Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Előd Takáts International Monetary Fund A Theory of “Crying Wolf” The Economics of Money Laundering Enforcement The views expressed herein are those of the author and should not be attributed to the IMF, its Executive Board, or its management. Roadmap Money laundering Related literature Model and Analysis Information Laffer curve Empirical evidence Policy implications General crying wolf problem 11/01/2007 2 Money Laundering Definition: illicit transfer Predicate crimes Traditional Terrorism financing Drug dealing, tax evasion, terrorism Importance Funds moved: $0.6-1.5 trillion half through US Harm: even larger Revenues: 5-15% Public interest 11/01/2007 3 Bank Reporting Reports 1) Rule based reports (standard) 2) Discretionary reports (new problem): SAR SAR (Suspicious Activity Report) Bank expertise and judgment “Constructive ambiguity” Bank’s incentive to report: fines 11/01/2007 Fines for false negatives 4 Problem: Outline Bank monitor 11/01/2007 investigation report Government Transaction 5 Economics Building blocks: 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) Coarse communication Coarse incentives (fines for false negatives) Uncertainty Dual task: monitor and report No ex-post state verification Policy implications 11/01/2007 Optimal fines (1-3) to avoid crying wolf Reporting fees (4) Increased harm, lower fines (2) 6 # Prosecution Information Laffer curve F’ 11/01/2007 F* F** Fines 7 # Prosecution Information Laffer curve Fines 11/01/2007 8 Some Evidence Empirical predictions: Fines: increase SAR: increase Prosecution: Humped shaped curve Data consistent 11/01/2007 9 Prosecution 11/01/2007 10 Further Evidence FinCEN (April 2005) on ‘defensive filing’: We estimate that if current filing trends continue, the total number of Suspicious Activity Reports filed this year will far surpass those filed in the previous years. …it fuels our concern that financial institutions are becoming increasingly convinced that the key to avoiding regulatory and criminal scrutiny under the Banking Secrecy Act is to file more reports, regardless of whether the conduct or transaction identified is suspicious. … If this trend continues, consumers of the data - law enforcement, regulatory agencies, and intelligence agencies - will suffer. 11/01/2007 11 Policy Implications Decrease fines to stop crying wolf (Prop 2) Introduce reporting fees (Lemma 4) Lower nominal fines (OCC internal memo, 2005) Centralize prosecution (Attorneys’ Manual, 2005) ‘Safe harbor’ for sound processes Price externality of information dilution Or longer reports: higher cost, less coarseness New angle on Patriot Act (Lemma 8, 9) Fine increase: intuitive, but wrong reaction 11/01/2007 12 Discussion: Reporting SAR reporting in 2000 number of reports / million population 1000 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 Aust ra lia Be lgium Fra nc e J a pa n Ne t he rla nds S wit z e rla nd Unit e d Unit e d S t a t e s Kingdom 11/01/2007 13 Conclusion Contribution Application: auditing First step: money laundering enforcement Implementable policy recommendations General crying wolf problem Crying wolf and material transactions General lesson Information= data + filtering Crying wolf: filtering Information age: abundant data, needed filtering 11/01/2007 14