Download “Development of IPF drugs: a slow process fraught with failures” Not

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Specialty drugs in the United States wikipedia , lookup

Electronic prescribing wikipedia , lookup

Polysubstance dependence wikipedia , lookup

Psychedelic therapy wikipedia , lookup

Drug discovery wikipedia , lookup

Orphan drug wikipedia , lookup

Adherence (medicine) wikipedia , lookup

Neuropharmacology wikipedia , lookup

Biosimilar wikipedia , lookup

Drug interaction wikipedia , lookup

Prescription drug prices in the United States wikipedia , lookup

Psychopharmacology wikipedia , lookup

Bilastine wikipedia , lookup

Neuropsychopharmacology wikipedia , lookup

Pharmaceutical industry wikipedia , lookup

Medication wikipedia , lookup

Pharmacognosy wikipedia , lookup

Prescription costs wikipedia , lookup

Pharmacogenomics wikipedia , lookup

Bad Pharma wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
“Development of IPF drugs: a slow process fraught with failures”
Not long ago, doctors had no proven treatment options for their IPF patients. Today, Canadian IPF
patients can be treated with Esbriet (pirfenidone), and encouraging clinical data suggests a second
option, nintenamib, may soon be available. Part of the reason why novel drugs are so slow to become
available to patients is that drug development takes significantly longer today than it did in the past.
According to Dr. Luca Richeldi, Professor of Respiratory Medicine at University of Southampton in the
United Kingdom, only one of every 5,000-10,000 drugs discovered eventually gets approved; a process
that can take up to 15 years.
In recent years, many potential drugs have not been approved due to safety concerns. Others seemed
promising in animal studies, but subsequently failed to show any impact in humans. “Even when you
start with the most promising preclinical data, when you get into the IPF patient population, the results
may be the opposite of what you expected,” noted Dr. Richeldi.