* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Hot Topic: Limiting Radiation Exposure in Radiographic Evaluation
Proton therapy wikipedia , lookup
Positron emission tomography wikipedia , lookup
Medical imaging wikipedia , lookup
Radiation therapy wikipedia , lookup
Backscatter X-ray wikipedia , lookup
Neutron capture therapy of cancer wikipedia , lookup
Nuclear medicine wikipedia , lookup
Radiosurgery wikipedia , lookup
Industrial radiography wikipedia , lookup
Center for Radiological Research wikipedia , lookup
Radiation burn wikipedia , lookup
Hot Topic: Limiting Radiation Exposure in Radiographic Evaluation Nothing to Disclose Advanced Topics • Gonadal Shielding • CT – Dose reduction software – Dual Energy CT – CT dose adjusted • Scoliosis • Internal Q/A • Pt knowledge/education – Consent Gonadal Shielding Where are the gonads? Left: Center: Right: Typical placement of a shield with limited pelvic coverage. Theoretical shield coverage of the entire pelvis, extending cephalocaudal from the symphysis pubis to the iliac crests and mediolaterally from ASIS to ASIS, would protect all ovaries. Proposed ovarian shielding technique: the lateral pelvis is shielded, protecting the majority of ovaries but allowing midline pelvic and spinal structures to be seen radiographically. SPR 2015 Paper #: 037 Lead Gonad Shields: Good or Bad for Patient Radiation Exposure? Summer Kaplan, Dennise Magill, Marc Felice, Sayed Ali, Xiaowei Zhu. SPR 2015 Paper #: 038 Table top Fluoroscopy: To Shield or Not to Shield Frank Goerner, PhD, Cristina Dodge, Robert Orth, MD, PhD Dose Reduction Software Emerging Techniques for Dose Optimization in Abdominal CT Ravi K. Kaza, MD • Joel F. Platt, MD • Mitchell M. Goodsitt, PhD • Mahmoud M. Al-Hawary, MD • Katherine E. Maturen, MD • Ashish P. Wasnik, MD • Amit Pandya, MD RadioGraphics 2014; 34:4–17 GE ASIR Appearance of liver parenchyma and a lesion using filtered back projection (FBP) and iterative reconstruction technique (IRT) at multiple radiation doses in a 12-year-old boy. CT scans acquired at 120 kV and 200 mAs (a–d) and 50 mAs (e–h) using ASIR 30–70% reconstruction technique. • JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, VOLUME 14, NUMBER 4, 2013 263 263 264 Ghetti et al.: Physical characterization of SAFIRE 264 Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, Vol. 14, No. 4, 2013 Dual Energy CT Dual- and Multi-Energy CT: Principles, Technical Approaches, and Clinical Applications. Cynthia H. McCollough, PhD Shuai Leng, PhD Lifeng Yu, PhD Joel G. Fletcher, MD Radiology: Volume 276: Number 3—September 2015 Dual Energy CT Dual- and Multi-Energy CT: Principles, Technical Approaches, and Clinical Applications. Cynthia H. McCollough, PhD Shuai Leng, PhD Lifeng Yu, PhD Joel G. Fletcher, MD Radiology: Volume 276: Number 3— September 2015 Dual Energy rd CT 3 Generation Dual Energy CT CTDIVOL x scan length= The single dose that best represents the distribution of doses delivered to the cross-sectional area of the phantom , it was intended as a tool,“to provide a standardized method to estimate and compare the radiation output of different CT scanners sic not a patient dose index” DLP SSDE Does not represent a patient dose index but rather the energy deposited in a standard phantom in all three dimensions. Size-Specific Dose Estimates (SSDE) which is an estimate of the radiation dose to the patient’s tissues within the scan volume of the CT. The accuracy of the SSDE is believed to be within 20%. (Requires measurement of greatest ap and lateral Dimensions to obtain conversion factors) Scoliosis Imaging Doody M, Lonstein JE, Stovall M, et al (2000) Breast cancer mortality after diagnostic radiography: findings from the U.S. Scoliosis Cohort Study. Spine 25:2052–2063 • Decreases Scatter Radiation • Amplification technique of detector improves SNR Internal Q/A, PQI, QRS TUV Patient Knowledge and education Point – Counterpoint Radiation Consent Radiology January 2012 ;262:1 Should be required Richard C. Semelka, MD, Diane M. Armao, MD, Jorge Elias, Jr, MD, PhD and Eugenio Picano, MD We believe that the radiology community should take the initiative to adopt guidelines and require that all imaging facilities use some form of active information process describing the risks of medical radiation . Should not be required James A. Brink , MD Marilyn J. Goske , MD John A. Patti , MD The alternative approach of informed decision making is an even more aggressive, collaborative educational opportunity that radiologists should embrace with their patients and is a better alternative. Informed decision making trumps informed consent Kathy Boutis, MD, William Cogollo, MD, Jason Fischer, MD, Stephen B. Freedman, MD, Guila Ben David, MRT(R), and Karen E. Thomas, MD CONCLUSIONS: Approximately half of the participating parents were aware of the potential increased lifetime malignancy risk associated with head CT imaging. Willingness to proceed with CT testing was reduced after risk disclosure but was a significant barrier for a small minority of parents. Most parents wanted to be informed of potential malignancy risks before proceeding with imaging. We strongly recommend that physicians be well informed of the benefits and potential risks of CT imaging. Web Data from Image Gently 2012 464, 166 Page views 55, 548 Site visits 37, 824 Unique views 2013 336, 808 Page views 46, 544 Site visits 32, 054 Unique views 2014 209, 689 Page views 74, 928 Site visits 56, 096 Unique views 2015 258, 576 Page views 86, 478 Site visits 61, 387 Unique views Courtesy Shaniece Rigans How old was Roentgen’s wife? Radiation Reporting • California and other states have mandated – The original law mandated that facilities must include CT radiation dose in patient records. The new law states that facilities are not required to report dose if the CT scan is used for therapeutic treatment planning or nuclear medicine. – Second, the original law indicated that all facilities must verify dose annually to ensure displayed dose remains within 20% of measured actual dose