* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download The calculation of the degree of an approximate greatest common
Eisenstein's criterion wikipedia , lookup
Compressed sensing wikipedia , lookup
Dynamic substructuring wikipedia , lookup
Quartic function wikipedia , lookup
Horner's method wikipedia , lookup
Multidisciplinary design optimization wikipedia , lookup
Newton's method wikipedia , lookup
Gaussian elimination wikipedia , lookup
Matrix multiplication wikipedia , lookup
Polynomial greatest common divisor wikipedia , lookup
Singular-value decomposition wikipedia , lookup
Factorization of polynomials over finite fields wikipedia , lookup
The calculation of the degree of an approximate greatest common divisor of two polynomials Joab Winkler, Sheffield University, Sheffield, England The calculation of the degree of an approximate greatest common divisor (AGCD) of two inexact polynomials f (y) and g(y) is a non-trivial computation because it reduces to the estimation of the rank loss of a resultant matrix R(f, g). This computation is usually performed by placing a threshold on the small singular values of R(f, g), but this method suffers from disadvantages because the numerical rank of R(f, g) may not be defined, or the noise level imposed on the coefficients of f (y) and g(y) may not be known, or it may only be known approximately. This talk addresses this problem by considering three methods for estimating the degree of an AGCD of f (y) and g(y), such that an estimate of the noise level is not assumed. The first method assigns probability distributions to the zero and non-zero singular values, and then uses the principle of maximum likelihood to calculate the most likely (probable) rank of R(f, g). The second method involves the calculation of the angle between two subspaces that are apparent from the structure of the Sylvester resultant matrix S(f, g), which is one type of resultant matrix. The third method uses the theory of subresultant matrices, which are derived from S(f, g) by the deletion of some of its rows and columns. The three methods are compared computationally on non-trivial polynomials (high degree, many multiple roots) and improvements to the methods are discussed. April 2009 1