Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Advanced Diploma in Business Administration Programme 4 Marketing Assignment The Role of the Product Life Cycle in Service Portfolio Management Author Michael Ward May 2000 Marketing Assignment [Client] Confidential Executive Summary As a result of a strategic drive to reduce complexity, CLIENT_TS has revised its service portfolio. This target portfolio contains ten standard IT services plus a further three services that have been identified for development. The focus of the new portfolio is simplicity. Services are offered in their basic form only, but can be combined to create integrated solutions. This document addresses the concept of product lifecycle management as a tool that CLIENT_TS can use to manage this new service portfolio, to ensure that: Services remain “standard” so that the core strategy of simplicity is not diluted Services remain fit for purpose. The Product Lifecycle (PLC) is a term given to a chart that follows the course of a product’s or service’s life through a series of life “stages”, namely development, introduction, growth, maturity and decline. The document identifies that there are three main uses of the PLC in service portfolio management, namely: Awareness of “Product Levels” Three product levels exist – product class (“soft drinks”), product form (“cola”) and product brand (“Pepsi”). The document finds that awareness of these levels can help an organisation to manage its services by making it aware of longer term changes in the market place – managing a product “brand”, for instance, needs to be done in context of the lifecycle of the product “form”. Setting Service Strategy The PLC can play an important role in setting service strategy. The document demonstrates how the PLC can be integrated with product portfolio theories such as the Boston Consulting Group’s “Growth/Share Matrix” to provide indicators of the most appropriate strategies to use. Product Development The PLC, when combined as a portfolio, can be used to identify opportunities to start product development, so that the new service reaches maturity as the old one would have declined. The document highlights various issues relating to the use of PLCs in organisations, such as the difficulties of knowing exactly where in its life cycle a product is and as a result basing strategies on the wrong positioning. However, the document finds that the product lifecycle is a powerful tool for CLIENT_TS to use in managing its services, and recommends that it be considered along with demand forecasting, benchmarking, performance and cost management as part of an integrated service portfolio management strategy. Page i Marketing Assignment [Client] Confidential Table of Contents INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 1 DEFINITION OF PRODUCT LIFECYCLE MANAGEMENT .................................................... 2 THE APPLICATION OF PRODUCT LIFECYCLE MANAGEMENT .......................................... 3 THE VALIDITY OF PRODUCT LIFECYCLE MANAGEMENT ............................................... 9 CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................................................ 11 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................ 13 BIBLIOGRAPHY ............................................................................................................ 14 APPENDIX 1: A BRIEF OVERVIEW OF CLIENT_TS SERVICES.................................... A-1 APPENDIX 2: ALTERNATIVE PRODUCT LIFECYCLE CURVE SHAPES ........................... A-2 Index of Figures FIGURE 1: THE PRODUCT LIFECYCLE ............................................................................. 2 FIGURE 2 : CHARACTERISTICS OF PLC STAGES .............................................................. 3 FIGURE 3: EXAMPLES OF PLC "LEVELS"........................................................................ 4 FIGURE 4: PLCS FOR TELEPHONY (“PRODUCT FORM”) AND CLEARWAY (“BRAND”) IN CLIENT_TS .......................................................................... 5 FIGURE 5: THE BCG GROWTH/SHARE MATRIX ............................................................. 5 FIGURE 6: COMBINED PLC/PRODUCT PORTFOLIO CONCEPTS ........................................ 6 FIGURE 7: STRATEGIES THROUGH THE PRODUCT LIFECYCLE ......................................... 7 FIGURE 8: CLIENT_TS SERVICE LIFECYCLE POSITIONING ........................................... 7 FIGURE 9: PRODUCT BRAND LIFECYCLE POSITIONING FOR THE WIDE AREA NETWORK PRODUCT FORM ....................................................... 8 FIGURE 10: IMPACT OF INNOVATION ON THE PRODUCT LIFECYCLE ............................... 8 FIGURE 11: PROBLEMATIC TECHNOLOGY PLC CURVES .............................................. 10 Page ii Marketing Assignment [Client] Confidential Introduction [CLIENT] Technology Services (CLIENT_TS) is a division of [Client] Bank responsible for delivering IT infrastructure to the rest of the Bank. It was formed in 1995 from the merger of [Client] Network Services (responsible for data and voice networks) and [Client] Computer Operations (mainframe and distributed processing). In 1998, as a response to customer criticism in terms of product cost, function and complexity, a new service strategy was launched that replaced the existing strategy of customisation with one that focussed on simplicity and standardisation. Since then, CLIENT_TS’ service portfolio has been revised. It now contains ten services covering IT requirements ranging from the running of “backend” mainframe computers, through to the support of the PC desktop environment, plus a further three services that have been identified for future service development. All of these services are considered to be standard “building blocks” that cannot be customised to suit local needs of individual customers – every customer receives the same service at the same unit cost. A brief overview of CLIENT_TS services is contained in Appendix 1. The new portfolio, launched at the end of 1999, presents CLIENT_TS with two challenges: 1. To ensure that services remain “standard” so that the core strategy of simplicity is not diluted 2. To ensure that within this framework services are flexible enough to respond to changing customer requirements. This document introduces the concept of Product Lifecycle Management as a method that CLIENT_TS can employ to help manage its services in light of these challenges. In so doing, it will explain, in the context of CLIENT_TS: 1. What the Product Lifecycle is. 2. How it can be used as a service management tool. Finally, the document will conclude with a summary of the benefits of Product Lifecycle Management to CLIENT_TS and make recommendations as appropriate for its use in setting product strategy. Page 1 Marketing Assignment [Client] Confidential Definition of Product Lifecycle Management Every product, according to marketing theory, has a lifecycle that can be used to chart its progress in terms of sales and as a basis for marketing and product strategy. Therefore, the product lifecycle (PLC), is “The course of a product’s sales and profits over a lifetime” Kotler et al (1999) The term “lifetime” used in this description implies that products have a limited life (Grantham, 1997), and that this life can be charted suggests that it passes through a number of stages during which it will face differing challenges and degrees of success in terms of profit (Kotler, 1994). This further suggests that, to maximise success, a product requires different management strategies (marketing, financial, manufacturing, etc) in each stage of its life. The PLC is a tool that management can use to identify which service strategies are needed and when to employ them. The product lifecycle traditionally consists of a product development phase plus four post-product launch lifetime stages, although most writers refer only to the post-launch stages. The PLC is shown in Figure 1, and its stages are described below. Product Development Stage Introduction Growth Maturity PRODUCT LAUNCH Sales & Profits Decline Sales Profit 0 Time Figure 1: The Product Lifecycle (Kotler, 1999) The characteristics of each of these stages are shown in Figure 2. Page 2 Marketing Assignment PLC Stage Product Development Introduction Growth Maturity Decline [Client] Confidential Characteristics Refers to the product development process that occurs once a company has identified an opportunity for a new product. This stage obviously occurs before product launch, and as such there are no sales, but development costs are incurred – hence the negative profit on the graph. Covers the product’s birth into the market place, and has: Low sales, negative profits High unit cost Low awareness of product & few customers Low competition Covers the period when market awareness heightens and sales accelerate. Unit cost starts to fall & sales increase Profits rise, perhaps breakeven Growing number of competitors Covers the period of peak demand for the product. Sales growth slows Unit costs are at their lowest & profits at their highest Number of competitors is at its highest Covers the period when sales fall, as the product becomes outdated or obsolete A decline in sales is experienced Number of competitors fall (and this may help to stabilise the fall in other products sales) Unit costs start to rise again. Figure 2 : Characteristics of PLC stages (adapted from Kotler, 1994) The Application of Product Lifecycle Management “In short, the product lifecycle concept provides a framework for thinking about both a product’s evolution through time and the kind of market segments that are likely to develop at various points in time”. Hayes & Wheelwright (1984) Product Lifecycle Management is a useful tool that can be used by organisations in a number of ways, as follows: Awareness of different product “levels” Service Portfolio Management Product Development Cycle These are explained in detail below. Page 3 Marketing Assignment [Client] Confidential Awareness of different product “levels” Kotler (1994) states that three levels of product lifecycle exist – product class (such as “toothpaste”), product forms (such as “whitening”), and brand (“Colgate”). Grantham (1997) suggests that most proponents of PLC theory refer to product form (“cola”) rather than brand (“Pepsi”) or class (“carbonated soft drinks”). However the theory is often applied in organisations at the brand level. Hence, organisations need to be aware of the levels and their differences. Wood (1990) suggests that the common practice of focussing on brands only is a “unhealthy myopia”. Figure 3 contains examples of these differences both for the car market and for some CLIENT_TS services. Product Class Automobiles Product Form Supermini Large Family Hatchback Network Connectivity Voice Networks Wide Area Data Networks Local Area Data Networks Brand Renault Clio VW Polo Ford Mondeo Vauxhall Vectra BT PSTN Clearway SNA UKDN MPRN GroupLAN Figure 3: Examples of PLC "Levels" The implication of product levels means that organisations need an understanding not only of the PLCs for their own brands, but also for the product form and class. The lifecycle of the automobile, for instance, is hugely different from the lifecycle of the Renault Clio. This can be demonstrated by analysing the CLIENT_TS Telephony service. Here the Clearway brand (which is the name for CLIENT_TS’ telephone network) appears to be approaching the “decline” stage, due to the changing Bank emphasis from branch-based customer service units to centralised customer contact centres. It is likely that, within the next 12-18 months, the functionality of Clearway will be excessive and the product will be too expensive for customer needs. Therefore Clearway will need to be replaced with a lower cost, lower functionality equivalent, and thus the brand will decline. However, the product form will remain the same. The product lifecycle for this will depend on emerging technologies such as IP Telephony and voice/data integration. This relationship is shown in Figure 4. Page 4 Marketing Assignment [Client] Confidential Sales Product Form: Telephone Networks Product Form: Voice over IP Clearway Clearway’s replacement Barclays VPN IP Telephony Services Time 1992 1996 2000 2004 2008 Figure 4: PLCs for Telephony (“Product Form”) and Clearway (“Brand”) in CLIENT_TS Service Portfolio Management A common approach to portfolio management is the Growth/Share Matrix proposed by the Boston Consulting Group (BCG). This matrix, shown in Figure 5, provides organisations with details of the range of products in their portfolio and enables them to set product strategies to fulfil the strategic aim. PROBLEM CHILD Products (size is relative to turnover) MARKET GROWTH High STAR Natural Drift Low DOG CASH COW High Low MARKET SHARE Figure 5: The BCG Growth/Share Matrix (Adapted from Lancaster & Messingham, 1999) Page 5 Marketing Assignment [Client] Confidential The main problem with this approach is that, by concentrating only on market share and growth, the matrix ignores new products and overlooks markets with negative growth rates (Lancaster & Massingham, 1999). Therefore, in PLC terms, it ignores the introduction and decline stages. This problem is addressed by Barksdale & Harris (1982), who extended the BCG matrix to show how strategies can be developed across the whole lifecycle. The relationship between the product portfolio and lifecycle is shown in Figure 6. Introduction Growth “Stars” High share High growth Maturity Decline “Cash Cows” High share Low growth “War Horse” High Share Negative Growth Sales “Infants” Sales “Problem Children” Low share High Growth “Dogs” Low share Low growth “Dodos” Low share Negative Growth Time Figure 6: Combined PLC/Product Portfolio Concepts (Barksdale & Harris, 1982) These models identify market conditions for a range of product “types”. From this, product strategies can be developed that help the company to build a balanced portfolio. The balance is essential to ensure the long term survival of the organisation – a portfolio consisting entirely of “cash cows” may appear attractive in the short term, but cash cows can soon become “dogs”. Depending on the type of product, there are a number of strategies available for an organisation to use, according to the industry and competitor characteristics displayed. Example strategies are shown in Figure 7. Page 6 Marketing Assignment [Client] Confidential STAGE OF PRODUCT LIFECYCLE Introduction Growth STAR Maturity CASH COW High • Maximise product share, using penetration pricing • Offer product extensions (eg warranty) INFANT Decline WAR HORSE • “Harvest” - Increase cash flow from product • “Harvest” profits or cut price to retain market share • Protect market share • Selective withdrawal from unprofitable sectors DOG DODO • Offer a basic product PROBLEM CHILD • Use cost-plus pricing • Build product awareness • “Harvest” - maximise profitability • Differentiate product (niche) • Differentiate Low SALES • Build market share through product awareness • Divest • Competitor watch (if they leave the market it may be profitable to stay) • Divest where not profitable Figure 7: Strategies through the Product Lifecycle (Adapted from Kotler (1994), Lancaster & Massingham (1999), Porter (1985) and Barksdale & Harris (1982)) Although some strategies in Figure 7 appear unfeasible for an internal organisation such as CLIENT_TS, (e.g. profit maximisation) the matrix does at least provide a framework for managing the service portfolio. Applying the model to the CLIENT_TS service portfolio shows that it has a concentration of “cash cows”. This is because CLIENT_TS is the only viable provider due to economies of scale, functionality or security concerns – for instance, the Bank needs interconnectivity so it is sensible to use only one supplier of wide area networks. CLIENT_TS services are shown plotted against the model in Figure 8 (for an overview of CLIENT_TS services, please turn to Appendix 1). STAGE OF PRODUCT LIFECYCLE Introduction Growth Maturity STAR INFANT High Data Processing Security WAN Messaging SALES Decline WAR HORSE CASH COW Voice Directory GroupLan Low Internet MDS BDSS Collaborative PROBLEM CHILD DOG DODO Figure 8: CLIENT_TS Service Lifecycle Positioning (NB: size of service markers are not relative to turnover) This shows the benefit that PLCs can bring to service portfolio management. In the CLIENT_TS case, the matrix appears to show a reasonably balanced portfolio, although the theory may suggest Page 7 Marketing Assignment [Client] Confidential concerns about the concentration of cash cows and lack of future stars or problem children. However, the concept of product levels needs to be applied again – as CLIENT_TS products are effectively product forms, the cash cows are likely to remain in maturity for many years. This is being demonstrated in CLIENT_TS by Project Reach, which is responsible for the migration of the old Wide Area Networks (which in CLIENT_TS are product “brands”) to a new IP network run by BT. This is shown in Figure 9. STAGE OF PRODUCT LIFECYCLE Introduction Growth STAR High INFANT Maturity Decline WAR HORSE CASH COW SALES MPRN UKDN IP Network (Reach) Low SNA PROBLEM CHILD DOG DODO Figure 9: Product Brand Lifecycle Positioning for the Wide Area Network Product Form Product Development Cycle As pressure for quicker speed to market increases, the product lifecycle can be used to ascertain when products should be replaced or developed. This decision cannot wait until the product is in decline, as shown in Figure 10. Sales Product C Longer-term gain from introducing new product earlier Short-term loss of potential revenue Later replacement of product B Product B replaces Product A Product A Time Figure 10: Impact of Innovation on the Product Lifecycle Page 8 Marketing Assignment [Client] Confidential In this example, by making changes as Product A reaches maturity (either by moving into a new market, or replacing the product with a new service, as shown in the graph), the company attains long-term benefits. This happens as, despite a potential short-term loss of revenue, Product B is into the growth stage and approaching maturity by the time Product A would have been in decline. This example is an extreme case, but the relevance to CLIENT_TS is that recognising changes in the market early results in longer-term benefits. Referring to the Telephony case on page 5, this means CLIENT_TS should not wait until Clearway is in decline, but start to think about its replacement now (bearing in mind that the full customer requirements may not be finalised). The Validity Of Product Lifecycle Management It is has been shown that the PLC can play a crucial role in helping organisations set product strategies. However, as markets continue to become more dynamic, questions need to be raised about the validity of PLC in modern organisations. This issue is particularly important for organisations such as CLIENT_TS, where technology change is increasing exponentially and strategic emphasis has been placed on speed to market through shorter development cycles. In this context, this may mean that the concept of tracing the lifecycle throughout its life is outmoded. The specific areas of concern are: It is not certain that a product has a “life” Grantham (1997) suggests that the PLC draws analogy with a biological being, and as such each stage of life is sequential and relatively fixed. However, this isn’t the case with products or markets – each one has a differently shaped curve where the time scales and outcome of each stage can vary. Examples of common PLC curve patterns can be found in Appendix 2. For technology services, the curve is likely to be relatively short and therefore a relatively unattractive proposition for the organisation to track (Goldman & Muller, 1982). If the “ideal” PLC curve shows short development time (and cost), plus a short growth period in which peak sales are met, a long maturity phase in which profits are maximised and a long decline phase to give organisations plenty of time to develop replacement services, technology services are almost the direct opposite. They have a long and costly development time, a long time for the technology to be adopted and then a short time until replacement technologies are revealed. These are shown in Figure 11. Page 9 Marketing Assignment Sales [Client] Confidential THE “IDEAL” PLC Sales TYPICAL TECHNOLOGY SERVICE PLC Short maturity Long maturity Rapid growth Slow Decline Slow growth Rapid Decline Time Short development Time Long, expensive development Figure 11: Problematic Technology PLC Curves (Goldman & Muller, reproduced in Kotler, 1994) As already mentioned, CLIENT_TS have minimised this problem by aligning its service to product forms. Referring to the telephony example, Clearway has been replaced by Telephony Network Provision. This means that the service has a much longer lifetime, meaning less change to customers, but the brand lifecycles are now adapted to technologies. As technologies change, the service remains roughly the same, although detail of functionality may alter. Therefore, if and when [Client]’ strategy makes Clearway obsolete, the “Featurenet” technology (which Clearway is based on) ends its lifecycle and the replacement starts its own lifecycle. In principle, the customer need never know that the technology has changed, as long as business requirements are fulfilled, costs do not increase (the rationale for the change in this case is actually for lower costs) and the telephone on the desk still works. It is difficult to plot where a product actually is in its cycle Dhalla & Yuseph (1976) suggest that the PLC stages are not distinct phases of a product, and characteristics in the phases are not consistent. This may lead to management believing that the product is at a different stage in its life than it actually is, and the wrong decisions may result. Confusing product forms and product brands may further exacerbate this situation. For example, if sales growth slows during the growth phase, the lifecycle theory would suggest that maturity is nearing. However, the slow down may be caused by other factors such as seasonal demand, supply problems or even a temporary “blip”. Heinz’s recent announcement to end sales of Salad Cream is one example of this happening – the company, thinking its product was in decline made front-page news with the demise of the brand, sales increased and the product entered a recycle stage of maturity as featured in the “cyclerecycle” PLC shape (as featured in Appendix 2). CLIENT_TS need to be aware of all the risks in placing its services in a lifecycle framework. Analyses of service positioning (as found in figures 8 and 9) are subjective and may be distorted by one-off occurrences. Page 10 Marketing Assignment [Client] Confidential Other factors can influence the shape of the PLC curve A more cynical view of Heinz’s Salad Cream announcement is that the company expected this reaction and only made it for cheap publicity – but whatever the motive, the effect was a boost in sales and a “recycle” effect happened. This interpretation of events can be used to demonstrate that organisations can have more control over the stages of the lifecycle than the model suggests. Poor advertising and other lacks of resources may result in a downturn in sales, but this does not necessarily mean the product is in decline. A new promotion may be all that is required to recover this situation. The PLC can be a self-fulfilling prophecy Management blindly following the signs of product lifecycle theory without considering the wider picture may create self-fulfilling prophesies (Wood, 1990). For instance, if sales show a fall, the theory would suggest that the product has passed maturity and has entered the decline phase. Following the suggested strategy, management would then divert resources away from the “declining” product and reallocate them to products that are earlier in their lifecycles, thereby actively contributing to the product’s demise. As already discussed, the fall in sales may actually have been caused by factors such as poor advertising. The use of the PLC may also lead to strategies that are the result of technology “push” rather than market “pull” (Baker, 1999).. The implication to CLIENT_TS of these final three points is that various factors need to be taken into account before product strategies are set. For instance, if the recent closure of branches resulted in reduction in Clearway sites, taken in isolation this may be mistaken for the start of Clearway’s decline. In actual fact, in Clearway terms, it is a lowering of peak demand and the setting of a new maturity level. Conclusions & Recommendations The purpose of this document was to determine to what extent Product Lifecycle Management can help CLIENT_TS to manage its services, to ensure they fulfil their strategic objectives whilst retaining flexibility to respond to changing needs. Firstly, analysis of product lifecycle theory highlighted many uses and advantages to organisations adopting the techniques, such as: Page 11 Marketing Assignment [Client] Confidential It provides a planning framework for product and market strategies, and suggests strategies that are appropriate for a particular stage of a product’s life It is a simple, desirable model as it brings a predictive approach to increasingly dynamic marketplaces (Wyland, 1998) It provides companies with an element of control by allowing product performance to be measured against similar products (Kotler, 1994) It provides a link to other aspects of the organisation by suggesting product and process improvements (Hayes & Wheelwright, 1979). However, companies that adopt the technique need to do so with caution, for the following reasons: Each product has a different shape of curve – this undermines confidence in its use as a planning framework It is difficult to use in practice, as it is not always certain where in its lifecycle a product actually is The strategies suggested can ignore the impact that other factors can have on the product’s demand (the concept is based on the founding principle that every product follows a sequential path through stages – as does, say, a human life). The above arguments, when combined, can lead to wrong strategies being applied and the lifecycle stages become self-fulfilling prophesies (Wood, 1990). There are examples of the concept already in use in CLIENT_TS, including the new service portfolio, which is aligned to the “product form” level (enabling service management to continue seamlessly when technologies change), and the detailed planning that takes place at both technology and service levels. However, to improve the confidence in strategies proposed through lifecycle management, CLIENT_TS needs to further integrate the process with other aspects of business management, such as: Business planning cycles, to ensure that the product cycle remains in line with customer requirements, and that changes in requirements can be foreseen and acted upon Benchmarking practices, to ensure that the product remains competitive against market alternatives, in terms of cost and functionality Performance monitoring, to ensure that the product does what it says it should do, and thus linking the planning framework with operational realities Cost management, to ensure that decisions can be made with a sound financial base. Therefore, product lifecycle management is a powerful tool for CLIENT_TS to use in managing its services, and should be considered along with demand forecasting, benchmarking, performance and cost management as part of an integrated service portfolio management strategy. Its concept is simple: change is inevitable. Its advantage is that it can be used to anticipate change and prepare the organisation for the challenges ahead. Page 12 Marketing Assignment [Client] Confidential References The books and articles referred to in this document are listed below, in alphabetical order. References are referred to in the text in the format Author (year). Baker,M.G. (1999), The Marketing Book (4th Edition) Butterworth Heinemann, pp6-7 Barksdale,H.C. & Harris,C.E. (1982) “Portfolio Analysis and the Product Life Cycle” Journal of Long-Range Planning, Vol 15 No 6, 1982 Cox,W.E. (1967) “Product Life Cycles as Marketing Models” Quoted in Kotler (1994) and Grantham (1997), details below. Dhalla,N.K. & Yuspeh,S. (1976) “Forget the Product Life Cycle Concept!” Harvard Business Review, Jan/Feb 1976, pp102-110 Goldman,A. & Muller,E. (1982) “Measuring Shape Patterns of Product Life Cycles: Implications for Marketing Strategy” Quoted in Kotler (1994), pg358, details below. Grantham,L.M. (1997) “The Validity of the Product Life Cycle in the High-Tech Industry” Marketing Intelligence & Planning, Vol 15 No 1, pp4-10 Hayes & Weelwright (1984) Restoring our competitive edge: Competing through manufacturing John Wiley & Sons Kotler,P. (1994) Marketing Management: Analysis, Planning, Implementation & Control (8th Edition) Prentice Hall International, pp354-379 Kotler,P., Armstrong,G., Saunders,J. & Wong,V. (1999) Principles of Marketing (2nd European Edition), Prentice Hall Europe, pg 627 Lancaster,G. & Massingham,L. (1999) Essentials of Marketing (3rd Edition), McGraw Hill, pp74-103 Porter,M.E. (1985) Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance Quoted in Lancaster,G. & Massingham,L. (1999), details above. Wood,L. (1990) “The End of the Product Life Cycle? Education says Goodbye to an Old Friend” Journal of Marketing Management, Vol 6 No 2, pp145-155 Wyland,D.W. (1998) “Keep Your Product in Play: Introducing Full Life-Cycle Management” Chain Store Age, Vol 74 No 9, p186 Page 13 Marketing Assignment [Client] Confidential Bibliography The books and articles used in the production of this document are listed below, in order of author: M.G.Baker, The Marketing Book (4th Edition) Butterworth Heinemann, 1999 Barksdale,H.C. & Harris,C.E., “Portfolio Analysis and the Product Life Cycle” Journal of Long-Range Planning, Vol 15 No 6, 1982 Dhalla,N.K. & Yuspeh,S., Forget the Product Life Cycle Concept! Harvard Business Review, Jan/Feb 1976 Grantham,L.M., The Validity of the Product Life Cycle in the High-Tech Industry Marketing Intelligence & Planning, Vol 15 No 1, 1997 Hayes & Weelwright, Restoring our competitive edge: Competing through manufacturing John Wiley & Sons, 1984 Kotler,P., Marketing Management: Analysis, Planning, Implementation & Control (8th Edition) Prentice Hall International, 1994 Kotler,P., Armstrong,G., Saunders,J. & Wong,V. Principles of Marketing (2nd European Edition), Prentice Hall Europe, 1999 G.Lancaster & L.Massingham, Essentials of Marketing (3rd Edition), McGraw Hill, 1999 G.Lancaster & P.Reynolds, Introduction to Marketing: A Step-by-Step Guide to all the Tools of Marketing Kogan Page Limited, 1999 G.M.Magnan, S.E.Fawcett, & L.M.Birou, Benchmarking Manufacturing Practice Using the Product Life Cycle Benchmarking: An International Journal, Vol 6 No 3, 1999 C.L.Martin, The History, Evolution and Principles of Services Marketing: Poised for the New Millennium Marketing Intelligence & Planning, Vol 17 No 7, 1999 S.Vandermerwe & C.Lovelock, Competing Through Services: Strategy & Implementation (European Casebook) Prentice Hall, 1994 L.Wood, The End of the Product Life Cycle? Education says Goodbye to an Old Friend Journal of Marketing Management, Vol 6 No 2, 1990 M.Worsam & D.Berkeley-Wright, Marketing in Management: Basic Principles Pitman Publishing, 1995 D.W.Wyland, Keep Your Product in Play: Introducing Full Life-Cycle Management Chain Store Age, Vol 74 No 9, 1998 Page 14 Marketing Assignment [Client] Confidential Appendix 1: A Brief Overview of CLIENT_TS Services To reinforce theoretical points, this document refers the reader to CLIENT_TS services. This appendix provides a brief overview of what these services are to aid the reader’s understanding of the issues being discussed. Underlined text shows a link to other services. Service BDSS Clearway Collaborative Services Data Processing Directory Services GroupLAN Internet / Intranet LAN Infrastructure MDS Messaging MPRN Reach Security & Certification Services SNA Telephony Services UKDN Voice WAN Description Stands for “[Client] Desktop Support Service”. Provides support to PC desktops and associated LAN servers. Very limited use; most of the Bank customers have their own arrangements with 3rd party suppliers. A product brand level service that is used to deliver telephony services in the Bank. Supplied in National (PABX-based) or Centrex (BT-exchange based) versions. A term given to a collection of technologies and services that will assist collaborative working practices, such as workflow and document management. The service has been identified as being required by the Bank but has not yet been developed. A collective term to describe the provision and management of mainframe and distributed systems infrastructure. All mainframe and most distributed systems are located in CLIENT_TS data centres. CLIENT_TS has a virtual monopoly in the Bank (the exception is a number of distributed systems that are located on customer premises for operational reasons). A term given to the provision of a bank-wide directory system to support access to all WANs, Collaborative, Internet and Data Processing services. The service is currently under development but will become mandatory. A product “brand” level name given to LAN Infrastructure Provision. Provided at a limited number of head office locations only. Other Bank premises have LANs managed by 3rd party companies. A term given to the hosting of the Bank’s internet and intranet services. It is mandatory to use CLIENT_TS for this purpose, although site development is not CLIENT_TS’ responsibility. See GroupLAN. Stands for “Managed Data Services”. The service takes data feeds from 3 rd party organisations, such as Reuters, and reformats them to be suitable for PC desktop viewing. The service has very few customers and has been undergoing an exit programme for approximately two years, but a suitable alternative supplier has not been found. The term given to the provision of the Bank’s e-mail backbone (also called “Mailbox”). The use of the backbone is mandatory, but the management of e-mail to the desktop can be provided by CLIENT_TS or, in many cases, by clients themselves. The service was rolled out to the Bank in 1999 and therefore has just reached maturity. A product brand level service that was previously one of the main wide area data networks in the Bank. Now being replaced with an IP Network. See WAN for more details. This is actually a project rather than a service. It is responsible for changing the way WAN services are delivered at the product brand level. The term given to the provision of firewalls and the forthcoming PKI security functionality. It is mandatory to use CLIENT_TS, although the service is still in infancy due to the development of PKI. A product brand level service that was previously one of the main wide area data networks in the Bank – it is still used, for access to mainframe systems. Will be replaced by C.IP.E (a secure IP network) that will be delivered as part of the IP Network through Project Reach. See WAN for more details. A “product form” term for the provision of a telephone network. Currently delivered through the Clearway product. The use of CLIENT_TS is mandatory for Bank-wide connectivity, but many customers also use BT for local telephone lines. A product brand level service that was previously one of the main wide area data networks in the Bank – it was a more secure version of MPRN. Now being replaced with an IP Network. See WAN for more details. A generic term given to the provision of Telephony services. Stands for Wide Area Networks – and is a product brand level service. Project Reach is redefining the CLIENT_TS WAN service, by replacing a number of networks based on differing technologies (MPRN, SNA & UKDN). The use of CLIENT_TS is mandatory. Page A-1 Marketing Assignment [Client] Confidential Appendix 2: Alternative Product Lifecycle Curve Shapes Cox (1967) argued that there are actually six patterns or curves that can show the life cycle of a product – the shape of the PLC does not always have to be the traditional “S” shape demonstrated in Figure 1 on page 2. Since then, more standard shapes have been identified and there are now considered to be up to seventeen (Kotler, 1994). Some example shapes are shown below, with relevance to CLIENT_TS. Name Characteristics Typical Shape CLIENT_TS Example Growth- Initial peak in demand falls Slump- before maturity is reached The number of Sales BDSS accounts hit a Maturity peak but Corporate Pattern Banking customers Time transferred to their own service. Cycle- The standard life cycle (primary) Recycle shows decline but sales recover Pattern into a secondary cycle (recycle) Clearway National Sales sales fell due to switch to Centrex, Primary Cycle – perhaps due to a company response such as renewed Recycle however the service Time advertising to arrest the decline. Scalloped The company finds new uses or Pattern markets for existing products. is now being installed into new call centres GroupLAN, initially Sales just available at one campus site, has since been installed Time at four others, each providing new demand. Page A-2