Download The calculation of the degree of an approximate greatest common

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Eisenstein's criterion wikipedia , lookup

Compressed sensing wikipedia , lookup

Dynamic substructuring wikipedia , lookup

Quartic function wikipedia , lookup

Horner's method wikipedia , lookup

Multidisciplinary design optimization wikipedia , lookup

Newton's method wikipedia , lookup

Gaussian elimination wikipedia , lookup

Matrix multiplication wikipedia , lookup

Polynomial greatest common divisor wikipedia , lookup

Singular-value decomposition wikipedia , lookup

Factorization of polynomials over finite fields wikipedia , lookup

False position method wikipedia , lookup

Resultant wikipedia , lookup

Root-finding algorithm wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
The calculation of the degree of an approximate greatest common divisor of two
polynomials
Joab Winkler, Sheffield University, Sheffield, England
The calculation of the degree of an approximate greatest common divisor (AGCD) of two inexact polynomials f (y) and g(y) is a non-trivial computation because it reduces to the estimation of the rank loss of a
resultant matrix R(f, g). This computation is usually performed by placing a threshold on the small singular values of R(f, g), but this method suffers from disadvantages because the numerical rank of R(f, g)
may not be defined, or the noise level imposed on the coefficients of f (y) and g(y) may not be known,
or it may only be known approximately. This talk addresses this problem by considering three methods
for estimating the degree of an AGCD of f (y) and g(y), such that an estimate of the noise level is not
assumed. The first method assigns probability distributions to the zero and non-zero singular values, and
then uses the principle of maximum likelihood to calculate the most likely (probable) rank of R(f, g).
The second method involves the calculation of the angle between two subspaces that are apparent from
the structure of the Sylvester resultant matrix S(f, g), which is one type of resultant matrix. The third
method uses the theory of subresultant matrices, which are derived from S(f, g) by the deletion of some
of its rows and columns. The three methods are compared computationally on non-trivial polynomials
(high degree, many multiple roots) and improvements to the methods are discussed.
April 2009
1