Download Creativity Session

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Targeting Affordability and
Controlling Cost Growth through
Should-Cost Analysis
May, 2012
Anthony A DeMarco
President, PRICE Systems, L.L.C.
17000 Commerce Parkway – Suite A
Mt. Laurel, NJ 08054
856.608.7214
[email protected]
© 2012 PRICE Systems, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
1
Targeting Affordability and Controlling Cost Growth
through Should-Cost Analysis
Presented by:
Anthony A DeMarco, President
[email protected]
Phone: 856-608-7214
Mr. DeMarco is a recognized expert and frequent speaker
on predictive cost modeling for optimizing planning,
budgeting, and cost management. During his 30 year
career he has contributed over 25 papers on cost
estimating, analysis and management and is cited on two
U.S. patents for cost estimating techniques.
Honors:
ISPA Freiman Award, 1997
Member, NASA IMCE Task Force 2001
NDIA Delaware Valley Chapter President, 2009-2011
© 2012 PRICE Systems, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
2
Secretary Carter Memorandum
On September 14th 2010 The Honorable Ashton B. Carter; Under
Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology and Logistics,
released a memorandum addressed to the acquisition professionals of
the Department of Defense. The primary thrust of the memorandum
was the current need for greater efficiency and productivity in defense
spending.
Secretary Carter provided guidance organized into five
initiatives 1:
– Target Affordability and Control Cost Growth
– Incentivize Productivity and Innovation in Industry
– Promote Real Competition
– Improve Tradecraft in Services Acquisition
– Reduce Non-Productive Processes and Bureaucracy.
Notes: 1 - Memorandum for Acquisition Professionals: SUBJECT: Better Buying Power for Obtaining Greater Efficiency and Productivity
in Defense Spending (Washington, D.C Sep 14 2010).
2 - Memorandum for Secretaries of the Military Departments / Directors of the Defense Agencies: SUBJECT: Implementation
Directive for Better Buying Power – Obtaining Greater Efficiency and Productivity in Defense Spending (Washington, D.C Nov 3
2010).
© 2012 PRICE Systems, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
3
Secretary Carter Calls for Will Cost/Should Cost
Management
Initiative #1
– Focus on affordability
– Drive to obtain cost control
– Improve production rates
Use Will Cost / Should
Cost Management to
drive productivity
– Use should cost analysis to
negotiate productivity
improvements
– Scrutinize every element of
program cost to assess the
contractor’s ability to reduce
cost year to year
© 2012 PRICE Systems, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
4
Implementation of Will-Cost and Should-Cost Management
April 22, 2011 Memo
Program Managers will develop, own, track, and report against
Should-Cost estimates. In doing so, they should use all relevant
resources within the Department to facilitate the development of
program Should-Cost estimates
Service and Component Acquisition Executives should develop
incentive plans for their Program Managers to reinforce and
reward commitment to the Will-Cost and Should-Cost
Management process. An essential ingredient of Should-Cost
management is the provision of incentives for both of the parties
to program execution: government managers, who seek more
value for the war-fighter and taxpayer; and industry managers,
who develop, build and sustain our systems and provide needed
services.
Should-Cost estimates can be developed in any of three ways or
in a combination.
1.
perform a bottoms-up estimate
2.
identify reductions from "Will-Cost" estimate
3.
use competitive contracting and contract negotiations
© 2012 PRICE Systems, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
5
Implementation of WillCost and Should-Cost
Management
April 22, 2011 Memo
© 2012 PRICE Systems, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
6
The good news is that this is a best practice!
© 2012 PRICE Systems, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
7
Outline
Program Managers and Suppliers are challenged to
identify efficiencies and manage affordability using
Will Cost and Should Cost analysis
Agile parametric models are necessary to rapidly
analyze data, determine Should Costs, and identify
efficiencies that drive savings
There are many examples of success and reusable
artifacts from these successes
Common among the successes are
5
proven
steps to successfully target affordability and control
cost growth through Should-Cost analysis
© 2012 PRICE Systems, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
8
5
1.
2.
Steps to Targeting Affordability and
Controlling Cost Growth through ShouldCost Analysis
Establish Will Cost using
a)
Contract price
b)
Models that leverages supplier’s actual productivity history to simulate most-likelycost at 50% confidence level
Establish Should Cost using models that
a)
simulate best practices applied to your program or item
b)
simulate desired objectives, i.e.; weight reduction
3.
Identify CRIs - Work with suppliers to determine specific cost
reduction initiatives (CRIs) that drive efforts a Should Cost target
4.
Incentivize suppliers to realize subsequent phase CRIs with
Award Fees
5.
Create a Should Cost glide path and implement a continuous
process that uses models to track CRIs results over time
© 2012 PRICE Systems, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
9
2
Agile, full system, total cost, fully linked cost
models are essential!
Set program factors
in accordance with
historical data or
assumptions
Create A PBS which
accounts for all
aspects of the
program
Set Life Cycle /
Logistics factors in
accordance with
program plan,
historical data or
assumptions
Determine correct
number of
production and
prototype units
© 2012 PRICE Systems, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
10
2
Agile, full system, total cost, fully linked
cost models are essential!.
© 2012 PRICE Systems, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
11
2
Example: Using Learning Curve and ECN
Modeling to Establish Should Cost*
Track supplier’s
cumulative average unit
cost over product lots
Use models to
determine cost of
engineering change
notices (ECNs) and
normalize average unit
costs
Use learning curve to
determine Should Cost
*taken from Lockheed Martin Tactical Aircraft
Supplier Assessment using PRICE H, 1997
© 2012 PRICE Systems, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
12
2
Example: Using Models to simulate best
practices to establish Should Cost*
Identify an analogous
system/item that
employs best practices
Use models to recast
system/item in target
operating environment
and other specifics
Present findings to
supplier and determine
a fair Should Cost target
*taken from Global Positioning System (GPS)
and the use of Parametrics, LT COL
Latterman, USAF 1992; Approach saved the
program millions of dollars
© 2012 PRICE Systems, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
13
2
Example: Using Models to simulate best
practices to establish Should Cost*
Publically available
information used to model
best commercial practice
for GPS handheld receiver
Used PRICE models to
recast receiver in military
operating environment
and other requirements
Presented findings to
supplier and determined a
fair Should Cost target
*taken from Global Positioning System (GPS) and
the use of Parametrics, LT COL Latterman, USAF
1992; Approach saved the program millions of
dollars
© 2012 PRICE Systems, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
14
2
Should Cost Example
Weapons Manager - flexible remote interfacing
product tailored to Jet Fighter AC & Weapons
distributed I/O management and actuation
control.
Sanitized Data from an actual program
• Cost Savings
Opportunity via
Technology
Refreshes – 4
times over 52
year operating
period.
Weapons
Managers
© 2012 PRICE Systems, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
2
Baseline (Will Cost)
Opportunity (Should Cost)
Development for 15 prototype &
2880 production A/C (SW & HW).
–
LRIP followed by full scale
production of first lot.
–
4 lots of multi-year buys follow
Development for 15 prototype &
140 production A/C (SW & HW);
LRIP & full scale production of
first lot only.
4 technology refresh
developments (2 A/C prototype
systems for each) followed by
full scale production quantities
of: 760, 970, 780, and 230.
10 – 15 hour per month average
A/C operation over 50 years.
10 – 15 hour per month average
A/C operation over 50 years.
Contractor repair of unit failures.
Contractor repair of unit failures.
© 2012 PRICE Systems, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
16
2
Baseline (Will Cost) Estimate Structure
© 2012 PRICE Systems, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
17
2
Opportunity (Should Cost) Estimate Structure
© 2012 PRICE Systems, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
18
2
Results
•$11M
additional Dev
to save $20M
Prod & $14M
O&S.
•Is a Net
Savings of
$23M (approx.
6%) over 50+
years really an
exciting
opportunity?
Should Cost
Components
© 2012 PRICE Systems, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
19
2
Bigger Picture
A/C could be an $800B program.
If only 25% of it can achieve 6% savings, the net
would be $12B - $3B more than the 2011
operating budget of Toronto – that’s getting
exciting!
Weapons
Managers
© 2012 PRICE Systems, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
2
International Space Station Initial Estimate
Mx versus IOC- Fighter/Attack AC
9.00
8.50
y = 0.0503x + 3.5424
R2 = 0.8918
8.00
7.50
Mx
7.00
6.50
6.00
5.50
5.00
4.50
4.00
0
20
40
60
80
100
$35B
120
IOC-1900
$14B
© 2012 PRICE Systems, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
21
3
Identify CRIs - Work with suppliers to determine
specific cost reduction initiatives (CRIs) that
drive efforts a Should Cost target
What if…
Aluminum vs. Titanium?
6 production lots of 100
over 6 years vs.
4 production lots of 150
over 6 years?
No gaps between lots vs.
5 month gap between
lots?
Weight is increased?
© 2012 PRICE Systems, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
22
3
Identify CRIs - Work with suppliers to determine
specific cost reduction initiatives (CRIs) that
drive efforts a Should Cost target
Taken from Army Program awarded Army CAIV Program of the Year 1998
© 2012 PRICE Systems, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
23
4
Incentivize suppliers to realize subsequent
phase CRIs with Award Fees
Today
Budget Targets
© 2012 PRICE Systems, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
24
4
Incentivize suppliers to realize subsequent
phase CRIs with Award Fees
Army Program Example
CPIF contract with an Award Fee incentive - up to
8%.
Identifying Efficiencies & Affordability Management
is an area of emphasis in the award fee criteria.
Unearned award fee rolled over to look-back period
at end of contract to provide long-term incentive.
Three cost goals:
–
Minimize Life Cycle Costs
–
Achieve Unit Rollaway Cost Goal
–
Control O&S cost drivers
© 2012 PRICE Systems, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
25
5
Create a Should Cost glide path and implement a
continuous process that uses models to track
results over time as CRIs are accomplished
UPC
Current
UPC
Target
J
F
M
A
M
J
J
A
S
O
N
D
1996
LCC
LCC
J
F
M
A
M
J
J
1996
© 2012 PRICE Systems, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
26
A
S
O
N
D
5
Create a Should Cost glide path and implement a
continuous process that uses models to track
results over time as CRIs are accomplished
Affordability Management
Process
Establish DTC Goal
Monitor and Review DTC Program (CITIS)
Customer
Affordability
Study
Negotiate
Dem/Val
Contract
Program
Requirements
Supplier
Preliminary
Design and
Baseline
Estimate
Allocate
DTUPC Goal
to Targets by
PDT
Perform Cost
Trade Studies
and
Recommend
Design Change
Determine
Variance of
DTUPC and
LCC
Update
Baseline
Estimate
Recommend DTC Goal
© 2012 PRICE Systems, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
27
Cost
Reduction
Initiatives
and
Corrective
Action
Plans
Make
Design
Decisions
5
1.
2.
Steps to Targeting Affordability and
Controlling Cost Growth through ShouldCost Analysis
Establish Will Cost using
a)
Contract price
b)
Models that leverages supplier’s actual productivity history to simulate most-likelycost at 50% confidence level
Establish Should Cost using models that
a)
simulate best practices applied to your program or item
b)
simulate desired objectives, i.e.; weight reduction
3.
Identify CRIs - Work with suppliers to determine specific cost
reduction initiatives (CRIs) that drive efforts a Should Cost target
4.
Incentivize suppliers to realize subsequent phase CRIs with
Award Fees
5.
Create a Should Cost glide path and implement a continuous
process that uses models to track CRIs results over time
© 2012 PRICE Systems, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
28
Summary
Program Managers and Suppliers are challenged to
identify efficiencies and manage affordability using
Will Cost and Should Cost analysis
Agile “system” models that simulate all program
phases are necessary to rapidly analyze data,
determine Should Costs, and identify efficiencies that
drive savings
There are many examples of success and reusable
artifacts from these successes
Common among the successes are
5
proven
steps to successfully target affordability and control
cost growth through Should-Cost analysis
© 2012 PRICE Systems, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
29
Q&A
© 2012 PRICE Systems, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
30