Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Joint Oireacthas Committee on the Future Funding of Domestic Water Services: Submission by the Customer Forum for Water in Scotland. Introduction The Customer Forum for Water in Scotland has been requested to make a short submission to the Joint Committee in respect of the Public Engagement and Transparency strand of their considerations on the role played by the Customer Forum in the delivery of water services in Scotland. Specifically, what is below addresses Q9 c). Customer role in decision making on water in Scotland The Customer Forum for Water in Scotland was created in 2011 specifically to bring a customer voice to the heart of key decisions affecting customers in the delivery of water services. The water utility in Scotland, Scottish Water, is a publicly owned corporation, operating on strong commercial principles and independently of government and is regulated by the Water Industry Commission for Scotland. In essence, because Scottish Water is a monopoly service provider and does not issue its own charges direct to customers (this is done through a separately identified charge administered alongside local tax bills by the local authorities in Scotland), it was felt that `normal’ commercial provider/customer dynamics could be strengthened, and that a direct voice of customer interests would also help inform the regulator in the exercise of their statutory responsibilities. The Customer Forum was therefore specifically designed to bring a new customer/company dynamic into the delivery of water services. At the instigation of the Regulator and through a co-operation agreement between the Regulator, Scottish Water and the statutory consumer agency in Scotland, the Customer Forum was established to sit equidistantly and independently from each of the partners to the co-operation agreement in the delivery of its role. The nine Forum members were appointed not as representatives of any specific sector or interest, nor were they seen as themselves as representative of customers, but as people of maturity and discretion who should seek to find out (with the Company or independently) what customers views and priorities were for services, and to then seek to interpret, represent and advocate those views with the company in the price setting process. Specifically, the Customer Forum’s role sits inside the regulatory process of price setting which runs on a (now) 6 year cycle. Within that process the Regulator invited Scottish Water and the Customer Forum to seek to find agreement, through a comprehensive engagement process, on the Business Plan of the Company for the 6 year period 2015 to 2021. This Business Plan would determine investment priorities and levels, set standards for performance and service delivery, and form the basis on which prices would be determined. Seeking agreement on the price domestic and business customers would pay for water was a specific part of the remit given. The Regulator at no point relinquished their statutory position in relation to the price review and set broad parameters within which the engagement process would take place, but which gave considerable scope to the Company and the Customer Forum to find an agreed outcome. The Regulator made clear that if the Company and the Customer Forum could not find agreement they would be required to set out why, and this would play out in public. Further, and this is perhaps the key point, the Regulator made clear from the outset that if the Company and the Forum could find agreement across the range of matters in the Business Plan, the Regulator would be minded to accept that agreement as the basis for the statutory price determination. This is what gave power to the whole process: it gave incentives to and impelled the Forum and the Company to seek to work constructively together to seek agreement; it gave the customer voice real power in the engagement process. The Customer Forum saw its role as to constantly ask of the Company, “why is it that what you propose is in the interests of customers?” If the Company, through the engagement process could satisfy the Forum of their reasoning on a wide range of propositions, the Forum could, in effect `sign off’ that proposition for inclusion in the eventual Business Plan. If, however, the Customer Forum was not satisfied with propositions put to them, they would ask the company to re-consider any such propositions, refine them, or potentially drop them altogether. Through this iterative process of engagement, the Company and the Customer Forum, constructively, but with some moments of healthy tension, worked through a substantial process of considerations and a final `end game negotiation’, until they did secure agreement on a Business Plan to put to the Regulator. That agreement, in the form of a Minute of Agreement between the Company and the Customer Forum formed the basis for the finally agreed price settlement by the Regulator. The Customer Forum and Company engagement in the decision making process is widely seen to have added real value to the last price determination and, without question in the view of the Customer Forum, empowered a customer view in a very real and significant way. The process has been independently evaluated, and there is now notable international interest in how this innovative approach might inform other nations and sectors as they seek to address customer engagement and empowerment in utility service delivery. With this short summary of what has been developing in Scotland, is attached: a copy of evaluative work undertaken by Professor Stephen Littlechild, probably the leading international expert in price regulation; and a copy of a legacy report prepared by the Customer Forum at the end of the process of engagement and agreement. There is considerable other documentation that surrounds the whole process and if the Joint Oireacthas Committee on the Future Funding of Domestic Water Services wishes further information, every endeavour will be made to meet that request. Peter Peacock Chair of the Customer Forum for Water in Scotland 28 January 2017