Download The Grand Challenge in Metagenomics Sensitive and

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Skin flora wikipedia , lookup

Virus wikipedia , lookup

Human microbiota wikipedia , lookup

EXPOSE wikipedia , lookup

Bacteria wikipedia , lookup

Bacterial cell structure wikipedia , lookup

Bacterial morphological plasticity wikipedia , lookup

Plant virus wikipedia , lookup

Introduction to viruses wikipedia , lookup

Microorganism wikipedia , lookup

Triclocarban wikipedia , lookup

Virology wikipedia , lookup

Community fingerprinting wikipedia , lookup

Phospholipid-derived fatty acids wikipedia , lookup

History of virology wikipedia , lookup

Metagenomics wikipedia , lookup

Bacterial taxonomy wikipedia , lookup

Marine microorganism wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
The Grand Challenge in
Metagenomics
Sensitive and Accurate Taxa Classification
Ebrahim Afshinnekoo
MetaSUB Global Project Director
Mason Lab
Weill Cornell Medical College
June 20th, 2015
@nycpathomap
Ambiguous
4.184%
Eukaryota
0.771%
Viruses Archaea Plasmids
0.032% 0.003%
0.001%
Bacteria
46.927%
Unknown
Organisms
48.313%
0.003%
0.001%
Unknown
Organisms
48.313%
But what about everything else…?
Ambiguous
4.184%
Eukaryota
0.771%
Viruses Archaea Plasmids
0.032% 0.003%
0.001%
Bacteria
46.927%
Unknown
Organisms
48.313%
We’re only as good as our
databases…
…and there is a great need for
standards!
Nucleic Acids
Research Group
More coming from the
Metagenomics Research
Group –stay tuned!
lu
En
s_
m
te
eg
ro
St
ba
at
ap
er
ct
iu
hy
er
m
_a
lo
co
er
cc
og
u
en
s_
Rh
es
e
od
pi
de
os
pi
rm
Ps
ril
eu
id
lu
is
do
m
_r
m
on
ub
as
ru
_a
m
er
M
ug
icr
in
oc
os
o
St
cc
a
re
us
pt
_l
om
ut
eu
yc
s
es
Kl
_g
eb
ris
sie
eu
l
s
l
a_
Sp
ox
or
yt
os
oc
ar
a
cin
a_
ur
Ba
ea
ci l
En
e
lu
te
s
_c
ro
er
co
eu
cc
s
us
_f
ae
ca
lis
Ba
cil
% of MegaBLAST Reads / Expected
30%
25%
BLAST
Expected
5%
0%
20
MetaPhlAn
20%
15
15%
10
10%
5
0
MetaPhlAn Abundance
35%
25
Comparing the tools…
0.4
0.35
0.3
0.25
0.2
Expected
BLAST
0.15
MetaPhlAn
OneCodex
0.1
GOTTCHA
CosmosID
0.05
0
The “Holy Grail” in Metagenomics
One Tool to rule them all
One Tool to find the taxa
One Tool to bring relative abundances
And in the metagenomics bind them
A more integrative approach…
http://microbe.net/2015/02/17/the-long-road-from-data-to-wisdom-and-from-dna-to-pathogen/
B. anthracis found by Kraken, MetaPhlAn, SURPI,
BWA, PhyloSift. But scant pXO, no PlcR SNP.
Thus, no evidence of a pathogen in the subway.
http://read-lab-confederation.github.io/nyc-subway-anthrax-study/
https://github.com/poeli/GOTTCHA
Great name, sounds good, I wonder
what it’ll find in some samples…
Conclusion:
The “G” in GOTTCHA actually
stands for Gonorrhea
MetaSUB Goals
(1) Standards
(2) Expand the Database
(3) Integrative taxa
classification pipeline
- Focus on responsible
interpretation!
(4) Expand the analysis
MBQC
Thanks to the Swabbing Teams! www.pathomap.org/people/