Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Human genetic variation wikipedia , lookup
Recent African origin of modern humans wikipedia , lookup
Adaptive evolution in the human genome wikipedia , lookup
Origin of language wikipedia , lookup
Behavioral modernity wikipedia , lookup
Discovery of human antiquity wikipedia , lookup
Origins of society wikipedia , lookup
Before the Dawn (book) wikipedia , lookup
Anatomically modern human wikipedia , lookup
Prescott 1 Makaloni U. Prescott Professor: Dr. Teri Potter ANTH 1020-008 July 19, 2016 Insights into the evolution of human bipedalism from experimental studies of humans and other primates One of the features that separate humans from all other primates is the habitual use of a bipedal gait. This single feature is seen as such a defining characteristic that skeletal adaptations to bipedalism are used to identify our extinct hominid ancestors (Schmitt). Scientist over many years have research and experiment analysis into the locomotion of humans and primates; to improve the understanding of the mechanics in human locomotion and the evolution of human bipedalism. Bipedalism has a number of advantages over quadrupedalism. Bipedalism allows for one to carry items for longer distances such as babies or food. It allows one to move more energy efficient than quadrupedalism, and allows for foraging and the use of tools as well as protecting oneself (Early Hominids). Bipedalism has a number of characteristics, which have evolved over millions of years. The differences exist between Australopithecus, Paranthropus, and Homo. Both Paranthropus and Australopithecus evolution have noticeable steps because they are among the earliest hominids recorded to adapt to bipedalism. Most significant changes include the cranium brain size, lumbar vertebra, sacrum and pelvis, the femur, knee, tibia & talus, arms Prescott 2 and legs, hands and fingers, feet and toes. Australopithecus were similar to humans below the neck their heads were significantly different from people today. Their adult brain size was about 1/3 that of ours today (Early Hominids). In the cranium, the foramen magnum is perpendicular to the orbital plane and is located inferiorly. Where as in quadruped the foramen magnum is dorsally placed. The lumbar vertebra has an (S) curve with lumbar lordosis. This shape helps with maintaining balance, as well as puts the center of gravity closer to the pelvis. In quadrupedal center of gravity is closer to the torso and the spine has a (C) curve. The sacrum articulates with the last lumbar vertebra. Included in the sacrum are the shape of the iliac blades, which are short, wide, curved and mediolaterally located to help support the vertical trunk (Prost J.H). You see how primates have a diversity of locomotive behaviors. Apes, Orangutans and Gorillas show a wide range of locomotor habits, including acrobatic armswinging, climbing, knuckle- or fist-walking, which shows bipedal locomotion actions. In class we learned that most arboreal primates have longer arms than legs, a short stocky back, long grasping fingers etc. In bipeds their legs are longer than their arms. Primates that tend to spend most of their time in branches have curved toes and fingers, which limited the capacity for precision. Primates that are non-arboreal have flat toes and fingers, which make for more precise hand movements. Laboratory-based studies of primates also suggest that human bipedalism arose not from a terrestrial ancestor but rather from a climbing, arboreal forerunner. Experimental data, in conjunction with anatomical data on early human ancestors, show clearly that a relatively stiff modern human gait and associated physiological and anatomical adaptations are not primitive retentions from a primate ancestor, but are instead recently acquired characters of our genus (Schmitt). Prescott 3 Conclusion - Experimental data collected on humans and nonhuman primates suggest that early hominid bipedalism evolved in an arboreal, climbing primate. The earliest mode of bipedalism included many aspects of locomotion seen in modern humans, but probably did not involve inverted pendulum-like mechanics. This difference in locomotor styles between early hominids and modern humans appears to be associated with small, gracile and poorly stabilized hind limbs in our earliest ancestors (Stern and Susman, 1983). Through the articles I read, I discovered there are various debates and hypotheses as to how and why bipedalism evolved in humans and possible reasons for the evolution of human bipedalism include freeing the hands for tool use and carrying and gathering of food. I learned that bipedal specializations are found in Australopithecus fossils from 4.2-3.9 million years ago. I learned there are multiple factors and behaviors to understand the evaluation human bipedal and that other mammals engage in limited, non-locomotor, bipedalism. A number of animals like rats, raccoons, and beavers will squat on their hind legs to manipulate some objects but will revert to four limbs when moving. The beaver (bipedally) will move when transporting wood for their dams, as will the raccoon when holding food. Bears will also fight (in) a bipedal stance, using their forelegs as weapons. I found various hypothesis and narratives interesting to read and I conclude The Evolution of Human Bipedalism was a developing and gradual study. Prescott 4 Work cited 1) Schmitt, D. "Insights into the evolution of human bipedalism from experimental studies of humans and other primates." The Journal of experimental biology 206.Pt 9 (2003): 1437. 2) Prost, J. H. (1980), Origin of bipedalism. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 52: 175–189. Web. 17 July. 2016. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.1330520204 3) "Early Hominin Evolution: Analysis of Early Hominids." Early Hominin Evolution: Analysis of Early Hominids. Web. 17 July. 2016. <http://anthro.palomar.edu/hominid/australo_2.htm>. 4) Stern, J. and Susman, R. (1983). The locomotor anatomy of Australopithecus afarensis. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 60,279 -317 Eportfolio: http://www.dozer815.com.yolasite.com/