Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Implementing an Antimicrobial Stewardship Program Angela Vassallo, MPH, MS, CIC, Snezana Naumovski, PharmD, Sarah Turkel, MPH, MS, MT(ASCP) Tanya Elgourt, PharmD, Robert Winters, MD, and Ellie JC Goldstein, MD Saint John’s Health Center, Santa Monica, CA BACKGROUND The Antimicrobial Stewardship Program (ASP) at Providence Saint John’s Health Center was implemented in June, 2013. The Antimicrobial Stewardship Team, made up of representatives from Pharmacy and Infectious Disease Services, was established in two phases: 1st phase (3-6 months) and 2nd phase (>6 months). 1st phase: 1. Familiarize physicians with the program 2. Develop physician Interactions related to antimicrobial stewardship ASP Cost Saving Interventions: Drug Utilization 6/2013-06/2014 METHODS The ASP tracked the following interventions in each phase: IV to PO, dosing adjustment redundancy, deescalation of restricted and high cost antibiotics (Daptomycin, Ertapenem, Ceftaroline, Linezolid, Vancomycin, Cefepime and Piperacillin-tazobactam), drug/bug mismatch, streamlining of broad spectrum therapy and duration of treatment. The cost savings impact of the ASP was determined by evaluating pharmacypurchasing data as well as the difference in drug utilization, hospital-wide, during the study period. $100,000.00 $94,250.00 $90,000.00 $80,000.00 $70,000.00 $60,000.00 $50,000.00 $40,000.00 $30,000.00 $19,422.00 $20,000.00 $5,043.10 $10,000.00 $3,290.32 $10,140.00 $2,178.00 $- RESULTS 3. Create policies and procedures. 2nd Phase: Identify and quantify the benefits of the ASP (drug cost savings, decreased length of stay, decreased days of therapy). PURPOSE The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of antimicrobial stewardship on the usage of restricted and broad spectrum antibiotics, measured as the number of doses administered over a period of time. Additionally, the stud determined the cost-saving benefits of this program. 4500 Total Vancomycin Doses 01/01/2012-09/01/2014 Total Ertapenem Doses 01/01/2012-09/01/2014 14000 4030 4000 12000 3500 10000 3147 3000 2000 1836 1500 6000 5654 4000 1000 $500,000.00 8177 8000 2500 500 2000 0 0 Yr 2012 Antibiotic Expenditure July-December Yr2012 &Yr 2013: Pharmacy-purchasing data 11695 Yr 2013 Yr 2014 Yr 2012 Yr 2013 Yr 2014 $498,786.68 Total Daptomycin Doses 01/01/2012-09/01/2014 $490,000.00 350 $480,000.00 600 366 500 300 $470,000.00 $462,640.73 $460,000.00 $450,000.00 250 200 300 150 200 80 50 Yr 2012 Yr 2013 501 400 236 100 $440,000.00 REFERENCES Total Linezolid Doses 01/01/2012-09/01/2014 400 366 272 100 0 0 Yr 2012 Yr 2013 Yr 2014 Yr 2012 Yr 2013 CONCLUSION Overall, physicians were receptive to the ASP program and intervention acceptance increased with each phase of implementation. Specifically, ID physician intervention acceptance increased from 19% in quarter 3, 2013 to 43% in quarter 2, 2014. During phases 1 and 2, the most frequently made interventions were redundancy and deescalation. De-escalation was the highest cost saving intervention ($94,250). Total cost savings since ASP was implemented was estimated $134,323.42. Number of total doses of restricted and high cost antibiotics showed significant decreases since the start of ASP. Future ASP goals are the development of an ASP policy with consequences for MDs who do not follow ASP recommendations and the analysis of the possible correlation between hospitalassociated MDROs and an effective hospital ASP. Yr 2014 APIC, Text for Infection Prevention, 2012 Dellit, TH et al. “Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Society of Healthcare Epidemiology of America Guidelines for Developing an Institutional Program to Enhance Antimicrobial Stewardship”. Clin Infect Dis 2007:44 Goff, DA, et al. “Is the ‘Low-Hanging Fruit’ Worth Picking for Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs?”. Clin Infect Dis 2012;55(4):587-92. Goldstein, EJC, Trivedi, KK. “Antimicrobial Stewardship: The View from California”. Infect Dis Clin Pract 2012;20:294-296. Kullar R., Goff D.A., Schulz LT., et al. The ‘Epic’ Challenge of Optimizing Antimicrobial Stewardship: The Role of Electronic Medical Records and Technology. Clin Infect Dis 2013 Oct;57(7):1005-13. Trivedi, KK, Rosenberg, The State of Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs in California. J. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2013;34(4):379-384.