Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Towards an integrated theory of ADHD (and substance abuse) Alban Burke November 2010 [The brain] ...is bound together in a dynamic system of systems that does millions of different things in parallel. It is probably so complex that will never succeed in comprehending itself. Yet it will never cease to try. (Carter, 1998, p.8) 1 Introduction • Attention Deficit /Hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a complex and common disorder with a great variation in its clinical presentation. • It has been historically classified primarily as a childhood disorder and has core symptoms associated with hyperactivity/ impulsivity and inattention. • Research evidence suggests that this disorder has strong neurobiological and genetic underpinnings. • The symptoms associated with ADHD are clinically significant impairment in the social and academic functioning of children with this disorder. 2 S O Stimulus C F I A O - M Organism E I C L O Y N O Response M I C Cognitive Footer Emotional Behavioural Physiological 3 Stimulus • This involves both internal and external events that start a recursive process. • External events are quite self-explanatory, however internal events are often ignored, especially in some quarters of Psychology. • These internal events are important in our ultimate model and they include cortical and sub-cortical hyper- or hypo-arousal as well minor or major physiological events. Footer 4 Organism: •Due to the fact that research on cortical and sub-cortical structures is not limited to humans, we decided on this term as it allows flexibility in accommodating various animal studies. •Various themes are included here, e.g.: Genetics Cortical arousal Sub-cortical structures Temperament / “personality” Coping and survival strategies Perceptual processes Information processing and memory Selective and sustained attention Psychomotor abilities Executive functions Footer 5 Response: • Typically, and erroneously, responses are often equated to behaviour only, however, it is argued that all responses have conscious or unconscious behavioural, emotional, cognitive and physiological responses. • In this model it is imperative that one investigates, and understands, all responses to an event. • It is maintained that all responses, and their outcomes, are monitored. In effect a response is not a final outcome, but rather a continuous process of reassessment which either results in the maintenance or adjustment of the response hierarchy. Footer 6 Always late, poor sense of time Interrupts others Anxious Irritable Preference for jobs involving verbal skills, such as salesman Argumentative Likes risky sports Preference with jobs involving working with the hands Bored easily Loses train of thought Preference for self-employment Cannot keep checkbook balanced Low frustration tolerance Problems with alcohol and drug abuse Chronic fatigue Low self-esteem Procrastinates Compulsive and impulsive spending May have been arrested or spent some time in jail Racing thoughts Daydreaming Rage attacks Depression May verbally or physically abuse spouse or children Difficulty with authority figures Mood swings Disorganized Muscle tics Reading problems (dyslexia) Restless -- cannot sit still, cracks knuckles, bites nails, jiggles feet Short or hot temper Failed to finish high school Narcissistic Talk excessively "Foot-in-mouth" disease -- says inappropriate things before thinking Overreactive Unable to finish high school or college Poor concentration Forgets things Unmotivated Poor in math in school History of multiple jobs Unstable personal relationships Poor short-term memory Impulsive Vocal tics Poor with spatial concepts Insomnia Footer 7 History of cADHD and aADHD Year Public / Social event Scientific event 1950’s 1968 Diagnostic event Diagnostic labels included: Minimal Brain Dysfunction (MBD) Hyperactive Syndrome Hyperkinesis Hyperactive Disorder of Childhood The terms Hyperactivity and MBD were most commonly used. (see Conrad 1975) Child's behaviour, especially at school, main criteria. Emphasis on hyperactive and disruptive behaviours (Conrad 1976). Well known, due, in part, to publicity it received concerning controversies about drug treatment. 1970’s Footer The major treatments for hyperactivity were stimulant medications, especially Ritalin. While there was no solid evidence of biological causation, there was an assumption that there was some type of organic pathology. DSM-II identified "minimal brain damage" and "hyperkinetic reaction" The disorders, thus, were defined by both hyperactivity and inattention Although mainly childhood it also allowed for the possibility of persistence into adolescence. Most common childhood psychiatric problem (Gross and Wilson 1974) No methodologically sound epidemiological studies but it was estimated that 3-5% of elementary school students were hyperactive (occasionally estimates were as high as 10%). Several cohort studies were published which followed children who had been originally diagnosed with hyperactivity a decade or more earlier and traced their development into adulthood. These studies established that for some hyperactive children, the symptoms persisted into adolescence and even into adulthood. Thus emerged the notion of what we call "adult hyperactives," 8 1980 Footer Varuous books and popular media reports aimed at the lay market were published: o Paul Wender (1987), The Hyperactive Child, Adolescent and Adult o Frank Wolkenberg (1987) wrote a first-person account in the New York Times Magazine about his discovery that he had ADHD This highly visible testimony of someone not previously diagnosed with ADHD as a child put the idea of "ADHD Adults" into the public realm. o Clinics for adults with ADHD were established at Wayne State University in 1989 and two years later at the University of Massachusetts in Worcester (Jaffe 1995). A major shift in psychiatric thinking occurred with the publication of DSMIII in 1980, when the largely psychoanalytic orientation was abandoned and replaced with an avowedly bio-medical and categorical approach to diagnosis. The "diagnostic project" was now heralded as a scientific endeavor, a claim that has increased with the publication of DSM-IV (1994), a revision that identifies nearly 400 distinct medical diagnostic entities (Conrad & Potter, 2000). Researchers investigated the persistence of symptoms into adulthood (e.g., Biederman, et al., 1996) to further identify what they believed to be confounding factors (such as co-morbidity with other disorders). The scientific studies found their way into diagnostic systems. Any diagnosis of Attention Deficit Disorder (ADD, as the diagnosis was renamed) was found only among adults whose disorder persisted from childhood and, thus, was not a disorder that was either "missed" during childhood or was of adult onset. All ADD adults were hyperactive children grown-up. 9 1990’s Popular media continues, with an increasing focus on adult ADHD: Lynn Weiss (1992) A.D.D. and Creativity Tapping Your Inner Muse: Attention Deficit Disorder Kelly and Ramundo (1993) You Mean I'm Not Lazy, Stupid or Crazy? Thom Hartmann (1994), Attention Deficit Disorder : A Different Perception "20/20," Catherine Crier attributed ADHD to a "biologic disorder of the brain" in adults (September 2, 1994). Dr. Timothy Johnson on "Good Morning America" (March 28, 1994) Newsweek, for example, described a 38-year old security guard who held more than 128 jobs since leaving college after being enrolled in the academic institution for 13 years (Cowley and Ramo 1993). Ladies' Home Journal (Stich 1993) Edward Hallowell and John Ratey (1994), Driven to Distraction Hallowell and Ratey (1994), Driven to Distraction The cover of July 18, 1994 Time Footer magazine issued a clarion call for ADHD adults: "Disorga-nized? Distracted? Discombobulated? Zametkin et al (1990)used positronemission tomography (PET) scanning to measure brain metabolism and demonstrated different levels of brain activity in individuals with ADHD compared to those with-out the disorder, providing new evidence for a biologic basis for ADHD. November 1998, NIH convened a Consensus Conference on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity. While little new emerged from the conference, two papers explicitly focused on adults with ADHD. Overall, the conference report affirmed the validity of ADHD, although recognizing scientific controversies, the need for more basic and longitudinal research, and a lack of consensus on optimal treatment It is clear that by 1994, the clinical diagnosis of ADHD had expanded to include adolescence and adulthood and had become institutionalized in psychiatry and medicine. By 1994, DSM-IV reflected the growing consensus that adults could be diagnosed with ADHD, provided they had exhibited symptoms as children before the age of seven. Two (out of the five) diagnostic criteria were clearly relevant to adults: o DSM-IV required that "some impairment must occur in at least 2 settings." While for children, these settings usually mean school and home, the range of settings may be greater for adults and include home, school, work, and other vocational or recreational settings. o Secondly "there must be clear evidence of interference with developmentally appropriate social, academic, or occupational functioning." o The inclusion of work environments in the criteria section of the manual reflected the central and relatively uncontroversial position that the diagnosis of ADHD in adults now occupied." 10 2000 Footer The expansion of the hyperactivity diagnosis to adults is not, primarily, the result of new scientific discoveries as findings have been varied. Several social factors appear to have contributed to the diagnostic expansion. Conrad and Potter describe these as being: o The Prozac Era o The Medicalization of Underperformance o A New Disability Studies have shown that the interaction of lay and professional claims-makers, rather than "medical imperialism," typically underlies the medicalization process. The case of adult ADHD indicates that popularization may also play a part in diagnostic expansion. Media, including TV, popular literature, and now the Internet, spread the word quickly about illnesses and treatment. This popularization of symptoms and diagnoses can create new "markets" for disorders and empower previously unidentified sufferers to seek treatment as new or expanded medical explanations become popularly available. The widespread popular acceptance of entities as illnesses suggests a feedback loop among professionals, claims-makers, media, and the public in terms of the creation, expansion, and application of illness categories. Medical diagnoses can penetrate the public consciousness and become "taken-for-granted as an objective natural entity" in the public sphere (Horwitz forthcoming). Such medical diagnostic entities are often accepted without recognizing their history and with an assumption of their universal categorical significance regardless of cultural context. Within an increasingly medically aware public reside individuals who take identified "symptoms" as revealing an underlying disease condition and, in cases like adult ADHD, may seek to attain their diagnosis of choice. Genetics is the rising paradigm in medicine and an increasing number of human problems are being attributed to genetic associations, markers, or causes (Conrad 1999). Some experts have long believed that there is a genetic component to ADHD and its predecessor, hyperactivity, but to date, evidence is only suggestive, even though the claims of inheritance date back at least 25 years (Cantwell 1975; Wender 1971; Wood, et al. 1976). Recent research has focused on a genetically induced imbalance of dopamine. Researchers posit a potential link between ADHD and three genes: D4 dopamine receptor gene, the dopamine transporter gene, and the D2 dopamine receptor gene (Faraone and Biederman). The thinking is that people who carry the gene overproduce dopamine, which impairs self-control. Despite the research and much published testimony the genetic nature of ADHD is still contested. In terms of diagnostic expansion, the ADHD case is not unique. We can point to other cases where medicalized categories, which were originally developed and legitimated for one set of problems, were extended or reframed to include a broader range of problems. 11 Current status of research: Genetics • Nadder , Silberg, Rutter, Maes and Eaves (2001) did a study in which they explored the phenotypic and genetic interrelationships underlying ADHD. • The ADHD symptomatology was assessed by various instruments in a sample of 735 male and 819 female same-sex twin pairs, aged 8 to 16 years. Multivariate analyses were applied to parental and teacher ratings from an investigator-based interview, the CAPA, and three questionnaires (the CBCL and the Rutter Parent and Teacher Scales). • Results from patterns of intercorrelations and factor analyses of maternal measures suggested that at the phenotypic level, these assessed the same underlying behavioural construct, which differed from other emotional and behavioural constructs. Footer 12 • Genetic analyses, however, showed that in addition to a common factor underlying the expression of ADHD as assessed across the range of measures, additional genetic factors were identified that were method- and rater-specific. • The findings suggest that although the investigator-based interview and the behavioural checklists tap similar aspects of ADHD behaviour, there is additional rater-specific variance. • In line with this, Sharp, McQuillin and Gurling (2009) describe ADHD as a clinically and genetically heterogeneous syndrome which is comorbid with childhood conduct disorder, alcoholism, substance abuse, antisocial personality disorder, and a wide array of affective disorders. Footer 13 • The common denominator seems to be the dopamine transporter gene (DAT1). Remarkably, and for the first time in psychiatry, genetic markers at the DAT1 locus appear to be able to predict clinical heterogeneity because the non-conduct disordered subgroup of ADHD is associated with DAT1 whereas other subgroups do not appear to be associated. • The second most well replicated susceptibility gene encodes the DRD4 dopamine receptor and many other dopamine related genes appear to be implicated. • It is becoming increasingly clear that genes causing bipolar mania overlap with genes for a subtype of ADHD. • The key to understanding the genetics of ADHD is to accept very considerable heterogeneity with different genes having effects in different families and in different individuals. Footer 14 Current status of research: Neurology, Neuropsychology and Neurophysiology Frontal lobe Decrease in size in the prefrontal cortex region part of the frontal lobe and Attention Deficit Disorder children show excessive slow brainwave activity (theta and alpha ranges) compared to non- ADD ADHD activity. The slow brainwave activity indicates a lack of control in the cortex of the brain. Response inhibition and working memory impairments in ADHD may stem from a common pathologic process rather than being distinct deficits. Such pathology could relate to right frontal-cortex abnormalities in ADHD, consistent with prior reports, as well as with the demonstration here of a significant association between SSRT and SWM in right frontal patients. Smaller white matter volume in ADHD is distributed bilaterally in frontal lobes. Parietal Smaller white matter volume in ADHD bilaterally in parietal lobes Occipital Although some research shows decreased volume in left, more research necessary Temporal Smaller white matter volume in ADHD was distributed bilaterally in temporal lobes Footer 15 Right putamen An overall reduction in gray matter in ADHD compared to controls Globus pallidus An overall reduction in gray matter compared to controls. Caudate nucleus combines with the putamen and globus pallidus to form a larger brain region called the corpus striatum Basal ganglia This region has often been found to be underactive in ADHD and similar disorders and overactive in obsessive compulsive or anxiety-related disorders. Limbic system If the limbic system is over-activated, a person might have wide mood swings, or quick temper outbursts. He might also be "over-aroused," quick to startle, touching everything around him, hyper-vigilant. Reduced volume, more significant in posterior areas Corpus Callossum Cerebellum Footer Several studies in ADHD in childhood and adolescence have shown structural cerebellar impairment . Indeed, the most marked neuroanatomical anomaly in ADHD has been described in the cerebellum,with volume changes more marked than in the prefrontal cortex (Castellanos et al. 2002). In children, reductions in right cerebellar hemisphere and vermis volume have been reported 16 Nigrostriatal This dopaminergic pathway normally improves attention by increasing focus and on-task behaviour and cognition. It is thought that in ADHD there may be underactivity which leads to impaired selective and sustained attention. Frontostriatal White matter abnormalities in motor/ premotor circuits are responsible for the persistence of overflow movements in patients with ADHD. The effect of MPH on myelin/ oligodendrocyte-related genes in a mature oligodendrocyte explains the improvement or resolution of overflow movements in children with ADHD (D'Agati, Casarelli, Pitzianti, & Pasini, 2010). Anterior cingulate Hypoactive and compensates by using lateral prefrontal cortex, insular cortex, as well as unilateral activation of the caudate, putamen, thalamus and pulvinar (Schneider, Retz, Coogan, Thome, & Rösler, 2006). Posterior cingulate Volume reduction in right hemisphere in children with ADHD (Schneider, Retz, Coogan, Thome, & Rösler, 2006). Footer 17 Glutamate Too little dopamine or norepinephrine is a problem, and too much is a problem. And the importance of glutamate in PFC functioning is beginning to come to the forefront in research. small doses of methylphenidate actually impact the effects of norepinephrine in the pre-frontal cortex more than it impacts the effects of dopamine in the PFC. This research has also shown that when the a2 receptors in the prefronatal cortex are blocked that the symptoms of ADHD can be created in a subject, including lack of selfcontrol, impulsivity, and hyperactivity (Berridg et al, 2006) Norepinephrine Too much or too little of either neurotransmitter decrease cognitive functions, both in terms of the performance of brain cells, and in the real world. But when the ratios and relationships are just right, performance is improved. Dopamine If ADHD involves altered reward processing, then alterations in dopamine function may underlie some of the symptoms of ADHD. Creatine and NAcetylaspartate (NAA) It is also likely that metabolic differences in the globus pallidus play a role in ADHD. Individuals with ADHD had an abnormally low ratio of NAA to creatine. Creatine supplements, often used by exercise enthusiasts, have been shown to boost levels of this nutrient to the brain as well, which can decrease the NAA to Creatine ratio (i.e., more creatine and less NAA), however creatine supplementation can possibly actually exacerbate some of negative effects of ADHD. Footer 18 • Imaging data are often confounded by small numbers of patients and sometimes contradictory results. However, recent findings have shown similarities in adult ADHD and ADHD in children, such as the impairment of cerebello-striato-frontal networks. • Consistent imaging findings are in the dysfunction of striatal brain structures and anterior cingulated cortex (Schneider, Retz, Coogan, Thome & Rösler, 2006). • Although the prefrontal cortical structures also seem to play a pivotal role in ADHD psychopathology, these findings are not unique or specific to ADHD. Footer 19 • Given that ADHD symptomatology undergoes changes with adulthood in terms of decline of hyperactivity and impulsivity, while disorganization and emotional dysregulation come to the fore, a more focused approach to understanding emotional dysregulation in adult ADHD should reveal insights into the pathophysiology of this condition. • It is important to bear in mind that comparison of results between young children and adults with ADHD could be confounded by maturational or developmental effects with increasing age (Schneider, Retz, Coogan, Thome & Rösler, 2006). Footer 20 • Finally, in animal models emerging evidence suggests that methylphenidate alters the dopaminergic system with long-term effects beyond the termination of treatment (Grund, Lehmann, Bock, Rothenberger, & Teuchert-Noodt, 2006). • On the other hand, longterm treatment did not show functional differences after termination of medication compared to treatmentnaïve ADHD patients (Pliszka, Glahn, SemrudClikeman, Franklin, Perez, Xiong & Liotti, 2006). • Whether stimulant medication has long-term influence on brain morphology or neuroregenerative effects is not clarified. • Thus, controversies between structural and functional results have still to be resolved. Footer 21 Footer 22 Sensation seeking: Mediating factor in substance abuse • A study by Faraone, Kunwar, Adamson and Biederman (2009) provides some evidence that those who have been diagnosed with AADHD show specific personality traits such as novelty seeking, harm avoidance, reward dependence, persistence, selfdirectiveness, cooperativeness and self-transcendence (Faraone et al., 2009). • These personality traits manifest, according to Faraone et al (2006) as follows: Footer 23 Sensation seeking: Mediating factor in substance abuse – High novelty seeking:individuals high in novelty seeking are quick-tempered, curious, easily bored, impulsive, extravagant, and disorderly. – High harm avoidance: People high in harm avoidance are fearful, socially inhibited, shy, passive, easily tired, and pessimistic even in situations that do not worry other people. Although the higher harm avoidance of ADHD subjects is consistent with ADHD’s comorbidity with anxiety disorders and depression (Biederman et al. 2006; Kessler et al. 2006), the group differences Faraone et al (2006) observed were not accounted for by these disorders, which suggests that this personality subscale may tap subclinical traits. – Low persistence: Tendency to give up easily when frustrated, less likely to strive for higher goals, unlikely to persevere at tasks and associated deficits in executive functioning. Low persistence is consistent with the executive functioning deficits seen in many patients with ADHD (Biederman et al. 2007). – Low reward dependence: Practicality, tough-mindedness, social insensitivity and indifference. Footer 24 Sensation seeking: Mediating factor in substance abuse – Low self-directedness: Less responsible, reliable, resourceful, goal-oriented and self-confident than other adults and they find it difficult to define, set and pursue meaningful internal goals. – Low cooperativeness: Self-absorbed, intolerant, critical, unhelpful, and opportunistic and inconsiderate of other people’s rights or feelings. These traits are consistent with ADHD’s co-morbidities with ODD and conduct disorder. • The extreme of normal personality traits, as suggested by the aforementioned study, not only describe a pattern of disruptive behaviour, but also raises many other questions and alternative perspectives on AADHD. • One personality trait which was not investigated by Faraone et al (2003) but may also be related to AADHD, is sensation seeking (the tendency to seek out novel experiences). Footer 25 Sensation seeking: Mediating factor in substance abuse • Research on the neurological and neurophysiological aspects of sensation seeking has yielded some interesting results. • One of these is where brain images showed that when high sensation seekers viewed emotionally arousing photographs, there was increased activity in the brain region known as the insula (See Figure 1a). • This brain structure acts in part as a gateway where visceral signals from the body are first received and interpreted by the brain. In contrast to this, when low sensation seekers looked at arousing photographs, there was increased activity in the frontal cortex area of the brain (See Figure 1b). Footer 26 Sensation seeking: Mediating factor in substance abuse • Regardless of whether the pictures were pleasant (e.g., mild erotica) or unpleasant (e.g., a snake poised to strike), the highsensation seekers showed early and strong activation in the insula. (See Figure 1a). • In contrast, in the low-sensation seekers, insula activity barely rose above baseline levels. (See Figure 1b.) • Instead, there was pronounced early activity in the anterior cingulate, a part of the cortex strongly linked to the regulation of emotions (and many other things). • In high-sensation seekers, anterior cingulate activation was delayed in relation to the lows, though it eventually reached a similar peak. Footer 27 Sensation seeking: Mediating factor in substance abuse Footer 28 Sensation seeking: Mediating factor in substance abuse • However, not only is there increased activity in certain areas but, in a further study, using urine samples and spinal taps, it was found that high sensation seekers had a significant deficit in levels of a byproduct of the brain chemical norepinephrine. • The findings of the aforementioned study should be viewed together with findings on brain structures, as the two are not mutually exclusive. • Often researchers make the mistake of viewing the causes of pathology or behaviour as being either brain structure, or neurotransmitter based. • However, in this instance we are not considering structural deficits, but rather functional deficits. • Brain activity, in essence, relies on neurotransmitter release. • If one considers that the noradrenergic pathway runs through the frontal and prefrontal cortex (see Figure 2), then altered norepinephrine must have an effect on the activity in these areas. Footer 29 Noradrenergic Footer Serotonergic Dopaminergic 30 Case study • 28 year old female, childhood diagnosis of ADHD, no formal diagnosis of aADHD, no medication. – 15-16 years very anti-drugs, then had boyfriend who smoked cigarettes and maijuana – Started using on weekends out of curiosity, first experience, no effect, thereafter euphoric, and heightened sensation (“supersonic hearring”) – Used it once before school day for the thrill of it – Went to raves where she started using Ecstasy. First experience was total euphoria, thereafter never the same experience and used more to try and regain that first experience – Also reports that her thoughts seemed to be more focussed – Stopped because she became bored of it – Used cocaine a few times, but according to her it had no effect – Anti-smoking and anti-alcohol (father an acloholic) – Smoked Hookah pipe – Now uses Bioplus and Vitamin B tablets because she discovered by accident that it slows her down and helps with her attention and concentration Footer 31 Integrated model • We propose that ADHD children and adults are predisposed to substance abuse. • In our opinion, ADHD sufferers are aware that their behaviour is unacceptable, and this awareness creates discomfort (e.g. 5year-old:”I don’t want to be like this”). i.e. the symptoms in themselves do not create discomfort (as opposed to disorders such as mood and anxiety). • The patients themselves are not aware of the underlying neurological causes • According to Mowrer’s two factor theory we propose that initial contact with a substance happens by chance and they ascribe “feeling better” to the substance Footer 32 • Subsequent use and “positive effects” are positively reinforced (operant conditioning) • Sensation seeking and resultant risk taking behaviour is a predisposing risk factor • We postulate that sensation seeking shares the same neurological and substrates with ADHD which is why we assume that it predisposes adults with ADHD to substance abuse Footer 33 Future research Adult ADHD Diagnostic Self Report Questionnaires Neurocognitive Neuropsychological signs and symptoms (CANTAB) Psychodiagnostics Neurological & Neuropsychological assessments Footer Cortical Arousal (Biopac Evoked potential) Mental HealthProfessionals' perceptions Sequelae Clinical Picture and classification Co-morbidity Sensation seeking and risk taking behaviour Substance abuse Investigating the role of dorsolateral, prefrontal-subcortical; anterior cingulatesubcortical; orbitofrontalsubcortical (fMRI) Career 34 Creativity So what do we propose to do? Degree D.Litt et Phil M.A (Psychology) M.A (Clin Psych) Footer Student / Staff Topic Alban Burke Investigating the neurodevelopmental theory of ADHD by means of DTI scans Tracey-Lee Austin Subcortical relationships between ADHD and Sensation seeking Human, Werner Neuropsychology of ADHD Human, Wilmien Comparison between ADHD and non ADHD Cave, J Comparison of attention, impulsivity and interpersonal relationships between ADHD and other disorders Jordaan, E Critical Psychological perspectives of ADHD Sayce, S Nicotene (Hubbly Bubbly) use and abuse in ADHD Sklar, R Hyperfocus in ADHD Cilliers, M Frontal cortical arousal in ADHD and sensation seeking Weideman, A Role of hormones in ADHD Pumphrett, C Career decision and ADHD De Jongh, H Comorbid conditions in aADHD Bester, T Ritalin: Risk or protective factor in ADHD and substance abuse Spannidis, C Lived experience of adults with ADHD Erasmus, A Alpha and Theta frontal wave activity in ADHD Ferreira, Q Comparison of alpha and theta frontal wave activity between anxiety and ADHD 35 Conclusion • It seems unlikely to me that we will continue to punish people for misconduct when the crossed wires that spark their behaviour become as clear to see as a broken bone. Rather, I hope (and expect) we will use our knowledge of the brain to develop treatments for sick brains that will be infinitely more effective than the long-winded, hit and miss psychological therapies we use today. (Carter, 1998, p.334) Footer 36