Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Chemistry 310; Course Mechanics -General Information Handout - The lab (Dr. Steehler) - Web & IT stuff – http://web.utk.edu/~msepania/ - Getting in touch with me (email best - [email protected]); creating a listserve - Study aids and approaches - Testing and grading - Your questions??? Analytical Chemistry is Scientific Practice that Tells Us - What compounds are in a sample, chemical composition? Qualitative Analysis - What is the concentration of a compound in a sample? Quantitative Analysis (the majority of this class) -The chemical and physical properties of the compounds of interest are important - Methods can be “wet chemical” or “instrumental” based - Determining what is in a sample is harder than determining if a particular compound is in a sample - Trace analysis is more difficult than bulk analysis 1 Chemistry 310; Section I – Basic Concepts and Error Analysis -Chapters 0-2 will be glossed over (it should be mostly review, but you to read) and no recommended problems - Chapters 3-5 involve error analysis, statistics, etc. (see recommended problems) Analytical Chemistry As It Relates Broadly to Other Areas 2 Steps in An Analytical Method ÅOften from the literature Homogeneous & heterogeneous samples Æ e.g., selectively derivatize to Æ ÅSometimes involves a “chemical separation” ÅOur resulting # is never absolutely certain An example of an analysis problem from another text (a deer kill) will be covered Skimming Over Chapter 1 Chapter 2 is largely lab related (read on your own) Quantities Most Important to Us - measures of amount and concentration - amount – moles; grams; etc. - concentration – molar, normal, part per something (ppm, ppb, etc.); pFunctions - prefixes: ten to the 3(kilo), 6(mega), -3(milli), -6(micro), -9(nano), -12(pico), ...-24(yocto) Some Problems 3 Chapters 3-5 – Data Treatment Some quotes on this topic – “… because data of unknown reliability are worthless.” “Indeed, the effort involved in establishing the quality of experimental results is frequently comparable to the effort expended in obtaining them.” “… a scientist can’t afford to waste time in the pursuit of greater reliability than is needed.” Or from the Harris text “ ” Precision – A measure of the reproducibility of a measurement. Accuracy – A measure of how close a measured value is to the “true” value. 4 Significant Figures Significant Figures are important because they communicate how precisely a value is known experimentally – How good is the number (value)? Someone’s weight: Rounding Errors (Don’t drop insignificant figures until you report a value). Uncertainty 200 lbs Implied in last 201.6 lbs digit 2.016 x 102 lbs 2.0 x 102 lbs 0.1 tons 0.1008 tons Systematic (Determinate) Error This type of error is reproducible and results from a problem with equipment, experiment design, or even personal. In principle it’s source can be discovered and eliminated. ACCURACY To Detect Systematic Error • Analyze samples of known composition – Standard Reference Materials (Does the measured quantity match what is expected?). • Analyze a “blank” sample (Is the response 0?). • Measure the the quantity using two different methods (Do both techniques give the same value?). 5 Example of a “Method Type” Systematic Error The Kjeldahl method (see p. 132) for determining the nitrogen in a sample is a wet chemical analysis involving reactions and a titration. Its success depends on the chemical form of the nitrogen in the sample (note – it can’t deal well with the type in nicotinic acid as results are systemically low) ÅAnother example of both accuracy and precision factors ÅThe N in Nicotinic acid – Pyridine with a carboxylic acid group – is not completely Reduced to NH4+ Random (Indeterminate) Error This type of error arises from uncontrolled variables in the measurement and has an equal chance of being positive or negative. It can be reduced but never eliminated. PRECISION Uncertainty Uncertainty in measured quantities is commonly expressed as ± a numerical value: 5.23 ± 0.03 mM • Uncertainty can be estimated. 6 Absolute Uncertainty 8.102 ± 0.003 g ⇒ 0.003 g Relative Uncertainty 8.102 ± 0.003 g ⇒ 0.003 g = 0.0004 8.102 g Percent Relative Uncertainty 8.102 ± 0.003 g ⇒ 0.003 g × 100% = 0.04% 8.102 g Propagation of Uncertainty What is the resulting error when measured quantities with errors are used in calculations – How does error propagate? et = e 12 + e 22 + e 32 ..... + and - %et = %e12 + %e 22 + %e32 ..... X and 7 Statistics Experimental scientists use statistics to define, quantify, understand and reduce experimental error. In this course we will primarily use statistics to define and quantify random (indeterminate) error associated with experiments – Precision! Gaussian Distributions •All experiments have some random error. •If a measurement is made multiple times, the data distribute themselves to form a Gaussian distribution (e.g. Figures 4-1, 4-2). •The overall shape of the curves don’t change, but the width of the curve does change. Wide distributions (broad curves) mean poor precision. Narrow distributions (sharp curves) mean good precision. Some Statistical Terms • The mean defines the center of the Gaussian distribution. x= ∑x i n i • The Standard Deviation defines the width of the Gaussian distribution. s= ∑ (x i − x) 2 i n −1 8 A Physical Picture of the Gaussian Error Curve Hypothetical case of calibrating a pipet – steps: 1. Fill with water; 2. Dispense into weighing vessel; 3. Weigh; 4. Measure temperature Some More Statistical Terms u x σ If we use in place of and we use in place of , this means the measurement has been repeated an “a very large” number of times (see Table 4.2). s Degrees of Freedom = n-1 Variance = s2 Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) and Coefficient of Variation (CV) are both: 100% ⋅ s / x 9 LECTURE 1-20-04 Review Questions What are the differences between systematic and random errors? Associate propagation of uncertainties of math operations with absolute or relative uncertainties? What is CV? What is the equation for a Gaussian error curve? & How does one report Confidence Limits? Area Under A Gaussian Error Curve ~ 95 % of the entire Error curve is between +2s 10 Reporting the Mean of a Measurement with Confidence Limits When s is a good estimate of σ CL for µ = x + z σ / N1/2 z values found in table You will not Be tested on Å this When s is a not a good estimate of σ CL for µ = x + t s / N1/2 t values found in table Comparison of Means Cases Case 1: Is the measured value different than a “known” value? tcalculated x − known value = n s If tcalculated is greater than ttable (Tab 4.2), then the answer is Yes – there is greater than a XX% (which t used) probability that they are different. Case 2: Are the “true values” of two sets of replicate measurements different? tcalculated x −x = 1 2 s pooled s pooled = n1n2 n1 + n2 s12 (n1 − 1) + s22 (n2 − 1) n1 + n2 − 2 If tcalculated is greater than ttable , then the answer is Yes – there is greater than a XX% (which t used) probability that they are different. Be able to deal with “pooled data” Case 3: From Text - Skip altogether 11 F-test to Determine if Separate Sets of Data are Significantly Different Fcalc = s12 / s22 If Fcalc is greater than Ftab then the standard deviations are significantly different Work Problem 4-13 Q Test to Reject (or not) Suspect Data • If you know you made a significant experimental error while making a measurement, make a note in you lab notebook and do not use the measurement. • If you see a value that seems anomalous, but you don’t know what happened, you can use the Q test to decide if it might make sense to discard this value (or repeat the experiment more times to be more certain of your result). Qcalculated = gap range If Qcalculated is greater than Qtable it may be reasonable to discard the data point. Work Q test question from “placekicker ?” 12 Calibration Plots Take Different Forms External Standard Known analyte concentrations for several Solutions spanning expected range of unknowns Standard Addition Internal Standard with each above Also contains a compound that “resembles” the analyte and is at a known concentration Most calibration plots come from inherently linear relationships (e.g., Abs = Constant x Concentration) or are made so (as with the log plot shown at left) However the plots do exhibit a “LDR” Method of Least Squares How do we determine the “best” fit of a linear calibration curve: y = mx + b ? • Know how to do this with a calculator or spreadsheet. • Understand what the computer programs are doing. What is our handy program doing? • Basically……The program assumes the values on the x-axis are correct/true – all error is in the y values. • The program then minimizes the squares of the vertical deviations – it finds values of m and b that result in this minimum (for all the data points). •R and R2 (correlation coefficients, regression coefficients) are measures of how “good” the fit is. The closer to 1, the better the fit. 13 Least Squares Determinations (Text Figure) We will ignore the math (simply use calculator or spread sheet) Work Problem 5-10 Standard Addition Techniques •This approach is effective when there are significant matrix effects – the instrument response can be increase or decrease “affected” due to the presence of sample components other than the analyte. •Known quantities of analyte are added to the unknown. The increase in signal is used to determine the unknown analyte concentration. •This approach assumes (requires) the response to be linear for modest changes in concentration near the unknown concentration of analyte in the sample. [X ]i [S ] f + [X ] f = IX I S+X 14 Internal Standards Internal standards are useful if your instrument or technique response is not stable (drifts) or if you have concerns about sample loss during the experiment. - Add a known concentration of a standard as early as is feasible during the experiment. - The signal from the unknown analyte is compared to the signal for the internal standard to determine the concentration of the unknown analyte in the sample. - The relative response of the internal standard to the analyte must be known through calibration and must be constant over a range of concentrations! It must be possible to detect the internal standard selectively in the presence of the analyte (often separations are needed)! - However it is desirable that the internal standard process (e.g., is extracted if extractions involved) similarly to the analyte. - More on Standard Addition and Internal Standards later PROBLEM: A driver of a car is arrested after a fatal accident. The legal blood alcohol level in TN is 0.08%. The driver’s blood alcohol level was measured 4 times: 0.078%, 0.081%, 0.082%, 0.080%. Calculate the mean blood alcohol level and the standard deviation. Calculate the confidence interval at 90% and 99.9%. Based on these measurements, would you want to send the driver to prison for the deaths of the victims? 0.078%, 0.081%, 0.082%, 0.080%. u=x± u90% x = 0.080 25 s = 0.00171 ts df = 3 t90% = 2.353 t99.9% = 12.924 n 2.353 × 0.00171 = 0.08025 ± = 0.0803 ± 0.0020 4 u99.9% = 0.08025 ± 12.924 × 0.00171 = 0.080 ± 0.011 4 2 To get 0.0803±0.0002 What if s was a σ? 2 ⎛ ts ⎞ ⎛ 3.3 × 0.00171 ⎞ n=⎜ ⎟ =⎜ ⎟ = 796.1 ⎝ 0.0002 ⎠ ⎝ 0.0002 ⎠ Then one needs a table for z not t. Work more problems 15 0.1 L Standard Addition Problem A spectrophotometric method for the quantitative determination of the concentration of Pb2+ in blood yields a signal of 0.712 for a 5.00-mL sample of blood. After spiking the blood with 5.00 µL of a 1560-ppb Pb2+ standard (5.00 µL spike added to 5.00 mL sample), a signal of 1.546 is measured. Determine the concentration of Pb2+ in the original sample of blood. [X ]i [S ] f + [X ] f [X ]f = [X ]i V0 = [X ]i V [S ]f = 1560 ppb = IX I S+X 5.00 mL = 0.999[ X ]i 5.005 mL 5 × 10−3 mL = 1.56 ppb 5.00 mL [X ]i 1.56 ppb + 0.999[X ]i = 0.712 1.546 [X ]i = 1.33 ppb 16 Mean = Σxi/N = -6 + -5 + 2(-4) ….. / 31 = -1.32 The middle value falls in the 8 at –2 m group Mean – x correct = -1.32 m Q concept covered later σ = [Σ(xi – µ)2 / N ]1/2 = 2.31 m (use calculator) If he corrects his systematic error his mean value will change from –1.32 m to 0 m (dead center) With σ or s = 1.25 the uprights are + and - two standard deviations from the mean. From Table 4.1 ~95% of the error curve falls in this range + = ts/N½ = 4.3 (1.25 m) / 3 ½ = + 3.1 m Systematic 9 17 Example Problems Example Problems 18 19 Section I Learning Topics Chapter 3 -Carrying through correct significant figures in simple (add, subtract, multiply, divide) math operations -Know difference between the following: systematic and random errors accuracy and precision absolute and relative uncertainty -Be able to compute uncertainty in simple math operations Chapter 4 - Understand the significance of the Gaussian-shape error curve and area under curve - Be able to compute means and standard deviations - Be able to calculate confidence intervals (using t-tables) - Be able to compute standard deviation from pooled data - Q testing for questionable data Chapter 5 - Be able to generate equations of linear calibration plots using your calculator; determine slope, intercept, and given a y-value (signal) calculate and x-value (unknown concentration) - Understand difference between external calibration and standard addition calibration methods - Be able to perform calculations for the standard addition method 20