* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Document
Survey
Document related concepts
Transcript
EDTA Titrations
Metal Chelate Complexes – complexes formed between a Lewis acid and a Lewis
base.
Metals ions are Lewis acids, because they accept electrons from Lewis bases.
When metal cations combine with Lewis bases, the resulting species is called a
complex ion, and the base is called a ligand.
The coordination number is the number of covalent bonds that the metal cation
tends to form with the electron donor.
Ligands: monodentate, bidentate, multidentate [dentate = “toothed”]
Tetradentate ligand: ATP (adesonine triphosphate)
Chelate effect - ability of multidentate ligands to form more stable metal
compounds than those formed by monodentate ligands.
K ≡ β2 = 8 x 109
1
EDTA, H6Y2+, is a hexaprotic system; it has six acidic hydrogens that are lost
upon metal-complex formation. The first four pK values apply to carboxyl
protons, and the last two are for the ammonium protons
2+
Hexaprotic system: H6Y
COOH H6Y2+ H+ + H5Y+ pK1 = 0.0
COOH H5Y+ H+ + H4Y pK2 = 1.5
Tetraprotic system: H4Y
COOH H4Y H+ + H3Y − pK3 = 2.0
COOH H3Y − H+ + H2Y 2− pK4 =2.69
+
Commonly used: Na2H2Y• 2H2O NH
H2Y 2− H+ + HY 3− pK5 = 6.13
NH+
HY 3− H+ + Y 4−
pK6 = 10.37
o
Note: pK values are at 25 C and µ = 0.1 M except pK1 applies at µ = 1.0 M
Complexometric titration: a titration based n a complex formation.
The pH of an EDTA solution affects the equilibrium constant of complex
formation. Solutions of high pH used in analytical procedures do not
significantly effect the stability of a complex.
The fraction of EDTA in each of its protonated forms is shown in the figure below:
2
We define α for each species as the fraction of EDTA at that form:
[EDTA] = [H6Y2+]+ [H5Y+]+ [H4Y]+ [H3Y − ]+ [H2Y 2− ]+ [HY 3− ]+ [Y 4− ]
[Y 4− ]
αY 4− =
[ EDTA] ← this is the concentration of “free” EDTA, not complexed to
metal ions. The α fraction is a function of pH. (Equation 12-4 of Harris)
αY =
4−
K1 K 2 K 3 K 4 K 5 K 6
{[ H ] + [ H ] K1 + [ H ] K1 K 2 + [ H ] K1 K 2 K 3 + [ H + ]2 K1 K 2 K 3 K 4 + [ H + ]K1 K 2 K 3 K 4 K 5 + K1 K 2 K 3 K 4 K 5 K 6 }
+ 6
+ 5
+ 4
+ 3
(Equation 12-4 of Harris)
Reaction with a Metal Ion
This Kf is defined only for Y 4− This is a problem!!!!
We saw from the fraction plot and Table 12-1 that most of the EDTA is not in
the form of Y 4− below a pH ~10.
3
Solution to the problem: Conditional formation
constant, K 'f
• We can derive a more useful equilibrium equation
by rearranging the fraction relationship:
αY =
4−
[Y ]
4-
[EDTA ]
[ ]
⇒ Y 4- = α Y 4− [EDTA ]
[MY ] = [MY ]
=
[M ][Y ] [M ]α [EDTA]
n −4
Kf
n+
4−
n −4
n+
Y 4-
αY
4−
• If we fix the pH of the titration with a buffer, then
is a constant that can be combined with Kf
K = α Y 4- K f
'
f
[MY ]
=
[M ][EDTA ]
n −4
n+
K f' = α Y 4− K f
M n + + EDTA ⇔ MY n − 4
Example
Calculate the concentration of free Ca2+ in a solution of 0.10 M CaY 2− at pH 10
and pH 6. Kf for CaY 2− is 4.5x1010 (Table 12-2)
K f' = α Y 4− K f
Ca 2+ + EDTA ↔ CaY 2−
at pH = 10.00, K f' = α Y 4− K f = (0.30)( 4.5 × 1010 ) = 1.34 × 1010
at pH = 6.00, K f' = α Y 4− K f = (1.8 × 10− 5 )( 4.5 × 1010 ) = 8.0 × 105
Ca 2+ + EDTA ↔ CaY 2−
Conci
0
0
0.1
Concf
x
x
0.1 - x
K
'
f
[CaY ] = 0.1 − x
=
[Ca ][EDTA] x
2−
2+
2
4
We solve w/r/t x and at pH 10: [Ca2+] = 2.7 x 10-6
and at pH 6: [Ca2+] = 3.5 x 10-4
Note : At low pH, the metal-complex is less stable
Calcium/EDTA Titration Curve
For calcium, the end point becomes hard to
detect below ~pH=8. The formation constant
is too small below this point. This can be used
to separate metals. At pH=4, Ca2+ does not
perform significant complexaion with EDTA.
Generic Titration Curve
We’ll consider a titration where we have 50.0
mL of 0.040 M Ca2+ (buffered at pH=10) with
0.080 M EDTA
Ca 2+ + EDTA ↔ CaY 2−
K f' = α Y 4− K f
(50.0 mL)(0.040 M) = Ve (0.080 M) ⇒
Ve= 25.0 mL
From the previous example at pH 10.00
K 'f = 1.34 x1010
• Before the Equivalence Point: What is pCa2+ when we have added 5.0 mL of
EDTA?
5
- 5.0
50.0
[Ca ] = 25.0
(0.040)
= 0.0291 M
25.0
55.0
2+
↑
Fraction
remaining
↑
↑
initial dilution factor
concentration
pCa 2+ = − log(1.2 × 10−6 ) = 5.91
• At the Equivalence Point: What is pCa2+ when we have added 25.0 mL of
EDTA?
At the equivalence point almost all the metal is in the form CaY 2−
[CaY ] = (0.040) 50.0
= 0.0267 M
75.0
2-
↑
↑
initial dilution factor
concentration
Free Ca2+ is small and can be found:
Ca 2+ + EDTA ↔ CaY 2−
K
'
f
Conci
0
0
0.0267
Concf
x
x
0.0267 - x
[CaY ] = 0.0267 − x = 1.34 × 10
=
[Ca ][EDTA]
x
2−
2+
10
2
x = 1.4 × 10−6 M
pCa 2+ = − log(1.4 × 10 −6 ) = 5.85
• After the Equivalence Point: What is pCa2+ when we have added 26.0 mL of
EDTA?
We have 1 mL excess of EDTA.
[EDTA ] = (0.080) 1.0 = 1.05x10-3 M
76.0
↑
↑
Initial [EDTA] dilution factor
6
[CaY ] = (0.040) 50.0
= 2.63 × 10
76.0
2-
↑
2+
−2
M
↑
Initial [Ca ] dilution factor
K
'
f
[CaY ] = 2.63 × 10
=
[Ca ][EDTA ] [Ca ](1.05 × 10
2−
−2
2+
2+
−3
)
= 1.34 × 1010
[Ca2+] = 1.9 x 10-9 M pCa2+ = 8.73
Auxiliary Complexing Agent
This is a ligand that binds strongly enough to the metal to prevent hydroxide
precipitation, but weak enough to be displaced by EDTA. Ammonia is a common
auxiliary complex for transition metals like Zn.
Metal Ion Indicators
To detect the end point of EDTA titrations, we usually use a metal ion indicator or
an ion-selective electrode (chapter in Electrochemistry).
Metal ion indicators change color when the metal ion is bound to EDTA:
MgEbT + EDTA ↔ MgEDTA + EbT
(Red)
(Clear)
(Clear)
(Blue)
The indicator must bind less strongly than EDTA.
EDTA Titration Techniques
• Direct titration: analyte is titrated with standard EDTA with solution
buffered at a pH where Kf’ is large.
• Back titration: known excess of EDTA is added to analyte. Excess EDTA
is titrated with 2nd metal ion.
7
• Displacement titration: For metals without a good indicator ion, the analyte
can be treated with excess Mg(EDTA)2-. The analyte displaces Mg2+, and
than Mg2+ can be titrated with standard EDTA.
• Indirect titration: Anions can be analyzed by precipitation with excess
metal ion and then titration of the metal in the dissolved precipitate with
EDTA.
Example 25.0 mL of an unknown Ni2+ solution was treated with 25.00 mL of
0.05283 M Na2EDTA. The pH of the solution was buffered to 5.5 and than
back-titrated with 17.61 mL of 0.02299 M Zn2+. What was the unknown Ni2+
M?
Zn 2+ + Y 4- ↔ ZnY 2mol EDTA = (25.00 mL)(0.05283 M) = 1.32 mmol EDTA
mol Zn 2+ = (17.61 mL)(0.02299 M) = 0.4049 mmol Zn 2+
Ni 2+ + Y 4- ↔ NiY 2mol Ni 2+ = 1.321 mmol EDTA - 0.4049 mmol Zn 2+ = 0.916 mmol
M Ni 2+ = (0.916 mmol)/(25.00 mL) = 0.0366 M
8