Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Evaluation of the Impact of an Antimicrobial Stewardship Program in Patients with Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections (ABSSSI) at a Teaching Hospital Poster Number 744 IDSA 2012 TR 1 Pasquale ; 1Department Abstract (Revised) Background: ABSSSIs are often associated with unnecessary use of broad-spectrum antibiotics; this use is a potential target for Antimicrobial Stewardship. In 2011, the average length of stay (LOS) at Summa Health System for ABSSSIs (ICD9 code 681-682.9) was 6.2 days, and 30-day ABSSSI readmission rate was 6.2%. Incorporating a key hospital initiative of reducing LOS, a decision was made to have Antimicrobial Stewardship Program (ASP) evaluate all patients admitted with ABSSSI for appropriateness of therapy. The primary objective of this study was to observe the impact of ASP on LOS, 30day ABSSSI readmission rate, and antimicrobial use. Methods: In February 2012, the ASP began to evaluate patients admitted with ABSSSI. Patients are identified via Emergency Department admission list of the previous 24 hours. Clinical Pharmacist and ID physician prospectively review patient’s clinical status and antimicrobial therapy regimen and provided feedback to attending physicians. Results: In this ongoing study, ASP intervened on 62 patients. Patient average age was 56 (range 19-90); 33 (53%) were male; 22 (35%) had diabetes mellitus. Lower extremity (52%) was the most common site. The intervention group LOS was 4.4 days compared to 6.2 days for historical data (p < 0.001). The 30-day ABSSSI readmission rate was 3% compared to 6.2% for historical data (p = 0.483). The ABSSSI subtype and interventions include: ABSSSI Subtype: Cellulitis Major or deep abscess Surgical Site Infection Diabetic Wound Intervention Type: No. (%) of patients (n = 62) 47 (76%) 16 (26%) 5 (8%) 2 (3%) Total Number of Interventions (n = 85) Antibiotic Regimen Change 20 (24%) De-escalation 23 (37%) Dose Change 27 (44%) ID Consult 6 (7%) Other 9 (11%) Interventions Accepted 81 (95%) The most common appropriate antimicrobial recommendation was change from an anti-MRSA agent to beta-lactam for methicillinsusceptible S. aureus. Most common de-escalation recommendation was reducing anti-pseudomonal broad-spectrum beta-lactam plus vancomycin to monotherapy with non-antipseudomonal beta-lactam. Conclusion: We have observed a reduction in the average LOS and 30 day ABSSSI readmission rate as a result of intervention recommendations by ASP compared with historical control. ABSSSI patient populations offer ASP a potential target population to significantly reduce costs. 1 TL Trienski ; DE 1 Olexia ; JP 2 Myers ; MJ 2 Tan ; AK 2 Leung ; JE 2 Poblete ; TM File Timothy R. Pasquale, PharmD Summa Health System 525 E. Market Street Akron, OH Phone: 330-375-7020 Fax: 330-375-7622 [email protected] 2 Jr of Pharmacy, Summa Health System, Akron, OH; 2Department of Medicine, Summa Health System, Akron, OH. Introduction Table 1 • Although acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs) are among the most common infections requiring hospitalizations, there is currently a of lack data regarding their management and outcomes. Jenkins et al recently reported one center’s experience of adult patients hospitalized with complicated skin and soft-tissue infections1. The authors concluded there was frequent use of potentially unnecessary diagnostic studies, broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy, and prolonged treatment courses in these patients1. In a matched cohort study, Hatoum et al. reported that patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections incurred on average 3.81 additional days and $14,794 excess hospitalization charges2.These findings are suggestive of potentially important targets for Antimicrobial Stewardship Program (ASP). • In 2011, the historical data from Summa Health System for patients with ABSSSIs (ICD9 code 681-682.9) revealed an average length of stay of 6.2 days and a 30-day ABSSSI readmission rate of 6.2%. • The primary objective of this study was to observe the impact of AST on LOS, 30-day ABSSSI readmission rate, and antimicrobial use. Patient Characteristics Variable Avg Age 55.87 (range 19-90) Male Gender 33 (53%) White Race 58 (94%) Avg Charlson Co-morbidity Index (with Age) De-escalation Dose Change 44% Diabetes mellitus 22 (35%) Congestive Heart Failure 7 (11%) Peripheral Vascular Disease 2 (3%) Cerebrovascular Disease 6 (10%) Myocardial Infarction 4 (6%) Renal Disease 7 (11%) Malignancy 7 (11%) ID Consult • Of the 23 de-escalation interventions: • 14 (61%) were anti-MRSA agent plus a beta-lactam to beta-lactam monotherapy. • 4 (17%) were beta-lactam plus anti-MRSA agent to antiMRSA agent monotherapy. • ID consults recommendations were for extensive cellulitis, orbital cellulitis, infected hardware, and osteomyelitis. 10% Lower Extremity 52% Upper Extremity Groin or Buttock 15% Trunk or Back Face, Head or Neck 11% • ABSSSI offer a great opportunity for ASP as hospitals have experienced a 71% increase in the rate of hospitalizations due to skin and soft-tissue infections1. • The most common interventions were dosage change, deescalation, and antibiotic regimen change. The most common de-escalation recommendation was from piperacillin/tazobactam plus vancomycin to monotherapy with cefazolin or ampicillin/sulbactam. • Prospective evaluation by ASP resulted in a significant reduction in the average length of stay of patients admitted with ABSSSI (ICD-9 codes 681-682.9) and readmission rates. • Study limitations include single center, observational, nonrandomized and small sample size. Outcomes of Patients Intervened by ASP Variable 15% • The primary goal of antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASP) is to optimize clinical outcomes while minimizing unintended consequences of antimicrobial use, including toxicity, the selection of pathogenic organisms, and the emergence of resistance3. • This observational study illustrated the positive impact of an ASP program on patients with ABSSSI. A total of 85 interventions on 62 patients from February 2012 to August 2012 were recommended with a 95% acceptance rate. Other Table 2 Primary Location of ABSSSI Average LOS, mean (days) ASP Group (n = 62) Historical Data (n = 1149) P – value* 4.4 days 6.2 days < 0.001 30 day All cause readmission rate 6.5% 30 day ABSSSI readmission rate 3.33% 16.71% 6.27% * Chi square analysis was performed. #95% CIs(0.00098, 5.024) • In this ongoing study, ASP has intervened on 62 patients admitted with an ABSSSI (ICD9 681-682.9). Figure 4 ABSSSI Subtype 0.050 0.483# Conclusions • ASP intervention demonstrated a significant reduction in the average LOS compared to historical controls. • We also observed a reduction in the 30 day all cause readmission rate as well as 30 ABSSSI readmission rate compared to historical controls. • ABSSSI patient populations offer ASP a potential target population to improve outcomes and decrease costs. References 3% 2% • Patient characteristics are listed in Table 1. 8% Cellulitis 26% Major or Deep Abscess Surgical Site Infection 76% Diabetic Wound Decubitus Ulcer • Outcomes are listed in Table 2. 37% 12 (19%) Figure 2 • ASP recommended 85 interventions and 81 (95%) were accepted. The interventions types are displayed in Figure 3. 24% Co-morbidities: • ID physician prospectively reviewed patient’s clinical status and antimicrobial therapy regimen and provided feedback to attending physician. • ABSSSI characteristics including location and subtype are displayed in Figures 1 and 2. 11% Antibiotic Regimen Change 20 (32%) Polymicrobial Infection • Patients are identified via Emergency Department admission list of the previous 24 hours. Results 7% 3 (range 0-7) Surgical Intervention • In February 2012, the Antimicrobial Stewardship Program (ASP) began to evaluate patients admitted with ABSSSI. • Patients without an Infectious Disease (ID) Consult on admission were further evaluated by a Clinical Pharmacist and ID physician. ASP Intervention Type (n = 85) No. (%) of Patients (n = 62) Figure 1 Methods Discussion Figure 3 • Example of cellulitis ASP intervened on is pictured in figure 4. SUMMA AKRON CITY HOSPITAL 1. Jenkins TC, Sabel AL, Sarcone EE, Price CS, Mehler PS, Burman WJ. Skin and Soft-Tissue Infections Requiring Hospitalization at an Academic Medical Center Opportunities for Antimicrobial Stewardship. Clin Infect Dis 2010; 51(8):895-903. 2. Hatoum HT, Akhras KS, Lin SJ. The attributable clinical and economic burden of skin and skin structure infections in hospitalized patients: a matched cohort study. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2009;64:305-310. 3. Dellit T.H., Owens R.C., McGowan J.E. Jr., Gerding D.N., et al. Infectious Disease Society of American and The Society of Healthcare Epidemiology of America Guidelines for Developing an Institutional Program to Enhance Antimicrobial Stewardship. Clin Infect Dis 2007;44:159-77.