Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Protein/Energy Model: Applied to cumulative effects assessment Energy – Protein model disturbance displacement Model structure FOOD INTAKE RUMEN ENERGY (MEI) disturbance displacement NITROGEN (MNI) ALLOCATION Why Protein? • By ignoring protein, we assume the growth of the fetus, the production of milk and the replenishment of muscle tissue is entirely dictated by available energy. NOT TRUE • An integral part of the weaning strategy in caribou – critical to buffer environmental change • While energy may be the key nutrient in winter, protein is the key nutrient in summer • “The resilience of Rangifer populations to respond to variable patterns of food supply and metabolic demand may be related to their ability to alter the timing and allocation of body protein to reproduction.” – Barboza 2008 DECISION TREE FOR CARIBOU WEANING STRATEGIES Date Above Threshold Below Threshold Weaning Class Reproductive Impact BIRTH Calf Weight gain Calf Weight gain Cow Protein gain Cow Protein gain Early September Cow fat weight Cow fat gain Early October Calf fat weight Calf fat weight Late June Mid July Post-natal weaner Summer weaner Early weaner Calf dies High probability of pregnancy Calf dies High probability of pregnancy Lower overwinter calf survival Later age of 1st reproduction Higher overwinter cow survival Increased probability of pregnancy Extended lactator Lower probability of pregnancy Higher overwinter calf survival Normal weaner “Normal” probability of pregnancy “Normal” overwinter calf survival Linking energy-protein model with a population model Scenarios (Daily Resolution) Snow Depth Climate Energy Protein Model Climate database Insects Veg Development Birth rate Activity Physiological Predictions Age first reproduction Impacts on Calf survival annually POPULATION MODEL Impacts on Cow survival Model applications • Porcupine – 1002 development – Climate change • George River – Vehicle for data integration • Bathurst – Cumulative effects pilot project • Central Arctic – Prudhoe Bay oil development • North Baffin – Baffinland’s Mary River project • Qamanirjuaq – AREVA’s Kiggavik project Residence time (days) Kiggavik assessment approach 5 4 3 2 1 0 • 100 cows/scenario • Weaning status • Fall body weights Energy Protein Model pregnancy calf mortality Population model projected to 2050 Climate database (average) Harvest adjustment needed to offset development effects Jay assessment components EERX ENERGY COST = EERX - EENRX EENRX Kiggavik assessment components EIC PIC EIRX PIRX EERX PERX EEC PEC EINRX PINRX EENRX PENRX ENERGY BALANCE (EB) = EI-EE ENERGY “COST” for RX caribou = EBC - EBRX ENERGY “COST” for NRX caribou = EBC - EBNRX PROTEIN BALANCE (PB) = PI-PE PROTEIN “COST” for RX caribou = PBC - PBRX PROTEIN “COST” for NRX caribou = PBC - PBNRX Probability of Pregnancy RESILIENCE the steeper the line; the less the resilience 1 0.9 Probability of Pregnancy 0.8 0.7 PRODUCTIVITY 0.6 0.5 The lower the RBW associated with 50% p of pregnancy, the more productive 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 RELATIVE Body Weight 0.8 0.9 1 Probability of pregnancy among arctic caribou herds in relation to Relative Body Weight 1.2 Probability of Pregnancy 1 0.8 0.6 GEORGE QAMANIRJUAQ TAIMYR 0.4 0.2 0 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 Relative Body Weight 0.8 0.9 1 Probability of pregnancy among arctic caribou herds in relation to Relative Body Weight 1.2 Probability of Pregnancy 1 0.8 GEORGE 0.6 QAMINURJUAQ TAIMYR BEV/BATHURST 0.4 PEARY 0.2 0 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 Relative Body Weight 0.8 0.9 1 Probability of pregnancy among arctic caribou herds in relation to Relative Body Weight 1.2 Probability of Pregnancy 1 0.8 GEORGE QAMINURJUAQ 0.6 TAIMYR BEV/BATHURST PEARY 0.4 CENTRAL ARCTIC PORCUPINE 0.2 0 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 Relative Body Weight 0.8 0.9 1 Major advantages of E-P approach linked to a population model • Accounts for protein dynamics • Flexible in designing scenarios – ask the “what-if” questions • Multi-scale: integrates from climate to population – thus can develop scenarios that effect any scale (climate, habitat, behaviour, demography) • Incorporates age structure – important when populations cycle • Can model up to 1000 animals at once through a scenario – i.e. can capture the population variability and identify vulnerable cohorts