; NS, not significant. Significance was for test of anterior vs. posterior data. All tests used analysis of covariance with volume as a regressor, except when comparing difference in SL,,,,, , which used analysis of variance. sites were not significantly different between the anterior and posterior walls (P > 0.88 and 0.79, respectively; Table 1). When the EDSL,,, was averaged over all hearts, it was 2.19 urn at the anterior epicardium vs. 2.17 urn at the posterior epicardium. At the midwall, the EDSL,,,, averaged 2.18 urn anteriorly compared with 2.20 urn posteriorly. LENGTHS table result. In fact, two previous studies (3, 17) reported that myocardial strain during a cardiac cycle evolved differently at anterior vs. posterior sites. Even in the hearts studied here, there were often conspicuous anterior-posterior differences in epicardial sarcomere length changes during the transition from rest to activity in the isovolumic contraction phase. We suspected that anterior-posterior differences in strain might be related to anterior-posterior differences in the structure of the left ventricular wall, in particular, differences in wall curvatures. When Guccione et al. (7) built such differences of curvature into a mathematical model, it indeed predicted that epicardial SLs during ejection would differ between the anterior and posterior sites if SLs were uniformly distributed when the left ventricle was in its unloaded passive configuration. Thus the anterior-posterior similarity of ejecting sarcomere function that we observed must develop despite inherent mechanical differences between the anterior and posterior regions of the left ventricle. This suggests that the ability of cardiac cells to alter their structure in response to mechanical loads allows sarcomere function during ejection to be nearly equilibrated A 0 ‘E W DISCUSSION 0 1 Anterior This study demonstrated that sarcomeres at anterior vs. posterior sites functioned similarly during ejection in isolated canine hearts. The amount of sarcomere shortening accompanying left ventricular ejection was similar in both walls of the left ventricle for sarcomeres located just below the epicardium and also for those near the midwall. The mean SL (taken at the middle of the ejecting range) was also similar between the anterior and posterior sites when averaged over all hearts. The similarity of sarcomere function held not only at end systole but throughout ejection and over wide ranges of ventricular pre- and afterloads. This report presents the first observations of sarcomere behavior during active ejections of an intact heart. Moreover, this report also presents the first comparison of lengths between sarcomeres from different regions of the same heart. Surprisingly, although there have been previous observations of SLs in fixed hearts, no regional and only two transmural comparisons (6,12) have been reported. The regional similarity of sarcomere function during ejection that we observed was not necessarily an inevi- I 1 Posterior I LV Wall B 2 o-* E $ 1 5- s ? J 1 o2 = g 5a.I > 0-c I * a t I Anterior I I Posterior I ’ LV Wall Fig. 5. Amounts of sarcomere shortening per ejected volume USL/ JW in anterior and posterior LV free walls at epicardium (A) of 6 hearts and at midwall (B) of 5 hearts. Each symbol represents a different heart. ANTERIOR-POSTERIOR LV SARCOMERE 0 Ial I ----- --9 a I ----Q -0.2 Fig. 6. mean length between and at heart. ) I sL~nI I sLej SLej I - sLuni 1 Variations between anterior (A) and posterior (PI walls in sarcomere length during ejection (SL,., 1, mean sarcomere during filling at smallest preload (Sill,,+, and difference SLlj and SL,,,,, (SL,,, - SL,,,,, 1 at epicardium (A ) of 6 hearts midwall (B) of 5 hearts. Each symbol represents a different between re gions via myocyte adaptation. This is espefunction (for cially so if ej ecti w aspects of sarcomere example, sarcomere shortening and the mean SL,, > are the important controlling variables feeding back to modify myocyte structure. In fact, cell stretching has been shown to induce adaptations in isolated myocytes (9, 13, 18). More specifically, in a theoretical construct, Arts et al. (1) showed that including both SL at the beginning of ejection and IISL/AV as controls for myocyte growth produced an adapting structure that reacted to altered hemodynamic loads much as observed in vivo. If local myocyte adaptation occurs such that anteriorposterior sarcomere function is equilibrated during ejection, then the mechanical differences between anterior and posterior sites [as incorporated into the mathematical model (7>] must induce sarcomere nonuniformity when the left ventricle is passive and externally unloaded. This prediction was confirmed by our experimental data. Note that the model answers the inverse question, What sarcomere behavior would occur if SLs were uniform at all sites in the passive unloaded state? We chose this question because the actual distribution of SLs throughout an unloaded ventricle is not known presently and because analytic techniques to incorpo- LENGTHS H475 rate such differences in finite-element models are just in development, although they have been used for simple cylindrical models (8). Thus, based solely on the differences in geometry between the two walls of the ventricle, the mathematical model predicted that sarcomeres would work during ejection at consistently longer lengths in the epicardium of the posterior site compared with the anterior site. However, we hypothesize that if cells in the posterior epicardium were chronically forced to work at extended lengths, they would be stimulated by their mechanical environment to lay down more sarcomeres in series than their anterior counterparts, so that ejecting SLs could be equilibrated between the two walls. Consequently, when the passive ventricle is then unloaded, sarcomeres in the posterior epicardium would become shorter than anterior ones as the greater number in series are compressed. This was, in fact, observed in our data. In every heart, wall mechanics caused sarcomeres to shorten more posteriorly in the transition from a midejecting to an unloaded configuration (SL,.i SL unl in Fig. 6), and, as a result, the epicardial sarcomeres in the unloaded state were shorter posteriorly in five of six hearts. At midwall depth, the mathematical model (7) predicted that ejecting SLs would be similar at both the anterior and posterior sites (within 0.05 urn) if SLs were equal in the unloaded state. When the train of thought above is followed, it predicts that the mechanical environment surrounding midwall myocytes would supply little adaptive stimulus to alter SLs differentially between the anterior and posterior sites. Consequently, we would predict that anterior and posterior midwall SLs would remain similar in an unloaded heart even after myocyte adaptation was allowed. This was, in fact, the general trend observed (Fig. 6). If differential growth by myocytes adapts them so that sarcomere function tends toward uniformity for the ejecting conditions, then differential compressions and tensions within the ventricular wall are likely to be present when such an adapted left ventricle is unloaded passively, even though there is no net transmural pressure gradient distending the ventricle. Such a ventricle is then said to contain residual stresses (4). These can be revealed by judiciously cutting apart an unloaded ventricle, which then deforms as the residual stresses are relieved. Such deformations are called residual strains, which were studied in rat hearts by Omens and Fung ( 10). One consistent result from that study (Fig. 7 in Ref. 10) was the difference in residual strains between the anterior and posterior sites on an equatorial ring from the left ventricle. For example, the circumferential component of residual strain was significantly greater anteriorly, which implies that a circumferentially oriented line segment was elongated significantly more on the anterior side of the unloaded ventricle compared with its length in the stress-free sectioned state attained after releasing residual stresses. The anterior-posterior differences in residual strain that Omens and Fung (10) noted are quantitatively H476 ANTERIOR-POSTERIOR compatible with the anterior-posterior differences in SL that we observed under our unloaded conditions. Before we could make such a comparison, we needed to estimate SLs in the stress-free configuration. After residual stresses have been removed by sectioning an unloaded ventricle, it then seems likely that all SLs would be uniform. Rodriguez et al. (12) have confirmed this by showing that after residual stress is removed from rat ventricles, the transmural distribution of SLs becomes uniform at 1.84 urn. Combining the data of Rodriguez et al. with that of Omens and Fung (lo), one can thus predict SLs in unloaded passive rat hearts at both the anterior and posterior sites. In making this prediction, we assumed that epicardial and midwall fibers were oriented at the average fiber angles we observed and that the longitudinal principal residual strain could be derived by assuming tissue incompressibility. At the epicardial layer, anterior sarcomeres were predicted to be 1.88 urn compared with 1.80 urn posteriorly. This 0.08~urn elongation of anterior epicardial sarcomeres predicted from residual strains measured in rat hearts compares favorably with the elongation of 0.06 urn that we observed in our unloaded state. At the midwall, the difference in predicted SLs for unloaded rat hearts was much smaller (anterior = 1.83 urn; posterior = 1.80 urn), identical to the insignificant 0.03~urn difference that we found. However, note that all absolute SLs were somewhat longer in our unloaded state (e.g., anterior epicardium = 2.01 urn; posterior epicardium = 1.94 urn). This is presumably because we never fully achieved an unloaded state (chamber pressures in our unloaded state were still positive), and thus the sarcomeres were somewhat distended beyond their truly unloaded lengths. All of our data on SLs during ejection were obtained after chordal transection; on the other hand, myocytes would have adapted with the chordae intact. A recent preliminary study (16) on two open-chest anesthetized dogs suggests that, at end systole, chordal transection increases the longitudinal-radial shear in the anterior papillary muscle and inner wall. Although chordal transection certainly caused some rearrangement in cardiac geometry, there are several reasons to expect that it may not have meaningfully altered our anteriorposterior comparison. 1) The regions we studied did not directly overlie papillary insertion points; we implanted beads near the ventricular equator (more basal than papillary roots), and the circumferential location was slightly more septal (i.e., just lateral to the anterior and posterior descending coronary arteries). 2) The major difference we observed occurred at the epicardium, and we did not examine strains from the inner half of the wall. 3) Only a differential effect (e.g., if one papillary muscle were stronger than the other) is likely to have influenced our anterior-posterior comparison. Note that the geometry of our finite-element model for ventricular mechanics (7) was also obtained after chordal transection. Further limitations of our SL data should be noted. Rodriguez et al. (11) estimated that the typical peak-topeak noise that is associated with reconstructing the LV SARCOMERE LENGTHS SL was on the order of 0.04 urn. This is ~13% of the typical amount of sarcomere shortening over the ejecting range (i.e., 0.3 urn; see Figs. 3A and 4A). Hence our reconstruction approach might not have been able to detect small differences in sarcomere shortening of this order. Moreover, the bead array used here consists of approximately two layers at least 5 mm apart, which exceeds the typical separation in the previous report by Rodriguez et al. Due to potential transmural inhomogeneities in myocardial strain, the greater the separation, the more error that could be introduced during sarcomere reconstruction. Rodriguez et al. found an uncertainty of co.02 urn when fiber orientation deviated from the plane of markers by <lo”. In this study, all midwall layers satisfied this angular criterion, but the larger separation may have introduced somewhat greater uncertainty due to transmural inhomogeneity of strain. Although we primarily examined SLs during ejection, uncertainties in the diastolic configuration of the isolated hearts and potential but unknowable differences in diastolic suspension of the heart between experiment and in vivo may have affected our ability to interpret data (such as SL,,,,I and EDSL,,;,, in Table 1) that were derived during diastole. Because passive myocardium becomes dramatically stiffer as it is stretched, we expect less influence from diastolic suspension on EDSL,,,;,, than on any other diastolic SL. Moreover, although the magnitude of SL,,,,, was clearly affected when we altered diastolic suspension by rotating the isolated heart, SL,,,,, at the anterior epicardial site remained significantly longer than that at the posterior site. In summary, sarcomeres at anterior vs. posterior sites in isolated canine hearts functioned similarly throughout ejection over wide ranges of ventricular pre- and afterloads. A mathematical model for ventricular mechanics (7) predicted that epicardial SL,i values would differ between the anterior and posterior sites if SLs were uniformly distributed when the left ventricle was in its unloaded passive configuration. Thus the anterior-posterior similarity of ejecting sarcomere function that we observed must develop despite inherent mechanical differences between the anterior and posterior regions of the left ventricle. This suggests that the ability of cardiac cells to alter their structure in response to mechanical loads allows sarcomere function during ejection to be nearly equilibrated between regions via myocyte adaptation. Such systolically governed adaptation, however, will lead to nonuniform SLs (residual strains) in the passive unloaded ventricle. The authors thank Dr. James H. Anderson, Michael Samphilipo, and Carolyn Magee for assistance with the biplane cineradiographic procedures. We also appreciate the help of Dr. Willard Graves and David Mearns for assistance with the marker-tracking software. We also thank Dr. Brian K. Slinker for expert advice on the statistical analysis of our data. Sincere thanks also go to Ken Rent, who provided invaluable surgical assistance, to Eric Lee and Beth Jones, who spent many hours tracking markers on film, and to Michele K. Leppo for performing the histological procedures and sectioning. This work was supported by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Grant HL-30552 (to W. C. Hunter). ANTERIOR-POSTERIOR J. M. Guccione was the recipient of Individual National Research Service Award lF32-HL-08492 from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. This support is gratefully acknowledged. Address for reprint requests: J. M. Guccione, Washington Univ. Campus Box 1185, One Brookings Dr., St. Louis, MO 63130-4899. Received 14 February 1996; accepted in final form 2 July 1996. REFERENCES 1. Arts, T., F. W. Prinzen, L. H. E. H. Snoeckx, J. M. Rijcken, and R. S. Reneman. Adaptation of cardiac structure by mechanical feedback in the environment of the cell: a model study. Biophys. J. 66: 953-961, 1994. Douglas, A. S., E. K. Rodriguez, W. G. O’Dell, and W. C. Hunter. Unique strain history during ejection in canine left ventricle. Am. J. Physiol. 260 (Heart Circ. Physiol. 29): Hl596H1611,1991. Fann, J. I., G. E. Sarris, N. B. Ingels, Jr., M. A. Niczyporuk, K, L. Yun, G. T. Daughters II, G. C. Derby, and D. C. Miller. Regional epicardial and endocardial two-dimensional finite deformations in canine left ventricle. Am. J. PI2ysioZ. 261 (Heart Circ. Physiol. 30): H1402-H1410, 1991. Fung, Y.-C. Biod.ynamics: Circulation. New York: SpringerVerlag, 1984. Glantz, S. A., and B. K. Slinker. Primer of Applied Regression and Analysis of Variance. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1990. Grimm, A. F., H. L. Lin, and B. R. Grimm. Left ventricular free wall and intraventricular pressure-sarcomere length distributions. Am. J. PhysioL. 239 (Heart Circ. Physiol. 8): HIOIH107,1980. Guccione, J. M., A. D. McCulloch, and W. C. Hunter. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of anterior-posterior variations in local sarcomere length and active fiber stress during left ventricular ejection. In: Advances in Rioengineering, edited by J. M. Tarbell. New York: American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 1993, vol. 26, p. 571-574. 8. Guccione, J. M., A. D. McCulloch, and L. K. Waldman. of intact ventricular mvocardium Passive material DroPerties LV SARCOMERE 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14 15. 16. 17. 18. LENGTHS H477 determined from a cylindrical model. J. Biomech. E12g. 113: 42-55,199l. Komuro, I., T. Kaida, Y. Shibazaki, M. Kurabayashi, Y. Katoh, E. Hoh, F. Takaku, and Y. Yazaki. Stretching cardiac myocytes stimulates protooncogene expression. J. Biol. Chem. 265: 3595-3598,199O. Omens, J. I-I., and Y. C. Fung. Residual strain in rat left ventricle. Circ. Res. 66: 37-45, 1990. Rodriguez, E. K., W. C. Hunter, M. J. Royce, M. K. Leppo, A. S. Douglas, and H. K. Weisman. A method to reconstruct myocardial sarcomere lengths and orientations at transmural sites in beating canine hearts. Am. J. Physiol. 263 (Heart Circ. Ph:ysioZ. 32 ): H293-H306, 1992. Rodriguez, E. K., J. H. Omens, L. K. Waldman, and A. D. McCulloch. Effect of residual stress on transmural sarcomere length distributions in rat left ventricle. Am. J. Physiol. 264 (Heart Circ. Physiol. 33 ): H 1048-H 1056, 1993. Sadoshima, J., L. Jahn, T. Takahashi, T. J. Kulik, and S. Izumo. Molecular characterization of the stretch-induced adaptation of cultured cardiac cells: an in vitro model of load-induced cardiac hypertrophy. J. Biol. Chem. 267: 10551-10560, 1992. Suga, H., and K. Sagawa. End-diastolic and end-systolic ventricular volume clamper for isolated canine heart. Am. J. Physiol. 233 (Heart Circ. Ph.ysiol. 2): H718-H722, 1977. Sunagawa, K., D. Burkhoff, K. 0. Lim, and K. Sagawa. Impedance loading servo pump system for excised canine ventricle. Am. J. Physiol. 243 (Heart Circ. Physiol. 12): H346-H350, 1982. Takayama, Y., I. J. LeGrice, J. W. Holmes, and J. W. Covell. Effects of chordal uncoupling on deformation in the papillary muscle (Abstract). FASEB J. 8: A591, 1994. Villarreal, F. J., and W. Y. W. Lew. Finite strains in anterior and posterior wall of canine left ventricle. Am. J. PhysioZ. 259 (Heart Circ. Physiol. 28): H1409-H1418, 1990. Yazaki,Y., I. Komuro, T.Yamazaki, K. Tobe, K. Maemura, T. Kadowaki, and R. Nagai. Role of protein kinase system in the signal transduction of stretch-mediated protooncogene expression and hypertrophy of cardiac myocytes. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 119: 11-16, 1993.