* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download A Review of Zoonotic Tuberculosis at the Human-Livestock
Neglected tropical diseases wikipedia , lookup
Hygiene hypothesis wikipedia , lookup
Germ theory of disease wikipedia , lookup
Management of multiple sclerosis wikipedia , lookup
African trypanosomiasis wikipedia , lookup
Sjögren syndrome wikipedia , lookup
Multiple sclerosis signs and symptoms wikipedia , lookup
Multiple sclerosis research wikipedia , lookup
Infection control wikipedia , lookup
Sociality and disease transmission wikipedia , lookup
Hospital-acquired infection wikipedia , lookup
Zoonotic Tuberculosis at the Human-Livestock-Wildlife Interface Meghan Gibas Colorado State University College of Veterinary Medicine & Biomedical Science Outline • Background • Rationale ▫ Systematic Literature Review ▫ Preliminary Field Data • Conclusion/Implications Tuberculosis in Humans • TB in humans is primarily caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M. tb) • TB is an infectious-contagious disease and represents one of the leading causes of death from an infectious disease worldwide. ▫ 8.7 million new cases of TB in 2011 ▫ 1.4 million deaths in 2011 (WHO Annual TB report, 2011) (3,833 deaths/day) Mycobacterium bovis (M. bovis) • The main host of M. bovis is cattle • 128 out of 155 countries reported the presence of M. bovis infection and/or clinical disease in their cattle population between 2005 and 2008 (Michel et al, 2010) • Most warm-blooded vertebrates can be infected. including humans Transmission & Pathology of M. bovis in Humans (Zoonotic TB) ▫ Orally (unpasteurized dairy products) or through inhalation (Michel et al., 2010) ▫ Patients with extra-pulmonary disease had increased odds of having M. bovis vs. M. tb (Hlavsa et al., 2008) ▫ M. bovis can be an important etiological agent for extra pulmonary TB, especially in HIV-infected patients. (Cicero et al., 2009) http://www.triple3livestock.com/images/gallery/w500/48530220.jpg http://www.mnn.com/sites/default/files/cow_17.jpg http://www.china-mike.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/mad_cowsmall.jpg M. bovis Resistant to PZA • M. bovis is naturally resistant to pyrazinamide (PZA), a critical component to effective short course TB treatment. • Thus, patients with undiagnosed M. bovis are being treated sub-optimally. Challenges of Zoonotic TB • Conditions in the developing world: (Cosivi et al., 1998; Thoen et al., 2006). ▫ ▫ ▫ ▫ Higher prevalence of bovine TB in livestock Lack of milk pasteurization Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) Close interaction between humans, livestock, and wildlife species Challenges of Zoonotic TB ▫ 1.4% is the generally perceived estimate for the proportion of human TB cases infected with M. bovis. Lack of targeted surveillance ▫ Scientific evidence indicates that the true risk of human TB caused by M. bovis is under investigated/under estimated/under reported. (Cosivi et al., 1998; Kazwala et al., 2001; Ayele et al., 2004; Danker and Davis, 2005; Hlavsa et al., 2008; Thoen et al.; 2010; de Kantor et al., 2010; Michel et al., 2010). Research questions 1) What is the range of risk estimates of M. bovis infection (zoonotic TB) among humans diagnosed with TB? - The risk of zoonotic TB was defined as the proportion of human TB patients infected with M. bovis. 2) What are the key study design characteristics that may contribute to the heterogeneity between different studies when estimating the risk of zoonotic TB? Key Study Characteristics Range of risk estimates of M. bovis infection • There is a large variation (a range of 0-45%) in the risk estimates of M. bovis infection in human TB patients. • 16 of the studies (26%) reported a >10% risk of M. bovis. Results • 53% of studies used culture positive TB patients as patient inclusion criteria. • 32% of the studies evaluated extra-pulmonary samples. • 48% of the studies used Stonebrink as a culture medium for the growth of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex species. • 8% evaluated the risk of zoonotic TB specifically in children specifically in children. • 11% evaluated the risk of zoonotic TB among TB patients from rural areas. Distribution of key study characteristics 72.58% 53.23% 48.39% 32.26% 11.30% 8.06% Preliminary Field Data - Zambia • Recent retrospective study analyzed sputum samples from 917 patients assumed to be infected with M. tb • 8 patients with M. bovis, all of whom were cattle farmers. • Currently have ongoing study looking at the rural Namwala district of Zambia • Sample includes 45 human patients diagnosed with TB • 15 (33%) have been initially classified as infected with M. bovis based on culture morphology (cultured on Stonebrink medium) • 13 of these patients indicated that they consume raw milk • Currently, strain typing is pending to confirm M. bovis One Health Collaboration - Kenya • Collaborating with physicians in Kenya that noticed monoresistance to pyrazinamide (PZA) among TB patients in rural areas. • 2012: 6% of M. tb complex isolates were monoresistant to PZA • Role of socio-cultural practices & the true risk of M. bovis infection in these rural communities of Kenya. Dr. Meghan McInerney (M.D. DTM&H) Fellow, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine Indiana University Dr. Jane Carter (MD) Associate Professor of Medicine The Union President MD, Division Global Public Health, University of California, San Diego Conclusions • There is considerable variation in the risk estimates reported for M. bovis infection among human TB patients (range 0-45%). • Key study characteristics differ considerably, which can have an effect on the risk estimates reported by different studies. • Rural communities are underrepresented in the current literature. • A considerable amount (>50%) of studies did not use the recommended culture medium to grow M. bovis, nor were extra-pulmonary samples evaluated. Implications • Epidemiology, pathology, and treatment challenges associated with M. bovis infection among humans are significant. Studies are needed to assess the risk of zoonotic TB among populations in regions where socio-cultural and economic factors increase the risk posed by this zoonosis. • Patient enrollment, sampling procedures, and laboratory protocols need to be carefully considered. Acknowledgements • Dr. Francisco Olea-Popelka Questions? http://www.shelbourn.com/gazette/gazette-2013.05.09g.jpg References • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Ayele, W.Y., Neill, S.D., Zinsstag, J., Weiss, M.G., Pavlik, I., 2004. Bovine tuberculosis: an old disease but a new threat to Africa. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis. 8, 924–937. Biet F, Boschiroli ML, Thorel MF, Gulliotean LA. 2005. Zoonotic aspects of Mycobacterium bovis and Mycobacterium aviumintracellulare complex (MAC). Vet. Res. 36:411–436. R. Cicero, H. Olivera, A. Hernández-Solis, E. Ramírez-Casanova, A. Escobar-Gutiérrez 2009. Frequency of Mycobacterium bovis as an etiologic agent in extrapulmonary tuberculosis in HIV-positive and -negative Mexican patients. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases. 28(5):455-460. Cosivi O, Grange JM, Daborn CJ, Raviglione MC, Fujikura T, Cousins D, Robinson RA, Huchzermeyer HFAK, de Kantor I, Meslin FX. 1998. Zoonotic Tuberculosis due to Mycobacterium bovis in Developing Countries. Emerging Infectious Diseases 4(1). Dankner, W.M., Davis, C.E., 2000. Mycobacterium bovis as a significant cause of tuberculosis in children residing along the United States–Mexico border in the Baja California region. Pediatrics 105, E79 de Kantor, I. N., LoBue, P. A. and Thoen C. O. 2010. Human Tuberculosis Caused by Mycobacterium bovis in the United States, Latin America, and the Caribean. International Journal on Tuberculosis and Lung Disease 14(11): 1369-1373. Evans, J.T., Smith, G., Banerjee, A., Smith, R.M.M., Dale, J., Innes, J.A., Hunt, D., Tweddell, A., Wood, A., Anderson, C., Hewinson, R.G., Smith, N.H., Hawkey, P.M., Sonnenberg, P. 2007. Cluster of human tuberculosis caused by Mycobacterium bovis: evidence for person-to-person transmission in the UK. The Lancet. 369(9569):1270 – 1276. Hlavsa M, Moonan P, Lobue P, et al. 2008. Human tuberculosis due to Mycobacterium bovis in the United States, 1995-2005. Clin Infect Dis. 2008; 47(2):168-175. Kazwala, R.R., Daborn, C.J., Sharp, J.M., Kambarage, D.M., Jiwa, S.F., Mbem- bati, N.A., 2001. Isolation of Mycobacterium bovis from human cases of cervical adenitis in Tanzania: a cause for concern? Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis. 5, 87–91. LoBue PA, and Moser KS. 2005. Treatment of Mycobacterium bovis infected tuberculosis patients: San Diego County, California, United States, 1994-2003. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 9(3): 333–338. LoBue PA, Betacourt W, Peter C, Moser KS. 2003. Epidemiology of Mycobacterium bovis disease in San Diego County, 1994– 2000 Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 7(2):180–185. Michel, A., Müller, B., van Helden P. 2010. Mycobacterium bovis at the animal–human interface: A problem,or not? Veterinary Microbiology 140: 371-381 Rodwell TC, Moore M, Moser KS, Brodine SK, Strathdee SA. 2008. Mycobacterium bovis tuberculosis in binational communities. Emerg Infect Dis. 14(6): 1-16. Thoen C, LoBue P, de Kantor I. 2010. Why has zoonotic tuberculosis not received much attention? Int. J. Tuberc Lung Dis 14(9): 1073-1074. World Health Organization. Neglected zoonotic diseases. World Health Organization. http://www.who.int/neglecteddiseases/zoonoses/en/. Accessed June 3, 2013.