* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Harmonized approach to the informal economy in different
Sharing economy wikipedia , lookup
Ragnar Nurkse's balanced growth theory wikipedia , lookup
Economics of fascism wikipedia , lookup
Rostow's stages of growth wikipedia , lookup
Steady-state economy wikipedia , lookup
Circular economy wikipedia , lookup
Protectionism wikipedia , lookup
Chinese economic reform wikipedia , lookup
Harmonized approach to the informal economy in different sectors (agriculture, trade, construction, and tourism) Eugen Jurzyca INEKO November 2012 Introductory remarks - Part of an (otherwise legal) economy that is not taxed, monitored by any form of government, or included in any gross national product (GNP), unlike the formal economy (Wikipedia). - Ambiguous: Good or bad? - Pluses: Cushion, buffer between IN work and OUT of work, sort of social safety net, may increase economic output - Minuses: less income security, lack of legal rights, lack of access to health care, low future pension, underfinanced public goods, competition distortion (free riding) - Evolution: Official beat shadow economies (example: good and bad economist) Rich shadow Rich shadow economies would economies would bebe HERE!!! HERE!!! Proposed general principles of sectoral policies 1. Gradual approach: being in is better than being shadow, but being shadow is better than being out; speed and scope of shadow economy decrease has its optimum 2. Harmonized approach: taking economic competition into account (focusing on one sector may harm the rest of the economy) 3. Nudge: Soft regulation (hard regulation comes after good rules are applied) Shadow economy in sectors Source: The Shadow Economy in Europe, 2010, ATKearney, Friedrich Schneider from the Johannes Kepler University, Linz, Austria Nudges to central policies Solution/Sector Tourism Construction Retail trade Agriculture Selected sectoral features, which are relevant to specific measures seasonal, partially seasonal, „visible“ publically, „visible“ individually seasonal, incl. big projects „visible“ individually incl. big projects Reducing tax burden for low-earners horizontally Use more electronic payments/official registration of transactions Negative enforcements Increased transparency Obligatory minimum wages at a low level relative to average market wages for low-skill jobs Flexible forms of employment Social capital, trust institutions Decentralize part of income tax collection to municipalities horizontally Nudges to central policies Solution/Sector Tourism Construction Retail trade Agriculture Selected sectoral features, which are relevant to specific measures seasonal, partially seasonal, „visible“ publically, „visible“ individually seasonal, incl. „visible“ individually Reducing tax burden for lowearners incl. big projects horizontally Top priority measure. Mentioned, although out of the core of this presentation. High “starting” taxes and other contributions discourage workers to leave shadow economy. Sectoral tax would: - be technically complicated - increase transaction costs - distort seriously economic competition among sectors/optimal allocation of resources - possibly decrease the shadow economy, but relatively costly big projects Nudges to central policies Solution/Sector Tourism Construction Retail trade Agriculture Selected sectoral features, which are relevant to specific measures seasonal, partially seasonal, „visible“ publically, „visible“ individually seasonal, incl. Obligatory minimum wages at a low level relative to average market wages for low-skill jobs „visible“ individually big projects incl. big projects High obligatory minimum wages discourage employers to officially hire labor force with lower marginal value. The “distance” between horizontally set obligatory minimum wage and the market wage may differ statically among sectors and dynamically in the phases of transition. Workers in the sectors with relatively higher obligatory minimum wage will be pushed to shadow economy. Therefore: considering collective bargaining process to set different minimum wage for different sectors. Sectoral minimum wage would: - be technically simple - correct the distortion to economic competition among sectors ensued from horizontal minimum wage - possibly decrease the shadow economy Nudges to central policies Solution/Sector Tourism Construction Retail trade Agriculture Selected sectoral features, which are relevant to specific measures seasonal, partially seasonal, „visible“ publically, „visible“ individually seasonal, incl. Flexible forms of employment „visible“ individually big projects incl. big projects Employers hesitate to employ workers fully protected by EPL (employment protection legislation). EPL increases firing (and therefore also hiring) costs for firms. Workers are then pushed to shadow economy. The risk is higher in the sectors where workers are employed seasonally. Restrictive EPL may do more damage than good for employment outcomes in competitive, internationally integrated economies (WB). Therefore: considering collective bargaining process to set different forms of employment (basically, firing costs) for different sectors. Seasonal sectors could bring higher return from more flexible forms of employment (my bigger tick marks ). Of course, the flexibility of employment forms is important horizontally, as well. Flexible forms of employment would: - be technically simple - be socially and politically sensitive (more in monopolistic/monopsonistic) regions) - possibly decrease the shadow economy Nudges to central policies Solution/Sector Tourism Construction Retail trade Agriculture Selected sectoral features, which are relevant to specific measures seasonal, partially seasonal, „visible“ publically, „visible“ individually seasonal, incl. Social capital, trusted institutions „visible“ individually big projects incl. big projects Convincing people that they should pay taxes. That it is moral, fair, that paying taxes is not a shame, tax evasion should not be national sport. It is not truth, that nobody pays taxes. See prisoner’s dilemma: if everybody believes that inflation will increase, it will increase, if everybody believes, that nobody pays taxes, almost nobody will pay them, if everybody believe, that all people are in shadow economy, almost all of them will enter it. The message is backed by emotions rather than numbers, it is to build a spirit of a society. Social capital, the relations in a society, as well as a physical capital can be accumulated, can bring dividends, can be tunneled. Sectors with high number of customers involved could bring higher return from improved trust and social capital (my bigger tick marks ). Improved social capital, trust in institutions would: - take long time (formal versus informal rules reforms) - bring solutions to more problems (budget deficits, public debts) - possibly decrease the shadow economy, although the effects of short term campaigns have not been clearly proved The message similar to the one from Dean Martin. Popular from 1948. Everybody loves somebody sometimes Everybody falls in love somehow Something in your kiss Just told me My sometimes is now Everybody loves somebody sometimes Everybody pays some taxes sometimes Everybody falls in love somehow Everybody gives the state somehow Something in your kiss Something in our statistics Just told me Just told us My sometimes is now Our sometimes is now Nudges to central policies Solution/Sector Tourism Construction Retail trade Agriculture Selected sectoral features, which are relevant to specific measures seasonal, partially seasonal, „visible“ publically, „visible“ individually seasonal, incl. big projects Use more electronic payments/official registration of transactions „visible“ individually incl. big projects Usage of more electronic payments is important horizontally, as well. Sectors with high percentage of low-value payments could bring higher return from using more electronic payments (my bigger tick marks ). Usage of electronic payments would: - bring solutions to more problems (budget deficits, public debts) - possibly decrease the shadow economy, some evidence available (government interventions described) Correlation with electronic payments Source: The Shadow Economy in Europe, 2010, ATKearney, Friedrich Schneider from the Johannes Kepler University, Linz, Austria Nudges to central policies Solution/Sector Tourism Construction Retail trade Agriculture Selected sectoral features, which are relevant to specific measures seasonal, partially seasonal, „visible“ publically, „visible“ individually seasonal, incl. big projects Negative enforcement „visible“ individually incl. big projects Examples of negative enforcements: Controls (e.g. onsite visits, tax audits), penalties (monetary, loss of state subsidies, up to forced closing of business), identification cards for construction workers, forced use of electronic payments, limits on cash transactions). One has to take into account that in Germany, more than two-thirds of services offered in the shadow economy would disappear or would be performed by customers themselves. Negative enforcements would: - possibly decrease the shadow economy, some evidence available (government interventions described) - possibly reduce economic activity Nudges to central policies Solution/Sector Tourism Construction Retail trade Agriculture Selected sectoral features, which are relevant to specific measures seasonal, partially seasonal, „visible“ publically, „visible“ individually seasonal, incl. big projects „visible“ individually Increased transparency incl. big projects Increased transparency allows the whole society distinguish between free riders and those to whom shadow economy functions as a safety net. Construction: in a publically visible places, information available about the constructor, hotline number to report concerns to the relevant government body. Hot Doc, an investigative magazine, recently published a list of 2,000 Greeks who kept accounts at a Geneva branch of HSBC. The Economist, November 3/9, 2012: A national sport no more. Increasing transparency would: - bring solutions to more problems - possibly decrease the shadow economy Nudges to central policies Solution/Sector Tourism Construction Retail trade Agriculture Selected sectoral features, which are relevant to specific measures seasonal, partially seasonal, „visible“ publically, „visible“ individually seasonal, incl. big projects Decentralize part of income tax collection to municipalities „visible“ individually incl. big projects horizontally Local municipalities have some information about the real income of taxpayers, which the central government does not have. They can recognize better than the central government who works in the shadow economy, to whom undeclared work serves as a sort of safety net and who is just a free rider. Sectoral income tax decentralization would: - be technically complicated - possibly distort economic competition among sectors/optimal allocation of resources - possibly decrease the shadow economy, but relatively costly Sources • Wikipedia • The Shadow Economy in Europe, 2010, ATKearney, Friedrich Schneider from the Johannes Kepler University, Linz, Austria • Peter Goliaš, INEKO: Shadow economy in Europe • In From the Shadow: Integrating Europe’s Informal Labor, The World Bank report on shadow economy in the Central and Eastern Europe, September 2012 • The Economist, November 3/9, 2012 • Not quoted in particular slides Thank you for your attention