Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Keratoconus wikipedia , lookup
Mitochondrial optic neuropathies wikipedia , lookup
Diabetic retinopathy wikipedia , lookup
Retinitis pigmentosa wikipedia , lookup
Dry eye syndrome wikipedia , lookup
Eyeglass prescription wikipedia , lookup
Blast-related ocular trauma wikipedia , lookup
Visual System The following case studies relate to injuries to the Visual System. More detailed information regarding the assessment of injuries to the visual system may be found at Chapter 8 of the MAA’s Permanent Impairment Guidelines and Chapter 8 of the AMA4 Guidelines. The Motor Accidents Authority of NSW makes no warranties or representation about the accuracy or completeness of the information contained in these Case Studies. It should be noted that the information contained herein is not provided as a substitute for legal advice. VISUAL Case Study # V1 V2 V3 V4 Brief Description Peripheral retinal atrophy Convergence insufficiency Traumatic optic neuropathy Apportionment of visual impairment Primary Body System Visual Visual Visual Visual Secondary Body System Injuries: Vitreous Floaters Right Visual Field Loss The claimant was involved in a head-on collision and sustained, amongst other injuries, a head injury with facial bruising and blurred vision. Following recovery from surgery for other injuries sustained in the motor vehicle accident (MVA), she noticed her vision was blurred in both eyes. The blurred vision resolved within three months of the MVA; however, she noticed ‘black spots’ and a ‘cobweb like structure floating’ in her right eye. The claimant had no past history of eye disease or accidents. She had never worn glasses. There was no family history of eye disease. She can read and see well in the distance in both eyes. She reports no ‘flashes’ of light and considers her vision is substantially the same as prior to the accident. She does complain, however, of problems with glare and occasional headaches. She has some irritation in the right eye and uses eye drops with only partial relief. The claimant had been reviewed by an Ophthalmologist and prescribed some drops to help with the feeling of irritation in the right eye. Clinical Examination • Distance vision (uncorrected) right eye: 6/6 (normal). • Distance vision (uncorrected) left eye: 6/6 (normal). • Reading vision (uncorrected) left eye: J1 (normal). • Ocular movements were normal and the eyes were straight for distance and near vision, however, there was an exophoria for near vision. (Exophoria is a condition in which the alignment of the eye is straight when both eyes are open, but either eye drifts outward when covered). • Pupillary reactions, lids, anterior segments, lenses, corneal sensation, ocular media, measurement of proptosis and ocular tensions were normal in each eye. • Fundi were normal. • There were two small spots of peripheral retinal atrophy. • Cup disc ratio was 0.3 in each eye. • Computerised Humphrey Visual Fields revealed a small area of decreased sensitivity in the peripheral superior right field. Any queries in respect of the methodology used in assessing permanent impairment may be directed to the WPI e-mail enquiry service at [email protected]. This service is operated by the Injury Management Branch of the MAA who are responsible for the content and publication of the MAA Permanent Impairment Guidelines. The claimant’s presentation was consistent with her reported symptoms, including right vitreous floaters and right visual field loss. The condition was considered stable. Impairment Evaluation The claimant’s presentation was consistent with her reported symptoms, including right vitreous floaters and right visual field loss. Visual Acuity • Near and distance for both eyes = 0% loss of central vision (calculated using AMA4, Table 2 p.211). Combined loss of central vision both eyes = 0% loss (AMA4, Table 3, p.212). Visual Field Loss – Left Eye • Loss of central vision = 0%. Loss of visual field = 0%. Visual System Impairment (left eye) = 0% (AMA 4, Combined Values Table, p.322). Right Eye • Loss of central vision = 0%. • Direct up-gaze is 25° of field. Normal is 45°, thus there is a loss of 20° (AMA4, Table 4, p.212). • Visual field retained in the right eye is 480° (500-20). This equals 50% loss of the left visual field (AMA4, Table 5, p.214). • Visual System Impairment for right eye = 4% (AMA4, Combined Values Table, p.322) • There is no additional impairment for any diplopia. Whole Person Impairment Right Eye Visual System Impairment (4) and Left Eye Visual System Impairment (0) using Table 7, page 219 (AMA4) equals = 1%. Conversion of 1% Visual System Impairment to Whole Person Impairment = 1% WPI (AMA4, Table 6, page 218). The total assessed Whole Person Impairment due to the ocular injuries is 1%. Any queries in respect of the methodology used in assessing permanent impairment may be directed to the WPI e-mail enquiry service at [email protected]. This service is operated by the Injury Management Branch of the MAA who are responsible for the content and publication of the MAA Permanent Impairment Guidelines. This matter was subject to review by a Medical Review Panel. These are the Review Panel’s findings. Claimant’s Date of Birth: 7 March 1974 Date of Motor Accident: 20 February 2006 Injuries: Convergence insufficiency – right eye blurred vision Clinical Findings Visual acuity was 6/6 in both eyes. On examination of her muscle movements she has marked convergence insufficiency. On examination of her fundi under a mydriatic I could find no abnormality. Intraocular appear to be within normal limits. The only abnormal clinical finding was the convergence insufficiency which measured 28cm on the RAAF rule. Panel Decision The panel considered the assessment of the visual system using Chapter 8 of the AMA Guides (4th Edition). The panel concluded that no assessment of impairment could be made for either visual acuity (Tables 2 & 3), visual fields (Tables 4 & 5) or ocular movements (diplopia). The panel then considered the last paragraph in column 1 on page 8/209 of AMA 4. This paragraph states: If an ocular or adnexal disturbance or deformity interferes with visual function and is not reflected in diminished visual acuity, decreased visual fields, or ocular motility with diplopia, the significance of the disturbance or deformity should be evaluated by the examining physician. In that situation, the physician may combine an additional 5% to 10% impairment with the impaired visual function of the involved eye. The panel noted that Assessor had used this paragraph and had chosen to combine 10% impairment. The panel noted though that the additional 10% impairment was to be combined with the impairment of the involved eye. It was not an additional 10% whole person impairment. From Table 7 on page 8/219 of AMA 4 10% impairment of the right eye and 0% impairment of the left eye gives a 3% visual system impairment for both eyes. Utilising Table 6 on page 8/218 a 3% visual system impairment converts to a 3% whole person impairment. The panel concluded that the correct assessment for the claimant’s blurred vision in the right eye is 3% WPI. The whole person permanent impairment of the injuries caused by the accident was calculated as follows: Any queries in respect of the methodology used in assessing permanent impairment may be directed to the WPI e-mail enquiry service at [email protected]. This service is operated by the Injury Management Branch of the MAA who are responsible for the content and publication of the MAA Permanent Impairment Guidelines. Body Part or System Visual system (right eye) AMA Guides/ MAA Guidelines References (chapter/ page/table) Stabilised (YES/NO) Current %WPI* %WPI* from pre-existing OR subsequent causes %WPI* due to motor accident Chapter 8, Tables 6 & 7, pages 218 & 219 Yes 3 0 3 %WPI = percentage whole person impairment Determination Regarding the Degree of Whole Person Impairment of the Injured Person as a Result of the Injuries Caused by the Motor Accident The total percentage whole person permanent impairment for assessed injuries caused by the motor accident is 3%. Therefore the total whole person impairment is not greater than 10%. Any queries in respect of the methodology used in assessing permanent impairment may be directed to the WPI e-mail enquiry service at [email protected]. This service is operated by the Injury Management Branch of the MAA who are responsible for the content and publication of the MAA Permanent Impairment Guidelines. Injuries: Traumatic Optic Neuropathy The claimant a motorbike rider struck by a car. He suffered skull and facial fractures. Approximately one month prior to the accident, the claimant had obtained prescription glasses for reading for the first time. He had no previous history of eye trauma, disease, operations or head trauma. There was no family history of eye problems. Since the accident, the claimant has complained that his eyes have felt ‘different’. He went to his optometrist after the accident and had new glasses prescribed and this improved his vision. He wears the glasses for both near and distant vision. If he does not wear his glasses his eyes feel sore and vision becomes blurred. He can drive at night, work with a computer and watch TV without reported difficulty. Since the accident, the claimant has had to change the prescription of his glasses several times. Clinical Examination • Distance vision (uncorrected) right eye: 6/6 (normal). • Distance vision (uncorrected) left eye: 6/6 (normal). • Reading vision (uncorrected) right eye: J1 (normal). • Reading vision (uncorrected) left eye: J1 (normal). • Small refractive error in each eye (astigmatism). • Ocular movements revealed no diplopia. • Convergence, accommodation, pupillary, ocular tensions, anterior segments, ocular media, lids fundi and crystalline lens were all normal. • Computerised visual fields 30-2 test revealed that in the right eye there were a few slight decreases in sensitivity in the periphery. In the left eye there was definite peripheral visual field loss in the nasal segment. Impairment Evaluation The claimant suffered from a left traumatic optic neuropathy due to the motorbike accident consistent with recorded head injury and skull fractures. Ocular Movement • Ocular movements were normal Any queries in respect of the methodology used in assessing permanent impairment may be directed to the WPI e-mail enquiry service at [email protected]. This service is operated by the Injury Management Branch of the MAA who are responsible for the content and publication of the MAA Permanent Impairment Guidelines. Visual Acuity • Near and distance for both eyes = 0% loss of central vision (AMA4, Table 2 p.211). • Combined loss of central vision both eyes = 0% loss (AMA4, Table 3, p.212) Visual Field Loss - Left eye • Loss of central vision = 0%. • Visual field retained in the left eye = 250 degrees (calculated using AMA4, Table 4, p.212). This equals 50% loss of the left visual field (AMA4, Table 5, p.214). • Visual Impairment for left eye = 50% (AMA4, Combined Values Table, p.322) Right eye • Loss of central vision = 0% • Loss of visual field = 0% • Visual Impairment for right eye = 0% (AMA4, Combined Values Table, p.322). Whole Person Impairment Right Eye Visual System Impairment (50) and Left Eye Visual System Impairment (0) using Table 7, p.219 (AMA4) equals = 13%. Conversion of 13% Visual Impairment to Whole Person Impairment = 12% WPI (AMA 4, Table 6, p.218). The total assessed Whole Person Impairment due to the ocular injuries is 12%. Any queries in respect of the methodology used in assessing permanent impairment may be directed to the WPI e-mail enquiry service at [email protected]. This service is operated by the Injury Management Branch of the MAA who are responsible for the content and publication of the MAA Permanent Impairment Guidelines. This matter was subject to review by a Medical Review Panel. These are the Review Panel’s findings. Injuries: Full thickness laceration of the left cornea Previous viral infection - almost total loss of sight in the right eye Clinical Findings Clinical examination revealed some intolerance to glare. Reading glasses are agerelated and not related to the injury. The right eye has no useful vision because of previous corneal infection. The left vision is 6/6 (normal) with glasses which contain a small astigmatism correction. Previous eye records are unavailable but the claimant states he had normal vision prior to the accident. Distance vision without glasses is 6/6 (say 6/7.5) (20/25). Near vision was a normal J1 (14/14) without the astigmatism correction. Panel Decision The Panel referred to Chapter 8 of the AMA4 Guides and in particular the method of assessment set out on page 209. The Panel agreed on an assessment of 10% visual impairment of the left eye, due to significant glare intolerance. They further agreed that the visual impairment of the right eye was 100%, and that using the visual system combination tables in the AMA4 (Table7 page 220) to combine the 100% impairment of the right eye with the 10% impairment of the left eye gives a total visual system impairment of 33%, which converts to a total whole person impairment (WPI) of 31% (Table 6, page 218 AMA4). The current WPI was therefore agreed to be 31%. The Panel further agreed that the pre-existing impairment was 100% of the vision of the right eye and no impairment of the left eye. Again using the visual system combination tables in AMA4 (Table 7, page 220) to combine the 100% impairment of the right eye with the 0% impairment of the left eye gives a total visual system impairment of 25%, which converts to a total WPI of 24% (Table 6, page 218 AMA4). The pre-existing WPI was therefore agreed to be 24%. The Panel also agreed that the applicable methodology, as outlined in both the AMA4 and MAA Impairment Guides, is to deduct the pre-existing WPI from the current WPI, thus 31% minus 24%, which gives 7% WPI caused by the subject accident. Any queries in respect of the methodology used in assessing permanent impairment may be directed to the WPI e-mail enquiry service at [email protected]. This service is operated by the Injury Management Branch of the MAA who are responsible for the content and publication of the MAA Permanent Impairment Guidelines. Body Part or System Visual system (left eye) AMA Guides/ MAA Guidelines References (chapter/ page/table) Stabilised (YES/NO) Current %WPI* %WPI* from pre-existing OR subsequent causes %WPI* due to motor accident Chapter 8, Tables 6 & 7, pages 218 & 219 Yes 31 24 7 %WPI = percentage whole person impairment Determination Regarding the Degree of Whole Person Impairment of the Injured Person as a Result of the Injuries Caused by the Motor Accident The total percentage whole person permanent impairment for assessed injuries caused by the motor accident is 7%. Therefore the total whole person impairment is not greater than 10%. Any queries in respect of the methodology used in assessing permanent impairment may be directed to the WPI e-mail enquiry service at [email protected]. This service is operated by the Injury Management Branch of the MAA who are responsible for the content and publication of the MAA Permanent Impairment Guidelines.