Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
General X-ray QA and QC Guideline THE ROYAL AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGISTS® General X-ray QA and QC Guideline Faculty of Clinical Radiology Name of document and version: General X-ray QA and QC Guideline, Version 1 Approved by: Faculty of Clinical Radiology Date of approval: 1 November 2013 ABN 37 000 029 863 Copyright for this publication rests with The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists ® The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists Level 9, 51 Druitt Street Sydney NSW 2000 Australia Email: [email protected] Website: www.ranzcr.edu.au Telephone: +61 2 9268 9777 Facsimile: +61 2 9268 9799 Disclaimer: The information provided in this document is of a general nature only and is not intended as a substitute for medical or legal advice. It is designed to support, not replace, the relationship that exists between a patient and his/her doctor. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction 3 2. Daily / As Required Tests 5 3. Weekly Tests 7 4. Monthly Tests 9 5. Quarterly Tests 13 6. Six-Monthly Tests 28 7. Review of QC Results by Designated Person 30 8. Related policy documents 31 9. Appendices 31 10. References 31 General X-ray QA and QC Guideline V1 © The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists® November 2013 Page 2 of 33 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Preamble Quality Assurance is a planned and systematic approach to monitoring and assessing the care provided, or the service being delivered, that identifies opportunities for improvement and maintains a mechanism through which action is taken to make and maintain these improvements (Australian Council of Healthcare Standards). The scope of activities in the quality management process for general radiology imaging systems includes, but is not limited to: i. Radiation protection and radiation monitoring (optimisation of radiation dose and image quality, structured dose reports, establishment of diagnostic reference levels); ii. Equipment testing (routine Quality Control); iii. Other recommended QA systems for general imaging (CR and DR systems), film printing, screening/fluoroscopy, mobile imaging, and theatre imaging; iv. Clinical image review and repeat / reject analysis This document has been produced as a resource document for best practice in these areas of quality management in Medical Imaging departments and assumes that all additional state / legislative requirements such as equipment compliance testing, licencing, registration, record keeping and regular service maintenance tests are conducted as part of routine site accreditation requirements. 1.2 1.3 Purpose and Scope (a) This guideline is intended to assist The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists® (ABN 37 000 029 863) (the College), radiologists, radiographers, equipment assessors in addressing quality control requirements relating to radiography equipment. This document sets out standardised procedures and instructions to complete quality control processes. (b) This document will be reviewed at the end of 2015. Please refer to individual manufacturers’ guidelines for any additional Quality Assurance requirements that may be applicable for specific systems. Overarching Management of QA and QC It is recommended that at least one staff member at each facility is identified and responsible for ensuring quality checks are undertaken at specified times. The designated person(s) may include one or more of the following staff members: Chief Radiographer / Assistant Chief Radiographer / Quality Manager / QA Radiographer / Section Senior Radiographer / RSO. The designated quality manager should also review non-compliance issues and provide strategies for corrective and preventative action in a timely manner and formulate quality improvement strategies within the department. General X-ray QA and QC Guideline V1 © The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists® November 2013 Page 3 of 33 The designated quality manager is also responsible for the organisation, dissemination and document control of all incoming quality guidelines, policies and directives from accrediting / regulatory bodies (e.g. RANZCR & ISO/IEC / Radiation Protection Authority), Local Health Service and State Departments of Health. 1.4 Reviewing QC Results and Taking Action It is essential to review QC results immediately and take action if they are out of tolerance. In some cases, it may be necessary to contact the service engineer. The urgency of remedial action by the service engineer should be determined by personal judgment. For example, a minor failure in x-ray to light-beam alignment could be fixed at the next service visit but anything that may affect patient dose or image quality should be addressed immediately. Prior to contacting the service engineer, you may wish to carry out the following steps: 1.5 i. Repeat the test. If you are not confident in carrying out QC tests, consult an experienced colleague ; ii. Check that you have used correct and consistent settings e.g. kV, mAs, test object, focus to detector distance; iii. If artefacts are present, try to identify their location e.g. on the monitor, the detector, the test object. Clean equipment and repeat the test; iv. Contact your medical physicist / equipment assessor for advice (if available) Acknowledgements The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists gratefully acknowledges the extensive work undertaken by the General X-Ray working group consisting of Dr Patrick Brennan, Ms Ingrid Egan, Dr Nick Pang, Mr John Robinson, Dr Andrew Scott and representatives of the ACPSEM Dr Lee Collins, Dr Jenny Diffey and Dr Ian Smith, in development of this guideline. 1.6 Definitions In this Guideline: College means The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists. Member means a member of the College. 1.7 College Mission The College’s Mission is: As a fellowship based organisation, The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists sets, promotes and continuously improves the standards of training and practice in radiology and radiation oncology, for the betterment of the people of Australia and New Zealand. General X-ray QA and QC Guideline V1 © The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists® November 2013 Page 4 of 33 2. DAILY / AS REQUIRED TESTS 2.1 Detector Calibration / Flat Field / Dark Noise Test (DR Only) Frequency: As recommended by manufacturer (see below). Tests such as Detector Calibration are not specifically included in the RANZCR guidelines, due to vendor variability. For example, Carestream require a daily detector calibration, known as the ‘Daily Dark’, whilst other vendors require an annual detector calibration which is normally performed by the service engineer. For this reason, no specific protocol or frequency is defined by RANZCR. Instead, the advice of the Working Group is simply to follow the advice of the vendor. These tests are generally ‘pass / fail’ and no output is recorded. An example form for recording that a daily detector calibration has been completed is included as Record Sheet 2.1.a. General X-ray QA and QC Guideline V1 © The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists® November 2013 Page 5 of 33 2.1.a Record Sheet - Daily Detector Calibration X-ray equipment ID: ________________ Month: DR manufacturer: ________________ Test (e.g. Daily Dark): ___________________ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Pass () / Fail () Initials Month: Pass () / Fail () Initials Month: Pass () / Fail () Initials Month: Pass () / Fail () Initials 3. WEEKLY TESTS 3.1 Image Plate Erasure (CR Only) Frequency: Weekly CR image plates are sensitive to scattered and naturally occurring radiation sources and if left unused for long periods of time will store energy absorbed from these sources. It is recommended that all CR image plates be subjected to a “primary” erasure procedure on a weekly basis, ideally on a Monday morning. Note that this frequency is based on the assumption that unused cassettes are stored under conditions whereby they are unlikely to receive any significant unintended exposure. Should unexposed cassette storage be less than optimal, an increased frequency of plate erasure will be required. 3.1.1 Procedure Perform a primary erasure on all CR cassettes Complete Record Sheet 3.1.a 3.1.2 Record Date test was performed Person performing test General X-ray QA and QC Guideline V1 © The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists® November 2013 Page 7 of 33 3.1.a Record Sheet – Image Plate Erasure (CR only) Frequency: Weekly Site / Department: ____________________________ Date Initials Date Initials Date Initials General X-ray QA and QC Guideline V1 © The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists® November 2013 Page 8 of 33 4. MONTHLY TESTS 4.1 Monitor QC Frequency: Monthly Test The monitor in the x-ray room, attached to the operating console, is referred to as the secondary or acquisition monitor. The high resolution monitors used for reporting the x-ray examination images are known as the primary or reporting / diagnostic review monitors. It is ONLY necessary to carry out this test on the primary (reporting) monitors. 4.1.1 Procedure Display the appropriate version of the TG18-QC test pattern (see Appendix 1) If window width (WW) and window level (WL) are displayed, these should be set to 4096 and 2048 respectively. Please note that these will not always be displayed, or be adjustable. If the pattern has been installed correctly, these will be the default settings Ensure viewing conditions are acceptable Examine image paying particular attention to the following: o Visibility and distortion of items used for the evaluation of the quality of the image o Disturbing artefacts Visually check for fingerprints and dust and clean gently using a lint-free cloth, or as per manufacturer’s recommendations If monitors are installed as a pair, visually check that the luminance of the left and right monitors are matched i.e. white, dark and grey squares should appear to have the same greyscale (please be aware that this test is subjective!) Complete monthly checklist and Record Sheet 4.1.a (you will need one Record Sheet for each monitor / pair of monitors) 4.1.2 Record Date test was performed Person performing test Monitor identification Test results 4.1.3 Limits Borders are visible Lines are straight Squares appear square No smearing at black-white transitions Squares of different shades from black to white are distinct The finest horizontal and vertical line pairs are visible in the high contrast pattern in all four corners and in the centre The 5% and 95% pixel value squares are clearly visible within the 0% and 100% backgrounds The pattern is centred in the active area No disturbing artefacts are visible At least 11 letters (i.e. QUALITY CONT) are visible in the phrase “QUALITY CONTROL” for the dark, mid-grey and light renditions. Note that you should record how many letters can be seen General X-ray QA and QC Guideline V1 © The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists® November 2013 Page 9 of 33 4.1.a Record Sheet – Monitor QC Frequency: Monthly Test Monitor ID (e.g. vendor, model, location): _______________________________________ Date: Initials: Left / right (if applicable) Left / Right / NA Left / Right / NA Left / Right / NA Left / Right / NA Pass () / Fail () General Image Quality No smearing No artefacts Ramps continuous General distortion Lines straight Boxes square Luminance Greyscale patches distinct 5% square visible in 0% background 95% square visible in 100% background Finest high contrast resolution elements visible (in all 4 corners and at centre) Horizontal line pairs Vertical line pairs Number of letters visible (at least 11 or “QUALITY CONT”) Dark Mid-grey Light Visual check for fingerprints / dust and cleaning (if required) Completed Monitor matching if applicable (subjectively by eye) Dark areas matched White areas matched Comments General X-ray QA and QC Guideline V1 © The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists® November 2013 Page 10 of 33 4.2 Printer QC (if applicable) Frequency: Monthly Test, or prior to printing if used less frequently Please note: Although many practices will not be printing films for primary reporting, it is still important to make sure that printed images are of a relatively high standard if being sent as the medical record. It is acknowledged that sites will no longer own a densitometer and for this reason, a visual check only is considered sufficient. It is expected that the Service Engineer will confirm that the optical density range is acceptable during their routine service visit. Note that a Printer Calibration is also required at installation, but this should be done in conjunction with the Service Engineer. Given that there may be a large number of x-ray equipment vendors at a single site, it is recommended that clinical images are sent to the printer from PACS, rather than from the Acquisition Workstation. 4.2.1 Procedure Print the TG18-QC test pattern (see Appendix 1) directly from the printer. Check visibility and distortion of several items used for evaluating the quality of the image Check for disturbing artefacts Clean the rollers (as required; based on frequency of use) Complete monthly check list and Record Sheet 4.2.a (you will need one Record Sheet for each printer) 4.2.2 Record Date test was performed Person performing test Printer identification Test results 4.2.3 Limits Borders are visible Lines are straight Squares appear square Squares of different shades from black to white are distinct The finest horizontal and vertical line pairs are visible in the high contrast pattern in all four corners and in the centre The 5% and 95% grey squares are clearly visible within the 0% and 100% backgrounds At least 11 letters (i.e. QUALITY CONT) are visible in the phrase “QUALITY CONTROL” for each of the dark, mid-grey and light renditions. Note that you should record how many letters can be seen No disturbing artefacts are visible Rollers clean General X-ray QA and QC Guideline V1 © The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists® November 2013 Page 11 of 33 4.2.a Record Sheet – Printer QC Frequency: Monthly Test, or prior to printing if used less frequently Printer ID (e.g. vendor, model, location): ____________________________________ Date: Initials: Pass () / Fail () General Image Quality No smearing No artefacts Ramps continuous General distortion Lines straight Boxes square Luminance Greyscale patches distinct 5% square visible in 0% background 95% square visible in 100% background Finest high contrast resolution elements visible (in all 4 corners and at centre) Horizontal line pairs Vertical line pairs Number of letters visible (at least 11 or “QUALITY CONT”) Dark Mid-grey Light Printer rollers Cleaned (if required) Comments General X-ray QA and QC Guideline V1 © The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists® November 2013 Page 12 of 33 5. QUARTERLY TESTS 5.1 Mechanical Inspection Frequency: Quarterly The practice staff must perform an overall mechanical inspection of the digital x-ray system and associated components. The inspection should be carried out quarterly to ensure that there are no hazardous, inoperative, out of alignment or improperly operating items on the system. The Service Engineer may perform additional checks during their service visit, for example CR Plate Sensitivity Matching. It is good practice to keep their service report alongside the site QC records. 5.1.1 Procedure Visual inspection of the system to ensure safe and optimum operation, using the checklist provided on Record Sheet 5.1.a. 5.1.2 Record Date inspection performed Inspection results X-ray equipment identification Person performing test 5.1.3 Limits Mechanical and safety functions operating correctly General X-ray QA and QC Guideline V1 © The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists® November 2013 Page 13 of 33 5.1.a Record Sheet – Mechanical Inspection Frequency: Quarterly X-ray Equipment ID: ____________________________________________________ Date: Initials: Item Description 1 Check that all cables are free from breaks, kinks or knots. Cables should not be under other heavy equipment 2 Verify that the interlocks and brakes are working correctly 3 Ensure that the table, tube and bucky move smoothly 4 Ensure that control panel switches, indicator lights and meters are functioning 5 Ensure that the field light is functioning, has adequate intensity and collimator is free from dust 6 Ensure that the current technique charts are displayed near the control panel 7 Ensure that there are no oil leaks around the x-ray tube and generator, and that these are free from dust 8 Check that CR plates are clean and free from artefacts (CR only) Pass () Fail () On the reporting workstation, display a recent clinical image and verify that the time and date as well as the facility identification are correct in the image annotation Check that the x-ray tube and generator model and serial numbers are clearly marked and readable (if labels are inaccessible, serial numbers must be displayed elsewhere e.g. in a file or label drawer) 9 10 11 Visually inspect gonad shields and personal protective devices (e.g. lead aprons, a thyroid shields) for shielding integrity 12 Confirm that the operator’s view of the patient from the control window is not obstructed by notices / charts 13 b Ensure that the radiation warning sign on the door is intact and that the room warning lights are working 14 b Ensure that cassette localization / auto-collimation and locks are working 15 b Check that centring and Source to Image Distance (SID) detents work correctly. Verify the accuracy of the distance displayed on the collimator a Although a visual inspection will suffice on a quarterly basis, please be aware that some State legislation (e.g. NSW EPA) requires that lead aprons are fluoroscopically screened on an annual basis b Not applicable to mobile units General X-ray QA and QC Guideline V1 © The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists® November 2013 Page 14 of 33 5.2 Alignment: X-ray to light field (CR and wireless DR detectors) / X-ray to detector (integrated DR detectors) Frequency: Quarterly To ensure accurate collimation and full coverage of image receptor without unnecessary exposure of patient. This test should be performed on all x-ray units. 5.2.1 Procedure CR and wireless DR detectors Ensure x-ray tube and table are level. Place CR cassette / wireless DR detector on table top. Set a source to detector distance of 100cm Dim the room lights so that you can clearly see the edges of the light field Collimate to an area greater than 10 x 10cm – the exact area is not important as long as it is within the CR cassette / wireless DR detector. Use coins to mark the edges of the light field. It is good practice to place a coin within and outside the light field (see Figure 1). Use an additional coin to mark the anode side. Edges of light field Coin to mark anode side Figure 1: Position of coins for x-ray to light-beam alignment test Make an exposure using 60kV and 5mAs Open up the collimators fully and make an exposure using 60kV and 1mAs. Readout the CR / DR image. Measure the difference between the x-ray field and the edge of the coin (light field) Repeat for broad and fine focus (if available). Note that if the x-ray field is greater than the light field, this is a +ve difference Complete Record Sheet 5.2.a Integrated DR detectors These are units where the digital detector is built in to the bucky. Markings on the top of the bucky show the position of the detector. Ensure x-ray tube and table are level Set a source to detector distance of 100cm Set auto-collimation Dim the room lights so that you can clearly see the edges of the light field. Visually check that the light field coincides with the markings on the bucky General X-ray QA and QC Guideline V1 © The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists® November 2013 Page 15 of 33 Switch the room lights on. Align coins with the edges of the markings on the bucky. Use an additional coin to mark the anode side. Make an exposure using 60kV and 5mAs Measure the difference between the edge of the image and the edge of the coin (lightfield) Repeat for broad and fine focus (if available) Note that if the imaged field is greater than the edge of the markings, this is a +ve difference The x-rays should extend to all edges of the detector (i.e. there should be no white bands around the edge of the image) Complete Record Sheet 5.2.b 5.2.2 Record Date test was performed Deviation of x-ray from light field / detector X-ray equipment identification Person performing test 5.2.3 Limits X-ray to light-field must be within ±1% of SID X-ray to detector must agree to within 2% of SID. X-ray field should extend to all edges of the detector General X-ray QA and QC Guideline V1 © The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists® November 2013 Page 16 of 33 5.2.a Record Sheet – Alignment: X-ray to light field (CR and wireless DR detectors) Frequency: Quarterly X-ray Equipment ID: _____________________ LIMITS X-ray to light field must be within ± 1% of SID (i.e. ± 1 cm for SID of 100 cm) Date Initials Broad Focus Deviation between X-ray and light field (mm) (positive indicates x-rays extend beyond light field) Anode Edge Cathode Edge Top Edge Bottom Edge Fine Focus Deviation between X-ray and light field (mm) (positive indicates x-rays extend beyond light field) Anode Edge Cathode Edge Top Edge Bottom Edge General X-ray QA and QC Guideline V1 © The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists® November 2013 Page 17 of 33 5.2.b Record Sheet – Alignment: X-ray to detector (integrated DR detectors) Frequency: Quarterly X-ray Equipment ID: _____________________ LIMITS X-ray to detector must agree to within 2% of SID X-ray field should extend to all edges of the detector Light field should coincide with markings on bucky Date Initials Broad Focus Deviation between x-ray imaged field and detector markings (mm) (positive indicates that the imaged field is greater than the detector markings on the bucky) Anode Edge Cathode Edge Top Edge Bottom Edge Confirm that the light field coincides with the markings on the bucky Pass () Fail () Comments Fine Focus Deviation between x-ray imaged field and detector markings (mm) (positive indicates that the imaged field is greater than the detector markings on the bucky) Anode Edge Cathode Edge Top Edge Bottom Edge Confirm that the light field coincides with the markings on the bucky Pass () Fail () Comments General X-ray QA and QC Guideline V1 © The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists® November 2013 Page 18 of 33 5.3 Consistency of Exposure Index Frequency: Quarterly To ensure that exposure index remains approximately constant under given exposure conditions. Note that this test requires you to set a baseline. This is done by following the procedure below and performing the test on 3 occasions (separated by e.g. an hour or a day). Doing it 3 times in a row is not recommended. If the results are consistent, set the average value as your baseline. Make a note of the date you set the baseline. All future results are compared to this value. If results are not consistent, repeat the test checking that you have followed the correct procedure using identical exposure conditions. There are occasions where it may be necessary to set a new baseline value, for example, following software upgrades or tube changes. Follow the steps described above and note the date the new baseline was set and the reason for the change. You should not set a new baseline simply because the test fails, unless an investigation of the reason for the failure indicates that this is justified. 5.3.1 Procedure CR A designated CR test cassette (freshly erased) and CR reader must be assigned for this test; this ensures consistency of measurement conditions. It is preferable to assign a cassette which is in clinical use as this will enable any deterioration due to general wear and tear to be detected, which may indicate that image plates are due for replacement. The test should be performed on all x-ray units. Note that in departments with multiple CR readers, it is considered good practice to repeat the test for all CR readers using one designated x-ray unit to make the exposures (there is no need to test all combinations of x-ray units and CR readers). Place the CR test cassette on the table Set focus to table distance of 110cm and centre x-ray beam on CR cassette Ensure collimator position covers the full area of the CR plate Attach 1mm copper sheet to tube collimator, ensuring beam fully intercepted Make a manual exposure using 70kV, 4mAs Process the image plate using a consistent image processing algorithm (e.g. L-spine) Record the Exposure Index (note that this will be manufacturer-specific e.g. Fuji = S number, Carestream = EI, Agfa = SAL or LgM) Use Record Sheet 5.3a DR If using a wireless DR detector, place this on the table Set focus to detector distance of 110cm and centre x-ray beam on detector Ensure collimator position covers the full area of the detector Attach 1mm copper sheet to tube collimator, ensuring beam fully intercepted Use a consistent image processing algorithm (e.g. L-spine) Make a manual exposure using 70kV, 4mAs General X-ray QA and QC Guideline V1 © The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists® November 2013 Page 19 of 33 Record the Exposure Index (note that this will be manufacturer-specific e.g. Carestream & Philips = EI, Canon = EXI, Shimadzu = S number) Use Record Sheet 5.3a 5.3.2 Record Date test was performed Processing algorithm Exposure Index X-ray equipment identification Person performing test 5.3.3 Limits Exposure Index should be within ± 10% of the baseline value If the change in Exposure Index over consecutive periods follows a trend (e.g. a continual increase or decrease in value), discuss the results with the Service Engineer General X-ray QA and QC Guideline V1 © The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists® November 2013 Page 20 of 33 5.3.a Record Sheet – Consistency of Exposure Index Frequency: Quarterly CR Systems Only CR Test Cassette ID: _____________________ CR Reader ID: __________________________ X-ray Equipment ID: _____________________ LIMITS Variation of the EI from the baseline value < ± 10% BASELINE DATA: Specify Exposure Indicator e.g. S number, EI ____________________ Date ____________ Baseline Lower Limit Upper Limit EI Date Initials Processing Algorithm EI EI within limits (P / F) Comments General X-ray QA and QC Guideline V1 © The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists® November 2013 Page 21 of 33 5.4 Image Uniformity and Artefact Evaluation Frequency: Quarterly To ensure that image is uniform and artefact-free. Additionally for DR, to ensure that flatfield correction is working. Note that as part of the process of “image critique”, every clinical image acquired should be subject to a quick artefact check before being sent to PACS or printed 5.4.1 Procedure Use the image acquired for 5.3 Consistency of Exposure Index. Visually inspect the image for non-uniformity and artefacts, accepting that CR images will suffer from the anode-heel effect (i.e. a decrease in greyscale intensity as you move from the cathode to the anode side of the image). Use Record Sheet 5.4.a. 5.4.2 Record Date test was performed Comments on uniformity and artefacts X-ray equipment identification Person performing test 5.4.3 Limits Uniform image No evidence of artefacts 5.4.4 Action If artefacts are seen it is important to determine whether they are due to the monitor, the detector, x-ray beam non-uniformity or the copper. Take the following steps: To eliminate the possibility of display artefacts, rotate or pan the image. If the artefact moves with the image it is due to the imaging system; if it stays in the same place, it is due to the display system (monitor). To eliminate the possibility of artefacts (dust, scratches or thickness non-uniformity) on the copper, rotate the copper and repeat the test. If the artefact stays in the same place, it is most likely to be due to the detector; if it moves, it may be attributable to nonuniformity on the copper. Clean the equipment (if possible and following vendor guidelines) and repeat the test. General X-ray QA and QC Guideline V1 © The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists® November 2013 Page 22 of 33 5.4.a Record Sheet – Image Uniformity and Artefact Evaluation Frequency: Quarterly X-ray Equipment ID: _____________________ LIMITS Image appears uniform No artefacts present Date Initials Image appears uniform? (Y/N) Comments (heel effect etc?) Artefacts present? (Y/N) Describe Action taken (if applicable) General X-ray QA and QC Guideline V1 © The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists® November 2013 Page 23 of 33 5.5 AEC Consistency It is important to ensure that the AEC operation remains stable over time. This should be checked using table and vertical buckies and by choosing examinations which encompass a range of AEC chambers. Note that this test requires you to set baseline values for mAs and EI for each examination. This is done by following the procedure below and performing the test on 3 occasions (separated by e.g. an hour or a day). Doing it 3 times in a row is not recommended. If the results are consistent, set the average value as your baseline. Make a note of the date you set the baseline. All future results are compared to this value. If results are not consistent, repeat the test checking that you have followed the correct procedure using identical exposure conditions. There are occasions where it may be necessary to set a new baseline value, for example, following software upgrades or tube changes. Follow the steps described above and note the date the new baseline was set and the reason for the change. You should not set a new baseline simply because the test fails, unless an investigation of the reason for the failure indicates that this is justified. 5.5.1 Procedure Select up to 3 frequently performed clinical examinations which are carried out under AEC. Try to include examinations which cover table and vertical buckies (if applicable) and a range of AEC chambers (e.g. Table bucky: L-Spine & Abdomen / Pelvis; Vertical bucky: Chest). Record these in the table on Record Sheet 4.5a Place designated CR test cassette / wireless digital detector in bucky (if applicable) For the table bucky, set the source to detector distance that would be used clinically (e.g. 110cm) and centre the x-ray beam to the centre of the bucky and the detector Ensure collimator position covers the full area of the AEC chambers Attach 1mm copper sheet to tube collimator, ensuring beam fully intercepted Select your examination (see table) and choose the clinically relevant kVp (e.g. 70kVp) Make an exposure under AEC and record indicated post-exposure mAs value Record the Exposure Index (note that this will be manufacturer-specific e.g. Fuji = S number, Carestream = EI, Agfa = SAL or LgM) Repeat for the second selected examination (see table) Repeat for the vertical bucky (if applicable), setting the SID and kVp that would be used clinically Use Record Sheet 5.5.a 5.5.2 Record Complete table of up to 3 frequently performed examinations Date test was performed Person performing test X-ray system identification Current density setting post exposure mAs Exposure Index General X-ray QA and QC Guideline V1 © The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists® November 2013 Page 24 of 33 5.5.3 Limits Post-exposure mAs within ± 20% of baseline values No limits are set for Exposure Index, due to vendor variability, but if the change in Exposure Index over consecutive periods follows a trend (e.g. a continual increase or decrease in value), discuss the results with the Service Engineer General X-ray QA and QC Guideline V1 © The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists® November 2013 Page 25 of 33 5.5.a Record Sheet – AEC Consistency Frequency: Quarterly X-ray Equipment ID: ____________________ Choose up to 3 frequently performed clinical examinations which are carried out under AEC and record the factors below. Examination Bucky used 1 Table 2 Table 3 Vertical kVp Chamber(s) Grid (Y/N) SID (cm) LIMITS mAs ±20% No limits are set for Exposure Index, due to vendor variability, but if the change in Exposure Index over consecutive periods follows a trend (e.g. a continual increase or decrease in value), discuss the results with the Service Engineer BASELINE DATA Date: Baseline Lower Limit Upper Limit mAs for Exam 1 mAs for Exam 2 mAs for Exam 3 EI for Exam 1 EI for Exam 2 Not required EI for Exam 3 General X-ray QA and QC Guideline V1 © The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists® November 2013 Page 26 of 33 Date : ____________________ Examination Density setting kV Initials: _____________________________ Post Exposure mAs mAs within acceptable range (/) Exposure Indicator EI within acceptable range (/) 1 2 3 Date : ____________________ Examination Density setting kV Initials: _____________________________ Post Exposure mAs mAs within acceptable range (/) Exposure Indicator EI within acceptable range (/) 1 2 3 Date : ____________________ Examination Density setting kV Initials: _____________________________ Post Exposure mAs mAs within acceptable range (/) Exposure Indicator EI within acceptable range (/) 1 2 3 Date : ____________________ Examination Density setting kV Initials: _____________________________ Post Exposure mAs mAs within acceptable range (/) Exposure Indicator EI within acceptable range (/) 1 2 3 General X-ray QA and QC Guideline V1 © The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists® November 2013 Page 27 of 33 6. SIX-MONTHLY TESTS 6.1 Image Quality Frequency: Six Monthly To ensure adequate image quality from each x-ray unit. Procedure Select 5 patients (mix of male and female) who have had a chest PA / AP x-ray for each x-ray unit Perform an assessment of image quality using the checklist on Record Sheet 6.1.a Record Date of assessment X-ray equipment ID Radiologist performing test Complete checklist Limits Images must be deemed clinically acceptable. If not, the reasons must be investigated. General X-ray QA and QC Guideline V1 © The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists® November 2013 Page 28 of 33 6.1.a Record Sheet – Image Quality Frequency: Six Monthly Date: _________________________ X-ray Equipment ID: ____________________ Name of Radiologist _____________________________________________________ Film 1 Chest AP / PA Film 2 Film 3 Film 4 Film 5 Exposure Indicator Image Assessment Criteria for Chest PA 1. Performed at deep inspiration (as assessed by the position of ribs above the diaphragm either 6 anteriorly or 10 posteriorly) 2. The spinous processes of the dorsal vertebrae are equidistant from the inner borders of the clavicles (no thorax rotation) 3. Medial border of the scapulae to be projected outside the lung fields 4. Reproduction from the 7th cervical vertebra to the bottom of both costophrenic sinuses (reproduction of the whole thoracic cavity) 5. Visually sharp reproduction of the peripheral vessels (performed with suspended respiration) 6. Visually sharp reproduction of the trachea, major bronchi, and borders of the cardiac silhouette 7. Visually sharp reproduction of both hemidiaphragms 8. Visualization of the lung vessels and mediastinal outline through the cardiac silhouette 9. The lower dorsal spine is no more than faintly appreciable with visualization of the intervertebral spaces 10. Quality overall acceptable for clinical purpose Poor Satisfactory Good Features invisible, detail invisible or not clear Features just visible, detail just visible but not clearly defined Features detected and fully reproduced, detail visible and clearly defined General X-ray QA and QC Guideline V1 © The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists® November 2013 Page 29 of 33 7. REVIEW OF QC RESULTS BY DESIGNATED PERSON The Designated Person may wish to use the form below to record the results of their review. Site: _____________________________________________ X-ray Equipment ID: _____________________________________ Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Image Plate Erasure (Weekly) Monitor QC (Monthly) Printer QC (Monthly) Mechanical inspection (Quarterly) X-ray Alignment (Quarterly) Consistency of Exposure Index (Quarterly) Image Uniformity and Artefact Evaluation (Quarterly) AEC Consistency (Quarterly) Image Quality (Quarterly) Comments General X-ray QA and QC Guideline V1 © The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists® November 2013 Page 30 of 33 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 8. RELATED POLICY DOCUMENTS Guideline for Quality Control Testing for Digital (CR and DR) Mammography V3. 9. APPENDICES A. Monitor and Printer Quality Control: TG18 Test Pattern 10. REFERENCES CRCPD (Conference of Radiation Control Program Directors) QC Recommendation Vol 3 EPA Radiation Guidelines General X-ray QA and QC Guideline V1 © The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists® November 2013 Page 31 of 33 Appendix A Monitor and Printer Quality Control: TG18-QC Test Pattern Display devices (monitors and printers) form part of the imaging chain and it is imperative that QC is carried out to ensure that: 1) they meet the required standards at baseline, and 2) performance does not deteriorate over time. In order to do this, the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) has developed a 1 series of test patterns known as the Task Group 18 (TG18) series . These are not physical test objects, but exist as files which can be loaded on to systems and displayed on the monitor or printed. It is important to know how to access them. Sometimes they are locked as a patient in PACS, but more commonly, they may be accessed through vendor-specific software such as Barco QA Web or Eizo RadiCS. The TG18-QC test pattern is shown overleaf. This should be displayed at full resolution (one display pixel for each pixel in the digital image). A visual inspection of the image should be carried out including tests such as: Are the squares from black (100%) to white (0%) distinct? Can you see the 95% square inside the 100% square? Can you see the 5% square inside the 0% square? Can you see the contrast patches in the corners of each grayscale square? Can you resolve the high contrast and low contrast line pair groups in all four corners and the centre? Can you see at least 11 letters in the phrase QUALITY CONTROL? Are the grayscale ramps on the left and right of the image continuous (i.e. does the black blend smoothly into the white)? Further details are given in the test protocols (4.1 and 4.2). General X-ray QA and QC Guideline V1 © The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists® November 2013 Page 32 of 33 Appendix A Figure 2: TG18-QC test pattern showing resolution patterns, ramps, 5% and 95% squares and corner patches 1. Assessment of Display Performance for Medical Imaging Systems. American Association of Physicists in Medicine. www.aapm.org/pubs/reports/OR_03.pdf General X-ray QA and QC Guideline V1 © The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists® November 2013 Page 33 of 33 THE ROYAL AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGISTS®