Download Quantification of rock mass deterioration process for cut slope

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
Transcript
Quantification of rock mass deterioration process for cut slope design in humid tropical areas –
case study Northern Kota Kinabalu, Sabah Malaysia
FREDERICK FRANCIS TATING1,2*, ROBERT HACK2, VICTOR JETTEN2
Minerals and Geoscience Department, Locked Bag 2042, 88999 Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia
2
Department of Earth Systems Analysis, Faculty of Geo-information Science and Earth Observation (ITC),
University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
*Email address: [email protected]
1
Keywords: Weathering, Intensity Rate, Intact Rock Strength, Sandstone, Sabah
Abstract
Road construction in mountainous areas especially in humid tropical climates is often afflicted by
slope instability. Road cut slopes are designed to be stable over a certain time span; i.e. the
engineering lifetime, however many slopes or parts of slopes fail before the end of the lifetime. The
reasons for failure sometime after construction are likely due to the deterioration of rock masses in cut
slopes. Deterioration is mainly due to stress relief and weathering. Deterioration rates depend on the
properties of rock mass including its history, and the environment in which it is exposed. The rate
decreases with time due to formation of a layer of residual material that prevents further contact
between fresh mass and weathering agents. Stress relief and weathering are often marginally
quantified or simply neglected in slope design (Huisman, 2006), due to lack of understanding and
appreciation of the processes. In addition, the limited quantitative information available makes it
difficult to incorporate the degradation in design. A proper design of a slope for the entire engineering
lifetime of the slope say up to 50 years should include quantitative factors accounting for the
degradation of the rock mass over its lifetime.
This paper presents the result of research that has been done to develop quantitative factors for
incorporation in the design of slopes to account for stress relief and weathering in humid tropical
areas. The quantitative factor was developed by establishing the relationship between weathering
intensity rate and exposure time for the intact rock strength (IRS) of sandstone (SST unit) in the area
around Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia. The geology in the area consists of interbedded thick-bedded
sandstone and thinly laminated shale beds belonging to the Crocker Formation.
The weathering intensity rate is determined by the change brought by the processes of weathering on
intact rock strength (IRS) after it was exposed for a certain period of time. It is done by comparing the
initial property value before and after weathering has occurred (Colman, 1981). Property refers to the
geotechnical properties such as intact rock strength (IRS), and rock mass internal angle of friction and
cohesion. These properties are preferred as these are directly related to slope stability. Therefore, the
empirical relationship to describe change of property value (for this research intact rock strength) as a
function of time is expressed as (Tating et al., 2013):
π‘Žπ‘π‘
𝐼𝑅𝑆𝑑 = 𝐼𝑅𝑆𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑑 + 𝑅𝐼𝑅𝑆 log(1 + 𝑑)
(1)
π‘Žπ‘π‘
where, 𝐼𝑅𝑆𝑑 is the IRS value at exposure time t, 𝐼𝑅𝑆𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑑 is the initial IRS value and 𝑅𝐼𝑅𝑆 is the
apparent rate of the IRS change. The property value change rate in this equation refers to the
β€œapparent rate” which is quantified by the change in property value from the initial state divided by a
function of the total exposure time.
The result of the research (Figure 1) shows that effect of weathering on IRS is related to time
following a logarithmic function:
𝐼𝑅𝑆𝑑 = 105 βˆ’ 34 log(1 + 𝑑)
(2)
Figure 1 Relationship between IRS and exposure time of sandstone (SST unit) expressed in
logarithmic function for the whole observation.
Similar analyses are carried out for the cohesion and friction angle for the SST unit, which is
estimated by using SSPC method (Hack et al., 2003). This is shown in Figures 2(A) and 2(B). Based
on the graphs, the SST unit cohesion reduction in time is expressed as:
πΆπ‘œβ„Žπ‘’π‘ π‘–π‘œπ‘›π‘‘ = 27004 βˆ’ 6850.3 log(1 + 𝑑)
(3)
πΆπ‘œβ„Žπ‘’π‘ π‘–π‘œπ‘›π‘‘ (Pa) is the intact rock cohesion of SST at the time t, and t is the time since exposure in
years. 27004 is the initial value of the cohesion in Pascal of the fresh SST unit at the time of
excavation, and 6850.3 is the apparent reduction rate in Pa/log [year].
A
B
Figure 2 (A) Relationship between the cohesion and exposure time; (B) friction and exposure time of
sandstone (SST unit) expressed in logarithmic function for the whole observation.
For the SST unit friction angle, the relationship is expressed as:
πΉπ‘Ÿπ‘–π‘π‘‘π‘–π‘œπ‘›π‘‘ = 56.1 βˆ’ 15 log(1 + 𝑑)
(4)
πΉπ‘Ÿπ‘–π‘π‘‘π‘–π‘œπ‘›π‘‘ (Deg) is the intact rock friction angle of SST unit at the time t, and t is the time since
exposure in years. 56.1 is the initial value of the cohesion in degree of the fresh SST unit at the time
of excavation, and 153 is the apparent reduction rate in Degree/log [year].
This relationship is likely also valid in other tropical areas and thus can be used for prediction of the
intact rock strength development of sandstone over the engineering lifetime of man-made slopes in
tropical areas.
References
Colman, S.M., 1981. Rock weathering rates as function of time. Quaternary Research 15, 250 - 264.
Huisman, M., 2006. Assessment of rock mass decay in artificial slopes. PhD Thesis, ITC, Enschede.
Hack, H.R.G.K., Price, D.G., Rengers, N., 2003. A new approach to rock stability - a probability
classification (SSPC). Bulletin Engineering Geology and the Environment 62, 167-184 and
erratum p. 185.
Tating, F., Hack, R., Jetten, V., 2013. Engineering aspects and time effects of rapid deterioration of
sandstone in the tropical environment of Sabah, Malaysia. Engineering Geology,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2013.03.009. In Press.