Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Project Management PROJECT MANAGEMENT LEADERSHIP FACILITATOR [DR RUFUS ADEBAYO] [[email protected]] [INSERT CONTACT NUMBER] Examine and analyse the challenges of operating under a matrix structure. A matrix organizational structure is a company structure in which the reporting relationships are set up as a grid, or matrix, rather than in the traditional hierarchy. In other words, employees have dual reporting relationships - generally to both a functional manager and a product manager. Matrix Organizational Structure: Advantages, Disadvantages Advantages: • • • • • Resources can be used efficiently, since experts and equipment can be shared across projects. Products and projects are formally coordinated across functional departments. Information flows both across and up through the organization. Employees are in contact with many people, which helps with sharing of information and can speed the decision process. Staffers have to work autonomously and do some selfmanagement between their competing bosses; this can enhance motivation and decision making in employees who enjoy it. Disadvantages: Violation of unity of command Costly structure Problems of over specialization Difficult in balance Feeling of insecurity Lack of wide coordination Lack of commitment The matrix structure is generally considered the toughest organizational form to work in, due to the conflicting pulls on resources. The overlaps can lead to turf battles, and difficulty in determining accountability. The major disadvantages of a matrix structure are: Violation of unity of command In matrix structures, subordinates have to follow instruction from more than one superior. Generally, they receive orders from functional managers as well as from project managers. In some cases, subordinates may receive instructions from both the superiors at a time, which confuses the subordinates. To avoid the problems, frequent and comprehensive communication among project and functional managers is necessary. Costly structure This structure maximizes administrative cost. Here, specialists from the project as well as functional authorities involve in project works. It maximizes paperwork and other information costs. Besides, it is essential to pay lump sum remuneration to functional and project specialists. Problems of over specialization In some situations, matrix organization creates a problem of over specialization. Specialists from both functional and project works gather to solve many complex problems of the organization. As many experts gather to solve problems. In some cases, they waste valuable time in discussing unrelated subjects matters. Thus, there is a possibility of delay in decision making. In one way, it maximizes the cost of the organization, and in the other it delays decision resulting in losses in the business. Difficult in balance Matrix structure demands a high level of inter personal relations and skill. It is essential to involve both functional and project specialists. Besides, it is essential to maintain a balance among these authorities to bring about uniformity in the organizational performance. In practical field, it is more difficult to maintain a balance among these authorities, especially if they have no positive attitude towards each other. Thus, the top level management has to invest more time to maintain mutual relation among these authorities. Feeling of insecurity A feeling of insecurity among the employees is one of the limitations of matrix structure. In many cases, a project runs only a for a fixes duration. After completion of the defined works, there is more probability of the dissolution of the project. In such a situation, the problem of unemployment may arise if another project is not available to the organization. Lack of wide coordination Time limit factor of the matrix structure creates problems in maintaining wide coordination among all the mechanisms of the organization. A project manager has been given a fixed time to coordinate all the mechanisms to complete the given work within the fixed time. As the time factor is limited, the manager cannot maintain a wide coordination among various departments and authorities. Lack of commitment In matrix structure, many specialists and experts are drawn from different functional departments in a project. They are generally appointed in the project only for a limited period. Their role is to provide technical and administrative support to the project managers. However, the project manager does not have the line authority to coordinate and control these personnel. Hence, a project manager is unable to make a commitment to achieve the project objectives in time. An Organizational Breakdown Structure (OBS) An Organizational Breakdown Structure is used in complex projects and in conjunction with the Work Breakdown Structure. It is used whenever a WBS would be helpful. It allows an at-a-glance look at the organizational resources structured in a hierarchical manner. An OBS is helpful in: · Project Management · Workforce Management · Work Breakdown Structures · Having a visual reference of the resources for any project · Viewing costs by resource · Viewing responsibilities by resource An OBS is not task-focused. For visual representation of tasks within a project, a Work Breakdown Structure would be used. How do you Create one? An OBS is created much in the same manner as a Work Breakdown Structure 1. Identify the organizational structure for the resources involved in the project, and draw this out. 2. 2. Once the structure has been filled out, identify all team members. Assign each team member a position in the structure. (Figure 2) 3. 3. If there are extra positions that have not been filled, fill them now. If there are additional resources, assign those resources so that all resources and positions are accounted for. 4. 4. Be sure that the OBS is structured from the most responsible department and then by the performing departments at the lower levels. These lower levels are where the project responsibilities are matched up with the resource needed. THE MATRIX ORGANISATION BREAKDOWN STRUCTURE The three different types of matrix structures are: Co-ordination matrix (weak matrix) Overlay matrix (strong matrix) Secondment matrix ( strong matrix) Matrix OBS Negotiation Strategies Negotiation is the method used to reach an agreement by compromise, which is open to discussion or modification. Negotiation is the process of trying to get a better deal for the project than the project manager would get without negotiation. Negotiation is a process of interaction between parties directed at reaching some form of agreement that will hold and that is based upon common interests; with the purpose of resolving conflict, despite widely dividing differences. This is achieved through the establishment of common ground and the creation of alternatives. The three basic negotiation strategies are • Win-lose strategy – This strategy is a competitive adversarial bargaining approach where each party is searching for the other party’s weakness and desires to capitalize on any weakness discovered. The consequence of this approach is that there is little or no sharing of information with the other party and consequently, no attempt is made to understand the other party’s needs and expectations. There is also very little trust between the parties, which essentially kills effective two way communication and goodwill. This strategy does not encourage teamwork or collaboration with functional managers which are two of the key leadership objectives. Win-win strategy – This strategy is a collaborative approach where each party is trying to achieve the best deal for both parties – a mutually agreeable solution. Information is openly shared between parties in order to improve their understanding of each other’s position. For this strategy to succeed there has to be a demonstrable climate of trust and honesty between the parties that allows an open exchange of views and expectations. The win-win strategy is essential when the functional managers’ input and commitment are crucial to achieving the desired outcomes for the project now and in the future. Lose-lose strategy – This strategy basically says that ‘ if I lose , I will make sure that you lose’. The implementation of this spiteful approach creates unnecessary enemies that could come back to haunt you in future negotiations. It is far better for long term business relations to ensure that each party leaves the negotiation table having won something. NEGOTIATION TACTICS The following negotiation tactics outline a number of useful approaches which should improve the project manager’s chances of getting a better deal: Prepare Develop a battle plan Exaggerate your position to weaken the other party’s argument Organise frequent meetings Recognise that opinions are often temporary Solve easy differences first Give concessions on minor issues Force the issue Bargaining: negotiation and bargaining are often used interchangeably as both concern themselves with reaching an agreement or compromise through the process of give and take. Collective bargaining: when two or more parties consisting of groups of people act collectively. Persuasion: communicative behaviour intended to change, modify or shape the responses, attitudes or behaviour of the receiver. Mediation: the process through which agreements are reached with the aid of a neutral third party or helper. The third party should have no decision-making power and have no vested interest in either of the parties. Arbitration: is when a third party has been brought in to settle a dispute most often when the two or more disputing parties have failed to negotiate successfully. Eg. CCMA (Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration). Lobbying: usually found in national and international negotiations, where one party tries to pressurise the other, directly or indirectly through a third party. Talks: informal meetings wherein parties will collect information and explore other’s point of view, flexibility and acceptability. Only when parties are within reach of each other’s objectives will the talks become negotiations. Leadership style Propose an appropriate leadership style for the project manager The leadership style is found to be reliant upon a number of issues: The personality of the leader The maturity of followers The wider needs of the environment Binary View - McGregor’s Theory X, Theory Y McGregor (1960 cited in Burke and Barron 2007: 239) proposed two fundamental approaches to managing people: Theory X –Authoritarian Management Style: This style assumes that the average person will do their best to avoid work and responsibility and therefore must be directed and forced to work. Theory Y- Participative Management Style: This style assumes that people enjoy work and will take responsibility by applying and directing themselves to further the aims of their project. McGregor’s contention was that Theory Y represented a more accurate profile of human nature. He suggested that the essential task of management was to create opportunities, release human potential, remove obstacles, encourage growth and provide guidance. He referred to this as management by objectives (MBO). McGregor’s model is considered to be too simplistic for today’s effective leader. Action Centered Leadership SITUATIONAL LEADERSHIP EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE LEADERSHIP (EI) STYLES Discuss components of emotional intelligence leadership Daniel Goleman (1998 cited in Burke and Barron 2007: 248), described six leadership styles that have some overlapping concepts with the Situational Leadership Model. Visionary Coaching Affiliative Democratic Commanding Pacesetting He also asserted that leaders who have mastered four or more styles – especially the authoritative, democratic, affiliative and coaching styles – have the best climate and business performance. Action Centered Leadership The model focuses on leadership action and suggests that the leader should focus on three responsibilities: Task, Team and Individual, acting according to the demands of each. GROUPS AND TEAMS The term project teams and project groups are often used interchangeably to describe a number of people who have complementary skills and who work to achieve a common goal, but in the project context that is where the similarity ends. The important distinction between a team and a group is how the people are managed and how they interact together, because they may well be doing exactly the same work. MOVING FROM GROUPS TO BEING A PERFORMING TEAM The team performance curve The team performance curve illustrates how well any small group of people performs depending on their approach: HOW CAN WE ACHIEVE SIGNIFICANT PERFORMANCE RESULTS? Katzenbach and Smith (1993 cited in Burke and Barron 2007:164) provide a series of suggestions for how teams can develop their performance. Themes and identity – Teams often adopt a theme or mission that establishes or conveys meaning about their purpose and identity. It is important that the themes have richness in their meaning to the team Enthusiasm an energy level – Teams both work and play hard and with enthusiasm, they put in extra time( without being asked) in order to achieve their goals, and to outsiders, the energy and enthusiasm within the team are easily recognized. Event-driven histories – Teams develop stories about their successes and failures that begin to define how they perceive themselves and their performance. Events are generally unplanned and have a galvanizing effect, especially building on effective responses to failures as well as to successes. These stories help propel team performance. Personal commitment – When there is strong commitment to one another’s development and success, there is always enrichment of the team’s aspirations and sense of purpose. This trait is most prevalent in a high performing team and cannot be dictated from outside the team. Performance results – Effective teams need clearly established measures of performance that set expectations. These measures are the drivers for the team and indicate how their effectiveness can be assessed. MOTIVATION How motivation theory applies to management? Motivation is an inner force that causes or induces us to do something. What motivates one person may not necessarily motivate another. What motivates a person in one set of circumstances may not motivate a person in another set of circumstances. The project manager’s task is to influence the situation in such a way as to encourage the team members to inspire and motivate themselves to achieve the project’s goals. The motivation cycle outlines the dynamic and changeable nature of motivation. COMMUNICATION Effective communication is one of the project manager’s key leadership skills. Project communication is the ability to transfer information from one person to another. The ability to communicate well, both verbally and in writing, is the foundation of effective project management leadership. Communication enables the project manager to develop interpersonal relationships; inspire team members, handle conflict, negotiate with stakeholders, chair meetings and make presentations. According to the PMBOK (1994 cited in Burke and Barron 2007: 341), project communications management is the process required to ensure proper collection and dissemination of project information. It consists of communication planning, information distribution, project meetings, progress reporting and administrative disclosure. Communication involves exchanging ideas. It is a way of getting ideas, information, and feeling across to another party. Communication needs two parties, and these parties need to understand one another if true communication is to take place. COMMUNICATION THEORY The Communication Process The purpose of a project communication system is to transfer information from one person or team member to another. Communication is essentially the interpersonal process of sending and receiving messages and information. The key components of the communications process are shown in Figure 12.1. They include the sender who encode and sends (transmits) the message, and the receiver who decodes and interprets the message. The receiver then feeds back a response to the sender and closes the loop. COMMUNICATIONS PLANNING Communications planning links the project manager to the project team and other stakeholders. The project manager and the project management office are at the heart of the project’s information and control system. It is the project manager’s responsibility to not only develop the project’s OBS but also to develop the project’s lines of communication and ensure that the right people are receiving the right information at the right time. The communications plan should outline the following: Who? – Lines of communication between sender and receiver showing responsibility and authority. What?- Scope of communication, content and format How? – Email, telephone, meeting When?- Schedule of meetings Feedback – Confirms message received and understood – document control, transmittals Filing – Filing, retrieval, storing, back-up, disaster recovery PROJECT MEETINGS AND TEAMWORK MEETINGS Project meetings are the project manager’s principle forum to manage the project and communicate with the team members and stakeholders. There are five basic reasons for holding a project meeting: Information sharing Problem solving Decision-making Planning Progress evaluation, monitoring reviewing and forecasting. The minutes of a meeting are a permanent certified record of what was said and agreed by the team members. Minutes should be taken for all meetings and produced as soon possible after the meeting and communicated to the key people as per the communications plan. TEAMWORK Communication is probably the single most important factor establishing cohesion amongst team members, because good communication is the thread binding the team members together to create a cohesive bond. It is only through communication that each team member gets to know the other team members and vice versa. Important themes are: Team building Conflict resolution Competencies Team roles Shared values Task Progress Contribution Recognition Support Effective communication enables the team to work together and perform the project efficiently. LINES OF COMMUNICATION AND COMMUNICATION CHANNELS LINES OF COMMUNICATION A line of communication may be defined as a formal or informal link between two or more people, departments, companies, suppliers, contractors or stakeholders. The lines of communication tend to follow the project’s OBS, which not only outlines the project manager’s position, but also implies responsibility, authority and who reports to whom. COMMUNICATION CHANNELS As a project team grows the number of channels of communication increases by the formula n((n-1)/2), where n = the number of people. Accordingly, a team of 5 will have 10 communication channels and a team of 20 will have 190 communication channels. For a team of 20 members to achieve full inter-member communication it will take a significant amount of time and the team’s efficiency is bound to suffer. Project Communication and Stakeholder Management The overall outcome for this section is that, on its completion, the learner should be able to demonstrate an understanding of project communication and documentation. This overall outcome will be achieved through the learner’s mastery of the following specific outcomes, in that the learner will be able to: 1. Describe communication in a project environment. 2. Distinguish between verbal and non-verbal communication. 3. Discuss the significance of communication in project management. 4. Identify and describe the different types of project meetings, and discuss the purpose and hosting of each. 5. Identify and describe the different types of project reports, and discuss the purpose each. 6. Describe and formulate a project communication plan. Communication in a project environment Communicating is a broader discipline and involves a substantial body of knowledge that is not unique to the project context. For example: Sender-receiver models (feedback loops, barriers to communication, etc.); Choice of media (when to communicate in writing versus when to communicate orally; when to write an informal memo versus when to write a formal report; etc.); Writing style (active versus passive voice, sentence structure word choice, etc.); Presentation techniques (body language, design of visual aids, etc.); Management techniques (preparing a meeting agenda, dealing with conflict, etc.). Project communication as an academic field embraces a large body of knowledge. Within a project management context, communication focuses on: How the project team members communicate with one another; How the project team, and specifically the project manager, liaise with senior management and internal stakeholders on project resources and progress; How the project team liaise with external stakeholders such as the media and community leaders; The distribution of information to all project stakeholders and role-players using appropriate media and technology; The planning and compilation of a project communication plan; Project-related documentation (progress reports, etc.). The following communication information should be contained within the project communication plan: Project communication strategy The kick-off meeting Roles and responsibilities of the team Project status meetings and frequency Change control communications Project review meetings Transition from deployment to operations Closure meeting Personal communication Personal communications may include private letters, memos, some electronic communications (like e-mails), personal interviews, and telephone conversations. Oral (Verbal) Written Graphical Numerical Electronic Significance of communication in project management Project communication, according to Healy (1997:227), has a dual purpose: the first is to cause some action or agreement to take place, and the second is to make a record that might be needed later. The larger the number of people involved in the project, the more communication paths there are, and the more project time is spent on simply sharing information and keeping stakeholders and role players up to date. Communication management is even more necessary if the project team is spread out over different geographical areas and timelines. Read more on the following: Project meetings Project Presentations Project reports Project communication management plan A project communication plan defines the generation and distribution of project documentation among stakeholders throughout the project (Clements and Gido, 2011:388). According to Clements and Gido (2012: 419), the following elements may be included in a project communication plan: Documents (e.g. project charter, contract, scope document, WBS, quality plan, etc.) Author or originator Required date or frequency Recipients Action required Comments Recapitulation Project communication can take various forms and encompasses different types of documents, reports, meetings which are also incorporated into a project communication plan. Project managers must possess and master various communication skills for effective project management. This includes personal communication skills, conducting meetings and delivering presentations, and collaborating with all stakeholders. THANK YOU