Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1986 Molecular Studies of T-Lymphocytes From Bovine Leukemia Virus-Infected Cattle. Diana Lynn Williams Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Williams, Diana Lynn, "Molecular Studies of T-Lymphocytes From Bovine Leukemia Virus-Infected Cattle." (1986). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 4273. http://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/4273 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This reproduction was made from a copy of a m anuscript sent to us for publication and microfilming. While the m ost advanced technology has been used to pho tograph and reproduce this m anuscript, the quality of the reproduction is heavily dependent upon the quality of the material submitted. Pages in any m anuscript may have Indistinct print. In all cases the best available copy has been filmed. The following explanation of techniques Is provided to help clarify notations which may appear on this reproduction. 1. Manuscripts may not always be complete. When it is not possible to obtain missing pages, a note appears to Indicate this. 2. When copyrighted materials are removed from the m anuscript, a note ap pears to indicate this. 3. Oversize materials (maps, drawings, and charts) are photographed by sec tioning the original, beginning at the upper left hand com er and continu ing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each oversize page Is also filmed as one exposure and is available, for a n additional charge, as a standard 35mm slide or in black and white paper format.* 4. Most photographs reproduce acceptably on positive microfilm or micro fiche but lack clarity on xerographic copies made from the microfilm. For an additional charge, all photographs are available in black and w hite standard 35mm slide format. * ♦For more information about black and white slides or enlarged paper reproductions, please contact the Dissertations Customer Services Department TU T1 VA /1f 1J D issertation Information S erv ice U niversity Microfilms International A Bell & Howell Inform ation C o m p a n y 3 0 0 N. Z e e b R o a d , A nn Arbor, M ich ig an 48 1 0 6 8629207 W illiam s, D iana Lynn MOLECULAR STUDIES OF T LYMPHOCYTES FROM BOVINE LEUKEMIA VIRUS-INFECTED CATTLE The Louisiana State U niversity a n d A g ricu ltu ra l and M echanical Col. University • Microfilms International 300 N. Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, Ml 4B106 Copyright 1987 by Williams, Diana Lynn All Rights Reserved Ph.D. 1986 PLEASE NOTE: In all c a se s this material has been filmed in the b est possible way from the available copy. Problems encountered with this docum ent have been identified here with a c h eck mark V . 1. Glossy photographs or p a g e s , 2. Colored illustrations, paper or prin t_____ 3. Photographs with dark background 4. Illustrations are p o o r c o p y ______ 5. P ages with black marks, not original c o p y ______ 6. Print shows through as there is text on both sides of p a g e _______ 7. Indistinct, broken o r small print on several pages __ Z . 8. Print exceeds m argin requirem ents______ 9. Tightly bound copy with print lost in s p in e _______ 10. Com puter printout pages with indistinct print_______ 11. Page{s)____________lacking w hen material received, a n d not available from school or author. 12. Page(s) 13. Two pages num bered 14. Curling and wrinkled pages 15. Dissertation co n tain s pages with print at a slant, filmed a s received 16. Other seem to b e missing in numbering only as text follows. . Text follows. University Microfilms In te rn a tio n a l MOLECULAR STUDIES OF T LYMPHOCYTES FROM BOVINE LEUKEMIA VIRUS-INFECTED CATTLE A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Veterinary Medical Sciences with an option in Veterinary Microbiology and Parasitology by Diana Lynn Williams M.S.. Louisiana State University. May 1986 1979 ©1987 DIANA LYNN WILLIAMS All Rights Reserved ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I wish to express my sincere graditude and appreciation to my major advisor, Dr. Grace Amborski, guidance with my research efforts. for her support and She afforded me great opportunities to interact and learn from research groups affiliated with the Louisiana State University system and other institutions around the country. Thanks are also due to the members of my graduate committee) Drs. Ronald Montelaro) Charles Issel, Ota Barta, and Ken Sehnorr for their constructive advice and help editing this dissertation. A special thanks is given to Dr. Ota Barta for his help and support with several aspects of this research. I am also indebted to Drs. James Casey and Dave Derse of the Department of Genetics of the National Cancer Institute for their continued help and for giving me the opportunity to learn molecular hybridization technology. Appreciation also goes to Dr. William Davis of the Department of Veterinary Microbiology and Pathology, Washington State University. 1 wish to thank Jennifer Lo for her continued help and support throughout my graduate program. The assistance given to me by Joel Walker, Rick Ramsey, Susan Pourciau and Li Huang is greatly appreciated. ii I am indebted to the Department of Veterinary Microbiology and Parasitology of the School of Veterinary Medicine* Louisiana State University for its financial support in the form of a graduate assistantship and for the privilege to undertake advanced studies. Additional funds for this investigation uiere provided by the Louisiana Agricultural Experiment Station, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center* 2296. Ill projects 1467 and To my husband Joe. Without your constant love, support, and understanding, the dream to be the best that I could be would never have become a reality. To my son, Anthony. Thank you for bringing more happiness and love into my world than 1 could ever have imagined. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page TITLE ........................................ ...................... ii ................................... iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS DEDICATION TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................... v .............................. xi ............................. xii ..................................... xvi INTRODUCTION .................................. 1 A. Statement of Research Problem ...... 2 B. Objectives ............................... 3 LIST OF TABLES LIST OF FIGURES ABSTRACT I. II. i LITERATURE REVIEW A. B. Enzootic Bovine Leukosis ................ 6 1. Aleukemic State ... 6 2. Persistent Lymphocytotic State ...... 6 3. Enzootic Bovine Lymphosarcoma 7 A. Geographic Distribution of BLV ...... 8 5. Diagnosis of B L V ..................... 8 6. Transmission of B L V 9 .... ..... BLV Infection in Other Animal S p e c i e s ................ .... ... ......... C. Sporatic Bovine Leukosis v ................ 10 ii Chapter II. Page D. Other Bovine Lymphotrophie Retroviruses ............................ E. 1. Bovine Syncytial V i r u s ..... 12 2. Bovine Visna-like Virus ............... 13 Lymphocytes in Enzootic Bovine L e u k o s i s ........ 1. F. 12 13 Lymphocyte Isolation P r o c e d u r e s .......................... 14 2. B Lymphocyte M a r k e r s .................. 15 3. T Lymphocyte Markers .................. 16 4. Frequency of T and B Lymphocytes in Enzootic Bovine Leukosis ........ 17 5. BLV Target Cells ....................... 19 6. Immune Responses to BLV I n f e c t i o n ........................... 21 Molecular Studies of B L V .................. 23 1. Bovine Leukemia Virus ................. 23 2. BLV P r o t e i n s ........... 24 3. BLV Genome .. . ......................... 27 4. Morphogeneous 5. Viral P e r s i s t e n c e .................... 6. Molecular Aspects of ...................... 27 BLV-induced Leukomogenesis 7. 28 ....... 3D Relatedness to Human Lymphotrophie Retroviruses vi ..... 32 Chapter Page III. ENUMERATION OF T AND B LYMPHOCYTES IN ALEUKEMIC AND PERSISTENT LYMPHOCYTOTIC CATTLE USING MONOCLONAL ANTIBODIES THAT DISTINGUISH THESE CELLS .................... A. Introduction ................. E. Materials and Methods 34 34 .................... 1. Animals ......................... 2. Isolation of Peripheral Blood 36 36 Mononuclear cells ................... 37 3. Complete Blood Counts 4. Staining Cells for B and T ....... Lymphocyte Enumeration 5. ....... C. Statistical Analysis Results ................ ............... 1. Hemograms ............ 2. Frequency of T and B Lymphocytes ..... 3. Absolute Numbers of T and B L y m p h o c y t e s ......................... D. 38 Detection of Fluorescence— Positive Cells ................................ 6. 36 Discussion ............ Vii 39 40 40 4D 40 43 44 Chapter IV. • Page PURIFICATION OF T LYMPHOCYTES FROM BOVINE PERIPHERAL BLOOD MONONUCLEAR CELLS USING IMMUNO—AFFINITY DEPLETION 'PANNING- ........ 59 A. Introduction B. Materials and Methods 1. ............................ .................... .................. 6i Coating Plastic Flasks with Immunoglobulin ..... 3. Affinity “Panning- Procedure A. Determination of Lymphocyte C. Results 61 ........ 62 ............. 63 ....... ............................ 64 Subsets and Monocytes 1. T Lymphocyte Yield after 'Panning- ........................... 2. 61 Isolation of Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells 2. 59 64 T Lymphocyte Enrichment and B Lymphocyte Depletion after "Panning- D. Discussion ........... viil .................... 64 65 Chapter V. Page ASSESSMENT OF THE PRESENCE OF BLV PROVIRUS IN THE T LYMPHOCYTES OF BLV-INFECTED* ALEUKEMIC CATTLE ........................... A. Introduction B. Materials and Methods .................... Animals 2. Isolation of PBMC 3. Purification of T Lymphocytes 4. Determination of Lymphocyte ...... ............... ..................... 75 DNA Purification 6. Restriction Enzyme Digestion ........... 7. Gel T r a n s f e r .......... 8. BLV-DNA Probe 9. Nick Translation of BLV-DNA ......... 77 79 Filter Hybridization 11. Autoradiography ................ 80 ...... 80 .................... 80 Purity of T Lymphocyte Preparations ........................ 2. 76 ........................ 77 ID. 1. 74 74 5. Results ..... 73 ............. and Gel Electrophoresis C. 73 73 Subsets and Monocytes Probe 71 .................... 1. 71 80 Agarose Gel Electrophoresis of Restriction Enzyme Fragments .... 81 lx Chapter Page 3. D. VI. DNA Hybridization Analysis Discussion .......... ........................ 81 82 RESPONSE OF LYMPHOCYTES FROM ALEUKEMIC AND PERSISTENT LYMPHOCYTOTIC CATTLE TO SELECTED PHYTOMITOGENS A. Introduction B. Materials and Methods ..................... ......... 1. Animals 2. Isolation of Peripheral Blood ........... VIII. IX. X. 97 97 ................. 3. Complete Blood Counts 4. Enumeration of T/B Lymphocyte Ratios VII. 94 ..................... Mononuclear Cells 94 97 .................. 98 ............................ 5. Serum Preparation 6. Preparation of Mitogens 7. Lymphocyte Blastogenesis Assay 6. Statistical Evaluations 98 .................... 99 ..............100 ...... 100 ............102 C. Results D. Discussion... ................................104 SUMMARY .................... ..102 .........................................11? A P P E N D I X ........................................ 123 BIBLIOGRAPHY VITAE ................................... 126 ......... 142 X LIST OF TABLES Table III- Page 1. Statistical Analysis of UBC and Lymphocyte Counts from Bovine Leukemia Virus-Infected III* Cattle .................... 2. Frequencies of T and B Lymphocytes 56 from Peripheral Blood of Bovine Leukemia Virus Infected III. 3. Cattle .................. 57 Statistical Analysis of T and B Lymphocytes from Bovine Leukemia Virus-Infected Cattle V. ............................... 1. Frequencies of T and B Lymphocytes 5B in Cell Preparations for DNA Hybridization Analysis VI. ........ 93 1. Statistical Analysis of Lymphocyte Blastogenesis of Lymphocytes from Bovine Leukemia Virus-Infected Cattle Using Stimulation Index VI. ............... 115 2. Statistical Analysis of Lymphocyte Blastogenesis of Lymphocytes from Bovine Leukemia Virus— Infected Cattle Using Corrected Counts per Minute ....... VI. 3. T/B Lymphocyte Ratios of Bovine Leukemia Virus-Infected Cattle ......... VIII. 116 117 1. Assessment of viral infections in Animals Used for Molecular'Studies of Bovine T Lymphocytes ............... xi 124 LIST OF FIGURES Figure III. Page 1. Procedure for Isolation of Bovine Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells Using Density Gradient Centrifugation III. 2. ............ ............. 49 WBC and Lymphocyte Counts from Peripheral Blood of Bovine Leukemia Virus Infected Cattle ......... III. 3. 50 Fluorescence Activating Cell Sorting Contour Plots of Lymphocytes from Bovine Leukemia Virus Negative* Control Com # 5 6 ............ .......... III. 4. 51 Fluorescence Activating Cell Sorting Analysis Profile of Lymphocytes from Bovine Leukemia Virus Infected* Aleukemic Com #75 ....................... III. 5. 52 Fluorescence Activating Cell Sorting Analysis Profile of Lymphocytes from Bovine Leukemia Virus Infected* Persistent Lymphocytotic III. 6. Com # BIO ..... 53 Fluorescence Activating Cell Sorting Contour Plots of Lymphocytes from Bovine Leukemia Virus Infected* Persistent Lymphocytotic Xii Com # 632 ..... 54 Figure III. 7. Page Absolute Numbers of Peripheral Blood T and B Lymphocytes from Bovine Leukemia Virus Infected* Aleukemic and Persistent Lymphocytotic Cattle .... IV. 1. Procedure for T Lymphocyte Purification Using "Panning* IV. 2. 55 ...................... 67 T Lymphocyte Yield After "Panning of Bovine Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells Using Anti—Bovine Immunoglobulin Coated Flasks IV. 3. .................... 6E3 T Lymphocyte Enrichment by "Panning* of Bovine Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells Using Anti-Bovine Immunoglobulin Coated Flasks IV. A. ............. 69 Depletion of B Lymphocytes by "Panning" of Bovine Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells Using Anti-Bovine Immunoglobulin Coated Flasks V. 1. ........ 70 Procedure for Detection of Bovine Leukemia Virus Provirus in the Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells and Purified T Lymphocytes of Bovine Leukemia Virus Infected Cattle ................. Xlii 87 Figure V. 2. Page Bovine Leukemia Virus Provirus Restriction Enzyme Map V. 3. . .,............. 88 Purification of BLV DNA Probe Using Electroelution of BLV-DNA Sacl Fragment t from an agarose gel ..................... V. 4. 89 Restriction Enzyme Fragments of Purified T Lymphocyte and Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cell DNA from Boyine Leukemia Virus Infected* Aleukemic Cattle Generated by Digestion uiith Sac 1 Restriction E n z y m e V. 5. ........ 90 DNA Hybridization Analysis of Purified T Lymphocyte and Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cell DNA from Bovine Leukemia Virus Infected* Aleukemic Cattle V. 6. ............. .................... 91 DNA Hybridization Analysis of Purified T Lymphocyte and Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cell DNA from Bovine Leukemia Virus Infected* Aleukemic Cattle VI. 1. ............ ..................... Procedure for Lymphocyte Blastogenesis ... xiv 92 110 F igure VI. 2. Page Schema of Plate Arrangement for Lymphocyte Blastogenesis with 3 Mitogens and 4 Different Serum Supplements (Cells Added to All Wells) ........................... VI. 3. Ill Response of Lymphocytes from Cattle to Optimal Concentrations of Selected Phytomitogens Using Stimulation Index VI. 4. ............. 112 Response of Lymphocytes from Cattle to Optimal Concentrations of Selected Phytomitogens Using Corrected Counts per M i n u t e ............................... VI. 5. 113 Response of Lymphocytes from Bovine Leukemia Virus Negative Cattle to Optimal Concentrations of Selected Phytomitogens in the Presence of Sera from Bovine Leukemia Virus Infected Cattle ........ XV 114 ABSTRACT MOLECULAR STUDIES OF T LYMPHOCYTES FROM BOVINE LEUKEMIA VIRUS INFECTED CATTLE by Diana Lynn Williams Highly specific monoclonal antibodies and raicrofluorimetry were used to determine the absolute number of B and T lymphocytes in the peripheral blood of bovine leukemia virus (BLV) infected cattle. The peripheral blood lymphocyte populations from BLV-infected cattle were elevated when compared to BLV-negative animals. The increase in the lymphocyte population in the aleukemic (AL) animals was due to an increase in T lymphocytes. In animals the increase was due mainly to an increase of B lymphocytes but also to an increase of T lymphocytes. thePL The PL animals showed a significantly higher number of surface immunoglobulin positive cells (slg'*') than did the animals. AL The majority of these cells contained surface IgM and had large quantities of this marker on their cell surfaces. One PL animal (632) had a very high lymphocyte count and contained lymphocytes that appeared to stain with markers for both bovine B and T lymphocytes. xvi Bovine T lymphocytes were purified from the peripheral blood Df BLV~infected, AL cattle using icnmuno-affinity depletion technique ("panning") with anti-bovine immunoglobulin-coated flasks. Large yields of highly purified T lymphocyte preparations (95-10054 T lymphocytes and 0-3?. contamination with B lymphocytes) were obtained by the use of this technique. The BLV provirus was found in the DNA of peripheral blood lymphocytes and 3 of A purified T lymphocyte preparations from AL animals using hybridization analysis uith radiolabeled BLV-DNA as a probe. Hybridization analysis also confirmed that the B lymphocyte is the major target of BLV infection. The blastogernic response of lymphocytes from PL and AL animals to selected phytomitogens appeared to be normal when compared to the responses of BLV-negative, animals. clinically normal The sera from both AL and PL animals contained a heat-stable* camitogenic blastogenesis-augmenting factor. xvii CHAPTER is INTRODUCTION Enzootic bovine leukosis (EBL) is a neoplasm of lymphatic tissue in the bovine species (B). The etiologic agent is bovine leukemia virus (BLV) (10B)* an exogenous* leukomogenic virus of the family Retroviridae. This virus may induce two clinical manifestations of disease either a benign proliferation of lymphocytes referred to as persistent lymphocytosis (PL) or the development of malignant lymphosarcoma (LS) (46). The majority of animals infected with BLV do not show any clinical signs of disease (88). These animals are referred to as inapparent carriers or as being aleukemic (AL). Some of these AL animals (25 X) will develop PL* and a small percentage (0.1 to 1 X) will develop LS (108). Studies have been conducted to investigate the relationship between the PL and LS stages of EBL (46*51)* but* very few studies have been done to investigate the relationship between the AL and PL stages of EBL. This may be very important since the switch from the AL to PL stage may be one of the primary steps in the progression of the disease to the tumor phase. Over 75X of LS cattle have a chronic PL phase which precedes tumor development (108). A target cell of BLV-infection in the cow has been reported to be the B lymphocyte (121). The majority of lymphocytes found in the peripheral blood of PL cattle have surface markers typical of B lymphocytes (110*156)* and a 1 percentage of these cells have been shown to exhibit viral antigens on their cell surfaces (72). A recent report suggested that some tumors consisted of cells that not only bear surface antigens of T lymphocyte lineage but also contain the BLV provirus <9D). The role of bovine T lymphocytes in the progression of EBL has not been investigated. Reports in the current literature have focused on the antigenic relatedness of BLV and the human T lymphotropic viruses HTLV I & II. These viruses are associated with human T cell leukemias (116*128). The T lymphocyte appears to be the target of both of these viral agents. Therefore* if T lymphocytes are found to be target cells of BLV and/or important in the progression of EBL* not only will this information aid in the better understanding of bovine leukosis* it may also help to establish an animal model to study human viral induced leukemia. I. A. STATEMENT OF RESEARCH PROBLEM Bovine T Lymphocytes from AL and PL cattle are the subject of these studies. Definitive studies on these cells in EBL have not been conducted mainly because purified preparations and specific markers for these cells have not been available. Monoclonal antibodies directed toward the surface antigens of bovine cells of the T lymphocyte lineage have recently been produced and characterized (90)* but purification techniques have not been perfected to give good yields of highly purified lymphocyte subpopulations. In order to determine whether T lymphocytes may serve as targets for BLV it is nessecary to have large quantities of purified T lymphocytes for DNA hybridization analysis. Further studies on T lymphocytes may help to define how the AL to PL shift is mediated. Information on the absolute number of T lymphocytes in the peripheral blood of AL and PL cattle may indicate that there is a modulation of this cell population in these animals. occur as a result of BLV— infection. This modulation may Information on the, functional ability of T lymphocytes from AL and PL cattle to respond to selected phytomitogens may indicate a modulation of the functional ability of these cells (T-helper and Tsuppressor). The uncontrolled proliferation of undifferientiated B lymphocytes in the PL animal may be the result of a lack of or enhancement of a particular T cell subset function. Therefore* studies on bovine T lymphocytes are needed to attempt to define the role if any of these cells in the AL and PL phases of EBL. I. B. OBJECTIVES The different chapters of this dissertation describe specific experiments that were employed to accomplish the following objectives! 4 1, To determine the numbers of bovine T and B lymphocytes from AL and PL cattle using monoclonal antibodies that distinguish these lymphocytes. 2- To purify T lymphocytes from bovine peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) of cattle using immuno-affinity depletion "panning". 3. To assess the presence of BLV provirus in purified T lymphocytes and PBMC of AL cattle and the PBMC of PL cattle using DNA hybridization analysis. 4. To evaluate and compare the responses of lymphocytes in AL and PL cattle to selected phytomitogens using the lymphocyte blastogenesis assay. The aim of these investigations is to acquire a better understanding of the role that bovine T lymphocytes play in the maintainance of the AL and PL stages of EBL. The results from these investigations are presented as individual chapters. Some of these have been submitted for publication to different Journals. indicated belou: They are entitled as "Enumeration of T and B lymphocytes in aleukemic and persistent lymphocytotic cattle using monoclonal antibodies that distinguish these cells. Submitted for publication to the "Journal of the National Cancer Institute". Co-authored by U. Davis and G. Amborski. ■Purification of bovine T lymphocytes from peripheral blood mononuclear cells using an immuno-affinity depletion technique ("panning"). Accepted for publication in "Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology". Co-authored by J. Lo and G. Amborski. "Assessment of the presence of bovine leukemia provirus in the DNA of purified bovine T lymphocytes of BLV-infected* aleukemic cattle." Manuscript in preparation for publication to "Cancer Research". Co—authored by G. Amborski. "Evaluation of the responses of lymphocytes of aleukemic and persistent lymphocytotic cattle to selected phytomitogens". Manuscript in preparation for submission to the "American Journal of Veterinary Research". and G. Amborski. Co-authored by 0. Barta CHAPTER IIs A- LITERATURE REVIEW: ENZOOTIC BOVINE LEUKOSIS Enzootic bovine leukosis (EBL) is a lymphoproliferative disease of the bovine species (6>. The etiologic agent is bovine leukemia virus (BLV), an exogenous leukemogenic virus of the family Retroviridae (108,75). The presence of this virus appears to be a prerequisite for tumor development, but, it is not by itself sufficient to cause the disease (75). The virus may induce either inapparent, aleukemic (AL) infections or two clinical manifestations of the disease, persistent lymphocytosis (PL) or malignant lymphosarcoma (LS) (46). II. A. 1. Aleukemic State Once infected with BLV, cattle show no signs of overt viremia, however, they elicit a strong and persistent humoral response to BLV structural proteins (49). Most infected cattle <75%) have no clinical signs of disease. These animals are inapparent carriers or AL cattle. gain and milk production is unaltered (88). Weight Lymphocyte counts remain in the normal range between 2.5 to 7.5 x ID3 /mm3 of whole blood (2). There has been very little information reported about the AL state of BLV— infection. II. A. 2. Persistent Lymphocytotic State Approximately 30% of BLV infected cattle develop PL (108). This stage of BLV— infection is a nonmalignant 6 hematological disorder characterized by an increase of circulating peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL) (> 7.5 x lO^/mm3 of whole blood) for over a period of 3 months (2). Weight gain and milk production appear to be unaltered (88). In most of the PL animals tested* it appears that the increase in the number of PBL is attributed to an increase in B lymphocytes (110*156). An increase in T lymphocytes of some animals has also been reported (142). The PL state is generally a chronic condition that may or may not lead to the tumor stage of EBL (108*51). The PL phase precedes the tumor phase (LS) in approximately 75’ /, of the cases (51). 12. A. 3. Enzootic Bovine Lymphosarcoma The adult form of bovine lymphosarcoma or EBL is most prevalent in dairy cattle herds and typically occurs in animals older than 2 years of age. It is a chronic disease* evolving over extended periods (1—8 years)* with tumors developing in only a small number of infected animals (0.1— 1%) (108). The majority of cattle affected by EBL are those from 5 to 8 years of age. Tumors observed in EBL cases are always of lymphoid origin and may invade mammary glands* subcutaneous tissues* abdominal muscles* diaphragm* heart* respiratory tract and spinal cord (19). Tumors are inconsistent in location and tumGrization is usually asymmetrical (53*17). As tumors grow* they mechanically impair normal function of organs* and the ultimate stage is complete destruction of the original organ structure. Any lymph node may be affected* but the pelvic lymph nodes are most often involved. Lymphosarcoma induced by BLV eventually leads to either death of the affected animal or condemnation of the carcass at slaughter. U. A. 4. Geographic Distribution of EBL The first cases of EBL were reported in Germany in 1B7B and in the United States in 1897 (9,8). world wide distribution (19). The disease now has In some parts of the world such as Switzerland and other parts of Europe, eradication programs are in progress (19). In these areas the number of cases of EBL is steadily decreasing. Some sections of the United States are endemic areas for EBL. One such area is Louisiana where many herds contain 75-100% BLV positive reactors (71). II. A. 5. Diagnosis of BLV Infection The viral etiology of EBL was shown in 1969 (106). Serological identification of reactors became possible in 1972 (45). Diagnostic techniques presently available for the detection of BLV reactors are virus neutralization (61), complement fixation (140,31), agar gel immunodiffusion (AGID) (33,34), enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay (ELISA) (80), radioimmunoassay (RIA) (125,89), and the syncytia induction and syncytia induction neutralization assays using bovine fetal spleen cells as indicator cells (40,62). AGID is the most commonly used diagnostic tool. The This assay detects antibodies to the major envelope and core proteins of BLV in the serum of infected cattle. Various serologic diagnostic tests have demonstrated that BLV antibodies are detectable in > 90’ A of LS and PL animals (19). II. A. 6. Transmission of BLV Studies conducted in mant) laboratories indicate that contact transmission is the principal method by which BLV is spread (122*AS). vivo (42,3), Since BLV particles are seldom produced in it is likely that in most cases BLV infection in cattle is the result of the transfer of infected lymphocytes rather than viral particles. The transfer of as few as 1 x ID4* blood lymphocytes from infected to non— infected animals results in virus transmission (20). Penetration of the skin appears tc be the mode of entry of the virus, therefore* infection can be easily spread through multiple use of needles* ear tagging devices* dehorning and castration equipment (154*160). Transmission studies using potential insect and tick vectors have been conducted (21*114*130). These investigations indicate that BLV may be spread by stable flies (Stomoxys calcitrans)* horn flies (Haematobia irritans)* horse flies (Tabanidae) (21*114)* and some species of ticks (Boophilus microplus) (130). Another possible means of BLV spread is in utero transmission. The incidence of transmission of BLV from infected dam to fetus is very low (46* 123). Usually less than 155i of BLV-infected cows give birth to infected calves (123). Colostrum and milk are potential sources of infection (50*119). Both contain BLV-infected lymphocytes* but the amount is minimal when compared to tnat of the blood (109). Usually antibody present in the colostrum of 10 infected cows is adequate for protecting calves until about a months of age <50, 49). Pasteurization of infected milk totally destroys BLV (5). Vertical transmission xn the gametes has never been observed (109). In Sweden* transmission of BLV has occurred through the use of a BLV— contaminated babesiosis vaccine <19). All the above observations confirm that natural spread of BLV occurs mainly through the horizontal route. II. B. BLV Infection in Other Animal Species Natural cases of viral-induced lymphomas in sheep are rare. The virus isolated from these cases appear indistinguishable from BLV (19). Sheep have been experimentally infected with either cell— free virus or BLVinfected lymphocytes from infected cattle. not occur in sheep. Typical PL does Lymphosarcoma usually occurs quite rapidly after infection (1-3 years) and at a much higher frequency than in cattle (19). Anatomopathological lesions are comparable for tumors of sheep and cattle. BLV sequences are present in tumor tissue but absent from normal tissue. Recent evidence seems to indicate that, unlike BLV- induced tumor cells in cattle, tumor cells in sheep are of T lymphocyte origin (67). BLV-infected sheep have antibodies to structural proteins of the virus. been demonstrated in sheep (19). No viremia has ever BLV-induced lymphosarcoma of sheep does not seem to be naturally transmitted from 11 animal to animal. BLV-induced lymphosarcoma has been demonstrated in only one other animals species. After numerous attempts to induce LS in goats with BLV experimentally* reported (115). Lymphoid tumors appeared in many organs 6 years postinfection. chimpanzees* one case was Many other animal species such as pigs* domestic rabbits* cats, dogs, deer, rats* and guinea pigs have been experimentally infected with BLV* but in none of these species were viremia or pathological disorder observed (97*153). The only species which 'remained antibody positive was the chimpanzee (153). BLV infection in humans has never been documented (6*153*97). II. C. SPORADIC BOVINE LEUKOSIS EBL induced by BLV should be distinguished from sporadic bovine leukosis (SBL) which includes the Juvenile* skin* and thymic forms of the disease (1). associated with BLV infection. Only EBL is The SBL forms occur at random* having no proven association with an infectious etiology. The possibility exists that other bovine retroviruses may be associated with this condition* although this has not been thoroughly investigated. A transient lymphocytosis may be detected in some SBL cases. The target cell of SBL appears to be the lymphocyte stem cell because tumors consist of cells of both T and B lymphocytes lineage (19). The calf or Juvenile form generally occurs in calves 12 less than 6 months of age* however* animals. it can occur in older Tumor cells can be found in lymph nodes* spleen and bone marrow. liver* In contrast the thymic form, typically restricted to the region of the thymus* the calf form typically occurs in young animals (6 to 3D months of age) and appears mainly in beef herds rather than in dairy herds (43). The skin form is extremely rare* and the only form of lymphosarcoma that is not fatal. Lesions of this form may regress but a generalized lymphadenopathy may occur (19). II. D. OTHER BOVINE LYMPHOTROPHIC RETROVIRUSES Studies on EBL have resulted in the isolation of two other bovine retroviruses* bovine syncytial virus (BSV) and bovine visna-like virus (BVV) which also produce syncytia in cell culture (54*96). However, Their relationship to EBL is unclear. neither agent is considered to be a significant factor in the cause of EBL (149*150). II. D. 1. Bovine Syncytial Virus BSV is a bovine lymphotrophic retrovirus that was originally isolated from buffy coat cells* spleen* lymph nodes and milk of lymphosarcomatous and normal cattle (150). The target cell(s) of this virus is not known nor is the effect of infection on susceptible animals. This viral agent induces syncytia formation in monolayer cultures of bovine fetal spleen cells and has been morphologically 13 characterized as a foamy virus (96*150). BSV was originally suspected of being the etiologic agent of EBL (96). Subsequent studies demonstrated that only 22% of LS animals had detectable levels of serum antibodies to BSV* whereas* over 90% of LS animals had detectable antibodies to BLV (148,19). Observations of experimentally infected calves and immunodiffusion tests of sera from normal and lymphosarcomatous cattle as well as cattle from multiple incidence lymphosarcoma herds have not provided evidence for a direct etiologic involvement of BSV in either the PL or LS stages of EBL (148). II. D. 2 Bovine Visna—Like Virus A syncytia-inducing virus (BVV) isolated from a cow with PL was found to be similar in structure to maedi, visna, and progressive pneumonia viruses of sheep (149). Calves inoculated with virus isolated from this PL cow developed a mild nonpersistent lymphocytosis and subcutaneous lymphatic nodules. The relationship of BVV to the induction of PL is unclear, but it does not appear that this viral agent is a significant factor in the development of PL or LS (149). II. E. LYMPHOCYTES IN ENZOOTIC BOVINE LEUKOSIS Lymphocytes in man and animals are composed of two subpopulations: thymus—derived (T) lymphocytes, which are involved in cell—mediated immunity and bursal—equivalent (B) 14 lymphocytes* primarily involved in humoral immunity. An understanding of the recognition and effector functions of these lymphocytes in disease processes is clearly dependent on the ability to enumerate and separate these cells for functional analysis. Various techniques have been used for the isolation and enumeration of T and B lymphocytes in the bovine species and have been applied to BLV— infected animals. 11. E. 1 Lymphocyte Isolation Procedures Bovine peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) have been isolated routinely using a density gradient of ficoll (146). This technique gives highly purified populations of mononuclear cells with an average of 2% polymorphonuclear leukocytes. Numerous other techniques have been utilized to isolate lymphocyte subpopulations. Nylon wool columns have been used to fractionate B and T lymphocytes (121) and yield highly purified T (nonadherent) and B (adherent) lymphocyte populations (95%)* but recoveries are very low (2 to 20%). Antibody— complement immunolysis has been used to selectively deplete B lymphocytes from PBMC and hence enrichs the T lymphocyte population (146). This technique also gives low yields of purified T lymphocytes. Bovine serum albumin gradients have been used to isolate subpopulations of bovine lymphocytes on the basis of their bouyant density. The purity and yield of these preparations are also low (73). The techniques currently used to isolate bovine lymphocyte subpopulations do not give large quantities of 15 highly purified T or B lymphocytes. Recently, an immuno- affinity depletion technique using immunoglobulin-coated surfaces has been used to isolate and purify murine peripheral blood T and B lymphocytes (92, 95). This technique has not been applied to purification of large quantities of bovine lymphocyte subpopulations. II. E. 2. B Lymphocyte Markers The B lymphocytes have 3 generally recognized cell surface receptors: (37.36), (2) (1) surface membrane immunoglobulin (slg) receptor for the Fc portion of immunoglobulin (38.36) and (3) the receptor for complement (29). These markers have been used to distinguish bovine B lymphocytes. The slg— bearing lymphocytes (slg'*') have been detected by an immunofluorescence antibody technique which uses fluorescein—conjugated F(ab')2 fragments of rabbit antibovine IgG (heavy and light chain specific) recently, monoclonal anti— IgM (127,110,90). (Rablg—FITC) and Rablg-FITC is specific for cells which contain slg (IgA, IgM, IgG) on their surface since this marker is directed against the neavy chains of all the immunoglobulin classes. The anti— IgM is specific for cells which contain surface IgM because this antibody is directed towards the heavy chain of IgM (u chain). Isotype specific lymphocyte surface immunoglobulins have not been as well studied in the cow as in certain other species. The isotypes on slg* bovine peripheral blood lymphocytes appear to be mainly IgM and IgA (85, 55). It was found that anti—bovine IgM is a highly specific marker 16 for bovine peripheral blood B ly m p h o c y t e s <55* 90). Detection of the Fc receptor on the surface of bovine B lymphocytes has been accomplished using an immunofluorescence technique* erythrocyte—antibody complement rosetting (EAC rosette) technique and slg staining (B5,142*110*156). The complement receptor has also been used to detect B lymphocytes (10). The use of these techniques has led to a wide range of values for bovine B lymphocytes in the PBMC of normal cattle. Many of these techniques are very cumbersome to perform. II. E. 3. Bovine T Lymphocyte Markers Markers which have been used for enumeration of bovine T lymphocytes include: cells (sRBC) (127*142)* (PNAR) (147)* (1) receptors for sheep red blood (2) receptors for peanut agglutinin (3) alpha-naphthy1 acetate esterase (ANAE) positive granules (71)* and (4) T lymphocyte surface antigens (B4). The frequency of lymphocytes which contain receptors for sRBC has been measured by the use of a sheep erythrocyte rosetting technique (E-rosette) (73*127*142). Peanut agglutinin receptor—positive cells (PNAR*) have been detected by a direct fluorescence technique using fluorescein-conjugated peanut agglutinin. This technique has been reported to be a very specific means of enumerating □ovine T lymphocytes (147* 55). Recently* with the use of monoclonal antibodies (MAb) directed towards T lymphocyte surface markers* it was found that PNAR can be found not 17 anly on T lymphocytes but also on other leukocytes (90). ANAE staining has been used as a cytochemical marker to enumerate bovine T lymphocytes (71), and the frequency of bovine T lymphocytes has been measured by direct immunofluorescence using anti— bovine T lymphocyte serum (ATS) (04). Many of the above markers and detection techniques have been used to enumerate T and B lymphocytes in normal and BLV-infected animals. The use of the above markers for enumeration of bovine T lymphocytes has led to great variation in the numbers of these cells in the PBMC of normal as well as BLV-infected animals. Recently, MAb specific for the sRBC receptor on the surface of bovine T lymphocytes have been prepared, characterized and used to enumerate the frequency of T lymphocytes in the PBMC of normal cattle (90). II. E. 4. Frequency of T and B Lymphocytes in Enzootic Bovine Leukosis Some of the above techniques for B and T lymphocyte enumeration have been used to study the frequency of these cells in PBMC from cattle with AL, PL and LS. Very little information is available on the lymphocytes of AL animals. One study of 8 cattle in the AL stage showed that lymphocyte counts averaged between 3.4 x lO3 to 7.5 x 103 /mm3of whole blood and between 12 to 50% of these cells were slg'*' (72). An increase in slg^ lymphocytes in the PL phase of the disease has been observed (110, 85, 72). The values averaged 2B% for BLV-negative <normal) and 63% far PL cattle (110). One report indicated that PL cows had 3.85 times more slg*lymphocytes than did normal cows (85). When EAC rosetting was used to enumerate the frequency of £ lymphocytes in the PBMC of PL animals* values of 10% to 20% for normal cattle* and 55% to 81% for PL animals were observed (72). Lymphocyte counts in the PL group ranged from 11.0 x 103 to 22 x ID3 /mm73 of whole blood* and there was a significant strong correlation between the percentages of cells bearing the B lymphocyte markers and the absolute lymphocyte counts (72). Tumor development correlates with a drastic modification of lymphocytosis (rapid increase or decrease of the total lymphocyte count) and the presence in the peripheral blood of lymphoblasts and lymphocytes with altered morphological and karyotypic characteriseics (104). Many animals with LS have lower percentages of circulating slg + cells and lymphoid cells from tumorous lymph nodes of these animals have a higher percentage of slg bearing cells than normal lymph nodes (142). Studies using E-rosette formation as a marker for bovine T lymphocytes indicated that between 12.5 to 26% of PBMC of normal cattle* 3.5 to 26.5% of PBL from BLV-infected cattle (AL or PL status unknown) and 0.5 to 50% of PBL from LS animals formed E-rosettes (142). This study also reported that in tho lymph nodes of BLV-negative animals* 8.5 to 30.5% of lymphoid cells formed E—rosettes. E—rosette 19 positive cells from lymph nodes of BLV-infected animals ranged from 7 to 43.5%. Lymph node cells from LS animals had 10% or fewer positive cells (142). Investigations using (ANAE) staining to identify T lymphocytes in cattle concluded that an average of 47.7% ANAE positive cells were present in the PBMC of normal cattle* and 20.5% present in the PBMC of PL cattle concluded that in the PBMC of PL were (71). Therefore, this study there was a decrease in the number of T lymphocytes. Studies were conducted using an indirect immunofluorescent antibody technique with rabbit anti— bovine thymocyte serum (ATS) to detect T lymphocytes in the PBMC of BLV-negative, (84). PL and LS cattle and tumor cells of LS cattle The frequency of T lymphocytes in the PBMC of BLV- negative animals ranged from 55 to 80%, to 45%, and LS animals from 5 to PL animals from 4 38%. The percentage of T cells found in tumors ranged from 2 to 30%. As described above, the use of such a variety of techniques for T and B lymphocyte enumeration has led to a wide range of values for these cells in both normal and BLVinfected cattle. The MAbs recognizing bovine T lymphocytes have not yet been used to assess the absolute numbers of T lymphocytes in BLV-infected cattle. II. E. 5. BLV Target Cells Since tumors present in EBL are neoplasms of the lymphoid system, cells of the lymphocyte lineage were the first candidates to be suspected as BLV-preferred targets. 20 This bias shown to be correct by demonstration of BLV production in vitro from cultures of lymphocytes from BLVinfected cattle (10B* 120). The target cell of BLV infection has been reported to be the B lymphocyte as evidenced by the presence of slg on the majority of tumor cells and BLV-infected lymphocytes in the peripheral blood of PL and LS cattle (72* 120). However* a recent report which investigated the phenotype of lymphoblastoid cell lines derived from two cases of LS indicates that BLV may also infect cells of the T lymphocyte lineage (91). It appears that BLV is present in a subpopulation of B lymphocytes of PL cattle (73). A nylon wool separation procedure was used to fractionate the B and non—B populations of peripheral blood of BLV-infected cattle. It was discovered that the capacity to produce C-type particles resided with the B lymphocytes (119). This was demonstrated by the use of transmission electron microscopy and the induction of syncytia in bovine fetal spleen cells (120*121*73). From these studies* it was concluded that 397. of the B lymphocytes produced BLV particles. This implies that BLV may be associated with a certain subpopulation of B lymphocytes. Isolation of a subpopulation of BLV-infected lymphocytes from AL and PL animals was accomplished by the use of density gradients of bovine serum albumin (B5A) (73). The B lymphocytes were reportedly separated into two distinct subpopulations* one which produced BLV and the 21 second which did not produce BLV* but underwent spontaneous blastogenesis when cultured in vitro <73). The BLV- nonproducer accounts for most of the cell—count increase in PL as assayed by the uptake of tritiated thymidine which measures DNA synthesis. It is not known if the lymphocytes which incorporate '~*H thymidine* but do not produce BLV* contain the BLV provirus in a repressed state. No further characterization of either of these two cell populations has been reported. II. E. 6. Immune Responses to BLV Infection Humoral response to BLV antiyens has been observed shortly after infection (49). The presence of antibodies directed against the major glycoprotein of the viral envelope (gp51) and internal viral core protein <p 24) is detectable shortly after experimental BLV infection (49). The anti—gp51 antibodies are consistently formed at a higher titer than anti— p 24 antibodies and display virus neutralizing activity and a strong cytolytic effect on BLV— producing cells in the presence of rabbit complement (47). Recently* a study was conducted to assess the humoral and cellular responses in calves experimentally infected with BLV (107). The results showed that there was an increase in the number of B lymphocytes* a decrease in the number of T lymphocytes and reduced levels of IgM in the sera of BLV infected calves. These findings seemed to indicate that the immune system of these calves was affected by the viral infection and a state of immune—suppression was 22 induced (107). Responses of lymphocytes from normal) AL* PL and LS cattle to phytomitogens have been evaluated using the lymphocyte blastogenesis assay (111* 112* 157* 132). This assay has been used to determine the functional ability of both T and B lymphocytes to respond to mitogenic stimuli. The T lymphocytes of normal cattle were found to be stimulated with both phytohemagglutinin (PHA) Concanavalin A (ConA) (111) 132) and (157). The T and B lymphocyte populations responded to pokeweed mitogen (PWM) (111)132). The mitogenic activity of PHA and PWM was studied on the PBMC from cows with PL, and it was found that when using stimulation indices) the degree of stimulation was markedly less for PBMC of PL cattle than for normal cows. Lymphocytes from cows with PL cultured without phytomitogens incorporated 5 times more tridiated thymidine than did lymphocytes from normal cows (112). It has been reported that this spontaneous blastogenesis is BLV—antigen driven because it can be inhibited by serum containing BLV antibodies but not by normal serum (143). The response of cultured PBMC from cattle affected with EBL to the mitogenic activity of ConA has been determined (157). It was found that the stimulatory effect of ConA was significantly decreased in lymphocytes from LS cattle in} comparison to lymphocytes from normal animals. The sera from cows with LS have been shown to inhibit the blastogenesis of normal lymphocytes (6B). This 23 suppressive activity was not observed in sera from animals that were infected with BLV but did not have LS. These results indicated that sera from l.S animals contained suppressive factor(s). No further characterization of this serum factor(s) was reported. The above studies indicated that the functional ability of T lymphocytes from AL animals to proliferate in response to mitogens appeared to be intact* but the functional ability of T lymphocytes in the PL and LS stages of EBL appeared to be suppressed. It is known that the percentage of T lymphocytes in the peripheral blood is significantly decreased in the PL animal. Therefore* the reported reduction in the response of the T cells in these animals may be due at least in part to the low number of these cells present in the lymphocyte blastogenesis assays. Suppression of natural cytotoxic activity of lymphocytes from PL and LS animals has been observed (164). It was demonstrated that the cytotoxic activity of PBMC was closely related to the stage of the disease. The activity of PBMC from cattle with PL and LS was decreased markedly when compared to that of normal or AL animals (164). II. F. MOLECULAR STUDIES OF BLV IX. F. 1. Bovine Leukemia Virus The putative etiological agent of EBL is BLV. This virus has been identified as an RNA virus of the family 24 Retroviridae and is characterized as a C-type oncornavirus (158,75). Since the original discovery of BLV in the supernatant fluids of short—tern* cultures of PL lymphocytes* long-term cultures producing BLV have been obtained. These include cell lines derived from explanted tumor tissues or various epithelioid and fibroblastoid cell lines infected with BLV after co-cultivation with BLV-infected bovine lymphoid cells (151*98*44). Most of the information on the structure and biosynthesis of BLV components has been obtained from the fetal lamb kidney-BLV-producing cell line (FLK-BLV) (152). The BLV virus has a sedimentation coefficient of 600S to 70QS with a buoyant density of 1.15 to 1.18 g/ml in sucrose and 1.12 g/ml in metrizamide solutions (39*59*74*75). The diameter of mature BLV particles ranges between 68 and 125 nm (22*23*15B). Particles contain a central electron— dense nucleoid with a diameter of 40 to 90 nm* and it appears that the nucleocapsid is icosahedral a 70S RNA. (155). The virion contains Denaturation of this virion RNA yields poly <A>- containing subunits that sediment at 38S and are found to be of molecular weight 2.95 x 10** daltons (ca.8.8 kb) in sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gels (57*25). II. F. 2. BLV Proteins. The internal structural protein* p2* was the first recognized BLV protein. It has been purified and extensively characterized (58*106*32). This protein has been partially sequenced and appears to share the 25 aminoterminal praline and carboxyterminal leucine of the p30 of all mammalian retroviruses. However* it has been found that BLV p24 is antigenically distinct from the major core protein of most other retroviruses. Nucleic acid and amino acid sequence homology has been found between BLV p24 and the major p£4 core protein of HTLV I (118*128). The major phosphoprotein of BLV* pl5* is a slightly basic protein that exists in two populations of molecules (70). One is linked to the lipid bilayer of the viral membrane* and the other is linked to viral RNA. basic protein of BLV is pi2. Another This protein has been shown to be in close proximity to viral RNA in BLV particles (144). Zt has been reported that there is amino acid homology between BLV pl2 and human T— cell Leukemia virus (HTLV I) pl2 (118*128). The other basic protein plO is able to bind to single-stranded DNA (93) Nature BLV particles also contain a RNA-dependent DNApolymerase (reverse transcriptase) of an approximate molecular weight of 70*000 dal tons (41). This enzyme is strictly dependent on RNA and all four deoxyribonucleoside triphosphates and* irrespective of template-primer used* displays a strong preference for Hg’*"*" over Mn*'*' (59*58*75). The major envelope glycoproteins of BLV are gp51 gp60) and gp3D. (or These proteins are found associated as a 1*1 complex linked by disulfide bonds in viral particles isolated under nonreducing conditions (18). It appears that these proteins are both derived from a precursor protein gPr72"‘r"’ ' and appear as a tetramer with two g p ^ molecules buried in the membrane structure of the virus* while the two gp51 molecules protrude outside (56*99). The overall structure resembles that of an inununoglobulin molecule. The gt*51 appears to function in the attachment of the virus to the target cell. Monoclonal antibodies to BLV gp51 have been obtained in the mouse using either nondisrupted BLV particles or purified gp51 as immunogens (16,15). Antigenic determinants on gp51 were shown to be involved in determining both virus infectivity of and syncytia formation by BLV—producing cells as well as functioning as a target for antibody-mediated complement-dependent cytotoxicity (15). It appears that the carbohydrate residues on gp51 are very important virus neutralization epitopes (15). From recent reports* it appears that the BLV genome like that of the HTLV's (HTLV I,HTLV II, and HTLV III) may produce another as yet uncharacterized protein referred to as a trans—acting protein (tat) (138*137,131). It has been proposed that this protein is coded for by the long open reading frame (LOR) region of approximately 16DD nucleotides 3' to the envelope gene. In HTLV I, it has been proposed that the HTLV tat protein mediates transcriptional trans activation of the HTLV long terminal repeat (LTR) (138*137). The transcriptional initiation signals for these retroviruses lie within the LTR sequences which flank the integrated provirus (137). A 2— kilobase message capable of encoding such a protein has been detected in BLV-infected 27 celIs* but the protein has not been found as an in vitro translation product of the viral genome (131). II. F. 3. BLV Genome. The genome contains the coding capacity for at least four internal structural proteins (p24* pl5, pl2* plO>, reverse transcriptase (p70)* and two envelope glycoproteins <gp51 and gp30> (99*100). It appears that the BLV gene order (5' —gag-pol—env—3') is similar to that of other replication-competent lymphoid leukemia viruses (56). It is not clear whether other proteins are encoded by the viral genome. Recent studies seem to indicate that the BLV genome contains ah additional coding region or LOR 3' to the envelope gene (131). This gene may code for a tat protein which may play a vital role in the ability of the virus to induce transformation (131). Nucleic acid hybridization experiments run with single stranded BLV tP-cDNA have shown no homology between BLV and any other retrovirus with the exception of HTLV I and II (24*74,75*11B»12B). Significant homology has been found with HTLV I (118*128). Up to 45 7. nucleic acid homology exists between DNA coding for p24 internal core proteins of BLV and HTLV I (113). II. F. 4. Morphogenesis. Detailed investigations in various laboratories have led to the conclusion that BLV has distinct morphogenesis events from most other retroviruses (22*23). Some investigators have shown peculiarities in budding of BLV viruses when comparing the budding processes of murine and feline oncornaviruses to that of BLV <2B). In short-term lymphocyte cultures* packages of virus particles accumulate in cytoplasmic bags surrounded by plasma membrane. BLV particles are rarely observed to be released from the plasma membrane into the pericellular spaces or into cytoplasmic vacuoles (151). It was suggested that virus particles do not mature at the cell surface but leave the cell by unusual routes (22*23). This mechanism of virion maturation may be responsible for the persistent infections observed with BLV. Since viral antigens may not be present in large quantities on the infected cell surfaces* BLV-infected cells may be protected from lysis mediated by antibody— dependent cytolysis mechanisms. II. F. 5. Viral Persistence The presence of antibodies directed against the major glycoprotein of the viral envelope (gp51) and internal viral core protein (p24) is detectable shortly after experimental BLV infection (49). The gp51 antibodies are consistently formed at a higher titer than p24 antibodies and display virus neutralizing activity and a strong cytolytic effect on BLV—producing cells in the presence of rabbit complement (47). Antigens do not appear to be expressed at detectable levels on infected cell surfaces in vivo. Consequently* production of virus in the blood plasma appears to be prevented. It is not known where virus replication and or 29 viral antigen production actually takes place in infected animals. The BLV provirus can be demonstrated in the genome of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) and tumor cells but not nonlymphoid tissues by Southern blot hybridization analysis of the DNA of these cells (22,73). There appears to be host modulation of BLV antigen expression and efficient control of virus spread. The BLV proviral genome can be activated by mitogens (108) or short— term cultivation (48-72 hours) (120). Viral antigens can then be demonstrated on the surface of infected cells by fluorescent microscopy techniques (140), and mature virions can be detected in the .pericellular spaces by transmission electron microscopy (120). The control of BLV antigen expression appears to be at the level of transcription (77). BLV mRNA transcripts cannot be detected in noncultivated circulating lymphocytes or tumor cells from PL or LS animals using solution hybridization techniques (77,76). Viral mRNA transcripts can be detected in these cells using highly sensitive in situ hybridization techniques. The amount of viral mRNA increases with short—term cultivation of these cells (77). Therefore, there appears to be control of BLV antigen expression. This lack of expression of gp51 on the BLV- infected cell surface could clearly prevent cell lysis by antibody mediated cytolytic mechanisms and allow for the expansion of BLV-carrying cells. The mechanism by which the BLV provirus is transcriptionally repressed in the lymphocytes of PL and AL animals is not understood. A plasma protein has been reported to be responsible for this repression (63). This protein has an approximate molecular weight of 150*000 daltons. It does not appear to be immunoglobulin or interferon* but a unique protein contained in the plasma fraction of BLV— infected bovine blood. When cel Is are separated from whole blood using density gradient centrifugation and washed* this protein is diluted or completely removed from the cell preparation as assessed by the increase of BLV p24 production using competitive radioimmunoassay on cell culture supernatant fluids. Transcription of the BLV genome can then proceed. II. E. 6. Molecular Aspects of BLV— induced Leu kemogenes is The exogenous nature of the BLV genome to the DNA of bovine cells as well as to the DNA of several other vertebrate species has been well documented (75*30). It has also been established that the BLV genetic information includes no one genes (80). Liquid hybridization and Southern blot analysis using a molecularly cloned BLV proviral—specific probe show that most of the cells of all BLV— induced tumors contain proviral genetic information (78). In individual tumors the site of proviral integration appears to be mono- or oligoclonal (78). However* no preferential integration site for BLV provirus* such as* in 31 close proximity to a cellular one gene sequence has ever been demonstrated either in tumor cells or PBL of AL or PL cattle (60*79). Proviral insertion sites in the lymphocytes of AL and PL cattle have been observed to be polyclonal. The BLV-infected lymphocytes of animals in PL do not display abnormalities in their chromosomal ploidy as do tumor lymphocytes (66). There appears to be a multi-step process for tumor development. The presence of the BLV provirus appears to be necessary but* by itself* insufficient to cause tumors (75). The role of BLV proviral information in the development and/or maintenance of the tumor state has been evaluated (78*76). Cells of BLV— induced tumors contain at least one or a portion of one provirus. When deletions occur, they seem to affect only the 5' half* as the 3' proviral sequences seem to be conserved. The conservation of the 3' proviral sequences may be of functional importance at a particular stage of disease development. The tat gene appears to be located in this portion of the genome (131). Experiments indicate that maintenance of the tumor state does not require a continuous expression of BLV proviral DNA (79). This may suggest that proviral transcription is important in a specific stage of EBL. Possibly* the PL stage of EBL is a manifestation of proviral gene expression. Gene product(s) such as the tat protein may induce rapid proliteration of lymphocytes. Tumor development may then be a consequence of chromosomal rearrangements which occur when cells 32 proliferate uncontrollably. This is one mechanism hypothesized in the tumorgenesis of Burkett's lymphoma (35). However* restriction enzyme analysis of a panel of ten tumor DNAs has failed to demonstrate rearrangements of the cellular homologues of several retroviral one genes including c-myc, c-myb, c-erbA, c-erbB, c-abl. c-src, crasH » c-fes* and c-sis (BO). Furthermore, the DNA of most BLV induced tumors do not induce foci of transformed cells when transfected into. NIH 3T3 cells. II. F. 7. Relatedness to Human Lymphotrophic Retroviruses The importance of studying the parameters involved in the development of EBL has been emphasized by the close genetic and antigenic relationship of BLV to some of the members of the human T lymphotrophic virus family (HTLV) (128,74,27). This virus family consists of three retroviruses, HTLV I, II and III (162). BLV is the closest known relative of HTLV I and II (94,128,27,133,). HTLV-I is the etiologic agent of adult T-cell leukemia (ATL) and HTLVII has been isolated from one patient with hairy T-cell leukemia (129,162). Both viruses appear to induce chronic leukemias and malignant lymphomas in man (165). These viruses have a tropism for the helper T lymphocytes possessing the cell—surface antigen 0KT4 and have the capacity to transform these cells and like BLV, induce syncytia formation in vitro (162,68). HTLV I, II and BLV appear to have a similar mechanism of transcriptional activation and may have similar mechanisms of neoplastic 33 transformation (137,138,135,131). A better understanding of the parameters involved in the development of BLV— induced lymphosarcoma may aid in the understanding of the mechanismts) of leukemogenesis and lymphomagenesis with the HTLV viruses. CHAPTER III: ENUMERATION OF T AND B LYMPHOCYTES IN ALEUKEMIC AND PERSISTENT LYMPHOCYTOTIC CATTLE USING MONOCLONAL ANTIBODIES THAT DISTINGUISH THESE CELLS. HI. A. INTRODUCTION Limited information has been obtained on the immune response of cattle to bovine leukemia virus (BLV) infection and the sequence of cellular events that leads to lymphocytosis and the development of lymphosarcoma. In animals which develop a persistent lymphocytosis (PL)* there appears to be a loss of control of B lymphocyte proliferation (72*84). is unclear. The reason for this lack of control It may be mediated* at least in parti by a decrease or increase in T lymphocyte numbers and* possibly* alteration of the function of these cells. Since T lymphocytes help control B lymphocyte proliteration and differentiation* any alteration in the T lymphocyte population may have profound effects on the B lymphocyte population (142). In a recent report* evidence was presented which demonstrated that calves experimentally infected with BLV had an increase in the B lymphocyte population as determined by the use of iromunofluorescence assay using fluorescein-conjugated rabbit anti-bovine IgM (107). There was a corresponding decrease in the absolute number of T lymphocytes using E—rosette formation for enumeration of these cells. 34 A decrease in 35 the concentration of IgM in the serum was also observed using quantitative radial immunodiffusion. The data reported suggest that BLV-infection may induce a state of immunosuppression. A comparison of the absolute numbers of bovine T lymphocytes in the peripheral blood of adult asymptomatic or aleukemic (AL), PL and BLV-negative cattle may indicate that there is an expansion or depletion of these cells m AL or PL animals. either This alteration in T lymphocyte numbers may indicate that the T lymphocyte population is affected by BLV infection. Identification of peripheral blood lymphocytes of cattle has been performed mainly on animals which exhibit PL or LS <110*72,51,156*46). Very few studies have been reported on the AL animal (72). Techniques which have been used to identify bovine B lymphocytes in BLV-infected cattle include the EAC resetting technique (142) and Fc receptor (85) and surface immunoglobulin (slg) immunofluoresence assays (110,B5,). Techniques which have been used for bovine T lymphocyte enumeration include E-rc-sette formation, (142) an assay for terminal deoxynucleotidy1 transferase activity (71), anti— thymocyte serum (ATS) and peanut agglutinin (PNA) cell surface fluorescence assays <B4,147>. The use of the above techniques for T lymphocyte enumeration has led to conflicting reports as to the numbers of these cells in normal and BLV-infected cattle. Recently, specific monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) that 36 distinguish bovine T and B lymphocytes have been developed and characterized (90). An anti-pan T cell antibody (B26a) that reacts with the sheep red cell receptor on the surface of T lymphocytes and an anti— IgM antibody'(PIgASA) that reacts with cell surface IgM (slgM) have been characterized as markers for bovine T and B lymphocytes) respectively (90). The specificities of these two MAbs mere determined using microcytotoxicity) dual fluorescence microscopy) and flow microfluorimetry (FMF). The present investigation was undertaken to determine the frequencies and absolute number of bovine T and B lymphocytes in the peripheral blood of AL and PL animals by FliF using MAbs that distinguish these cells. MAbs and fluorescein labelled PNA (PNA—FITC) were used for T lymphocyte enumeration anti— IgM and fluorescein labelled rabbit anti-bovine immunoglobulin (Rblg—FITC) for B lymphocyte enumeration. XII. B. MATERIALS AND METHODS III. B. 1. Animals A total of 12 cows at least 3 years of age were used in this study. Animals were acquired from sale barns in Southern Louisiana and were maintained at the Veterinary Medical Farm of the Louisisana State University Agricultural Center) Louisiana State University School of Veterinary Medicine) Baton Rouge) Louisiana. The BLV infection status was monitored by detection of serum antibodies to BLV structural antigens using the agar gel immunodiffusion assay <49). Of the 12 cattle tested* 4 were negative for BLV antibodies* 4 were clinically normal but had BLV antibodies <AL), and 4 were diagnosed as having PL using the criteria of the International Conference on Bovine Leukosis (> 7.? x ID3* lymphocytes/mm3 of whole blood for over a period of 3 months) <2). Animals were also vaccinated for various bovine viral diseases and screened for infection by other lymphotrophic retroviruses* bovine syncytial virus (BSV) and bovine visna-like virus <EVV). VIZI and Table VIII. (For details* see Chapter 1.) III. B. 2. Isolation of Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells Peripheral blood was collected by Jugular venipuncture into 20 ml vacutainer tubes containing 10 units/ml of Pan he pr in’* (Abbott Laboratories). The heparinized blood was then diluted in an equal volume of phosphate buffered saline (PBS)* pH 7.4. Twenty ml aliquots were layered onto 20 ml of sodium diatrizoate/ficoll (Histopaque” 1077* Sigma Chemical Co.USA) in 50 cc conical centrifuge tubes (Costar* Cambridge MA). The gradients were centrifuged for 30 min at 1DO0 x g at room temperature* and the bands at the interface between the plasma layer and HistopaqueR were collected and uashed twice in PBS at 500 x g for 10 min at room temperature. Viability counts were performed using the trypan blue exclusion method. The cell concentration was 3B adjusted to 10 x 10^ cells/ml with PBS. The peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) preparation usually contained greater than 95X viable cells and less than 2X contamination with granulocytes. (Refer to Figure 111. 1. for flow diagram.) III. B. 3. Complete Blood Counts Animals were bled by venipuncture every 2-3 weeks for a period of 3 months to give a total of A counts per animal. Blood was collected in tubes containing ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid as an anticoagulant. Total leukocyte counts were made on an automatic cell counter. Blood smears were prepared and stained by the Wright method* and differential counts were made. III. B. 4. Staining CelIs for B and T Lymphocyte Enumeration PBMC were isolated from each animal twice at 30 day intervals. To identify B lymphocytes* 3 x 10* PBMC were incubated with either 100 ul (0.74 mg/ml) fluoresceinconjugated F(ab')=. fragments of rabbit anti— bovine IgG* H & L chains specific (Rblg—FITC) (Cappel Labs* Cochranvi1le* PA> or 10 ul (1 mg/ml) of hab PIg45a (14. Davis* Washington State University* Pullman* U A . ). To identify T lymphocytes* 3 x lO* PBMC were incubated with either 100 ul (1 mg/ml) PNA-FITC (E.Y. Laboratories, U.S.A.) or 10 ul (1 mg/ml) pan T cell Mab B26a (W. Davis* Washington State University, Pullman* W A . ). Cells were incubated for 3D min at 4 C in the dark* then washed twice in 1 ml aliquots of PBS with 39 0.02% Nahl3 to prevent antibody‘capping. The washed preparations of antibody coated cells (PIg45a and E26a) were then reacted with 100 ul cf fluorescein-conjugated goat anti-murine IgGf Igrt, IgG mix (GaM-FITC) Cochranville, PA>, described above. (Cappel Labs., incubated for 30 min at 4 C and washed as All cells were fixed with 1 ml 0.5% formalin in PBS NaN3 . An aliquot of cells were reacted with GaM-FITC as a control for nonspecific binding. III. B. 5. Detection of F 1uorescence—positive CelIs Fluorochrome labelled cells were enumerated by FMF (90). The instrument used for screening and analysis was the mercury arc lamp based flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson Hg— arc F A C S ™ Research Analyzer, Becton Dickinson Immunocytometry Systems Inc.* Mountain View, CA). The instrument measures individual cells simultaneously for fluorescence (autofluorescence and fluorescence imparted by fluorochrome— coupled antibodies or other specific fluorochrome reagents bound to a cell membrane), size (measured by electronic volume) and granularity (measured by wide angle light scatter). Data on 5000 cells were collected in list mode on each sample for analysis. Two parameter data, scatter versus fluorescence were recorded in dot plot, contour plot (with concentric lines outlining areas of highest cell density) and isometric display using the data analysis programs provided for the Beckton Dickinson Consort 30. The percent of labelled cells was determined with the computer program 40 by setting a marker at the appropriate channel on a contour profile of control cells (exposed to GaM-FITC alone) such that 95% of the signal imparted by cells fell between channels 10 and 80. Erythrocytes and platelets were excluded from analysis by setting the trigger threshold and gates to exclude low scatter and low volume signal* thereby excluding cells smaller than lymphocytes. III. B. 6. Statisiteal Analysis The statistical significance of the total UBC* lymphocyte* and absolute B and T lymphocyte counts was assessed with an unpaired Student's t test (136). III. C. RESULTS III. C. 1.Hemogram The total UBC and lymphocyte counts used for statistical evaluation were obtained from 4 individual bleeding times (2-3 weeks apart) for each animal. Four animals were evaluated from each group of AL* PL and BLV— negative control animals. The mean UBC from BLV—negative cattle was 6.7 x 103/mm3 of whole blood* from AL animals* 9.7 x 103/mm3 * and from PL animals* 26.5 x lCP/mnr* (Fig. III.2). The mean lymphocyte counts from BLV—negative cattle was 3.3 x lCP/mm3 * from AL animals* 5.0 xlO^/mm3 * and from PL animals was 23.5 x lO^/mwr* (Fig. III. 2). These data show that there was a significant increase (p < 0.005) in the both the UBC and lymphocyte populations in the peripheral blood of AL and PL cattle tested (Table III. 1). 41 III. C. 2. Frequencies of T and B Lymphocytes A FMF analysis of one representative animal from each BLV group (BLV-negative* AL and PL animals) was selected to demonstrate the staining characteristics of that group. Animal R 56 represents the BLV—negative group of animals (Fig. III.3). Animal Y 75 represents the AL group (Fig. III.4) and animal B 10 represents the PL group (Fig. III.5). When PNA was reacted with PBMC from BLV-negative, AL and animals, three patterns of labelling were observed. PL In uninfected animals* T lymphocytes invariably exhibited high expressions of the PNA receptors (Fig. III. 3a). B lymphocytes and null cells exhibited low expression or inapparent expression (i.e.* detected by FMF). levels of expression not Cells from animals in the AL phase contained a high percentage of brightly stained PNA positive cells and a small population of the dimly stained PNA positive cells (Fig. III. 4a). In contrast* in cell preparations from PL animals* a large population of dimly stained PNA positive cells were present and there was only a small population of brightly stained cells (Fig. III. 5a>. When PBMC from normal* AL and PL cattle were reacted with B26A (pan T cell antibody)* the positive cells corresponded to the brightly staining PNA cells (Figs. 3b*4b*5b). III. The percentage of B26a positive cells ranged from 10—20% fewer than PNA positive cells (Table III. 2). There was a decrease in the percentage of labelled cells ( PNA or B26a) in the PBMC of PL animals. Cells which reacted with Rablg—FITC (sly*) and PIg45A (slgM-*") corresponded with the percent of dimly staining PNA positive cells in all animals tested (Figs. III.3c,d,4c,d,5c,d). The percentage of slgM* cells corresponded with the slg"~ cell population (Table III.2). In the PL animals, the staining intensity was much greater for the slgli* bearing cells than for the slg* cells (Fig. III. 4c,d>. This indicated that the majority of B lymphocytes in the PBMC of these animals were IgM— bearing cells and that these cells contain large quantities of IgM on their surfaces. The percentage of slgM* cells equaled the percentage of slg* cells in most cases (Table III. 2). These results indicated that even though the anti— IgM antibody was an intact Ig molecule, it was not binding to cells other than B lymphocytes via the receptor for the Fc portion of the Ig molecule. There was an increase in the percentage of both slg“" and slgM* cells in the PBMC of PL animals when compared to either AL or BLV—negative control animals. The pattern of labelling differed only in one animal, 632 (Fig. III. 6). This was a PL animal with a high level of lymphocytes (72 x 103 /mm3 of whole blood) of which B75i were positive for the PIg45A marker (Table III.2). A number of slg~ cells appeared to react with both B26A and PIg45A suggesting the cells may co-express slg and the B26A antigen. The staining characteristics of this animal's PBMC showed that the majority of its cells stained very intensely 43 with the PIg45a marker, indicating that these cells had large quantities of IgM on their surfaces (Fig. Ill, 6d) III. C. 3. Absolute Numbers of T and B Lymphocytes The absolute numbers of T and B lymphocytes (B26a"‘ and slgM*) in the PBMC of animals tested were determined by multiplying the percentage of these cells by the total lymphocyte counts. Four animals in each group of AL and BLV-negative control animals and 3 PL animals were used. Lymphocytes harvested from 2 bleedings (30 days apart) were used in this study. Data on 500P cells were collected for each sample tested. The statistical information was obtained by using raw data for each group (Table III. 3). The absolute numbers of B and T lymphocytes in the peripheral blood of the BLV-negative* AL and PL animals tested are summarized in Figure III. 7. The number of T lymphocytes in the PBMC of AL and PL animals was significantly higher (significance at the level of (p < 0.DOS) than those of BLV— negative animals (Table III. 3). The number of B lymphocytes in the FBMC of PL animals was significantly higher than that of BLV—negative control animals (p < 0.005). There was no significant difference in the number of B lymphocytes in the PBMC of AL animals when compared to BLV—negative control animals. Absolute numbers of B and T lymphocytes from the PBMC of animal 632 were not averaged into the counts for PL animals because under the labelling conditions used in this study we were unable to distinguish B from T lymphocytes 44 because a cell population appeared to stain with both T and B lymphocyte markers. III. D. DISCUSSION Monoclonal antibodies were used to determine the frequencies of T and B lymphocytes in the peripheral blood of AL and PL cattle using monoclonal antibodies that distinguish these cells. An overall increase in the lymphocyte population in AL and PL animals tested when compared to BLV—negative control animals. The increase in the lymphocyte numbers of AL animals was attributed to an increase in the T but not the B lymphocyte population. In the PL animals* an increase in both the T and B lymphocyte populations was observed. These experiments indicate that not only the B lymphocyte population but also the T lymphocyte population may be affected by BLV infection. In order to assess the increase of B and T lymphocytes in the peripheral blood of AL and PL cattle* it was important to look at absolute numbers of these cells based on their frequencies in the PBMC and relative to the total lymphocyte counts. Relying on the percentage of cells alone leads to an inaccurate assessment of the number of cells present in the circulation of individual animals because of the increase in the total lymphocyte numbers in AL and PL animals. Most of the information reported on T and B lymphocytes in BLV-infected animals is reported as percentages not as absolute numbers (72*B5*142). This is 45 probably the main reason that the increase of T lymphocytes in these animals has gone unnoticed. The use of MAbs to assay bovine T and B lymphocytes has many advantages over other methods of evaluation (i.e. SRBC rosetting, enumeration of the Fc receptor positive cells* ANAE staining). These methods are tedious* and the results have been difficult to reproduce in different laboratories. In cattle* these techniques have yielded wide ranges of values for peripheral B and T lymphocytes (72*142*84). Moreover* it has been demonstrated that up to 10% of E— rosetting bovine PBMC may be slg~ (147). The existence of a population of T lymphocytes having receptors for the Fc fragment of IgG has also been demonstrated (147). These findings could account for some for the variability previously observed in the characterization of the frequencies of T and B lymphocytes in BLV-infected animals. In the experiments reported here* an anti— IgM antibody of the IgM subclass and F(ab')2 fragments of IgG mere used to enumerate bovine B lymphocytes and to avoid possible nonspecific staining of other PBMC. PNA-FITC mas found to stain T lymphocytes brightly and B lymphocytes and null cells dimly* forming two distinct populations with cells from most animals tested. Cells labelled with B26A and Rablg and Pig45A corresponded with the brightly and dimly PNA-FITC labelled cells respectively. Preliminary studies using dual fluorescence analysis with granulocyte free HistopaqueR purified PBMC* fluorescein labelled PNA versus phycoerythrin—avidin biotinated GaMIg revealed B26A reacts with cells expressing a high concentration of the PNA receptor and that RbXg—FITC and PIg45A react with cells expressing a low concentration of PNA (90). Therefore* the data presented in this report is in agreement with these findings. The staining characteristics of PIg45a closely parallel those of Rablg indicating that this marker is highly specific for bovine B lymphocytes. These results give further evidence that the MAb markers are specific for the lymphocyte subsets. The staining characteristics of lymphocytes from animal 632 seem to indicate that there is a subpopulation of lymphocytes in some BLV-positive cattle with very high lymphocyte, counts that carries both B and T lymphocyte markers on their cell surfaces. This is an observation consistent with SRBC resetting studies reported previously (147). Additional studies by dual fluorescence analysis are needed to analyse carefully the antigen expression on the cells in this animal. There is also an increase in the number of cells that bind the PIg45A MAbs alone. antibody is an anti-bovine IgM antibody* Since this it suggests that PL is attributable* at least in part* to an ‘increase in the number of slgM-bearing lymphocytes. These cells are most likely immature (virgin) or memory B lymphocytes (142). Perhaps this is the BLV-infected population. This hypothesis may be proven by isolating this population of cells and performing DNA hybridization on its purified DNA 47 with a specific BLV-DNA probe. Some of the BLV—negative and BLV-infected animals used in this study had concurrent infections with other bovine lymphotrophic viruses (Table VIII. 1). There did not appear to be any correlation between the infection with other retroviruses* BSV and B W and the BLV status (AL or PL) of the animals used in the above study. that both BSV and BVV (148* 149*11*96). Ithas been reported have been found in PL and LS animals It was once considered that these viruses were responsible for EBL (148*149*11). However* it was found that the incidence of infection by these viral agents in PL or LS animals was low (<2570* whereas* greater than 9DTi of animals with EBL have antibodies to BLV antigens. No direct connection between either of these virus infections and the AL or PL state has ever been established (96). All AL and PL animals were positive for BLV antibodies throughout the course of this study. In increase in the total WBC* lymphocyte cattle with PL* an count and B lymphocyte population in the peripheral blood has been documented <110*85*72). An elevation in the T lymphocyte population in PL animals has not been previously reported. This study is also the first documentation of an elevation of the T lymphocyte population of AL cattle. Therefore* the data obtained from the experiments reported herein suggest that there is an alteration in the T lymphocyte numbers of BLVinfected animals. Identification of the particular T lymphocyte subset that is affected by BLV-infection must AB wait for the development of additional monoclonal antibodies to bovine T lymphocyte markers. The reason for increase in the numbers of T lymphocytes in the peripheral blood of AL and PL animals is unclear. The T lymphocyte may be a target cell for BLV infection and as a result of infection there could be a T-cell lymphocytosis. To address this hypothesis* DNA from purified T lymphocytes of BLV-infected animals must be acquired and DNA hybridization analysis must be performed using a highly specific BLV—DNA probe. The T lymphocyte population may be responding to the presence of a serum protein(s) which may augment the mitogenesis of these or a subpopulation of T lymphocytes. It has been shown that the BLV proviral genome codes for a trans activational transcriptional protein (tat? which mediates transcriptional activation of BLV proviral gene sequences and perhaps host cellular genes (131). Perhaps* this gene product is responsible for augmenting the T and B lymphocytosis observed in BLV-infected animals. 49 © © © HISTOPAQUE® SEPARATION © \ 7 © DILUTED PERIPHERAL BLOOD 1 :2 WITH P B S LAYERED 2 0 m l ALIQUOTS ON 2 0 m l HISTOPAQUE ( d e n s i t y , 1 .0 7 7 g /m l) CENTRIFUGED 1 0 0 0 x g , 3 0 min, 25C REMOVED BANDED CELLS AT INTERFACE WASHED X 2 WITH P B S , SOOXg 1 0 min, 2 5 C \ PERIPHERAL BLOOD MONONUCLEAR CELLS (PBMC) Figure I I I . l . Procedure f o r Is o la tio n o f Bovine P e rip h e ra l Blood Mononuclear C e lls Using D en sity G radient C e n trifu g a tio n . 50 60 ?0 60 | u 22 H A leu k em ic of C e 11s o o 20 18 Number m £ E \ tn NBC I PL ye mr spi hs ot ecny tot t1c m 0 j: 2C BLV Neg |J L y m phocytes 16 14 I 12 1 03 10 I 6 6 / / / 4 2 / / / 0 2 ^54 ^ 6 Y73 Y12 *32 Y?4 Y?S ®10 Y11 Y13 Y632 Animal Numbers Figure III.2. WBC and Lymphocyte Counts fran Peripheral Blood of Bovine Leukemia Virus Infected Cattle 51 7/2G/8S FACS Analyzer I Sample 10 : SG/PtIA Sample t a g : 002 7/2G/85 FACS Analyzer I 1* 1 0 ma m «w t> Sample ID : SG/B26 Sample tag ; 004 ma (l j u JL a a a rw 7/2G/8S FACS Analyzer 1 Sample ID : PIg45A/56 Sample tag : 007 7/2670S FACS Analyzer I Sample ID : 56/F<ab Sample tag : 003 n a a ma u u a fl is oa **io° oa •D> Figure III.3. Fluorescence Activating Cell Sorting Contour Plots of Lymphocytes from Bovine Leukemia Virus Negative, Control Cow #56 52 '4 !“ « • * ."■vjr-v */y PNR-Y 75 V* T • ••;•/** /. ?.s?*IB-Y75 B26R-Y75 BCRTTER, TLti PNA-Y 75 B26R -Y 75 PIB45fl-Y?5 d c t) y * v!ofy=* * ■ i; .* .A'- *tu* * <i^V B‘3« •I9-Y7S P I g « 3fl-Y 73 6 Figure III.4.. Fluorescence Activating Cell Sorting Analysis Profile of Lymphocytes from Bovine Leukemia Virus Infected, Aleukemic Cow #75 SCATTER. 53 SCATTER PN A -B 1B B26R -B I 0 P I g 45ft-810 u IA Figure III.5. Fluorescence Activating Cell Sorting Analysis Profile of Lymphocytes from Bovine Leukemia Virus Infected, Persistent Lymphocytotic Cow #B10. 54 7/26/8S FACS Analyzer I Sample ID : PNA/632 Sample tag : 010 7/26/B5 FACS AnaJyier I Sample ID : B2SA/632 Sample tag : 012 ma Ma u £ o s a a aa n.i IB 7/26/85 FACS Analyzer I Sample ID : PIg45A/632 Sample tag : 015 7/26/85 FACS Analyzer I Sample ID : F(ab‘12/632 Sample tag : 011 W HUT TTr ie' IB IQ' ID :-"h M* f« i^n* . ‘ z j * 1»* | -1 11muj i a° IB IB* IXI IB F ig u re I I I . 6 . Fluorescence A c tiv a tin g C e ll S o rtin g Contour P lo ts o f Lymphocytes from Bovine Leukemia Virus In fe c te d , P e rs is te n t Lymphocytotic Cow #632 55 12 ^ BLV Nag ^ Aleukemic Persistent Lymphocytot1c C e lls 10 *TJ O O m I P B Lymphocytes } T Lymphocytes e 0 of X 2 6 Number CO E E \ CO 1 G> Id 0 R R R a ti l Y 52 54 56 73 Y Y Y Y 12 32 74 75 Animal B Y 10 11 Y Numbers Figure III.7. Absolute Numbers of Peripheral Blood T and B Lymphocytes fran Bovine Leukenia Virus Infected Aleukemic and Persistent Lymphocytotic Cattle 13 Table III. 1. Statisical Analysis of VJBC and Lymphocyte Counts from Bovine Leukemia Virus Infected Cattle BLV* Status T Value Degrees of Freedom P Value WBC BLV (-) Vs BLV (AL) 4.942 29 '0.005 BLV (-) VS BLV (PL) 3.322 30 0.005 BLV (-) Vs BLV (AL) 5.439 28 0.005 BLV (-) VS BLV (PL) 3.268 29 0.005 Lymphoc\rtes BLV (-) = Cattle with no detectable serum antibodies to BLV antigens using- iitmunodiffusion test. BLV (AL) - Cattle with detectable serum antibodies to to BLV antigens but have no clinical signs of disease. BLV (PL) = Cattle with detectable serum antibodies to BLV antigens and have persistent lymphocytosis. Table III. 2. Frequencies of T and B Lymphocytes from the Peripheral Blood of Bovine Leukemia Virus Infected Cattle * BLV Status No. of Animals Percent o£^Positive Lymphocytes % T % B ** PNA B26a SIg SIgM BLV (AL) 4 82 + 6+ 66 ± 9 16 + 11 21 + 13 BLV (PL) 3 45+3 53 + 16 58 + 11 BLV (-) 4 79 + 11 56 + 12 26 +, 6 26 + 7 1 44 + 11 57 + 6 77 ± 11 632++ 34+6 87 + 7 * BLV Status indicates: BLV (-) = Cattle negative for BLV antibodies. BLV (AL) = Cattle positive for BLV antibodies but no clinical signs. BLV (PL) - Cattle positive for BLV antibodies and have persistent lymphocytosis. ** Frequency of T lymphocytes detected by peanut agglutinin (PNA) and monoclonal antibodies to pan T cells using microfluorimetry. Frequency of Blymphocytes detected by rabbit anti-bovine IgG (h & L chains specific) (F(ab’)2 fragments and monoclonal antibodies to surface bound IgM using microfluorimetry. + Mean ar standard deviation ++ PL animal with high lymphocyte count. 58 Table III. 3. Statistical Analysis of T and B Lymphocytes frctn Bovine Leukemia Virus Infected Cattle BLV* Status T Value Degrees of Freedom P Value T Lymphocytes BLV (-) vs BLV (AL) 5.599 12 0.005 BLV (-) vs BLV (PL) 5.382 14 0.005 BLV (-) vs BLV (AL) 0.132 14 BLV (-) vs BLV (PL) 6.250 12 B Lymphocytes ** N.S. 0.005 * BLV (-) = Cattle with no detectable serum antibodies • to BLV antigens using immunodiffusion test. BLV (AL) = Cattle with detectable serum antibodies to BLV antigens but have no clinical signs of disease. BLV (PL) = Cattle with detectable serum antibodies to BLV antigens and have persistent lymphocytosis. ** Not significant at the level P = 0.1. CHAPTER IV: PURIFICATION OF T LYMPHOCYTES FROM BOVINE PERIPHERAL BLOOD MONONUCLEAR CELLS USING IMHUNO AFFINITY DEPLETION (“PANNING") IV. A. INTRODUCTION It has been documented that B lymphocytes are target cells for bovine leukemia virus (BLV), the etiologic agent of enzootic bovine leukosis (EBL> (8,108,75). The role that T lymphocytes play in the disease process is unknown. It was demonstrated that there is an increase in the number of circulating T lymphocytes in BLV-infected aleukemic (AL> and "s. persistent'lymphocytotic (PL) animals (Chapter III). Purified T lymphocyte populations are necessary to determine the significance of this increase in the progression of EBL. There are numerous techniques for purification of T lymphocytes from human and mouse peripheral blood (£4,86,134). However, no techniques are currently available for the efficient separation of large quantities of bovine lymphocyte subsets. Purification of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) is done routinely by centrifugation on ficoll of density 1‘.077 g/ml (146). Attempts to accomplish further separation of bovine T lymphocyte subsets using various techniques have failed to give reproducible separation results. Purification of bovine T lymphocytes by nylon wool adherence has given high purity of these cells, 59 6D however the yield of purified cells uias less than 37. of the original cells applied (121). Antibody-complement immunolysis has been used to selectively deplete B lymphocytes from PBMC of cattle and enrich the T lymphocyte population but recoveries are also law (146). The efficient separation of murine T lymphocytes has been reported using plastic surfaces coated with anti-murine immunoglobulin antibodies. This technique is referred to as immuno-affinity depletion ('panning") (92). This technique has' £-iven good yields of highly purified murine T lymphocytes. Polystyrene surfaces have also been employed as an insoluble matrix for the affinity reagents used to separate lymphocyte subpopulations from other species (95jl63). A procedure using “panning" has not been reported for the efficient separation of bovine T lymphocytes. Surface markers have been used to identify bovine lymphocytes (Refer to Chapter III). Those cells staining with anti-bovine immunoglobulin conjugated with fluorescein isothiocyanate (slg-bearing cells) are suggested to be B lymphocytes (B5*55)» and those staining with peanut agglutinin conjugated with fluorescein isothiocyanate (PNAFITC), T lymphocytes (124*55). The purpose of the present investigation was to explore the application of "panning" to enrich T lymphocytes from the PBMC of BLV— infected cattle so that large numbers of these cells could be obtained for further testing. The "panning" technique is based on the fact that bovine B 61 lymphocytes have immunogiobulin <Ig> on their cell surfaces and that bovine T lymphocytes do not. Therefore* plastic surfaces coated uiith anti-bovine Ig will specifically bind and therefore deplete B lymphocytes from PBMC. The T lymphocytes can then be recovered from the nonadherent cell fraction. IV. 3. MATERIALS AND METHODS IV. B. 1. Isolation of Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells Forty ml of peripheral blood were obtained by venipuncture of the Jugular vein from adult AL cows (Y 12* Y 32, Y 74) and BLV-negative cows (R 52, R 56) Chapter VIII). (Refer to The blood was diluted in an equal volume of phosphate buffered saline (FBS), pH 7.4. Twenty ml of diluted blood were layered on 20 ml of Histopaque" (density 1.077 g/ml) (Sigma* U.S.A.), in 50 ml polypropylene* conical centrifuge tubes (Costar* U.S.A.) and centrifuged at 1000 x g for 30 min at 25 C. Cells at the interface between the plasma and Histopaque" phases were removed with sterile Pasteur pipettes* washed twice with PBS <500 x g for 10 min at 25 C), pooled and resuspended in 2 ml PBS. Cell viability was determined by the trypan blue exclusion test* and the cell suspension was diluted to a concentration of 2.0 x IQ7 cells in PBS. diagram.) (Refer to Figure III.l. for a flow 62 IV. B. 2. Coating Plastic Flasks with Immunogiobulin To coat polystyrene tissue culture flasks with antibovine Ig a previously described procedure (92) was used with the following modifications. Two ml (2.5 mg/ml) of F ( a b ')s fragments of rabbit anti— bovine IgG, heavy and light chains specific (anti— bovine Ig) (Cappeli U.S.A.) were added to each 25 cm2 polystyrene tissue culture flask (Costar, U.S.A.). The concentration of anti-bovine Ig was critical? if less than 5 mg per flask were used* the yield and purity of the T lymphocyte preparation were low. The flasks were incubated on a level table for 19-24 hours at 4 C to optimize Ig binding. Immediately before use* the unbound anti-bQvine Ig was transferred to a new, sterile flask which was then stored at 4 C for future use. The Ig-coated flask was then washed four times, each time with 5 ml PB5. IV. B. 3. Affinity **Panning" Procedure The PBMC were gently agitated to assure a single cell suspension. coated flask. Two ml (4.0 x 107 cells) were added to an IgThe flask was placed on a level table and gently swirled to assure even distribution of the cells over the entire dish. After incubation for 15 min at 25 C, the nonadherent cells were carefully resuspended by rocking the flask, then removed with a pipette and washed twice with PBS (500 x g for 10 min at 25 C). Maximum binding of cells to precoated surfaces was determined to occur within fifteen minutes of incubation at 25 C. Longer incubation times did not increase the cell binding capacity. Shorter incubation 63 periods resulted in lower T lymphocyte yield and higher slg— bearing cell contamination. Cell viability was determined by trypan blue exclusion test, and the cells were resuspended to a concentration of 10 x ID*" viable cells/ml in PBS to prepare for quantitation of lymphocyte subsets and monocytes. (Refer to Figure IV. 1. for a flow diagram.) IV. B. 4. Determination of Lymphocyte Subsets and Monocytes For detection of contamination with slg bearing cells, nonadherent cells were incubated with fluorescein-conjugated F(ad')a fragments of rabbit anti-bovine IgG, heavy and light chains specific <Rablg-FITC>, (Cappel, U.S.A). To detect T lymphocytes, nonadherent cells were incubated with PNA-FITC (E.Y. Laboratories, U.S.A.). Approximately, 0.3 ml (3.0 x 10^ ) cells were mixed with either 0.1 ml <0.74 mg/ml) of Rablg-FITC or 0.1 ml (2.5 mg/ml) PNA-FITC. The cells were incubated for 30 minutes at 4 C then washed twice (500 x g for 10 min at 25 C) with 1 ml of PBS containing 0.02% NaN3 . This concentration of NaN? was used to insure that capping and shedding of Igs did not occur on the slgbearing cells. Rablg-FITC and PNA-FITC positive cells were enumerated by counting 200 cells at 1000 x magnification with the aid of a fluorescent microscope equipped for phase contrast and incident UV light i 11 uniin at ion (Leitz, Germany). The detection of monocytes in the nonadherent cell population was accomplished by using a nonspecific esterase staining 64 procedure (83). IV. C. RESULTS IV. C. 1. T Lymphocyte Vield after "Panning* The results Df T lymphocyte recovery or yield after ■panning* using the PBMC of coins are summarized in Figure IV. 2. An average of 31 x 10** PNA-positive (T lymphocytes) were added to an anti— Ig coated flask. 15 minutes, After incubation for the T lymphocyte recovery in the nonadherent fraction averaged 15 x 10** cells. This was an average yield of 48%. IV. C. 2. T Lymphocyte Enrichment and B Lymphocyte Depletion The results of T lymphocyte enrichment from PBMC using ■panning* are summarized in Figure IV. 3. After separation on a density gradient of HistopaqueR , the PBMC fraction consisted of an average of 77% T lymphocytes. After “panning", the nonadherent cell fraction was composed of an average of 95% T lymphccyte population. An average of 85% of the slg-bearing cells were depleted from the PBMC using "panning" (Fig. IV. 4). B lymphocytes accounted for an average 3% of the contaminating cells in the nonadherent fractions. The rest of the cells were not identified by the methods used and were assumed to be null cells. Non—specific esterase— positive cells (monocytes) were not detected in the nonadherent cell 65 fractions. IV. D. DISCUSSION An affinity depletion technique for the efficient enrichment of bovine T lymphocytes from peripheral blood has been described. Antibodies to bovine Igs attached to polystyrene tissue culture flasks mere used to separate slgbearing cells from T lymphocytes. The T lymphocyte yield and purity using "panning" on the PBMC of cattle is higher than any method previously reported. For example* the use of nylon wool adherence to deplete B lymphocytes from PBMC resulted in high T lymphocyte purity (96%) but low cell recovery (2.5%) in the nonadherent fraction (121). However* the use of "panning" resulted in a 95% T lymphocyte purity and 48% recovery. This technique gave reproducible results with BLVinfected AL animals (Y 12* Y 32 and Y 74) and BLV-negative control animals (R 52 and R 54) which had normal white cell counts in the range of 6.8-9.B x lCF/mm3 in whole blood and 52—64% lymphocytes (121). “Panning" did not give good yields (< 10%) of purified T lymphocytes from PBMC of BLVinfected cattle which exhibited a persistent B cell lymphocytosis (PL). These animals typically had elevated WBC (> 7.5 x lCP/mm3 in whole blood). They also had a high percentage of lymphocytes (> 50%)* of which the majority 60%) were slg-bearing cells. (> When PBMC from these animals were added to an anti-Ig coated flasks, the number of slgbearing cell binding sites on the flask apparently became saturated* and the nonadherent cell fraction mas highly contaminated with slg-bearing cells. Therefore, in order to obtain an efficient T lymphocyte recovery with high purity, modification of the above procedure was attempted. A second ■panning" step to remove the slg— bearing cells not bound by the first "panning" was employed. This technique did not give good yields of highly purified T lymphocytes. 0 trier separation techniques such as B lymphocyte depletion by antibody, complement-mediated cytolysis (14&), and separation on PercollR density gradients as well as affinity column chromatography using Affi-Gel anti—FITC columns < BioRad, U.S.A.) were used to attempt to purify T lymphocytes from the PBMC of PL cattle. No procedure gave good yields of purified T lymphocytes from these animals. The affinity "panning" for efficient enrichment of bovine T lymphocytes from PBMC of normal and AL cattle was a simple, reproducible method that gave a highly purified, viable T cell population in as little as two hours. The procedure used a minimal amount of reagents, and the unbound anti— Ig could be transferred and used up to three times without loss of T lymphocyte purity or yield. The technique yielded 20-40 >: ID*5* T lymphocytes from 40 ml of whole blood. 67 ADD 2 ML (2.5 MG/ML) F(AB’)2 FRAGMENTS OF ANTI-BOVINE IgG H&L CHAINS SPECIFIC INCUBATE 18 H AT 4°C ........ s REMOVE UNBOUND IgG WASH X 4 - 5 ML PBS ADD 2 ML (4 .0 X 107) PBMC INCUBATE X 15 MIN AT 2 5 °C TO BIND IgG BEARING CELLS (B CELLS) NONADHERENT CELLS (T CELLS) GENTLY AGITATE WASH X 2 WITH PBS ( 5 0 0 X G FOR 1 0 MIN ) Figure IV . 1. Procedure f o r T Lymphocyte P u r if ic a tio n using "Panning". 68 40 A verage C l 31 B efore 30 ■ 15 A fter 20 T-C ells X 10“ CO 10 R52 R56 Y12 Y32 Y74 A nim al N u m b er Figure IV.2. T Lymphocyte Yield after "Panning" of Bovine Peripheral Blood Honnuclear Cells using AntiBovine Immunoglobulin Coated Flasks 69 T -C ells A verage Percent A fter R52 R56 yi2 Y32. Y74 A nim al N u m b er Figure IV.3. T Lymphocyte Enrichment by "Panning"of Bovine Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells using Anti-Bovine Immunoglobulin Coated Flasks. 70 25 A verage □ 20 20 Percent B -C ells B efore 15 A fter 10 R52 R56 Y 12 Y32 Y74 A nim al N u m b er Figure IV.4. Depletion of B Lymphocytes by "Panning" of Bovine Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells using Anti-Bovine Immunoglobulin Coated Flasks. CHAPTER V: ASSESSMENT OF THE PRESENCE OF BLV PROVIRUS IN THE T LYMPHOCYTES OF BLV-INFECTED* ALEUKEMIC CATTLE V. A. INTRODUCTION The bovine leukemia virus (BLV)* an exogenous (14) leukemogenic virus of the family Retroviridae* has been implicated as the etiologic agent of enzootic bovine leukosis (EBL) (108). This virus may infect cattle and not produce any clinical signs of disease. referred to as aleukemic (AL) cattle. These animals are The virus may also induce two clinical manifestations of diseasepersistent lymphocytosis (PL) or malignant lymphosarcoma (LS) Since* EBL is a neoplasm of the lymphoid system* (46). cells of the lymphocyte lineage were the first candidates to be suspected as preferred BLV targets. This was shown to be correct by demonstration of BLV production in vitro from cultures of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) from BLV-infected cattle (108). Also* molecular hybridization analysis using a single-stranded BLV cDNA probe for detection of BLV proviral sequences in the white blood cells of PL cattle confirmed the presence of BLV in the lymphocytes of these animals (76). By using the nylon wool separation procedure to fractionate the B and non—B populations of bovine peripheral blood and subsequent in vitro cultivation of these cells* was shown that the capacity to produce C-type particles resided with the B lymphocytes (124). 71 it 72 It was also found that the majority of lymphocytes present in the peripheral blood of PL and LS cattle and in had markers typical of B lymphocytes (110,85,72). tumors This information led to the conclusion that the B lymphocyte is the target cell of BLV infection. A recent study indicated that lymphoblastoid-l ike cells derived from two EBL tumors had cell surface markers typical of T lymphocytes and that the cells from these cultures contained BLV provirus (91). It has been demonstrated that there is an increase in the absolute number of T lymphocytes in AL and PL animals (Chapter 111). the peripheral blood of These studies suggest that T lymphocytes of BLV-infected animals may either be infected by BLV or are responding to the presence of the virus or viral proteins. Definitive studies on highly purified T lymphocyte populations from the peripheral blood of animals with AL or PL have not been conducted. The main reason that this research has not been done is that purification techniques which yield large quantities of highly purified T lymphocyte preparations have not been available. A technique using immuno-affinity depletion "panning* to deplete B lymphocytes from PBMC of cattle has recently been reported (Chapter IV, ld»l). This technique gives good yields of highly purified bovine T lymphocytes from AL but not PL animals. The purpose of this investigation was to assess the presence of the BLV provirus in the DNA of immuno—affinity purified bovine T lymphocytes from AL cattle using DNA hybridization with a highly specific* nick-translated 3ap— BLV-DNA cloned probe. V- B. MATERIALS AND METHODS V. B. 1. Animals A total of 7 animals were used in this study (R 52* 73* Y 12* Y 32* Y 74, Y 75 and B 10). (For more details refer to Chapter VIII and Table VIII. 1.) Y The cattle were examined clinically and hematologically for signs of bovine leukosis using the guidelines of the International Conference of Bovine Leukosis (2). BLV infection was monitored by detection of serum antibodies to Bi_V structural antigens using the agar gel immunodiffusion assay (33). Of the 7 animals* 2 were BLV-negative* 4 were AL and 1 one was a PL animal. V. B. 2. Isolation of PBMC Large quantities of cells were required <1 x 10B cells) for DNA purification. Therefore* 5DD ml of peripheral blood were collected by venipuncture into vacuum bottles containing Panheparinw * 10 units/ml whole blood (Abbott Laboratories, U.S.A.). The heparinized blood was then diluted in an equal volume of phosphate buffered saline (PBS)* p H 7.4. Twenty ml aliquots were layered onto equal volumes of sodium diatrizoate/ficol1 * 1.077 g/ml (Histopaque** 1077* Sigma Chemical Co. * U.S.A. ) in 50 cc conical centrifuge tubes (Costar* U.S.A.). The gradients 74 uere centrifuged for 30 min at 1000 x g at room temperature. The bands at the interface between the plasma layer and HistopaqueR were collected and washed twice in PBS at 500 x g for 10 min at room temperature. Viability counts were performed using the trypan blue exclusion method. The lymphocyte preparation usually contained greater than 7b5i viable cells. V. B. 3. (Refer to Figure III. 1 for flow diagram). Purification of T Lymphocytes The T lymphocytes were purified from PBMC of BLV— negative and AL cattle by immuno—affinity depletion ("panning*)i a method previously described (Refer to Chapter IV.). Briefly* 4 x IG'7’ PBMC were added to each of six 25 cm2 * polystyrene tissue culture flasks (Costar* U.S.A.). These flasks had been previously coated with 5 mg of F(ab')2 fragments of rabbit anti— bovine IgG* H and L chains specific (anti—bov IgG) (Cappel* U.S.A.)* and incubated for at least IB hours at 4 C. The unbound anti-bov IgG was then removed* and the coated flasks were washed x 4 with 5 ml of PBS. The cells were incubated in the immunoglobulin-coated flasks at 25 C for 15 min. After incubation* the nonadherent cells were carefully resuspended by rocking the flask* then removed with a pipette and washed twice with PBS. Figure IV. 2. for flow diagram). (Refer to The nonadherent cell preparation usually contained 40-502 of the original number of cells applied. V. B. 4. Determination of Lymphocyte Subsets and Monocytes For detection of B lymphocytes in PBMC and purified T lymphocyte preparations, 3 x 10** cells were mixed with 100 ul CO.74 mg/ml) of fluorescein— conjugated F(ab')2 fragments of rabbit anti— bovine IgG* H and L chains specific (RablgFITC) (Cappel* U.S.A.). This marker has been shown to be highly specific for bovine B lymphocytes (refer to Chapter III). For detection of T lymphocytes! nonadherent cells were mixed with 100 ul (2.5 mg/ml) of fluorescein-conjugated peanut agglutinin—FITC (PNA-FITC) (Cappelf U.S.A.). This marker has been shown to label bovine T lymphocytes (Refer to Chapter III). All cell preparations were incubated for 30 minutes at 4 C* then washed twice with 1 ml of PBS containing 0.02% NaN3 to prevent antibody capping. Fluorescence-positive cells were enumerated by counting 200 cells at 1000 x magnification with the aid of a fluorescent microscope equipped for phase contrast and incident UV light illumination (Leitz* Germany). The detection of monocytes in the T lymphocyte preparations was accomplished by using the nonspecific esterase staining procedure <63). V. B. 5. DNA Purification DNA purification of PBMC and T lymphocyte preparations was performed as previously described with the following modifications (101). Briefly* 1 x 10s cells were lysed in DNA lysing medium (10 mM Tris buffer pH 7.4* lOmM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTAf 0.1 M NaCl* 1.0% Sarcosyl and 10D ug/ml Protease K* Sigma Chemical Co U.S.A.). The lysate was digested for 45 min. at 37 C then either promptly extracted or frozen at —70 C. The lysates were extracted 2 x with equal volumes of chloroform:isoamyl alcohol mixture (24:1) (centrifuged 2*500 x g for 20 min at 25 C). The chloroform was removed by two cycles of ether extraction using an equal volume of H20 saturated ether. Residual chloroform and ether was removed by heating the preparation to 6B C for 10 min. The salt concentration of the DNA preparation was adjusted to 0.5 M NaCl. The DNA was ethanol precipitated with two volumes of ethanol for at least 2 hrs at -20 C. The precipitate was pelleted at 15*000 x g for 15 min at 4 C and resuspended in 1-2, ml Tris EDTA (TLE) buffer (lOmM Tris, pH 7.4 and 0.1 M EDTA). The concentration of DNA was assessed by spectrophotometric means using 0D2M3 for DNA concentration quantitation and 0D2 M ,/0D2OO ratio as an estimate of purity (135). One optical density at 260nm was equal to 50ug of DNA. A ratio of from 1.8 to 2.0 (0D2<>o/0D2tsc,) was considered of good purity. The DNA was stored at —20 C until used. (Refer to Figure V. 1. for flow diagram.) V. B. 6. Restriction Endonuclease Digestion and Gel Electrophoresis Sac 1 restriction endonuclease (R.E.) (Cooper Biomedical* U.S.A.) digestions were carried out on the bovine PBMC and T lymphocyte DNA's using the following method. Approximately 5 ug of DNA was mixed with 5 ul of ID X Sac 1 buffer <60 mM NaCl, 6D mM Tris, pH 7.4, 60 mM 77 MgCl, 60 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, and 100 ug/rol bovine serum albumin), 5 ul of Sac 1 R.E. a 50 ul reaction mixture. hr at 37 C. (10 units/ul), and H^O to make This mixture was incubated for 2 After digestion was complete, 5 ul of DNA loading dye (0.25% bromophenol blue, 0.25% xylene cyanol, and 15% ficoll type 400) was added tD the digests. The reaction mixtures were loaded into individual wells of horizontal, 0.7% agarose (SeaChem agarose FMC U.S.A.) slab gels. The Hind III digest of lambda DNA and the Haelll fragments of 0X174 RF DNA (New England BioLabs, MA) were used as molecular-weight markers. Sac 1 digest of DNA from the fetal lamb kidney cell line which is persistently infected with BLV (FL.K—BLV) (153) as well as DNA from PBMC of PL animal B ID were used as BLV-DNA positive controls. Sac 1 digests from PBMC and purified T lymphocyte preparations from BLV-negatiive cows were used as negative controls. The DNA was electrophoresed in Tris acetate buffer (TAE) (0.04 M Tris acetate and 0.002 M EDTA). at 30 V for 16 hr at 25 C. The gel was then stained for 30 min using ethidium bromide (EtBr) (5 ug/ml) and photographed using long wave UV light illumination and Polaroid Type 57 film. V. B. 7. Gel Transfer DNA fragments were transferred from agarose gels to nitrocellulose filters using the Southern transfer technique (137). Nitrocellulose filters were then dried for 2 hr at 60 C in a vacuum oven. V. B. 8. BLV-DNA Probe The BLV DNA probe was provided by Dr. James Casey (Frederick Cancer Res. Inst. Fredrick* MD . ) as a cloned provirus probe consisting of an EcoRl fragment of FLK-BLV DNA which contained almost the entire BLV provirus excluding the 3' long terminal repeat and included 20D base pairs of cellular flanking sequence DNA (Fig. V. 2). This fragment was ligated into a PUC-S vector plasmid and cloned in E. coli HB101. This probe hybridized to the 7.5 kilobase (Kb) fragment of the BLV-provirus DNA in BLV-infected lymphocytes but hybridization also occurred with a variety of other fragments in these DNAs and in BLV—negative control animals. Therefore* the cloned probe was further purified as described below. The BLV-DNA probe (ID ug) was digested with Sac 1 to purify almost the entire BLV proviral genome as a 7.5 Kb fragment ( Fig. V. 2). ' The R.E. fragments were then separated by agarose gel electrophoresis using a 0.7'i horizontal agarose gel at 30 V for 16 hr in TAE buffer. The gel was then stained with EtBr to visualize the R. E. fragments. A 2 mm wide trough was cut in front of the leading edge of the 7.5 Kb fragment* and the trough was filled with electrophoresis buffer. The band was then observed by UV light as it was electroeluted from the gel into the trough at 200 V. Every 30 to 40 seconds the fluid from the trough was recovered* and the trough was refilled with fresh buffer. Electrophoresis was then continued until all the DNA in the band was removed from the gel and was 79 recovered in the fluid taken from the trough (Fig. V. 3). The probe was further purified of contaminating gel components by ion—exchange chromatography using a nucleic acids chromatography column (NACS P R E P A C ™ mini-column) (Bethesda Research Laboratories* MA). The DNA mas precipitated in two volumes of cold ethanol at -20 C for 2 hr and then pelleted at 15*000 x g* 15 min* A C. The pellet was resuspended in 20 ul TLE. V. B. 9. Nick Translation of BLV-DNA Probe The BLV-DNA probe was radiolabelled with a-32P labelled deoxycytosine triphosphate (dCTP Ca-^^Pl) by nicktranslation using a Nick Translation Kit” (Cooper Biomedical* PA). Briefly* 2 ug of BLV-DNA* 5 ul of nick translation buffer* 1 ul of each of dATP* dTTP and dGTP* 10 ul of dCTP Ca—33rP3 (10 mCi/ml) (New England Nuclear* MA), 2 ul of DNAase 1/ DNA polymerase I mixture and H^O were added to make a 50 ul reaction mixture. The mixture was incubated at 18 C for 1 hour* and the reaction stopped with 20 mM EDTA. The unincorporated isotope was removed from the nick- translated DNA using gel filtration chromatography using a MINI—SPIN” column (Cooper Biomedical, PA). This column consisted of a pre— hydrated* prepacked column of Sephadex* G-50. The nick-translated probe was then dissociated into single-stranded DNA by the addition of 1/10**' volume of 2 M NaOH. The specific activity of the radiolabelled probe was determined by scintillation counting of the probe using Hz0 as a scintillation medium (Packard Tricarb Scintillation ea Counters USA). V. B. 9. Filter Hybridization Nitrocellulose filters were prehybridized in hybridization mixture (103) for 48 hr at 37 C. Hybridization was carried out by adding 1.5 x ID7 cpm of the single-strandedt nick translated 33P-BLV DNA cloned probe in B ml of hybridization buffer. The filters were wrapped in SaranR wrap and once in aluminum foil. incubated for 48 hr at 37 C* x 2 The filters were washed for 1 hr in a .high salt solution <2x SSC and 0.5% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) at 37 C and for 2 hr in a low salt solution (0-lx SSC and 0.5% SDS) (104) at 45 C. V. B 10. Filters were dried at 60 C for 1 hr. Autoradiography Filters were exposed at -70 C to Kodak X RP-5 X—Omat film in the presence of 2 Cronexj Lightning Plus'S intensifying screens (Dupont( U.S.A.) for 2-5 days. The exposed film was then developed using a Kodak X-Omat Processor (Kodak T U S A ). V. C. RESULTS V. C. 1. Purity of T Lymphocyte Preparations The frequency of T and B lymphocytes in the PBMC and purified T lymphocyte preparations used for DNA hybridization analysis can be found in Table V. 1. The frequency of T lymphocytes in the PBMC of AL and BLVnegative control animals ranged from 69 to 89%. The 81 frequency of B lymphocytes in the PBMC of these animals ranged from 15 to 23%. In the purified T lymphocyte preparations* frequencies of T lymphocytes ranged from 91 to 97%* and frequencies of B lymphocytes ranged from 0 to 4%. Based on 1 x 10s cells (quantity of cells iysed for DNA purification) the absolute number of contaminating B lymphocytes were estimated for each DNA preparation. Animals Y 12 and Y 74 were assumed to have no B lymphocytes in their purified T lymphocyte preparations* whereas* in the PBMC of these animals there were 5 x 10* and 13 x 10* B lymphocytes* respectively. In the purified T lymphocyte preparation of animal Y 75* there were 3 x 10* B lymphocytes f versus 23 x 10* B lymphocytes found in the PBMC of this animal. In the T lymphocyte preparation of animal Y 32* there were 4 x 10* Blymphocytes versus 27 x 10* B lymphocytes found in the PBMC of this animal. V. C. 2. Agarose Gel Electrophoresis Results of the agarose gel electrophoresis of R. E. fragments show that test DNA was present in relatively equal concentrations in each of the lanes of the gel. Also* the enzyme Sac 1 effectively digested the DNA's as evidenced by detection of the highly repetitive DNA sequences (Fig. V. 3) V. C. 3. DNA Hybridization Analysis As shown in Figures V. 5 & 6* ^“ P-labeled BLV DNA hybridized on the 7.5 Kb Sac 1 fragment from the PBMC of all BLV-positive AL and PL cattle and the FLK-BLV positive control DNA. No hybridization was observed to the DNA fragments from BLV—negative cattle. DNA from the purified T lymphocyte preparations of 3 AL animals (Y 74, Y 75, and Y 32) were positive for hybridization on the 7.5 Kb Sac 1 fragment with the BLV-DNA probe. The quantity of DNA which hybridized with the probe appeared to be much lower in the purified T lymphocyte DNA preparations than in the respective PBMC DNA preparations because the respective bands on the autoradiographs were much less dense than those of the PBMC DNA preparations. Cow Y 74 contained no detectable B lymphocytes in the purified T lymphocyte preparation but its DNA gave a positive hybridization signal with the BLV-DNA probe. Cow Y 12 which also contained no detectable B lymphocytes in the purified T lymphocyte preparation gave negative hybridization results. V. D. DISCUSSION The purpose of this study was to determine if bovine T lymphocytes were targets for BLV infection. Results from the experiments reported herein suggest that bovine T lymphocytes of some AL cattle contain the BLV provirus. The BLV provirus was detected in the DNA of PBMC from all AL animals and also in the DNA of 3 of 4 purified T lymphocyte preparations from AL animals. Two of the T lymphocyte preparations which gave positive hybridization results contained only small amounts of contaminating B lymphocytes (3 and 4%). It has been well documented that the B lymphocyte is a target for BLV infection (45,108,121). Therefore, it is possible that the positive hybridization results obtained from the DNA of these 2 cel) preparations were due to the DNA from contaminating BLV-infected B lymphocytes. Less than 25% of B lymphocytes from BLV- infected animal5 have been shown to produce viral particles or display viral antigens on their cell surfaces after short term incubation (121,73). Therefore, less than 10 x 10s BLV-infected B lymphocytes were possibly present in the purified T lymphocyte preparations. It is possible that this amount of BLV-infected lymphocyte DNA can give a hybridization signal because of the sensitivity of the solid Phase hybridization procedure. The sensitivity of the solid phase DNA hybridization assay is such that it can detect 1 proviral copy in 10. (personal communication Dr. James Casey, National Cancer Institute, Fredrick, tiD). When comparisons of the percentage of B lymphocyte DNA in the purified T lymphocyte preparations and the percentage of B lymphocyte DNA in the PBMC of the same animals were made with their respective hybridization signals on the autoradiographs, it appeared that the signals generated by the purified T lymphocyte DNA preparations were greater than what would be expected if only B lymphocytes contained the BLV provirus. One purified T lymphocyte preparation (animal Y 74) contained no detectable B lymphocytes. The DNA from this cell preparation gave positive hybridization results. It is possible that a population of slg- B lymphocytes exists in cattle* but this has not been reported. The marker used in this study to enumerate bovine B lymphocytes has been shown to be highly specific for bovine peripheral blood B lymphocytes (55*90*85). The lymphocyte surface marker profile of this animal appeared normal using flow microfluorimetry (FMF) (Chapter III). Monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) against surface bound IgM (PIg45a> and Rablg-FITC markers for B lymphocyte enumeration and MAbs against T lymphocyte surface antigens and PNA receptors for T lymphocyte enumeration were used in the FMF assays (Chapter III). One additional AL animal (Y 12) had no detectable B lymphocytes in the purified T lymphocyte preparation. However* the DNA from this preparation' gave no hybridization with the BLV—DNA probe. The DNA of the PBMC from this animal gave a weaker hybridization signal than the DNA from other AL animals and this indicated that fewer cells contained the BLV provirus. The BLV-infected T lymphocytes may have been depleted in the “panning* procedure since the average yield of T lymphocytes from “panning" is 48 % of the original number of T lymphocytes applied to the “panning" flask (Refer to Figure VI. 2). Another possibility is that not all AL animals have detectable levels of BLV-infected T lymphocytes. This study documents the first attempt to assess the presence of the BLV provirus in highly purified peripheral blood T lymphocyte populations from BLV-infected AL cattle. Hybridization studies reported to date using highly specific BLV-DNA probes and buffy coat preparations or PBMC* demonstrated that the BLV provirus was present in the lymphocyte population (75*76). It was also shown that the ability to produce C-type viral particles resided with the B lymphocyte subset (121). However* definitive studies on highly purified peripheral blood lymphocyte subsets had not been reported. A recent report showed that lymphoblastoid- like cells derived from two EBL tumors not only had markers of the T lymphocyte lineage but also contained the BLV provirus (91). Therefore, it appeared that bovine T lymphocyte population of BLV-infected animals may be infected with the BLV provirus. The results of this study suggest that the B lymphocyte is the major target cell of BLV infection in the AL animal. After B lymphocytes were depleted from PBMC using "panning" with anti-bovine Ig* the amount of DNA in the "panned” cell preparation which hybridized with the 32P BLV—DNA probe was greatly reduced. This indicates that a large number of BLV- infected cells (B lymphocytes) were removed by the "panning” procedure. This study also suggests that the BLV provirus can be detected in the DNA of T lymphocytes of some AL animals. It appears that only a small number of these cells are infected by the virus* as evidenced by the weak hybridization signal from the purified T lymphocyte DNA preparations. Therefore, BLV may infect only a subpopulation of T lymphocytes in the peripheral blood of AL animals. Infection of this cell population may alter function of these cells and thereby facilitate the transition from the AL to PL stage of EBL. Possibly* infection of the T lymphocytes is a prerequisite for the progression to the PL state. In order to address this hypothesis* purified T lymphocytes from PL animals must be screened for BLV provirus. The purification techniques which were used in this study for T lymphocyte purification were not applicable to PBMC of PL animals (Refer to Chapter IV). This was probablly due to the very low frequencies of T lymphocytes present in the PBMC preparations. The question of whether BLV infects cells of the T lymphocyte lineage is of importance for the use of EBL as a model for the viral-incuced human adult T cell leukemia (ATL) associated with human T cell leukemia virus (HTLV I) (162). Many aspects of the disease induced by HTLV I parallel those of EBL (162*121). chronic. The disease is typically Lymphocytosis occurs in some cases as do immunodefficiencies. Lymphoma occurs in a small percentage of infected individuals. A major difference between ATL and EBL is that the target cell of HTLV I appears to be the T lymphocyte and the major target cell of BLV appears to be the B lymphocyte (162* 121). The data presented here indicate that bovine T lymphocytes may also act as targets for infection by BLV and therefore* this information may contribute to the BLV model of HTLV— induced leukemogenesis. 87 PURIFIED CELLS (T CELLS + PBMC) © LYSED CELLS WITH DNA LYSING MEDIUM ^ ®.DIGESTED DNA PURIFICATION: CHLOROFORM EXTRACTED X 2 ETHER EXTRACTED X 1 ETHANOL PRECIPITATED ~)Z Z Z Z-Z' ~)ZZ Z Z DNA WITH R.E. SAC 1 U'UU u u u u ©SEPARATED R.E, FRAGMENTS BY AGAROSE GEL ELECTROPHORESIS BLOTTED DNA ONTO NITROCELLULOSE PAPER ©HYBRIDIZED WITH 3 2 P LABELED BLV-DNA PROBE (S u pplied by Dr. Jim C a se y ) AUTORADIOGRAPHY Figure V . l . Procedure f o r D etectio n o f Bovine Leukemia Virus P ro viru s in the P e rip h e ra l Blood Mononuclear C e lls and P u r ifie d T Lymphocytes o f Bovine Leukemia Virus In fe c te d C a ttle 88 Kb 3 2 I * Sac1 T 4 — i- Bam 7 -i. Bam Y i Pst1 5 _i_ T I Bgl1 8 Bam S a c 1 S a c 1 |R 1 v T TT r — A A Bgl1 Bgl1 - Figure V .2 . Bovine Leukemia Virus P rovirus R e s tr ic tio n Enzyme Hap 89 B L V DNA PROBE M.W. MARKERS 7.5 Kb BEFORE ELECTROELHTION 7.5 Kb AFTER ELECTROELOTION Figure V.3. Purification of BLV DNA Probe Using Electroelution of BLV DNA Sac 1 Fragment from an Agarose Gel. 90 Figure V.4. Gel Electrophoresis of Sac 1 Restriction Enzyme Fragments of Lymphocyte DNA. BLV (PL) (AL) (AL) B 10 PBMC Y 74 T Lymph Y 74 PBMC (AL) (-) (AL) status] FLK BLV Y 75 R 52 T Lymph PBMC Y 75 PBMC — A^ « 4.-5? * f *§sv'r- , Figure V.5. DNA Hybridization Analysis of Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells and Purified T Lymphocytes from Bovine Leukemia Virus-Infected Cattle Using a -*2p BLV-DNA Probe. 7.5 Kb BLV STATUS J FLK BLV (PL) (— ) (AL) B 10 PBMC R 52 PBMC Y 32 Y 32 Y 73 Y 73 Y 12 P BMC T Lymph PBMC T Lymph T Lymph (AL) (— ) (— ) (AL) (AL) Y 12 'PBMC 7.5 Kb ^ 4 Figure V. 6. DNA Hybridization Analysis of Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells and Purified T Lymphocytes from Bovine Leukemia Virus-Infected Cattle Using a 33p BLV-DNA P r o b e . v£> ro 93 Table V. 1 — Frequencies of T and B Lymphocytes for DNA Hybridization Analysis Animal No. Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells % T a B L V (AL)c Y 74 % B b Purified T Lymphocytes % T % B 79 13 97 0 Y 75 76 23 91 3 Y 32 69 27 95 4 Y 12 79 5 95 0 R 52 69 20 ND ND Y 73 73 22 94 2 BLV (— )d aCells positive for fluorescence using PNA-FITC. ^Cells positive for fluorescence using Rablg-FITC. cBovine leukemia virus positive, aleukemic state. No detectable antibodies to bovine leukemia virus. CHAPTER VI: EVALUATION OF THE RESPONSES OF LYMPHOCYTES OF ALEUKEMIC AND PERSISTENT LYMPHOCYTOTIC CATTLE TO SELECTED PHYTOMITOGENS VI- A. INTRODUCTION Approximately 30% of cattle infected with bovine leukemia virus (BLV) develop a benign condition referred to as persistent lymphocytosis (PL) (10B). The PL state is characterized as a persistent elevation of primarily lymphocytes in the peripheral blood (108). B Animals with PL develop clinical lymphosarcoma (LS) more frequently than do BLV-infected) aleukemic (AL) cattle which have no clinical signs (51). Therefore) the transition from the AL to PL state may be a primary step in the progression of the disease to the tumor state. It is unclear what factor(s) mediate the switch from the AL to the PL stage or allow for the uncontrolled B-cell lymphocytosis. A possible factor may be a modulation of a specific T-helper or suppressor cell population that elicit soluble factors which help to regulate B lymphocyte proliferation (81). However) little is known about the immunological and functional properties of lymphocytes of AL or PL cattle. It has been demonstrated in other leukomogenic retroviral infections (human adult T cell leukemia (ATL)) feline leukemia) murine leukemia) avian leukemia) 94 that immunosuppression takes place as a result of retroviral modulation of immune cells (13* 159* 26). Immunosuppression may occur as a result of the interaction of BLV with its target cells. It has been documented that the B lymphocyte is a target cell for BLV infection (45*73*76). It has also been demonstrated that the T lymphocytes from the peripheral blood of some AL animals and tumors of some LS animals contain the BLV provirus (Chapter V f9i). An increase in the absolute T lymphocyte numbers in AL animals and an increase in the absolute number T and B lymphocytes in PL animals has also been observed (Chapter 111*142). It is unclear whether these factors affect T lymphocyte function in BLV-infected animals. The mitogenic stimulation of lymphocytes as measured by uptake of 3H thymidine is used to evaluate inherited and acquired immunodeficiencies and the effect of the iiwnunoenhancing or immunosuppressive action of serum factors (4* 112*157). This technique can therefore be used as an indicator of lymphocyte function. Mitogens such as phytohemagglutinin (PHA>* Concanavalin A (Con A) and pokeweed (PWW) have been used tD assess the mitogenic response of bovine lymphocytes (111*112*132*157). The PHA and Con A responsiveness is a property of bovine thymusderived lymphocytes <T lymphocytes) (111*132) and the PWM responsiveness is a property of both T and B lymphocytes because a B lymphocyte mitogen requires the presence of T lymphocyte soluble factors to obtain a full blastogenic 96 response (111,132). In studies with BLV-infected animals* the lymphocyte response to PWM and PHA* as indicated by the use of stimulation index (S.I.), was markedly less for those cells obtained from animals with PL than for those obtained from hematologically normal animals (112). The lymphocytes from cows with PL that were cultured without phytomitogens incorporated approximately 5 times more tritiated thymidine than did lymphocytes from normal animals (112). It was also shown that the lymphocyte stimulation of AL animals appeared to be normal when blastogenesis assays were conducted using PHA as the mitogen (68). Another study suggested that the stimulatory effect of Con A on lymphocytes of PL- cattle was significantly depressed when compared to response using normal lymphocytes (157). These results suggested that the T lymphocyte population of PL animals may be functionally affected in the ability to respond to mitogens. However* the depressed stimulation may have been the result of low numbers of T lymphocytes present in the lymphocyte preparations of PL cattle used in the in vitro blastogenesis assays or because stimulation index was used to assess the responsiveness to mitogens. These questions have not been fully considered. Inhibition of lymphocyte blastogenesis of normal lymphocytes by sera from cows with LS has been shown but suppression has not been demonstrated with the sera from PL or AL cattle (164). If present* these serum factors may 97 affect immunoregulation. The purpose of the present investigation was to compare the response of lymphocytes from AL and PL cattle to phytomitogens PHA, ConA* and PWM using the in vitro lymphocyte blastogenesis assay. The responsiveness of the cells to mitogens were compared to the T/B lymphocyte ratios from these animals. The effect of sera from AL and PL cattle on lymphocyte blastogenesis of BLV—negative control cattle was also evaluated to determine if suppressive or augmenting factors were present. VI. B. MATERIALS AND METHODS VI. B. 1. Animals A total of 9 cows of at least 3 years of age mere used in this study. The animals were examined clinically and hematologically for symptoms of bovine leukosis* and the BLV infection status was monitored by detection of serum antibodies to BLV structural antigens using the double immunodiffusion assay (33). Of the 9 animals* 3 were BLV- negative on repeated tests* 3 were AL and 3 were PL as determined by the critera of the International Committee of Bovine Leukosis (2). VIII* Table VIII. (For more details refer to Chapter 1.) VI. B. 2. Isolation of Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cel Is Peripheral blood was collected by Jugular venipuncture into 20 ml vacutainer tubes containing 20 units/ml of preservative-free heparin (Sigma Chemical Co.* U.S.A.). The heparinized blood was then diluted in an equal volume of calcium and magnesium free (CMF) Hanks buffer* pH 7.4. Twenty milliliter aliquots were layered onto equal volumes of sodium diatrizoate/ficoll (Histopaque" 1D77* Sigma Chemical Co.* U.S.A.) in 50 cc conical centrifuge tubes (CDstar* U.S.A.). The gradients were centrifuged for 30 min at 1000 x g at room temperature* and the cells banded at the Histopaque"— plasma interface were collected and washed twice in CMF Hanks buffer at 50D x g for ID min at room temperature. Viability counts were done using 900 ul of 10% trypan blue mixed with 100 ul of cells* and the peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) concentration was adjusted to 2 x 10* viable cells/ml in RPMI 1640 medium (GIBC0* Burlington* Ontario) supplemented with NaHCo3 and antibiotics (100 units/ml of penicillin and 100 ug/ml of streptomycin* 5 ug/ml gentamycin). VI. B. 3. Complete Blood Counts Blood was collected in tubes containing ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid as an anticoagulant. Total leukocyte counts were determined on an automatic cell counter and differential counts were performed. VI. B. 4. Enumeration of T/B Lymphocyte Ratios Aliquots of PBMC which were isolated for the lymphocyte blastogenesis assays were stained for B and T lymphocyte enumeration using the following procedure. To identify B lymphocytes* 3 x 10* PBMC were mixed with 10D ul (G.74mg/ml) 99 of fluorescein— conjugated Ftab'J^. fragments of rabbit antibovine IgG, H & L chains specific <Cappel Labs, Cochranvi1le, PA). To identify T lymphocytes, 3 x 10fc PBMC were mixed with 10 ul B26a (1 mg/ml, bovine pan T cell monoclonal antibody which recognizes the sheep RBC receptor on T lymphocytes) (courtesy of Dr. William Davis, Washington State University, Pullman* WA>. The PBMC were incubated at A C for 30 min in the dark, then washed twice in 1 ml aliquots of phosphate buffered saline (PBS) pH 7.4 with 0.05% NaN3 (PBS NaN3 ) to prevent antibody capping. PBMC pretreated with B26a were stained with 100 ul (1 mg/ml) of fluorescein-conjugated goat anti-murine IgG, IgA, IgM mixture (goat anti-mouse-FITC) (Cappel Labs., Cochranvi1le, PA), incubated and washed as described above. then fixed in 0.551 formalin in PBS-NalM3 . The PBMC were An aliquot of PBMC was also stained with goat anti—mouse FITC as a control. The method used for the detection of fluorescencepositive celIs was fluorescence microscopy. Positive cells were enumerated by counting 200 cells at 1000 x magnification with the aid of a fluorescence microscope equipped for phase contrast and incident UV light illumination (Leitz, Germany). The T/B ratio was then determined by dividing the average of the percent T lymphocytes by the average of the percent B lymphocytes in the peripheral blood of each animal. VI. B. 5. Serum Preparation Twenty ml of blood was collected from each animal into lOD vacutainer tubes at sane tine blood was removed for blastogenesis assays. The blood was allowed to clot at room temperature for one hour, and centrifuged at 1000 x g for 15 min. The harvested serum was filter sterilized by ultrafiltration with a 0.45 um disposable syringe filter (AcrodiscR, Gelman, U.S.A.). One half of the serum was heat inactivated at 56 C for 30 min* and the remaining serum was kept at 25 C until used. The sera (both heat inactivated and fresh) were then diluted in RPMI 1640 medium to a final concentration of 40% which was mixed in the lymphocyte blastogenesis test with an egual volume of cell suspension to yield 20% final concentration. Heat inactivated fetal calf serum (FCS) and heat inactivated sera from BLV-negative cows were diluted to 40% with RPMI 1640 medium and used as serum controls. VI. B. 6. Preparation of Mitogens Suboptimal and optimal concentrations of Con A* PHA, and PWM as determined by pre-testing on the PBMC of BLVnegative, clinically normal animals were prepared in RPMI 1640 medium. VI. B. 7. Lymphocyte Blastogenesis Assay The lymphocyte blastogenesis assay was performed as previously described (143). Briefly, the test was conducted in flat-bottom, 96-well, tissue culture plates with 2 x 10= viable PBMC cells/well. Medium in the wells contained a final concentration'of 20% (v/v) of serum. Each animal's lymphocytes were tested with the following sera added: fresh ioi autologous sera, heat-inactivated autologous sera* heatinactivated control BLV-negative sera* and FCS (Fig. VI.2.). The total well content was 0.2 ml* to which 1 of the following had been added (final concentrations): Con A* 5 and 30 ug/ml; PHA* 2 and 5 ug/ml; and PWM* 0.05 and 0.2 ug/ml. The lower concentrations represented the subDptimal* and the higher concentrations* the optimal doses of mitogens to stimulate lymphocytes from a majority of clinically normal cows. For each animal's cells* there were 6 control wells used with PBMC without addition of the mitogens* and 3 wells for each mitogen concentration and the given serum addition. (Refer to Figure VI.1 for flow diagram.) To test for the presence of blastogenesis augmenting or suppressive factors in the serum of BLV-infected animals* serum was obtained from 3 AL and 3 PL animals and 2 BLVnegative control animals at 2 intervals 30 days apart and processed as above then applied to lymphocytes of BLVnegative animals. Heat— inactivation was used to determine if possible augmenting or suppressive factors present in the serum were heat stable. The PBMC were incubated at 37 C in 5Z CCL. for 3 days* labeled with [3HDthymidine (1 uCi/well)* and incubated for an additional A hours. The PBMC were harvested onto Skatron filter mats* using a multiple-well cell harvester (Skatron* Norway). After treating each sample with Concifluor” toluene scintillation cocktail (Fisher Scientific* U.S.A.)* the radioactivity or counts per minute (cpm) was determined 102 using a scintillation counter (Packard TriCarb, Union Carbide* U.S.A.). VI. B. 7.Statistical Evaluations Statistical evaluations were performed on log transformed data using standard programs of the Prophet Computer System (U.S. Dept, of Health and Human Resources* Bethesda* HD.). To test the hypothesis of homogeneity of variance the Bartlett's test was used (14). A two-tailed T— test using unpooled variances was performed on all data (136* 14). The nearest P value was calculated. Data were considered significant at a level of P < 0.05. VI. C. RESULTS The results of blastogenesis assays were expressed as the log of the stimulation index (S.I. = cpm of mitogenstimulated PBMC divided by cpm of unstimulated PBMC grown in the presence of the same serum) (Fig. VI. 3) and as the log of delta counts per minute (cpm of mitogen—stimulated PBMC minus cpm of unstimulated PBMC grown in the presence of the same serum ) (Fig. VI 4.). The responses of lymphocytes from the animals used in blastogenesis assays were determined using FCS as the serum source because of the variability encountered when autologus and homologus sera were used. There were no significant differences noted between the responsiveness of PBMC from AL and BLV-negative animals when SI was used to measure the response to Con A* PHA* and PWM 103 (Table VI. 1). The PBMC of PL animals appeared to have a significant decrease in the blastogenic response to Con A (p < 0.01), PHA (p < 0.01) and PWM (p < D.G2) when SI was used as a measure of the mitogenic response. It was also observed that the spontaneous blastogenesis (PBMC cultured with no mitogen) was significantly higher for the BLVinfected anixals when compared to that of BLV-negative animals (Table VI. 2). When delta cpms were used as a measure of the mitogenic responsiveness of lymphocytes from AL and PL animals* it was found that there were no significant differences in the responses to any of the mitogens when compared to the mitogenic response of lymphocytes from BLV—negative animals (Table VI. 2). T/B lymphocyte ratios from BLV-negative control* AL and PL animals are shown in Table VI. 3. The T/B ratios from PL animals were lower than those from either AL control animals. or BLV-negative There were fewer T and more B lymphocytes in the PBMC preparations used in the blastogenesis assay for these animals (B 10, Y 11* Y 13). There was the T/B ratio of an increase in AL animals when compared to PL or BLV- negative animals.. There were fewer B and more T lymphocytes in the PBMC preparations used in the assay. When lymphocyte responses to phytomitogens were compared to T/B ratios using linear regression analysis, it was found that there was no correlation between The presence of possible suppressive or augmentative IDA factors for blastogenesis in the sera of BLV-infected animals was assessed by the addition of these sera to PBMC from BLV—negative control animals in the presence of mitogens. The data was expressed as corrected counts per minute (cpm of mitogen—stimulated BLV-negative PBMC in the presence of BLV-infected serum minus cpm of mitogenstimulated BLV-negative PBMC in the presence of BLV-negative serum) (Figure VI. 5). The sera from AL and PL animals augmented the mitogenic response of lymphocytes to optimal concentrations of Con Ai PHA and PWM in comparison to the reponses observed BLV-negative control sera. No augmentation was observed in cultures without mitogen. The blastogenic response of the lymphocytes to all mitogens was greater in sera from PL animals than sera from AL. The blastogenesis augmenting factor was active on both T and B lymphocytes and was heat stable at 56 C for 30 min. VI. D. DISCUSSION The stimulatory effect of optimal concentrations of PHA* Con A and PWM on the PBMC from BLV-negative control animals could be demonstrated clearly in the experiments reported herein. The values obtained in lymphocyte blastogenesis studies with optimal concentrations of mitogens were used in this study to assess the blastogenic responsiveness of lymphocytes. The use of suboptimal concentrations of i mitogens gave no different information on the response of 105 lymphocytes to various mitogens. These data are not presented. When SI was used to measure the mitogenie responsiveness of lymphocytes from BLV— infected animals* there appeared to be a false assessment of the response due to the high spontaneous blastogenesis observed in the unstimulated PBMC cultures. SI was calculated by dividing the cpm obtained from mitogen—stimulated PBMC by the cpm of unstimulated PBMC. If spontaneous blastogenesis was high and the response to mitogens was within the normal range then the SI was low. Therefore* the PL animals which had high spontaneous blastogenesis had low SI. The observations that lymphocytes from PL animals undergo high levels of spontaneous blastogenesis and have low SI are in agreement with previous reports (112*143). This information led to the original conclusion that lymphocytes from PL animals have depressed responses to mitogenie stimulation. This does not appear to be a correct conclusion as discussed below. The observation that the lymphocytes of AL animals undergo high levels of spontaneous blastogenesis has not been previously reported. When delta counts per minute were used to measure the mitogenie responsiveness of lymphocytes from AL and PL animals* no significant difference was noted when compared to the response observed for the lymphocytes of BLV-negative animals. This suggested that the lymphocytes of BLV/ infected AL and PL animals are capable of normal mitogenie 106 response to both T and £ lymphocyte mitogens. It has been observed that there is an increase in the absolute number of T lymphocytes in the peripheral blood of AL animals (Chapter 111). It was shown in this study« that T/B ratios were higher in AL animals than either PL or BLVnegative animals. More lymphocytes with T lymphocyte markers were present in the PBMC preparations of AL animals used for the blastogenesis assays. This increase in T lymphocyte numbers did not appear to affect the overall response to optimal concentrations of the mitogens used in this study. It has been shown that the response of lymphocytes to Con A is a property of the T lymphocyte population but is dependent on accessory cells (monocytes) (B2*86). Therefore* even though T lymphocyte numbers were more numerous in the cultures from AL animals used for the mitogenie studies* the limiting factor may have been the concentration of monocytes in the culture. It was also observed that as the T/B ratios decreased (PBMC of PL animals)* there was no significant increase or decrease in the ability of the cultured cells to respond to mitogens. Even though there were more B lymphocytes in the cultures of PL animals used in the blastogenesis assay* the response to PVNi was not elevated. Responsiveness to PWM is predominantly a property of B lymphocytes (111*112). The ability of B lymphocytes to respond to PWM is T lymphocyte (T— helper) dependent (112*111). Even though there was an / increase in the number of lymphocytes with B lymphocyte 107 markers in the cultures used for mitogenie studies* no increase in the response was observed because the concentration of T— helper cells might have been the limiting factorThe increase of peripheral blood T lymphocytes in AL animals and Blymphocytes in PL animals mag be the result of antigen-induced expansion of T and B lgmphocgte clones* respectivelg. These cells mag also be responding to infection bg BLV (Chapter V* 91)- The high spontaneous blastogenesis as measured bg the synthesis of DNA indicates that cells in the cultures from AL and PL animals were undergoing high levels of mitosis. These stimulated cell populations might have been refractory to further mitogenie stimulation therefore* no increase in the response to mitogens was observed. It was concluded that the increase in the relative numbers of T and B lymphocytes in the cultures used for blastogenesis assays did not affect the response to selected phytomitogens. Therefore* the lymphocytes of AL and PL animals were considered as responsive to mitogenie stimulation as lymphocytes from BLV-negative* clinically normal animals Sera from AL and PL animals contained a heat—stable blastogen'esis-augmenting factor(s). This factor enhanced the mitogenie response of lymphocytes from BLV-negative animals for Con A* PHA and PWM. No augmentation was observed with BLV-negative control sera nor was / blastogenesis augmentation observed in the absence of 10B mitogenie stimulation. Therefore* it was assumed that this factor was a comitogenic serum factor or one that works in the presence of mitogens or exhibits its activity on mitogen and /or antigen—activated cells. Sera from PL animals gave a higher degree of stimulation than did sera from AL animals. Since the augmenting factor enhanced the blastogenic activity of all three phytomitogens* it was assumed that the effect was on both B and T lymphocytes. heat stable. This factor was No further characterization of the serum factor was attempted in this study. Uhen HTLV— III— infected T lymphocytes are stimulated to divide by antigen activation* the viral genome is also activated (105). There is then production of the trans- activation of transcription <tat) viral gene product. This protein enhances the expression of not only the proviral genes but also the genes for interleukin—2 and its receptor (105). divide. The infected cells are then further activated to This tat enhancement of antigen— driven lymphocyte blastogenesis also appears to occur in the other HTLVs (I and II) (105). BLV is closely related to HTLV I and II and > has been found to contain a tat gene (128*131). The co rnitog enic factor found iii the sera of BLV— infected animals may be the tat protein. The enhancement of mitosis was only apparent when PBMC of BLV-infected animals are cultured in the presence of mitogens and sera from BLV— infected animals. The mitogenie activation of lymphocytes appeared to be 10? necessary before this protein bias able to enhance the blastogenic response. An increase in concentration of this factor in the sera of PL animals may be responsible for maintenance of the PL state. The T and B lymphocytes of BLV-infected animals used in this study appeared to be responsive to the selected phytomitogens. Responsiveness to mitogens is used as an indicator of functional competence of lymphocytes (4,111*132). This study indicates that at least a portion of lymphocytes from AL and PL animals respond to mitogenie stimulation at least to a level comparable to that of lymphocytes from BLV-negative, clinically normal animals. The blastogenenesis augmenting factor present in the sera of PL animals may be important in maintaining the PL stage of EBL. The observation that BLV-infected animals have a blastogenesis augmenting factor present in their sera is important for the establishment of BLV-induced enzootic bovine leukosis as a model for HTLV I induced ATL. lymphocytosis occurs in some cases of ATL (162). A T— cell The tat protein appears to be responsible for the rapid proliferation of antigen-activated lymphocytes in this disease (105). If the tat protein of BLV is found to be responsible for the B-cell lymphocytosis observed in PL animals, BLV-induced persistent lymphocytosis in cattle may be used as an animal model for HTLV— induced ATL. 110 BLV(+)-Aleukemlc BLV(+)-Persistent Lym phocytotlc BLV(-j-Control 1) WBC 2) Lym phocyte C ounts Serum H Istopaque S eparation F resh Heat Inactivated 56C Dilute in RPMI)640 PBMC ADD 2 X 1 0 s ceIls/w efl In RPMI]g4Q 3X10® cells to: 1) anti-bovine pan T cell m onoclonal antibody 2} anti-bovine tgM Phytom itogens DPNA 2JCONA 3JPWM Incubated 37C X 3 days * T ♦ B cells ADD3 H-thymldlne |3 7 C X 4 hours H arvest Cells on Cell H arv ester (Skatron) cpm S cintillation Counting Figure V I. I . Procedure f o r Lymphocyte Blastogenesis / SI 111 x © tim o o cD > 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [101112 Mitogen: Without mitogen Con A PHA PWM C oncentration: s u b o p ti m a l ODtima! su b o p tim a l optim al su b o p tim a l optim al Auto I' Dgous H om o Bovine f r e s h | inactiv. lo g o u s f e t a l inactiv. inactiv. Figure V I. 2. Schema o f P la te Arrangement f o r Lymphocyte Transform ation w ith 3 Mitogens and 4 D if fe r e n t Serum supplements (C e lls added to a l l w e l l s ) . / 112 £J Con R 30ug/n1 ^ PHR Sug/ml 3.0 2.0 8888 L O G ( 10) STIMULATION INDEX (S.I | PWM 0.2ug/ml 1.0 *%2 R 56 Y 73 Y 32 Y 74 Y 75 B 10 Y 11 Y 13 I__________ I I__________ I I---------- 1 BLVCNeg) BLV(RL) Animal BLV(PL) N u m/b e r s Fiqure VI. 3. Response of Lyrrphocytes fran Cattle to Optimal Concentrations of Selected Phytcmitogens Using Sirmilation Index 113 D 7.0 C on R 3 0 u g /m l | PWM 0.2ugSml 6.0 - 5.0 L O G ( 10) DELTR COUNTS PER MINUTE ^ PHR 5 u g / m l 4.0 3.0 36 Y 73 Y 32 Y 74 Y I I BLVCNeg) 75 B 10 Y U Y 13 I I---------- 1 BLVCRL) Rnlmal BLVCPL) Numbers Figure VI. 4. Response of Lyirpbocytes frcm Cattle to Optimal Concentrations of Selected Phytanitogens Using Delta Counts Per Minute 114 6 |~| Con fl 30ug/m1 0 PHR 5ug/m1 | PWH 0.2ug/ml - COUNTS PER MINUTE 7 r 5 - LOGU0) I 4 - Y 32 Y 74 Y 73 I____________________ I BLV(RL) Rnlmal B ° ie Y it Y 13 _____________________ i BLV(PL) N um bers Figure VI. 5. Response of Lymphocytes fran Bovine Leukania Virus Negative Cattle to Selected Phytanitogens in the Presence of Sera frcm BLV-Infected Cattle 115 Table VI. 1. Statistical Analysis of Lymphocyte Blastogenesis of Lymphocytes from Bovine Leukemia Virus Infected Cattle Using Stimulation Index* ** BLV Status BLV (-) Vs BLV (AL) BLV (-) vs BLV (PL) Mitogen T Value Con A 1.391 16 N.S.-^ PfiA 1.495 16 N.S. EWM 0.631 16 N.S. Con A 2.654 16 0.01 FHA 2.257 16 0.01 PWM 3.985 16 0.02 Degrees of Freedom P Value * Stimulation Index = cpns of mitogen treated cultures divided by cpns of cultures with no mitogen. ** BLV Status indicates: BLV (-) = Cattle negative for BLV antibodies. BLV(AL) = Cattle positive for BLV antibodies but have no clinical signs. BLV (PL) = Cattle positive for BLV antibodies and have persistent lymphocytosis. + Optimal Concentrations. Not significant at the level of p = 0.05. 116 Table VI. 2. Statistical Analysis of Lymphocyte Blastogenesis of Lymphocytes from Bovine Leukania Virus A Infected Cattle Using Corrected Counts per Minute ** BLV Status BLV (-) vs BLV (AL) + Mitogen ■ T Value Degrees of Freedom p Value None 2.015 16 0.05 Con A 1.629 16 N.S. PHA 1.894 16 N.S. PWM 1.858 16 N.S. None 2.677 Con A 0.3512 16 N.S. PHA 0.3522 16 N.S. PVM 0.1246 16 N.S. I. I. BLV (-) vs BLV (PL) 0.02 Corrected counts per minute = cpns of mitogen treated cultures minus cpns of cultures with no mitogen treatment. ** BLV Status indicates: BLV (-) = Cattle negative for BLV antibodies. BLV(AL) = Cattle positive for BLV antibodies but have no clinical signs, BLV (PL) = Cattle positive for BLV antibodies and have persistent lymphocytosis. + Optimal concentrations. ++ Not significant at the level of p = 0.05. 117 Table VI. 3. T / B Lymphocyte Ratios of Bovine Leukemia Virus-Infected Cattle Animal Numbers R 52 R 54 Y 73 .BLV Status mm - T /B a Ratio 1.9 2.0 2.0 Y 32 Y 74 Y 75 AL AL AL 3.2 5.1 3.3 B 10 Y 11 Y 13 PL PL PL 0.5 0.8 0.7 T/B ratio = %T lymphocytes in peripheral blood divided by the % B lymphocytes in the peripheral blood. CHAPTER VIis SUMMARY The aim of the investigations reported herein was to obtain a better understanding of the numbers and function of bovine T lymphocytes in bovine leukemia virus (BLV) infected cattle in the aleukemic (AL) and persistent lymphocytotic (PL) stages of enzootic bovine leukosis. Highly specific monoclonal antibodies that distinguish bovine T and B lymphocytes and flow microfluorimetry (FACS analysis) were used to determine the absolute number of B and T lymphocytes in the peripheral blood of ELV-infected cattle. The peripheral blood lymphocyte populations from A AL and 4 PL cattle appeared to be increased when compared to that of 4 BLV negative control animals. The increase in the lymphocyte population in the AL animals was due to an increase in T lymphocytes but not B lymphocytes* whereas* in the PL animals the increase appeared to be due to an increase in both T and B lymphocyte populations. This information indicates that there is an alteration in the lymphocyte populations of BLV-infected cattle. The PL animals showed a significantly higher number of surface immunoglobulin positive cells (slg"’') than did the AL animals. The majority of these cells had IgM on their cell surfaces* which is typical for virgin (res'ting)* intermediate or memory B lymphocytes. Therefore* it appears that these cells have been induced to proliferate but not to differentiate into antibody secreting (plasma) 118 cells because plasma cells typically do not have surface bound IgM as do intermediate mature (activated) B lymphocytes and are rarely found in the peripheral blood. This observation indicates that the increase in the numbers of lymphocytes in the peripheral blood of PL animals is not totally an antigen driven event. It is possible that the uncontrolled lymphocytosis is at least in part due to the activity of a trans activational transcriptional protein (tat protein) (a product of the BLV genome). It was shown in this study that there is a comitogenic blastogenesis augmenting factor in the sera of all AL and PL animals tested. This factor may be responsible for the further proliteration of antigen—activated lymphocytes. It has been observed that antigen-activated HTLV III virus infected cells are further induced to proliferate as a result of the tat protein. PL animal 632 had an elevated lymphocyte count (72 x lCP/mm3 of whole blood) and contained a subpopulation of lymphocytes that appeared to stain for markers of both bovine B and T lymphocytes. mere immature. This suggested that these cells It has been observed that animals with LS contain immature lymphocytes circulating in the peripheral blood. Perhaps this is the BLV— infected cell population. We were unable to guantitate the number of T lymphocytes in this animal using cell surface markers. The lymphocytes of this animal stained much more intensely with the anti-bovine Igli monoclonal antibody than lymphocytes from the other PL 120 animals tested. This suggests that there is modulation of the expression of this immunoglobulin marker in animal 632. Perhaps the gene that codes for cell surface bound IgM is enhanced in its expression in PL animals as a response of the tat protein effect on lymphocytes in the peripheral blood. Bovine T lymphocytes were purified from the peripheral blood of BLV-infected* AL cattle using immuno-affinity depletion <"panning") with anti-bovine immunoglobulin-coated flasks. Large yields of highly purified T lymphocyte preparations (95-100X T lymphocytes and 0-35C contamination with B lymphocytes) were obtained from BLV-negative and AL* but not PL animals by the use of this technique. This purification technique was easy to perform* required minimal amounts of reagents and gave higher yields of purified T lymphocytes than any technique. other currently available purification It was then possible to assess the presence of BLV provirus in highly purified T lymphocyte populations of AL animals. A 7.5 kilobase fragment of the original BLV— provirus probe (EcoRl fragment of the FLK-BLV DNA ligated into PUC-S vector plasmid) was purified by Sac 1 restriction enzyme digestion* agarDse gel electrophoresis and subsequent fragment electroelution. The presence of BLV provirus was then demonstrated in the DNA of the peripheral blood mononuclear cells of all AL animals tested and 3 of the 4 purified T lymphocyte preparations using DNA hybridization 121 techniques with the highly specific radiolabelled (3=P) BLVDNA probe. This study documents the first attempt to assess the presence of the BLV provirus in highly purified peripheral blood T lymphocytes from BLV— infected* AL cattle. These experiments shouted that bovine T lymphocytes are possible targets of BLV infection. The significance of this finding is that infection of T lymphocytes or a specific subpopulation of T lymphocytes may lead to modulation of this cell population and may facilitate the progression of the disease to the PL and ultimately the tumor state. This study also confirmed that the B lymphocyte is the major target of BLV infection. As these cells were depleted from the PBMC by "panning", the hybridization signal that was obtained from purified DNA of the "panned" cells was much less dense than the signal obtained from the PBMC preparation. The lymphocyte blastogenesis assay was used as an indicator of the functional ability of lymphocytes of AL and PL animals to respond to mitogenie stimuli. It appeared, that the responsiveness of lymphocytes from AL and PL animals to Con A, PHA, and PWM mitogens was comparable to that of lymphocytes from BLV-negative animals when delta cpms were used as measurement of mitogenic— induced blastogenesis. This indicated that the infection of some cells of the lymphocyte population does not appear to alter the overall response of the lymphocytes to mitogenie stimuli. 122 High levels of spontaneous blastogenesis in the absence of mitogenie stimulation was observed for lymphocyte preparations of both AL and PL animals. proliferation of lymphocytes is unclear. The reason for this Sera from AL and PL animals was found to contain a blastogenesis—augmenting factor(s) when added to lymphocytes from BLV-negative control animals in the presence of Con A* PHA and PWM. Therefore* it appeared that the effect of augmentation was on B and T lymphocytes. tat protein. Perhaps this serum factor is the The PL animals appeared to have more of this factor or a more active form of this factor in their sera than the AL animals. The PL animals also had higher levels of spontaneous blastogenesis and higher rates of lymphocyte proliferation in vivo as Judged by peripheral blood lymphocytes counts. The presence of the blastogenesis- augmenting factor(s) in tne serum of BLV— infected animals may facilitate the transition from AL to PL phase of EBL and /or is at least partly responsible for maintenance of the PL phase of EBL. CHAPTER VIIis APPENDIX The animals used in this project mere cows of various breeds between the ages of 3 and 5 years old (Table VIII. i>. They were purchased from sale barns in southern Louisiana and maintained at the Veterinary Medicine Farm* Lousiana State University Agricultural Center* Louisiana State University* School of Veterinary Medicine* Baton Rouge* Louisiana for at least 3 months before being used in the project. lactating. The animals were neither pregnant* nor They were judged healthy on physical exam by the staff veterinarian. All BLV positive animals were naturally infected* therefore* it was not known when infection originally occurred. It was not known when persistent lymphocytosis developed. Peripheral blood was collected from all test animals at monthly intervals prior to and during the project. Serum was harvested* and the agar gel immunodiffusion test (AG2D) was performed for the detection of antibodies to BLV antigens. Total WBC and differiential counts were performed at monthly intervals to establish the BLV status (AL or PL). Animals with detectable serum antibodies to BLV antigens but no clinical signs of disease were considered to be aleukemic animals (AL). Animals with detectable serum antibodies to BLV antigens and a persistent elevation of peripheral blood lymphocytes (> 7.5 x lCPcelIs/mm3 whole blood over a three month period) were considered persistent lymphocytotic 123 124artimale <PL) (2). Animals with no detectable antibodies to BLV antigens on repeated testing were BLV-negative animals. These BLV negative animals were used as control animals in all studies. All animals were also palpated for the presence of tumors. No tumors were observed in any of the test animals. Animals were screened for Brucellosis and Anaplasmosis and found negative. diarrhea virus* They were also vaccinated for bovine infectious rhinotracheitis virus and parainfluenza virus type III by the Louisiana State University School of Veterinary Medicine clinical staff. The presence of antibodies to bovine lymphotrophic retroviruses* bovine syncytial virus (BSV) and bovine visnalike virus (BVV) was also evaluated. Antibodies to these viruses were detected by the use of indirect immunofluoresence test assays utilizing bovine fetal spleen cells infected with either BSV or BVV (Table VIII. 1). 125 Table VIII. 1. Assessment of Viral Infection in Animals Used for Molecular Studies of Bovine T Lymphocytes Animal Number Breed Antibodies BLV+ BSV** + R R R Y 52 54 56 73 Holstein Holstein Holstein , Jersey Y Y Y Y 12 32 74 75 Holstein Holstein Jersey Jersey + + + + (AL) (AL) (AL) (AL) B Y Y Y 10 11 13 632 Hereford Holstein Holstein Holstein + + + + (PL) (PL) (PL) (PL) bvvh + + - - - * - — — — _ + - — + + — - + — — + + -f BLV antibodies determined by the use of agar gel iimtunodiffusion. BLV status determined by clinical signs. BLV (-) - Animals with no detectable BLV antibodies BLV (+)AL - Animals with detectable antibodies to BLV antigens but no clinical signs of disease BLV (-f)PL - Animals with detectable BLV antibodies and exhibit persitent lymphocytosis. ++BSV - Bovine syncytial, virus I|| BVV - Bovine visna-like virus 126 CHAPTER IX: BIBLIOGRAPHY 1. Anderson, L . , Jarrett, W.F. and g.W. Crighton 1968. A classification of lymphoid neoplasms of domestic animals. Natl. Cancer Inst. Monogr.* 32:343-353. 2. Anonymous, (i960). International Committee on Bovine Leukosis. Criteria for the determination of the normal and leukotic state in cattle. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 41:243-263. 3. Baliga, V. and J.F. Ferrer. 1977. Expression of the bovine leukemia virus and its internal antigen in blood lymphocytes. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 156:38B. 4. Barta, O. , Oyekan,P. and L., Shaffer. 19B4. Lymphocyte transformation (Activation) test. In:Laboratory Techniques of Veterinary Clinical Immunology edited by 0. Barta. Charles C. Thomas. Springfield, Illinois. pp.B6-100. 5. Baumgartener, L. , Olson, C. and M. Onuma. 1976. Effect of pasteurization and heat treatment on bovine leukemia virus. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 169:1189-1191. 6. Baumgartener, L.E., and C. Olson. 19B2. Host range of bovine leukosis virus: preliminary report. Curr. Top. Vet. Med. Anim. Sci. 15:338-347. 7. Bech-Neilsen, S., Piper, C.E., and J.F. Ferrer. 1978. Natural mode of transmission of the bovine leukemia virus; role of blood—sucking insects. Am. J. Vet. Res. 39:1089. 8. Bendixen, H.J. 1965. Bovine enzootic leukosis. Adv. Vet. Sci. Comp. Med. 10:129. 9. Bendixen, H.J. 1:422. 1965. Natl. Cancer Inst. Monogr. ID. Bianco, C., Patrick, R . , and V. Nussenzweig. 1975. A population of lymphocytes bearing a memgrane receptor for antigen-antibody-complexes, I. Separation and characterization. J. Exp. Med. 132;702-707. 11. Boothe, A. D. and M.J. Van der Maaten. 1974. U1trastructural studies of a visna-like syncytial— producing virus from cattle with lymphocytosis. J. Virol. 13:197-204. 127 12. Boothe* A.D. * Van der Maaten, M.J.* and W.A. Malmquist. 1970. Morphological variation of a syncytial virus from lymphosarcomatous and apparently normal cattle. Archiv fur die gesamte Virusforschung. 31:373-384. 13. Broder* S.* Bunn* P. A. * Jaffe* E.S. * et al. 1984. T—cell lymphoproliferative syndrome associated with human T-cell leukemia/lymphoma virus. Ann. Intern. Med. 100s543. 14. Brown* B.U. and N. Kolander. 1977. Statistics: £ Biomedical Introduction. John Mi ley & Sons* New York* pp. 328-331. 15. Bruck* C.* Mathot, S.* Portelelle, D . » Berte* C.* et al. 1982. Monoclonal antibodies define eight independent antigenic regions on the bovine leukemia virus (BLV) envelope glycoprotein gp 51. Virology 122:342-352. It. Bruck* C . * Rensonnet* N. * Portetelle* D . * Cleuter* Y., et al. 1984. Biologically active epitopes of bovine leukemia virus glycoprotein g p 5 1 :their dependence on protein glycosylation and genetic variability. Virology* in press. 17. Burny* A.* Bex* F . * Chantrenne* H . * Cleuter, Y., et al. 1978. Bovine leukemia virus involvement in enzootic bovine leukosis. Adv. Cancer Res. 2B:251—311. 18. Burny* A.* Bex* F. * Bruck* C.* Cleuter* Y . * et a l . 1978. Biochemical studies on enzootic and sporadic types of bovine leukosis. InsAntiviral mechanisms in the control of neoplasia. Chandra*.P. editor. Plenum* New York* p p . 83-99. 19. Burny* A.* Bruck* C.* Chantrenne* H. * Cleuter* Y . * et al. 198D. Bovine leukemia virus: molecular biology and epidemiology. In: Viral Oncology, editor George Klein. Raven Press* New York. 234. 20. Buxton* B.A. and R.D. Schultz. 1984. Factors affecting the infectivity of lymphocytes from cattle with bovine leukosis virus. Can J. Comp. Med. 48:365-369. 21. Buxton B.A.* Hinkle* N.C.» and R.D. Schultz. 1985. Role of insects in the transmission of bovine leukosis virus: Potential for transmission by stable flies* horn flies* and tabanids. Am J Vet. Res. 46:123-126. 128 22. Calafat* J. , Hageman* P.C.* and A.A. Ressang. 1974. Structure of C— type virus particles in lymphocyte cultures of bovine origin. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 52:1251-1257. 23. Calafat* J. and A. A. Ressang. 1977. Ultrastructure of bovine leukemia virus. Comparison with other RNA tumor viruses. In: Bovine Leucosis: Various Methods of Molecular Virology* edited by A. Burny* pp13-30. Commission of European Communities* Luxembourg. 24. Callahan* R.* Lieber* M.M.* Todaro* G.J.* et al. 1976. Bovine leukemia virus genes in the DNA of leukemic cattle. Science 192:1005. 25. Casey* J,W. and M.O. Nicholson. 19B2. Susceptibility to productive infection by the bovine leukemia virus is governed at the proviral level. Fed. Pro 41:1275 26. Cockerell* G.L. and E.A. Hoover. 1977. Inhibition of normal lymphocyte mitogenie reactivity by serum from feline leukemia virus— infected cats. Cancer Res. 3 7 :3985-39B9. 27. Copeland* T.D.* Morgan* M.A.* and S.Oroszlan. 19B3. Complete amino acid sequence of the nucleic acid binding protein of bovine leukemia virus FEBS Lett. 156:37-40. 28. Dekegel* D.* Mammerickx* M . * Burny* A.* Portetelle* D. * et al. 1977. Morphogenesis of bovine leukemia virus <BLV>. In: Bovine Leucosis: Various Methods of Molecular Virology.edited by A. Burny* PP. 31-42. 29. Dermont* E . * Clarke* J.K. and J. Samuels. 1971. The morphogenesis and classifcation of bovine syncytial virus. Gen. Virol. 12:105-119. 30. Deschamps* J . * Kettmann* R.* and Burny* A. 1981. Experiments with cloned complete tumor— derived bovine leukemia virus information prove that the virus is totally exogenous to its target animal species. J. Virology* 40:605—609. 31. Deshayse» L . * Levy* D.*Parodi* A.L.*and J. Levy. 1977. Proteins of bovine leukemia virus. I. Characterization and reactions with natural antibodies. J. Virol. 21:1056. 129 32. Devare, S.G.« Stephenson* J.R.* Santa* P.S.* et al. 1976. Bovine lymphosarcoma: Development of a radioimmunologic technique for detection of the etiologic agent. Sci. 194:1428-1430. 33. Devare* S.* Chandler* S.* Samagh* B.S.* and J.R. Stephenson. 1977. Evaluation of radioimmunoprecipitation for the detection of bovine leukemia virus infection in domestic cattle. J. Immunol.* 119:277-282. 34. Devare* S.* Oroszlan, S.* and J.R. Stephenson. 1978. Application of radioimmunologic techniques to epidemiologic studies of lymphosarcoma in domestic cattle. Ann. Rech. Vet. 9:6B9-697. 35. Diamond* A.* Cooper* G.M., Ritz* J. and M. Lane. 1983. Identification and molecular cloning of the human BLym transforming gene activated in Burkett's lymphoma. Nature 305:112-116. 36. Dickler, H.B. and H.G. Kunkel. 1972. Interaction of aggregated y—globulin with B-lymphocytes* J. Exp. Med. 136:191-196. 37. Dickler, H.B., Siegal* F.P., Bentwich* Z.H.* et al. 1973. Lymphocyte binding of aggregated IgG and surface Ig staining in chronic lymphocytotic leukemia. Clin Exp. Immunol. 14:97— 106. 38. Dickler, H.B. 1974. Studeis of the human lymphocyte receptor for heat aggregated or antigen— complexed immunoglobulin. J. Exp* Med. 140:508-522. 39. Dietzschold, B . * Kaaden, 0.R . * Uberschar*S. Wei land, F.» and O.C. Straub. 1974. Suggestive evidence for an oncornavirus-specific DNA polymerase from C-type particles of boivne leukosis. Z. Naturforsch. 29:72-75. 40. Diglio* C.A.* and J.F. Ferrer. 1976. Induction of -syncytia by the bovine C— type leukemia virus. Cancer Res. 36:1056-1067. 41. Drescher, B . * Rossler, H . * Venker, P., and W. Wittman. 1979. Purification and characterization of bovine leukemia virus DNA polymerase. Arch. Geschtuulstforsch. 49:569—579 42. Driscoll, D. M. and C. Olson. 1977. Bovine leukemia virus associated antigens in lymphocyte cultures. Am J. Vet. Res. 38:1897-1898. 130 43. Dungworth, D.L. Theilen, G.H. , and J. Lengyel. 1964. Bovine lymphosarcoma in California. II. The thymic form. Path. Vet., 1:323-350. 44. Ferrer, J.F. Stock, N.D., and P.S. Lin. 1971. Detection of replicating C— type viruses in continuous cell cultures established from coins with leukemia: effect of the culture medium. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 47:613-621. 45. Ferrer, J.F., Avila, L . , and N.D.Stock. 1972. Serological detection of type C viruses found in bovine cultures. Cancer Res. 32:1864— 1870. 46. Ferrer, J.F., Abt, D.A., Bhatt,D.H.* and R.R. Marshak. 1974. Studies on the relationship between infection with bovine C— type virus, leukemia, and persistent lymphocytosis in cattle. Cancer Res. 3 1 :093. 47. Ferrer, J.F., and C.A Diglio. 1976. Development of an in vitro infectivity assay for the C-type bovine leukemia virus. Cancer Res. 36:1068. 48. Ferrer, J.F., Piper, C.E., Abt, D.A., Marshak, R.R., and D.M. Bhatt. 1976. Natural mode of transmission of the bovine C-type virus (BLV). Bibl. Haematol. 43:235. 49. Ferrer, J.F., C.E. Piper, D.A. Abt, and R.R Marshak. 1977. Diagnosis of bovine leukemia virus infection; evaluation of serological and hematological tests by means of a direct infectivity assay. Am. J. Vet. Res. 38:1977. 50. Ferrer, J.F. and C.E. Piper. 1978. Role of milk in the transmission of BLV. Ann. Rech. Vet. 9:803-807. 51. Ferrer, J.F., Marshak, R.R., Abt, D.A., and S.J. Kenyon. 1979. Relationship between lymphosarcoma and persistent lymphocytosis in cattle: A Review. J.A.V.M.A. 175:705-708. 52. Froland, S.5. and J.B. Natvig. 1973. Identification of three different human lymphocyte populations by surface markers. Transplant Rev. 16:114-162. 53. Fujimoto, Y. Miller, J, and C. Olson. 1969. the fine structure of lymphosarcoma in cattle. Pathol Vet 6:15-29. 131 54. Georgiades* J.A. * Billiau* A. and B. Vandershueren. 1970. Infection of human cell cultures with bovine visna virus. J. Gen Virol. 3B:375-3B1. 55. Gershwin* L.J.* Lance* P. and A.S. Rokito. 1983. Cottiparison of analysis of bovine surface immunoglobulin bearing and peanut agglutinin binding lymphocytes by flow cytometry and fluorescence microscopy. Vet. Immunol. Immunopath. 5:185-196. 56. Ghysdael* J . * Kettmann R.* A. Burny. 1978. Translation of bovine leukemia virus genome information in heterologous protein synthesizing systems programmed with virion RNA and in cel 1-lines persistently infected by BLV. Ann. Rech. Vet. 9:627-634. 57. Ghysdael* J . * Kettmann* R . * and A. Burny. 1979. Translation of BLV virion RNAs in heterologous protein synthesizing systems. J. Virol. 29:1087-1098. 58. Gilden* R.V.* Long* C.U.* Hanson* M . * et al. 1975. Characteristics of the major internal protein and DNA—dependent DNA polymerase of bovine leukemia virus. J. Gen. Virol. 29:305-314. 59. Graves* D. C.* Diglio* C. A . * and Ferrer* J.F.* 1977. A reverse transcriptase assay for detection of t.he bovine leukemia virus. Am. J. Vet. Res. 38:1739-1744. 60. Graves* D.C. and L. V. Jones. 1981. Early syncytium formation by bovine leukemia virus. J. Virol. 38:1055-1063. 61. Greig* A.S.* Chandler* S . * Samagh* B . * and A. M. Bouillant*. 1978. A simple* rapid syncytial-inhibition test for antibodies to bovine leukemia virus. Can. J. Comp. Med. 42*446-451. 62. Guillemain* B . * Mamoun* R.* Astier* T . * Duplan* J.F. et al. 1978. Early polykaryocytosis inhibition test: Evaluation of its performance in a sercepidemiologicaL survey of bovine leukemia virus induced antibodies in cattle. Ann. Rech. Vet. 9:709-720. 132 63- Gupta, P.* Kashmiri, S.V. , and J.F. Ferrer. 1984. Transcriptional control of the bovine leukemia virus genome: role and characterization of a non-immunoglobulin plasma protein from bovine leukemia virus-infected cattle. J. Virology 50:267-270. 64. Gutierrez, C., Bernabe, R.R*, and J. Vega. 1979. Purification of human T and B cells by a discontinuous density gradient of Percoll. J. Immunol. Methods. 29:57-63. 65. Halseltine, W. A., Sodroski, J . , Patarca, R. , et al. .1984. Structure of 3' terminal region of type XI human T lymphotrophic virus: Evidence for new coding region. Sc i .225:419-421. 66. Hare, W.C., Yang, T.J., and R.A. McFeely. 1967. a survey of chromosome findings in 47 cases of bovine lymphosarcoma <leukemia). J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 38:383-387. 67. Horvath, Z. 1982. Experimental transmission of bovine leukosis to sheep (Clinicopathological considerations). Curr. Top. Vet. Med. Anim. Sci.15:269-281. 68. Jacobs, R.M., Valli, V.E. and B.N. Wilkie. 1979. Inhibition of lymphocyte blastogenesis by sera from cows with lymphoma. Am. J. Vet. Res. 41:372-376. 69. Janossy, G., and M.F. Greaves. 1971. Lymphocyte activation.I. Response of T and B lymphocytes to phytomitogens. Clin. Exptl Immunol. 9:483-498. 70. Kaaden, O.R., Frenzel, B . , Dietzschold, B . , et al. 1977. Isolation of a pl5 polypeptide form bovine leukemia virus and detection of specific antibodies in leukemic cattle. Virology, 77:501-509. 71. Kajikawa, 0., Koyama, H. , Yoshikawa, T. , et al. 1983. Use of alpha-naphthyl acetate esterase staining to identify T lymphocytes in cattle. Am. J. Vet. Res. 44:1549-1552. 72. Kenyon, S.J., and C.E. Piper. 1977. Cellular basis of persistent lymphocytosis in cattle infected with bovine leukemia virus. Infect. Immun 16:891. 133 73. Kenyon* 5.J.T and C.E. Piper. 1977. Properties of density gradient-fractionated peripheral blood leukocytes from cattle with bovine leukemia virus. Infection and Immunity 16*898-903. 74. Kettmann* R. * Mammerickx, M. * Dekegel, D. * et al. 1975. Biochemical approach to bovine leukemia. Acta Haematol. 54:201—209. 75. Kettmann* R.* Portelle, D . * Mammerickx, M . * Cleuter, Y.* et a l . 1976. Bovine leukemia virus* An exogenous RNA oncogenic virus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 73:1014-1018. 76. Kettmann, R., Marbaix, 6., Cleuter, Y . , et. a l . 1980. Genomic intergration of bovine leukemia provirus and lack of viral RNA expression in the target cells of cattle with different responses to BLV infection. Leukemia Res. 77. 78. Kettmann, R. Marbaix, G . , and A. Burny, et. al. 1980. In: Viruses in naturally occurring cancer. CDld Spring Harbor Conference on Cell Proliferation ?: 927-941 Kettmann, R., Cleuter, Y . , Mammerickx, M . , et al. 1980. Genomic integration of bovine leukemia provirus: comparison of persistent lymphocytosis with lymph node tumor form of enzootic bovine leukosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 77:2577^25B1. 79. Kettmann, R . , Deschamps* J . , Cleuter, Y. , Couez, D . , et a l . 1982. Leukemogenesis by bovine leukemia virus: proviral DNA integration and lack of RNA expression of viral long terminal repeat and 3' proximate cellular sequences. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 79:2465-2469. 80. Kettmann R., Westin, E.H., Marbaix, G. , Deschamps, et a l . 1983. Lack of expression of cellular homologues of retroviral one genes in bovine tumors. In: Modern Trends in Human Leukemia, edited by Neth* R., et al. V. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 21B-221. 81. Kishimoto, T. 19B5. Factors affecting B-cell growth and differentiation. Ann. Rev. Immunol. 3:133— 157. 82. Knop, J. 1980. Influences of various macrophage populations on Con A induced T-cell proliferation. Immunol. 41: 379—385. 134 83. Koskif I.R. * Poplack* D.G.* and R.M. Blaese. 1776. A nonspecific esterase stain for the identification of monocytes and macrophages. In: jU) Vitro Methods of Cel1 Mediated and Tumor Immunity, eds. B. Bloom and J. David. Academic Press Inc.* New York pp. 359—362. 84. Koyama* H . * Nakanishi* H. * Kajikawa* O. * et al. 1983. T and B lymphocytes in persistent lymphocytic and leukemic cattle. Jpn. J. Vet. Sci. 45:471-475. 85. Kumar* S.P.* Paul* P.S.* Pomeroy* K.A. Johnson* D.U. et al. 1978. Frequency of lymphocytes bearing Fc receptors and surface membrane immunoglobulins in normal* persistent lymphocytotic and leukemic cows. Am. J. Vet. Res. 39:45-49. 86. Kumar* S.P.* Muscoplat* C.C.* Thoen* C.O.* and D.U. Johnson. 1979. Potentiation of lymphocyte mitogen responses to Con A by antigen—activated peripheral blood monocytes in bovine. B7. Kurnick* J.T.* Ostberg* L. and M. Stegagno. 1979. A rapid method for the separation of functional lymphoid cell populations of hyman and animal origin on PVP—silica (Percoll) density gradients. Scand. J. Immunol. 10:563-573. 88. Langston* A . * Ferdinand* G.A.* Ouppanner* R . * et.al. 1978. Comparison of production variables of bovine leukemia virus antibody-negative and antibody positive cows in two California dairy herds. Am. J. Vet. Res. 39:1093-1098. 89. Levy* D.* Deshayes* L . * Parodi* A.* Levy* J.P. et al. 1977. Bovine leukemia virus specific antibodies among French cattle. II. Radioimmunoassay with the major structural protein (BLV p24). Int. J. Cancer. 20:543-550. 90. Lewin* H. A.* Davis* W. and D. Bernoco. 1985. Monoclonal antibodies that distinguish bovine t and B lymphocytes. Vet. Immuno.* and Immunopath. 9:87-102. 91. Lewin* H. A.* Casey* J.W.* and D. Bernoco. 1985. Lymphoblastoid cell lines derived from two cases of enzootic bovine lymphosarcoma express a T— cell phenotype. Abstract* Proceedings of Federation of Biological Research * 1985. 135 92. Lewis* 6.K.* and J.W. Goodman* 197B. Purification of functional* determinant specific idiotype-beering murine T cells. J. Exp. Med. 14B:915—924. 93. Long* C.U.* Henderson* L.E.* and S. Oroszlan. 19BD. Isolation and characterization of low molecular weight DNA binding proteins from retroviruses. Virology 104:491—496. 94. Oroszlan* S.* Sarngadharan* M.G.* Copeland* T.D., et al- 19B2. Primary structure analysis of the major internal protein p24 of human type C T-cell leukemia virus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 79:1291-1294. 95. Mage* M.G.* McHugh* L.L. * and T.L. Rothstein. 1977., Mouse lymphocytes with and without surface immunoglobulin: Preparative scale separation on polystyrene tissue culture dishes coated with specifically purified anti-immunoglobulin. J. Immunol. Methods. 15:47-56. 96. Malmquist* 14.A.* Van der Maaten* M.J. and A. D. Boothe. 1969.Isolation* Immunodiffusion* Immunofluorescence* and electron microscopy of a syncytial virus of lymphosarcomatous and apparently normal cattle. Cancer Res. 29:18B-2DD. 97. Mammerickx* M.* Portetelle* D. * and A. Burny. 19B2. Experimental cross-transmissions of bovine leukemia virus (BLV) between several animal species. Zentralbl Veterinaermed (B) 28:69-81. 9B. Mamoun R.Z., Astier* T.* and B. Guillemain. 1991. Establishment and propagation of a bovine leukemia virus-producing cell-line derived from the leukocytes of a leukemic cow. J. Gen. Virol. 54:357-365. 99. Mamoun* R.Z.* Astier*T.<, Guillemain* B . * and J.F. Duplan. 1983. Bovine lymphosarcoma: expression of BLV-related proteins in cultured cells. J. Gen. Virology. 64:1B95-19D5. 100. Mamoun* R.Z.* Astier* B . * Guillemain* B . * J.F. Duplan. 1983. Bovine lymphosarcoma: processing of bovine leukemia virus— coded proteins. 64:2791-2795. 101. Maniatus*T.* Fritsch* E.F.* and J. Sambrook. 19B3. Purifications of nucleic acid. In:Molecular Cloning Cold Spring Harbor Press, pp.458-462. 136 1D2. Maniatus,T., Fritsch, E.F.,and J. Sambrook. 1983. Spectrophometric determination of DNA or RNA. In: Molecular Cloning. Cold Spring Harbor Press. P.46B. 103. Maniatus, T . , Fritsch, E.F. and J. Sambrook. 1983. Preparation of stock solutions. In: Molecular Cloning. Cold Spring Harbor Press. P P .4 4 7 - 4 4 B . 104. Marshak, R.R., Coriell, L.L., Laurence, W.C. et al. 1962. Studies on bovine lymphosarcoma. I. Clinical aspects. II. Pathological alterations and herd studies. Cancer Res. 22:202-217. 105. Marx, J. 1986. The slou, insidious natures of the HTLV's. Sci. 231:450-451. 106. McDonald, H.C., and J.F. Ferrer. 1976. Detection, quantitation and characterization of the major internal virion antigen of the bovine leukemia virus by radioimmunoassay. J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 5 7 s875-882. 107. Merion , R. Brenner, J., Gluckman, A., Avraham, R., et al 1985. Humoral and cellular responses in calves experimentally infected bovine leukemia virus (BLV). Vet. Immuno and Immunopathol. 9:105-114. 108. Miller, J.M., Miller, L.S., Olson,S., and D.G. Gillette. 1969. Virus-like particles in phytohemagglutinin- stimulated lymphocyte cultures with reference to bovine lymphosarcoma. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 43:1297-1305. 109. Miller, J.M. and M.J. van der Maaten. 1978. Infectivity tests of secretions and excretion from cattle infected uith bovine leukemia virus. J. Natl, Cancer Inst. 62:425-428. 110 . 111. Muscoplat, C.C., Johnson, D.W.» K.A. Pomeroy, et. a l . 1974. Lymphocyte surface immunoglobulin: Frequency .in normal and lymphocytotic cattle. Am. J. Vet. Res. 35:593-595. Muscoplat, C.C., Wu Chen, A., Johnson, D.W., and I. Alhji. 1974. In vitro stimulation of bovine peripheral blood lymphocytes: standardization and kinetics of the responses. Am. J. Vet. Res. 35:1557-1561. 137 Muscoplat* C.C.* Alhaji* 1.* Johnson* D.U.* et al. 1974. Character1stics of lymphocyte responses to phytomitogens: comparison of responses of lymphocytes from normal and lymphocytotic cows. Am. J. Vet. Res. 35:1053-1057. 113. Notzel* U . * Drescher* E . * and S. Rosenthal. 1962. Detection of bovine leukaemia virus RNA sequences in non-cultivated peripheral lymphocytes by in situ hybridization with 3H-labelled viral cDNA. Acta Virol 26:33-40. 114. Ohshima* K* Okada* K.* Numakunai* S. et a l . 1981. Evidence of horizontal transmission of bovine leukemia virus due to blood sucking tabanid flies. Jpn. J. Vet, Sci. 43:79-81. 115. Olson, C., Kettmann, R., Burny, A., and R. Kaja. 1981. Goat lymphosarcoma from bovine leukemia virus. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 67:671—675. 116. Onuma, M . , and C. Olson. 1977. tumor-associated antigen in bovine and ovine lymphosarcoma. Cancer Res. 37:3249-3256. 117. Onuma, M . , Takashima, I., and C. Olson. 1978. Tumor-associated antigen and cell surface marker in cells of bovine lymphosarcoma. Ann. Rech. Vet. 9:825—83D. 118. Oroszlan, S., Sarngadharan M.G., Copeland, T.D., et al. 1982. Primary structure analysis of the major internal protein p24 of human type-C T-cel1 leukemia virus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 79:1291-1294. 119. Parfanovitch, M.I., Zhdanov, V.M., Kolomiets, A.G. et al. 1978. Leukogenic properties of purified BLV and possible routes of transmission with leukocytes of milk. Ann. Rech. Vet. 9:781-796. 120 . Paul, P.S., Pomeroy, K.A., Johnson, D.W., et al.1977. Evidence for the replication of bovine leukemia virus in the B-lymphocytes. Am J. Vet. Res. 38:B73. 121. Paul, P.S., Pomeroy, K.A., Castro, A.E, et. al. 1977. Detection of bovine leukemia virus in B-lymphocytes by the syncytia induction assay. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 59:1269-1271 122. Piper, C.E., Abt, D.A., Ferrer, J.F., and R.R. Marshak. 1975. Seroepidemiological evidence of the horizontal transmission of the bovine C-type virus. Cancer Res. 35:2714. 138 123. Piper, C.E. Ferrer, J.F. , Abt, D.D., and R.R. Marshak. 1979. Postnatal and prenatal transmission of the bovine leukemia virus under natural conditions. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 62:165-16B. 124. Pomeroy, K.A., Paul, P.S., Weber, A.F., Sorensen, D.K., and D.W. Johnson. 1977. Evidence that B-lymphocyt.es carry the nuclear pocket abnormality associated with bovine leukemia virus infection. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 59:281-283. 125. Portetelle, D . , Mammerickx, M . , Bex, F . , et a l . 1 9 7 7 . Purification of BLV 9 P 7 0 and BLV p24. Detection by radioimmunoassay of antibodies directed against these antigens. In : Bovine Leucosis: Various Methods of Molecular Virology, edited by A. Burny, PP. 1 3 1 —1 5 2 . Commission of European Communities, Luxembourg. 126. Ressang, A.A., Gielkens, A.L., Quak, S., et al.l?78. Studies on bovine leukosis. VI. Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay for the detection of antibodies to bovine leukosis virus. Ann. Rech. Vet. 9:663-666. 127. Reeves, J.H. and H.U. Renshau. 1978. Surface membrane markers on bovine peripheral blood lymphocytes. Am J. Vet. Res. 39:917—923. 128. Rice, R.R., Stephens, R.M., Burny, A., and R.V. Gilden. 1985. The gag and pol genes of bovine leukemia virus: nucleotide sequence and analysis. Virology 142:357-377. 129. Robert-Guroff, M . * Nakao, Yl, Notake, K . , et a l . 1982. Natural anitbodies to human retrovirus HTLV in a cluster of Japanese patients with adult T cell leukemia. Sci. 215:975—97B. 130. Romero, C.H., Abaracon, D . , Rowe, C.A., and A. G. Silva. 1984. Bovine leukosis virus infectivity in Boophilus microplus ticks. Vet.Record.115:440—441. 131. Rosen, C.A., Sodroski, J.G., Kettmann, R. , Burny, A., and W. Haseltine. 1985. Trans activation of the bovine leukemia virus long terminal repeat in BLV-infected cells. Sci. 227. 320-322. 132. Rouse, B.T. and L.A. Babiuk. 1974. Host responses to infectious bovine rhinotracheitis virus III. Isolation and immunologic activities of bovine T lymphocytes. J. Immunol. 113:1391-1398 139 133. Sagata* N . * Yasmaga* T.* Tsuzuku* I.* et.al. 19B5. Complete nucleotide sequence of the genome of BLV: Its evolutionary relationship to other retroviruses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U>S>A> 82:677-681. 134. Salisburg* J.G. * Graham* J.M.* and C.A. Pasternak. A rapid method for the separation of large and small thymocytes from rats and mice. 1979. J. Biochem. Biophys. Methods. 1:341-347. 135. Slanon* D.J.* Press* M.F.* Souza* L.M.* et al. 1985. Studies of the putative transforming protein of the Type I human T-cell leukemia virus. Sci. 228:1427-1430. 136 . Snedecor G. and W.G. Cochran. 1967. Statistical Methods. Sixth Ed. Iowa State Univ. Univ. Press. Anesi Iowa. 137. Sodroskit J. G.. Rosen* C.A.* and W.A. Haseltine. 1984. Trans-Acting transcriptional activation of the long terminal repeat of human T lymphotropic viruses in infected cells. Sci. 225:381-385. 138. Sodroski* J.G.* Rosen C.* Goh* C.W.* and U. Haseltine 1985. A transcriptional activator protein encoded by the x— lor region of the human T-cell leukemia virus. Sci. 228:1430-1434. 139. Southern* E. 1975. Detection of specific sequences among DNA fragments separated by gel electrophoresis. J. Mol. Biol. 98:503. 140. Stock* N.D.* and J.F. Ferrer. 1972. Replicating C-type virus in PHA treated buffy coat cultures of bovine origin. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 48:985—996. 141. Tabel* H . * Chander* S.* Van der Maaten* h.J.* and J.M. Miller. 1976. Bovine leukosis virus. Epidemiological study of bovine C-type virus by the use of the complement fixation test. Can J. Comp. Med. 40:350-354. 142. Takashima* I.* C.* Olson* Driscoll* D.M . * and L.E. Baumgartnener. 1977. B lymphocytes and T lymphocytes in three types of bovine lymphosarcoma. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 59:1205-1209. 143. Thorn* R.M.* Gupta* P.* Kenyon* S.J.and J.F. Ferrer. 1981. Evidence that the spontaneous blastogenseis of lymphocytes from bovine leukemia virus-infected cattle is viral antigen specific. Infection and Immunity 34:84-89. 140 144. Uckert* W . * and V. Wunderlich. 1979. Proteins of bovine leukemia virus! pis is the major phosphoprotein. Acta Biol Med Ger 30=K42. 145. Uckert* W.i and Wunderlichf V. * Ghysdael* J . * Portetelle* D.* and A. Burny. 1964. Bovine leukemia virus (BLV) structural model based on chemical cross-linking studies. Virology* in press. 146. Usinger* W.R.* and G.A. Splitter. I960. A simple method for specific depletion of B lymphocytes from bovine peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Immunol. Commun. 9 s693-703. 147. Usinger* U.R.* and G.A. Splitter. 1981. Two molecularly independent surface receptors identify bovine T lymphocytes. J. Immunol. Methods. 45:209-219. 146. Van der Maaten* Boothe* A.D. and W.A. Malmquist.1969. Further Studies of bovine syncytial virus. Comparative Leukemia Res. 36:446-452. 149. Van der Maaten* Boothe* A. D . * and C. L. Seger. 1972. Isolation of a virus from cattle with persistent lymphocytosis. J. Natl. Can. Inst. 49: 1649-1657 150. Van der Maaten* M. J. Hubbert* W. T . * Boothe* A. D. * et al. 1973. Isolations of bovine syncytial virus from maternal and fetal blood. Am. J. Vet. Res. 34:341-343. 151. Van der Maaten* M.J.* J. M. Miller and A.D. Boothe. 1974. Replication type-C virus particles in monolayer cell cultures of tissue from cattle with lymphosarcoma. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 52:491-497. 152. Van der Maaten* M.J. and J.M Miller. 1976. Replication of bovine leukemia virus in monolayer cell cultures. Bibl. Haematol. 43:341—343. 153. Van der Maaten* M.J.* and J.M. Miller. 1976. Serological evidence of transmission of bovine leukemia virus to chimpanzees. Vet. Microbiol. 1:351-357. 154. Van der Maaten* M.J.* and J.M. Miller. 1978. Susceptibility of cattle to bovine leukemia virus infection by various routes of exposure. In: Advances in Comparative Leukemia Research, edited by P. Beutvelzen. Elsevier* North Holland* Amsterdam, pp. 29—32. 141 155. Wei land* F . , Uberschar, S., Straub, O . , et al. 1?74. C— type particles in cultured lymphocytes from highly leukemic cattle. Intervirology, 4:14D-149. 156. Weiland, F . , and O.C. Straub. 1975. Frequency of surface immunoglobulin bearing blood lymphocytes in cattle affected with bovine leukosis. Res. Vet. Sci. 2 0 i340-41. 157. Weiland, F. and O.C. Straub. 1976. Differences in the in vitro response of lymphocytes from leukotic and normal cattle to Concanavalin A. Res. Vet. Sci. 20:340-341. 158. Weiland, F . , and S. Ubershar. 1976. U1trastructural comparison of bovine leukemia virus (BLV) with C-type particles of other species. Arch. Virol., 54:187-190. 159. Weiss, A., Hollander H. and J. Stobo. 1985. Acquired Immunodeficiency syndrome: Epidmiology, virology, and immunology. Ann. Rev. Med. 36:545-562. 160. Wilesmith, J.W., Straub, O.C. and R.J. Lorenz. 1979. Some observations on the epidemiology of bovine leukosis virus in a large dairy herd. Res. Vet. Sci. 161. Williams, D.L., Lo, J . , and G. F. Enrichment of T lymphocytes from blood mononuclear cells using an depletion technique ("panning"). Immunopathol. (in press). 162. Wong—Stal1, F. and R. C. Gallo. 1985. Human T-lymphotrophic retroviruses. Nature 317:393-403. 163. Wysocki, L.H., and V.L. sato. 1978. “Panning* for lymphocytes: A method for cell separation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (USA). 75:2844-284B. 164. Yamamoto, S., Onuma, 11., Kosama, H. , Mikamai, T . , and H. Izawa. 1984. Suppression of natural cytotoxic activity of lymphocytes from cattle and sheep during the progress of bovine leukosis. Vet. Micro. 9:105— 111. 165. Yamantota, N . , Okada, M . , Koyanagi, Y. , et al. 1982. Transformation of human leukocytes by cocultivation with an adult T cell leukemia virus producer cell line. Sci. 217:737-739. •f' Amborski. 1985. bovine peripheral immuno—affinity Vet. Immunol. CHAPTER X: NAME: CURRICULUM VITAE Diana Lynn Brubach Williams DATE AND PLACE OF BIRTH: July 7, 1951 Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania CITIZENSHIP: United States of America HOME ADDRESS: 13B06 Broad Ave. PHONE (504) 293-3815 Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70810 MARITAL STATUS: Married CHILDREN: Anthony, 19B0 UNIVERSITY EDUCATION: Institution Louisiana State Dates Speciality Degree 1974-1977 Microbiology B.S. 1977-1979 Veterinary and M.S. University Baton Rouge, La. Louisiana State University Medical Entomology Baton Rouge, La. School of Veterinary 1982-1985 Medicine, Louisiana Veterinary Microbiology State University, Baton Rouge, La. 142 Ph.D. D OC TO R AL EXAMINATION A ND DISSERTATION REPORT Candidate: Major Field: D iana L. W illiam s V e t. M edical S c ie n c e s Title of Dissertation: M o lec u la r S tu d ie s on T Lymphocytes from B ovine Leukemia V iru s I n f e c te d C a t tle Approved: Major Professor and Chairman Dean of the Graduate uaye School Sctux EXAMINING COMMITTEE: AT OVq- Date of Examination: fj»..