Download Serguei Brazovski. Ferroelectricity in Organic and Polymeric

Perspectives for the ferroelectricity in π-conjugated systems
FROM ORGANIC CONDUCTORS TO CONDUCTING POLYMERS
S. Brazovski & N. Kirova
CNRS - Orsay, France



Ferroelectric Mott-Hubbard phase and charge disproportionation in
quasi 1d organic conductors.
Modern requests for plastic ferroelectrics.
Reality: Existing structural ferroelectricity in a saturated polymer.

Expectations: electronic ferroelectricity in conjugated modified polyenes.

Hypothesis: zigzag edge states in graphene
1
I.F. Shchegolev
Memorial Volume
Common Trends in Synthetic Metals and High-Tc Superconductors.
Journal de Physique I December 1996
56 state-of-the-art articles on
Organic Conductors, related low dimensional systems and High- Tc materials.
Examples of this volume reviews relevant to this talk:
Structural Aspects of the Bechgaard Salts and Related Compounds
J.P. Pouget and S. Ravy
Investigations of Organic Conductors by the Shchegolev Method
H.W. Helberg and M. Dressel
« In the beginning was the Word, …
and without him was not anything made that was made »
He laid his fingers on my ears
And they were filled with roaring sound:
I heard the music of the spheres,
The flight of Angels through the skies,
The beasts that crept beneath the sea,
The heady uprush of the vine;
…………………..
'Rise, prophet, rise, and hear, and see,
And let my works be seen and heard'
The Profet.
Vrubel illustration to verses by Pushkin
His very first publication and the first review:
I.F.Shchegolev Signal/noise ratio of NMR-regenerative detector (1958).
I.F.Shchegolev Investigation of electron structure of metals by NMR-technique (1962).
-Something special that the founders of Synthetic Metals were coming from the NMR
-(Heeger, Jerome, Schegolev). The same for the later comers and for the today core
(Berthier and Coulon, Clark and Brown, Takahashi and Kanoda) –
unless another source : X-ray (Shibaeva, Comes and Pouget, Kagoshima).
NMR as a common tool and hence a bridge between physics and chemistry
as the essence of our science?
Indeed, a fate is driving to the future destiny, unforeseen yet:
Yu.S.Karimov, I.F.Shchegolev Magnetic properties of ferrocene polymers (1962).
and now firmly on the path:
E.B.Yagubskii, M.L.Chidekel, I.F.Shchegolev, L.I.Buravov, R.B.Lubovskii, V.B.Stryukov
Investigation in potential organic superconductors field. I. Painting complexes with 7,7,8,8tetracyanquinodimethane (1968).
Moving to the subject:
Shchegolev path of anomalous dielectric susceptibilities.
"You have been looking for superconductors and discovered the superdielectric"
- Peotr L. Kapitza comment to the early discovery of the Schegolev group.
L.I.Buravov, M.L.Khidekel, I.F.Shchegolev, E.B.Yagubskii
(1970)
Superconductivity and dielectric constant of highly conductive complexes of TCQM
And then spread over the community :
Microwave conductivity and dieiectric constant of tetramethyltetrathiafulvalene salts
[(TMTTF)2X, X-SCN, Re04, SbF6
H. H. S. Javadi, R. Laversanne, and A. J. Epstein
Phys. Rev. B (1988)
"Microwave measurements were performed using a cavity perturbation technique
[15] which has been a successful tool in earlier studies of metal-insulator transitions,
Peierls gaps, CDW and spin-density waves (SDW's) and their ground-state excitations"
…
[15] L. Buravov and I. F. Shchegolev, Prib. Tekh. Eksp. 2, 171 (1970)
These high-T anomalies have been seen also
by other methods (C.Coulon et al, mid 80's)
but NOT by X-rays (till just 2009 – J.P. Pouget talk),
hence the name (incorrect today)
"structure-less transitions", then unexplained and
abandoned, and the amnesia till 2000's.
In today's retrospective, this is the
charge ordering phase transition which shows up,
amusingly, as a ferro- or anti-ferro-electricity
(ReO4 or SCN cases)
FERROELECTRIC MOTT-HUBBARD PHASE and CHARGE DISPROPORTIONATION
in QUASI 1D ORGANIC CONDUCTORS
Felix Nad, Pierre Monceau, S. Brazovskii
PRL 2001
Stuart Brown et al: NMR group of UCLA
PRL 2001
Review : S. B. cond-mat/0606009 & Springer series 2008
T
Earlier theory and experimental hints on the Charge Ordering:
Seo and Fukuyama, Kanoda et al (late 90's)
Intrigues for organic conductors and beyond:
20 years old mystery of “structureless” phase transitions;
revaluation of their basic phase diagram just at the 20’th anniversary
(1980) of the superconductivity discovery;
synthesis of lost relationships in synthetic metals :
organic conductors, conjugated polymers, charge density waves.
Link to High-Tc world :
recent discovery of charge ordering in cobaltides;
high-T crossover line becomes a true transition.
(TMTCF)2X, 1980 – Bechgaard, Jerome
Black and white:
SC- superconductivity
AF- AFM = SDW
SP- Spin-Peierls
LL- Luttinger liquid
MI- Mott insulator
Red line TFE – 2000’s revolution:
Structurless transitions (Coulon et al 1985)
= Ferroelectricity (Monceau et al)
= Charge disproportionation (Brown et al)
Resolving the mystery of structureless transitions: Coulon et all, 1985
Gigantic anomaly in permitivity of (T) (Nad et al, Grenoble-Moscow)
Charge Orderin seen by NMR
(Brown - UCLA, Fujiyama -IMS).
Views and interpretations:
FerroElectric Mott-Hubbard state,
mixed site/bond 4KF CDW, nonsymmetrically
pinned Wigner crystal,
charge ordering = disproportionation
Facility to see Solitons:
Purely 1D regime for
electrons - TFE150K is
10 times above 3D
electronic transitions.
conterion
= dopant X
Molecule
TMTTF
or TMTSF
Built-in dimerization of bonds - counterions against each second pair of molecules )
Spontaneous symmetry breaking – displacements of counterions,
nonequivqlence of sites
Arrows show displacements of ions X.
They follow and stabilize the electronic
charge disproportionation.
Collinear arrows – ferroelectricity.
Alternating arrows – anti-ferroelectricity.
A single stack is polarized in any case.
Major polarization comes from redistribution of electronic density,
hence amplification of polarizability  by a factor of (ωp/∆)2~102
giving even a background  ~103
COMBINED MOTT - HUBBARD STATE
2 types of dimerization 
2 interfering sources for two-fold commensurability
 2 contributions to the Umklapp interaction:
Site dimerization :
HUs=-Us cos 2
(spontaneous)
Bond dimerization :
HUb=-Ub sin 2
(build-in)
At presence of both site and bond types
HU= -Uscos 2 -Ubsin 2 = -Ucos (2-2)
Us0   0  phase  = “mean displacement of all electrons”
shifts from  =0 to  = , hence the gigantic FE polarization.
From a single stack to a crystal: Macroscopic FerroElectric ground
state if the same  is chosen for all stacks,
Anti-FE state if the sign of  alternates - both cases are observed
AsF6
SbF6
AsF6
ReO4
′ linear scale
PF6
SbF6
PF6
ReO4
SCN
Dielectric anomaly (T) in (TMTTF)2X, after Nad & Monceau
Left: at f=1MHz in semi logarithmic scale | Right: at f=100 kHz in linear scale
Anti-FE case of SCN shows only a kink as it should be.
Smoothened anomaly in PF6 correlates with its weak frequency dispersion
- Mabe FE domain walls and hidden hysteresis ?.
Other cases - pure mono-domain “initial” FE susceptibility.
T dependence of the
inverse of the real part :
1/' at f=100Hz,
X=PF6,AsF6,SbF6,ReO4
1/ ' =C(T-T0)
Typically C~104/T0
C<=2C> -exact Landau theory !
complication: PF6
Clear cut fitting of the anomaly in (T) to the Curie law prooves
the least expected case of the ferroelectric phase.
Even more curiously, it is the ferroelectric version of the
Mott-Hubbard state and of the Charge Disproportionation.
Frequency dependence of imaginary part of ε
Comparison of the ε′′(f) curves at two
temperatures near Tc:
above - 105K and below - 97K.
Low frequency shoulder - only at T<Tc :
pinning of FE domain walls ?
T- dependence of relaxation time for the
main peak:
Critical slowing down near Tc,
Activation law at low T – friction of FE
domain walls by charge carriers
LandauKhalatnikov
critical relaxation
13
Ferroelectricity imprinting:
Inversion symmetry lifting tested by nonlinear optics.
K. Yamamoto et al (2008)
Second harmonic
generation λ(ω)=1400nm
α-(ET)2I3 - should be a metal,
actually a correlated (Mott) insulator,
below T≈140K it becomes a Wigner Crystal
Problem of identification of the
frozen polarization:
through anomalous optical activity
- lack of inversion summetry
W
 2
E  2E3
8
E3 may exist only in case of inversion symmetry breaking
And what's about the metallic state of the Se sub-family?
Can the Charge ordering or even Ferroelectricity be hidden there ?
14
Log scales
of frequency
parasite intramolecular modes
Mott gap 2Δρ in TMTTF
emerges only when
it is as low as in Br
Drude peak –
TMTSF
is a metal !
Optical Conductivity () = absorption
The peak due to either 2Δ of pairs of kinks production or
Eg - optical absorption edge (exciton = bound kink+antikink)
Notice identity of static (TMTTF case)
and fluctuational (TMTSF case) Mott states
Ferroelectricity is a rising demand in
fundamental and applied solid state physics.
Active gate materials and electric RAM in microelectronics,
Capacitors in portable WiFi communicators,
Electro-Optical-Acoustic modulators,
Electro-Mechanical actuators
Transducers and Sensors in medical imaging.
Request for plasticity – polymer-ceramic composites work today
but with weak responses – effective ε~100.
Plastic ferrroelectrics are necessary in medical imaging – shaping,
also need a low weight for compatibility of acoustic impedances with
biological tissues.
17
Ferroelectrics are available mostly in the inorganic world.
Can we have organic only, particularly polymer only ferroelectric ?
One ferroelectric saturated polymer does
exist - Poly(vinylidene flouride) PVDF :
• ferroelectric and pyroelectric,
• efficient piezoelectric if poled –
quenched under a high voltage.
PVDF structural unit,
ferroelectric β-phase
(trans-polymer)
 Light, flexible, non-toxic, cheap to
produce
 Helps in very costly applications
• ultrasonic transducers.
• hydrophone probes, sonar equipment
• unique as long stretching actuator.
Can we go wider, diversely, and may be better with conjugated polymers?
Can we mobilize their fast pi-electrons to make a better job than common ions?
Conducting polymers: today’s applications
LED display and microelectronic chip made by Phillips
Research Lab
Tsukuba, LED TV.
Ferroelectricity in conjugated polymers?
Where does the confidence come?
What may be a scale of effects ?
Proved by the success in organic conducting crystals.
19
But was “organic supercondictivity” the only promised land?
Not quite : some of the profet’s visions actually imply a spontaneous electric
polarization, hence they are FERROELECTRIC.
R=
phenyl
Drawing from the PRB 1964
It is a pyroelectric if N≠H
Later popular drawing (Sci. Am.)
It must be a ferroelectric if R≠H
Instructions of the FE design: Combined symmetry breaking.
Lift the inversion symmetry, remove the mirror symmetry,
do not leave a glide plane.
Keep the double degeneracy to get a ferroelectric.
Realization: conjugated polymers of the (AB)x type:
modified polyacetylene (CRCR’)x
Bonds are polar because of site dimerization Dipoles are not compensated if bonds are also dimerized.
Precausion: – At presence of bonds dimerization, the Charge Ordering is a threshold effect
∆bonds WILL NOT be spontaneously generated if ∆sites already exceeds the wanted optimal Peierls gap ∆0
Chemistry precaution: make a small difference of ligands R and R’
0  2bonds  2sites
21
The necessary polymer does exist which has not been realized:
Di-Substituted Poly-Acethylene, since 1999 from Kyoto-Osaka-Utah team.
By today – complete optical characterization,
indirect proof for spontaneous bonds dimerization
via spectral signatures of solitons.
“Accidental” origin of the success
to get the Peierls effect of bonds dimerization:
weak difference or radicals
– only by a distant side group.
Small site dimerisation gap provokes to add the
bond dimerisation gap.
Still a missing link : no idea was to check for the Ferroelectricity:
To be tried ? and discovered !
22
Proof for spontaneous dimerization through the existence of solitons
Optical results by
Z.V. Vardeny group:
Soliton feature,
Absorption,
Luminescence,
Dynamics
Still a missing link : no idea was to check for the Ferroelectricity:
To be tried ? and discovered !
Not a polaron, but
spin soliton ?
23
Particular interest in developing of ferroelectric π-conjugated systems
“electronic ferroelectrics”:
Manipulations of charged solitons by electric field.
Their spectral features arrive in optics
Gigantic ε, easy repolarization – fast response
Conductivity and/or optical activity of -conjugated systems
will add more functionality to their ferroelectric states.
Polarizability of chains can allow to manipulate morphology
(existing hybrids of polymers and liquid crystals. K. Akagi - Kyoto).
High and fast nonlinearity : χ2 for the optical mixing , second harmonic generation
 2
W  E  2E3
8
E3 may exist only in case of inversion symmetry breaking
24
LESSONS and PERSPECTIVES

-conjugated systems can support the electronic ferroelectricity.

Effect is registered and interpreted in two families of
organic crystalline conductors (quasi 1D and quasi 2D).

Mechanism is well understood as combined collective effects of
Mott (S.B. 2001) or Peierls (N.K.&S.B. 1981) types.

An example of a must_be_ferroelectric polyene has been already studied
(Vardeny et al).

The design is symmetrically defined and can be previewed.
Cases of low temperature phases should not be overlooked.

Solitons will serve duties of re-polarization walls.
25
WARNINGS
1. Ferroelectric transition in organic conductors was weakly observed,
but missed to be identified, for 15 years before its clarification.
2. Success was due to a synthesis of methods coming from
a. experimental techniques for sliding Charge Density Waves,
b. materials from organic metals,
c. ideas from theory of conjugated polymers.
3. Theory guides only towards a single chain polarization.
The bulk arrangement may be also anti-ferroelectric –
still interesting while less spectacular. Empirical reason for optimism:
majority of (TMTTF)2X cases are ferroelectrics.
4. …….
…………………..
13. High-Tc superconductivity was discovered leading by a “false idea”
of looking for a vicinity of ferroelectric oxide conductors.
26