* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Catching signals surfing the net
Survey
Document related concepts
Transcript
You are cordially invited to the (UvA/VU) Systems Biology seminar: Catching signals surfing the net By Dr. Boris N. Kholodenko Systems Biology Ireland, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin, Ireland date: Thursday 6 April 2017 time: 12h15–13h15 venue: O|2-building, De Boelelaan 1108, O|2 Auditorium 00E70 host: Hans Westerhoff, [email protected] Professor, Microbial Physiology, VU Amsterdam Systems Biology Seminar series Coordinator: Matteo Barberis (UvA) Abstract The advancements in “omics” (proteomics, genomics, and metabolomics) technologies have yielded large inventories of genes, transcripts, proteins, and metabolites. The challenge is to find out how these entities work together to regulate cellular responses to external and internal cues. Computational models provide insight into the intricate relationships between stimuli and responses, revealing mechanisms that enable networks to amplify signals and reduce noise and generate discontinuous bistable dynamics or oscillations. In this talk, I review experimental and theoretical progress towards better understanding of how the cellular functions are encoded by the dynamics of signalling and gene networks and how the design features of networks specify biological decisions (1,2). I focus on (i) how graded, analogue signals from growth factor receptors can be converted into diverse patterns of mitogenic and survival signalling, which are further decoded by transcriptional circuits to create discrete, digital outputs leading to specific cell-fate decisions (3,4); and (ii) how competing protein interactions with phosphorylation-controlled affinities create switches between signalling fluxes through mitogenic RAF-1/MEK/ERK and proapoptotic MST2/LATS/YAP pathways, which coordinate cell-fate decisions (5). I show that drug resistance resulting from dimerization of kinases, such as BRAF/CRAF, JAK2 and others can be explained by allosteric inhibitor effects and the emergence of different drug affinities between free kinase monomers versus dimers (6). This analysis extends to kinase homo- and heterodimers, allows for their symmetric and asymmetric conformations and predicts how thermodynamic factors influence dose-response dependencies. I show how two inhibitors ineffective on their own when combined can abolish drug resistance at lower doses than either inhibitor applied alone (7). Selected Literature 1. Kolch W, Halasz M, Granovskaya M, Kholodenko BN. The dynamic control of signal transduction networks in cancer cells. Nature Reviews Cancer 15, 515-527 (2015). 2. Kholodenko BN. Cell-signalling dynamics in time and space, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 7, 165-176 (2006). 3. Nakakuki T et al. Ligand-specific c-Fos expression emerges from the spatiotemporal control of ErbB network dynamics, Cell 141, 884-896 (2010). 4. Kholodenko B, Yaffe MB, Kolch W. Computational approaches for analyzing information flow in biological networks. Science Signaling 5, re1 (2012). 5. Romano D. et al. Protein interaction switches coordinate Raf-1 and MST2/Hippo signalling. Nature Cell Biology 16, 673-684 (2014). 6. Kholodenko BN. Drug Resistance Resulting from Kinase Dimerization Is Rationalized by Thermodynamic Factors Describing Allosteric Inhibitor Effects. Cell Reports 12, 1939-1949 (2015). 7. Byrne KM et al. Bistability in the Rac1, PAK, and RhoA Signaling Network Drives Actin Cytoskeleton Dynamics and Cell Motility Switches. Cell Systems 2, 38–48 (2016).