Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS (1919-1939) OVERVIEW CHANGED WORLD AFTER WWI • COLLAPSE OF AUSTRIAN-HUNGARIAN EMPIRE NEW COUNTRIES BASED ON NATIONALITY RATHER THAN MILITARY STRENGTH OR DEFENSIBLE BORDERS NEW COUNTRIES • • • • • AUSTRIA HUNGARY CZECHOSLOVAKIA YUGOSLAVIA POLAND Feuding and autarkic RUSSIAN EMPIRE FELL APART • CREATION OF NEW STATES – – – – – – ESTONIA LATVIA LITHUANIA POLAND BESSARABIA FINLAND RUSSIA FOLLOWED A NEW SOCIAL, ECONOMIC, AND POLITICAL SYSTEM • COMMUNISM – STATE OWNERSHIP AND CONTROL OF ECONOMIC RESOURCES – PROMOTION OF WORLD-WIDE PROLETARIAT REVOLUTION UNITED STATES • US INTERVENTION DECISIVE TO OUTCOME OF WWI • WITHDRAWS IMMEDIATELY INTO ISOLATIONISM BRITAIN AND FRANCE • LACKED THE MEANS AND DESIRE TO DIRECT INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS • EUROPE WAS ESSENTIALLY A POWER VACUUM VICTORIOUS ALLIES APPROACH PROBLEM OF EUROPEAN POLITICAL RECONSTRUCTION BASED ON TWO FALSE ASSMPTIONS • ALLIES HAD WON THE WAR • GROUND WAS CLEAR FOR JUST AND ENLIGTENED RE-ORDERING OF POLITICS GERMANY HAD ONLY BEEN PARTLY DEFEATED MILITARILY • GERMANY HAD CLEARLY DEFEATED RUSSIA ON THE EASTERN FRONT • TREATY OF BREST-LITOVSK GERMANY HAD NOT BEEN DEFEATED IN TWO AREAS • EONOMIC POTENTIAL • POLITICAL IDEAS THAT HAD DRIVEN ITS WWI EXPANSION BITTER RESENTMENT FELT BY GERMANY AT PEACE TREATY • REPARATIONS • WAR GUILT CLAUSE • LOSS OF TERRITORY TO POLAND, FRANCE, BELGIUM AND DENMARK • LOSS OF COLONIES PROBLEM OF ENFORCEMENT OF HATEDTREATY • TWO STRATEGIES PARTLY UNSUCCESSFUL – USE OF FORCE (Ruhr Invasion) – PERSUADING GERMANS TO ACCEPT TERMS THIRD STRATEGY • USE RESOURCES OF AMERICAN CAPITALISM TO FUND GERMANY AND THEREFORE EUROPEAN STABILITY • SUCCESSFUL BETWEEN 1924-1929 (Golden Age of Weimar Republic) RECENT HISTORIANS SEE NAZISM AS A PRODUCT OF THE COMPLEX WORLD CREATED BY THE ECONOMIC COLLAPSE OF 1929 BRITAIN AND FRANCE FOCUSED ON DOMESTIC PROBLEMS • SYMPATHETIC TO DISARMAMENT • INDEPENDENCE MOVEMENTS IN THEIR COLONIES • JAPANESE EXPLOITATION OF THESE INDEPENDENCE MOVEMENTS DESTABILIZATION OF CAPITALISM • DEBT CANCELLATION BY RUSSIA • FEARED SPREAD OF COMMUNISM • SUSPICIOUS OF SOVIET UNION AND THEIR PROMOTION OF WORLD REVOLUTION NAZISM NOT SEEN IMMEDIATELY AS THE MAJOR THREAT • FORMATION OF ALLIANCES TO DETER GERMANY • NONE OF WESTERN POWERS WANTED A WAR WESTSERN POWERS WERE LOOKING TOWARD THEIR OWN NATIONAL SECURITY • FRANCE RETREATED BEHIND MAGINOT LINE • APPEASEMENT • ALLIANCE WITH A COMMUNIST SOVIET UNION TOO PAINFUL TO CONTEMPLATE (memories of Rapallo) APPEASEMENT • INTENDED TO MAKE GERMANY A RESPONSIBLE MEMBER OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY • FAILED-GERMANY WAS ENCOURAGED TO PURSUE ITS POLICIES THIRD STRATEGYALLIGN WITH HITLER • POLAND SIGNED A NON-AGRESSION PACT(1934) • ITALY SIGNED THE PACT OF STEEL (1938) • SOVIET UNION SIGNED A NONAGRESSION PACT (1939) • THE VICHY GOVERNMENT OF FRANCE (1940) (form of appeasement) FAILURE OF VERSAILLES TREATY • GERMANY REMAINED A GREAT FORCE EVEN AFTER DEFEAT • GERMANY STILL HAD POWERFUL FRIENDS IN THE WORLD • GERMANY KEPT 90% OF ITS RESOURCES • GERMANY WAS DISARMED BUT WAS THE TECHNOLOGY LEADER OF EUROPE GERMANY’S POSITION IN BALANCE OF POWER REMAINED UNCHANGED • NEW NATIONS WERE WEAK • RUSSIA OUTLAWED AFTER 1917 REVOLUTION • WOULD GERMANY BE NEEDED TO STOP SPREAD OF COMMUNISM? WILSON’S FAILURE TO KEEP US INVOLVED IN EUROPE • SENATE REJECTS THE VERSAILLES TREATY • US REJECTS INTERNATIONALISM FAILURE OF THE LEAGUE • NO ARMY (IDEA WAS OPPOSED BY BRITISH) • RELIED ON ECONOMIC SANCTIONS • GERMANY AND SOVIET UNION WERE NOT INCLUDED UNTIL LATER-US NEVER JOINED • UNANIMOUS VOTE REQUIRED IN COUNCIL INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS (1918-1929) • FRANCE INVADED THE RUHR TO GET COAL FOR MISSED REPARATIONS • CAUSED RESENTMENT IN GERMANY AND UNEASE IN BRITAIN AND US • EXPOSED CONFLICT BETWEEN THE LEADERS OF THE WEIMAR GOVERNMENT (hyperinflation) DAWES PLAN 1924 • REPARATIONS REDUCED • INVOLVED FRANCE’S ALLIES IN COLLECTION • “GOLDEN AGE OF REPARATIONS (1924-1929) GERMAN COMPLAINTS ABOUT THE DAWES PLAN • PAYMENTS TOO HIGH • NO FINAL DATE FOR THEIR END GERMANY CONTINUED TO PURSUE A REVISIONIST STRATEGY YOUNG PLAN 1929 • REDUCED THE PAYMENTS • LINKED BRITISH AND FRENCH DEBTS TO US TO LEVEL OF GERMAN PAYMENTS • 1988 SET AS FINAL YEAR OF PAYMENT LOCARNO PACT 1925 • SIGNED BY GERMANY, ITALY, BRITAIN, FRANCE AND BELGIUM • GERMANY ACCEPTED ITS WESTERN BORDERS • OPPOSED BY SOME IN GERMANY • RECOGNIZED FRANCE’S COMMITMENT TO POLAND AND CZECHOSLOVAKIA • GERMANY ALLOWED TO JOIN LEAGUE AS A PERMANENT MEMBER KELLOGG-BRIAND PACT 1928 • FRANCE’S POLICY CHANGED TO BRINGING GERMANY INTO THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY • WAR RENOUNCED AS AN INSTRUMENT OF NATIONAL POLICY (SIGNED BY 62 NATIONS) HAGUE CONFERENCE 1929 • FRANCE LEFT THE RHINELAND • RECONCILIATION • LOCARNO AND GERMAN ENTRY INTO LEAGUE SEEMED TO CREATE STABILITY • DAWES PLAN ALLOWED FOR REGULAR PAYMENT OF REPARATIONS STABILITY SHATTERED IN 1929 • POINCARE RETIRED • STRESEMANN DIED • BLACK THURSDAY- US STOCK MARKET CRASHES • THE DEPRESSION BEGINS POLITICAL IMPACT OF GREAT DEPRESSION • • • • • EVERY NATION FOR HIMSELF HIGHER TARIFFS FALLING PRICES (deflation) RISE OF NATIONALISM APPEASEMENT-ANOTHER WAR WAS UNTHINKABLE • CAPITALISM WAS DISCREDITED HOOVER MORATORIUM 1931 • REPARATIONS AND WAR DEBTS SUSPENDED • INTENDED AS A TEMPORARY MEASURE BUT BECAME FINAL • DISARMAMENT CONFERENCE FAILED FAILURE TO STOP HITLER • FOUR POWER PACT-BRITAIN, FRANCE, ITALY AND GERMANY AGREED TO MAINTAIN PEACE FOR 10 YEARS (1933) • HITLER FELT CONFIDENT TO LEAVE LEAGUE AND BEGIN CONSCRIPTION • EASTERN EUROPE FELT ABANDONED REACTION TO THE FOUR POWER PACT • POLAND SIGNED NONAGGRESSION PACT WITH GERMANY (1934) • SU NEGOTIATED WITH FRANCE FOR MUTUAL ASSISTANCE PACT STESA FRONT 1935 • SIGNED BY BRITAIN, FRANCE AND ITALY • OPPOSED UNILATERAL REPUDIATION OF TREATIES • ITALY SAW THIS AS A CHANCE TO PURSUE IMPERIAL AIMS ITALY INVADED ABYSSINIA 1935 • REVENGE FOR EARLIER DEFEAT • BUILD AN EMPIRE LIKE BRITAIN AND FRANCE • WAR FOR WAR’S SAKE • GLORY OF VICTORY • BADLY NEEDED MARKETS AND RAW MATERIALS ECONOMIC SANCTIONS BY LEAGUE • SANCTIONS INEFFECTIVE • DID NOT INCLUDE OIL • NON-MEMBERS (US, JAPAN AND GERMANY) WERE NOT COMMITTED • JAPAN WAS NOT PUNISHED FOR AGGRESSION IN CHINA (1931) MUSSOLINI WANTED TO BE ON THE SIDE OF POWER • BRITAIN AND FRANCE LACKED WILL TO CONFRONT HITLER • ITALY NEEDED A SECURE EUROPE FOR CONTINUED EXPANSION • PARTICIPATION IN SPANISH CIVIL SHOWED WEAKNESS OF ITALIAN ARMIES THOUGH FRANCO WON • HITLER IMPRESSED HIM GERMAN-ITALIAN ALLIANCE 1936 • BEGAN AS AN ANTI-BOLSHEVIK RELATIONSHIP • BECAME BERLIN-ROME AXIS • ITALY JOINED ANTICOMMINTERN PACT WITH GERMANY AND JAPAN GERMAN ANSCHLUSS 1939 • ITALY’S MEEK ACCEPTANCE • HITLER PRESSURED FOR THE PACT OF STEEL • MUSSOLINI LOST CONTROL OVER HIS FOREIGN POLICY • GAVE HITLER CARTE-BLANCHE TO ATTACK POLAND AND PLUNGE INTO WWII HITLER CHANGED VERSAILLES TREATY • REMILITARIZED THE RHINELAND • HITLER ACTED AND THEN NEGOTIATED • FELT JUSTIFIED AS FRANCE HAD SIGNED MUTUAL ASSISTANCE PACTS WITH SOVIET UNION, CZECHCHOSLOVAKIA AND POLAND • BRITAIN WOULD NOT SEND AID RESULTS OF REMILITARIZATION • WESTERN POWERS UNWILLING TO ACT ON UNILATERAL REVISIONS OF VERSTILLES TREATY • POLAND AND CZECHOSLOVAKIAFRANCE UNABLE TO HELP THEM • END OF LOCARNO TREATY ANSCHLUSS • PROS – LANGUAGE – PAST RELATIONSHIP – GAIN ECONOMICALLY – ITALY COULD NOT STOP – AUSTRIAN NAZIS FORCED ISSUE • CONS – MANY AUSTRIANS WANTED TO REMAIN INDEPENDENT – HOSTILITY OF FRANCE AND BRITAIN CZECHOSLOVAKIA AND THE SUDETENLAND • PROS – MOUNTAINOUS, DEFENSIBLE BORDER – BIG ARMY-WELL SUPPLIED – ALLIED WITH BRITAIN, FRANCE, POLAND AND SU • CONS – MANY MINORITY GROUPS – IMPORTANT GERMAN MINORITY LOST PRIVILEGED STATUS – NO COMMON BORDER WITH FRANCE AND SU – HAD INDEPENDENCE MOVEMENT MUNICH AND APPEASEMENT • BRITAIN AND FRANCE TRIED TO PERSUADE BENES TO ACCEPT • FEARED GENERAL WAR • BRITAIN AND FRANCE RENEWED GUARANTEES TO POLAND • HITLER DIVIDED AND CONQUERED REST OF CZECHOSLOVAKIA MUNICH AND SOVIET UNION • CONFIRMED STALIN’S FEAR THAT BRITAIN AND FRANCE PREFERRED HITLER OVER COMMUNISM • SHOWED BRITAIN AND FRANCE TOO WEAK TO STOP HITLER • SHOWED ALLIES CONFIRMED HITLER’S AIM OF LIVING SPACE TO THE EAST GERMAN-SOVIET PACT OF 1939 • BRITAIN AND FRANCE REFUSED TO ALLOW SOVIETS TO CROSS INTO POLAND IF GERMANY ATTACKED • HITLER FEARED WAR WITH SU IF BRITAIN AND FRANCE HELPED POLAND • DIVIDED UP POLAND DANZIG AND THE POLISH CORRIDOR • DANZIG WAS A GERMAN CITY • THE CORRIDOR HAD 1 MILLION GERMANS AND SEPARATED PRUSSIA FROM THE REST OF GERMANY • RAPALLO AND LOCARNO THREATENED POLAND • SOUGHT ALLIANCES WITH FRANCE POLAND • FEARED THE SU MORE THAN GERMANY • SIGNED NON-AGRESSION PACT WITH HITLER IN 1934 • BECK PARTICIPATED IN THE PARTITION OF CZECHOSLOVAKIA INVASION OF POLAND • BRITAIN AND FRANCE TRIED TO PERSUADE POLAND TO CEDE DANZIG • POLAND REFUSED REMEMBERING CZECHOSLOVAKIA • HITLER INVADED POLAND CLAIMING “BORDER VIOLATIONS” • TWO DAYS LATER, BRITAIN AND FRANCE DECLARED WAR