Download Background in formation of Jattu Trust

1. Background in formation of Jattu Trust
A. Name of PIA
: JATTU TRUST
B. Address
: THOTAPALLI, GARUGUBILLI(Mandal),VIZIANAGARAM(Dist),
ANDHRA PRADESH, PIN : 535525
E.mail : [email protected]
Web : www.jattutrust.org
C. Contact persons
: 1. D.PARINAIDU
Executive Trustee
Jattu Trust
Cell : 9440164289
2. M.NUKAM NAIDU
Project Manager
MKSP – NTFP
Cell : 9440094384
D. State
: ANDHRA PRADESH
Past experience
Sl.No Name of the
project
Budget
Source of
funds
Geographical Area
1
Community
Managed
sustainable
Agriculture
Maa Thota
28,00,000
S.E.R.P
Govt.of
A.P
A.P Vizianagaram
(Dist) 6Mandals
120 habitations
Mahila Kisan
Sashaktikaran
pariyojana ½
acre Annapurna
food security
model
5,61,05,520/- M.O.R.D
2
3
2,38,46,000/- NABARD
Gummalaxmipuram,
vizianagaram (Dist)
A.P
150 Villages
6mandals in
Vizianagaram (Dist)
A.P.
No.of poor
households
covered
6500
500
608 +
Proposed
another
1500
families in
this current
year.
Experience : Jattu Trust have got rich experience in implementing the above projects.
During the implementation of community Managed sustainable Agriculture Jattu Trust
visited and identified many Traditional Agricultural practices. And have direct
experience in implementation of various existing crop models in our own campus. I.e 10
guntha model, 36X36 model, Gangamaa model, Rainfed sustainable agriculture model
etc…
With in this experience we have developed ½ an acre Annapurna crop model.
Sri P. Mohanaiah Chief General Manager NABARD visited and supported to publication
of concept book on Annapurna and also agreed to change Maathota crop pattern into
Annapurna Design in our implementing area.
The Annapurna crop model have been practicing in Maathota – NABARD
supporting programme by Tribal farmers since 3 years.
Currently the ministry of Rural development, Govt. of India supporting the
Annapurna crop model under the MKSP-NTFP project among the Tribal and other poor
families of Vizianagaram Dist.
Some of the farmers in all over the Andhra Pradesh and Telangana voluntarily
approach Jattu Trust and taken Annapurna knowledge and have started work in their
fields.
The states of Odissa, Maharastra, Jharkand have been visited Annapurna fields,
Thotapalli, Vizianagaram, A.P. The MKSP Partner NGO Kovel foundation implementing
the same model in Visakhapatnam, Tirupathi, Rampachodavaram and Khammam with
the Tribal Farmers.
2.1 Demographic information for the current project
I.
II.
District
Mandals
III.
No.of Revenue Villages/
Habitations covered
: Existing 74 + 40 habitations.
Target population
for the intervention
: 1500
Domain of best practices : Annapurna crop model (S.A)
IV.
V.
: Vizianagaram
: Gummalakshmipuram, Kurupam, Jiyyammavalasa,
Komarada,Garugubilli, Parvathipuram.
2.2 cost benefit analysis of best practices:
Total investment required for supporting B.P :2,80,000,00 (Two crore eihty lakhs)
(for current year)
Total no.of women farmers covered (1500 current year)
Investment per women former covered : Rs 10,800/- excluding training and
Administration cost.
Net income for each women farmer benefit/cost ratio : Rs 30,000 to 50,000 in rainfed
areas, where as in irrigated area Rs 50,000 to 1 lakh.
3. In your view what are the BPs of your organization in implementing Mahila kisan
sashaktikaran pariyojana?
ANS : ½ acre Annapurna crop model.
3.2.1 why are the practice may be considered as a BP?
ANS : 1. Its give yearlong family food security.
2. It is very much suitable to rainfed areas.
3. ½ acre land can be provide food security if the family spend 2-3 hours per day in
this model.
4. Safety food available.
5. Improve ground water levels.
6. Recycling soil enrichment in this model.
Need/problem before the BP was rolled out
Need: It is a need to provide food security for every poor family.
Problems:
1. Availability of ½ acre land.
2. Readiness of family
3 .Regular monitoring and guidance.
3.2.2 when the B.P was initially implemented
ANS : BP was initially implementation in the year of 2010-11 with the experience
taken from CMSA-SERP Andhra Pradesh. Initially fruit plants planted vertically and
horizontally in the length of 36 feet, 18feet and 9 feet length. Canopy enlarged in
whole of the land in duration of 3 years. Then the production of vegetables reduced
gradually. After we get experience from farmers changed fruit plants pattern
vertically only.
3.2.3.Identification of house holds :
ANS : 1.½ Acre dry land family holder.
2. Member of SHG or willing to join in SHG
3. Women headed family
4. Two acres of rain fed land holders.
5. Tribal families
3.2.4. Infrastructure setup / processes :
1. Dug 1 ½ feet width 1 feet depth trench around the bund.
2. Formation of 7feet soil beds
3. Provide furrows (1feet depth 2 feet width) between every two soil beds.
4. Live fencing around the field.
5. 3types of fruit plants should be there at every 36 feet 18 feet and 9 feet range.
3.2.5. Family members can do for setting up above infrastructure. Old age farmers and
women headed family need external human support to create said
infrastructure.
3.2.6. Key outputs/achievements?
Rs 30,000 to 50,000 will get in rainfed ½ acre Annapurna crop model. Will get
Rs.50,000 to 1,00,000 in irrigated areas.
3.2.7. Outcome/ output of B.P. measured :
Recording daily output and outcome from the crop model
Recording daily consumption and marketing of produces.
Sample report enclosed in Annexure - II
3.2.8. Was the BP scaled up, if yes – what was the scope of scale up? If not why?
It should be scaled up. If we provide one time expenditure to poor and
poorest of the poor who are having below 2 acres of dry land.
3.2.9. one time investment around 11 thousand rupees required for implementation of
B.P
3.2.10.
Bed based and multi crop cultivation introducing in Annapurna crop
model. So there is no need to hiring outsourcing labour. Proposed weeder/power
weeder to reduction of drudgery of farmers.
3.2.11.
The Annapurna crop model is a Eco - friendly crop model. It will be
improve water level and save water. It can be sustain in anywhere of the Country.
I strongly believe that the practice is sustainable. All the seasonal fruit plants
given returns round the year. Vegetables and other cereals will be cultivate along
with fruit plants. So I have to say that the model can provide food security
lifelong.