Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Presenter Disclosure Information • Moira Kapral • Challenges and Opportunities in Linking Administrative Claims Data with Stroke Registry Data FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: None UNLABELED/UNAPPROVED USES DISCLOSURE: None Challenges and opportunities in linking administrative claims data with registry data: the Registry of the Canadian Stroke Network Moira K. Kapral MD, MSc, FRCPC May 2010 Overview • Description of the Registry of the Canadian Stroke Network (RCSN) • Administrative databases available for linkage • Linkage process • Advantages and disadvantages of linking registry to administrative data Ontario, Canada • Canada's largest province • Population 13 million • Urban and rural • Ethnically diverse • Universal health coverage with single payer Ontario Stroke System • Regionalized stroke care • Designated stroke centres • Transfer and bypass protocols • Funded by Ministry of Health • Part of a nationwide stroke strategy • Requirement for measurement of monitoring of the quality of stroke care delivery Evaluation of the provincial stroke strategy • Mandate for reporting regional performance on key stroke quality indicators • 23 indicators including – Thrombolysis – Neuroimaging – Stroke unit care – Carotid imaging – Antithrombotic therapy – Risk factor modification • Need for high-quality clinical database Registry of the Canadian Stroke Network • Clinical database founded in 2001 • Patients with acute stroke or transient ischemic attack admitted to hospital or seen in the ED of acute care institutions • Four phases with varying methodology • Funded by the Canadian Stroke Network and the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care • www.rcsn.org Registry of the CSN Core Database EMS Data Emergency Department Data Entry Criteria: • ED diagnosis of stroke/TIA • onset 2 weeks of hospital visit Hospital Admission Data Discharge Administrative Data -Hospitalizations -Mortality -Physician Services -Provincial Drug Formulary Data Data collected • Demographics • Pre-hospital/EMS and emergency department care • Stroke data – type, subtype, severity, scales • In-hospital interventions, consultations, complications • Medications – prehospital, during admission, at discharge • Investigations • Disposition Methodology • laptop computer with custom software for data entry • electronic transfer of data to coordinating centre • web-based module also in use (SPIRIT) Intelligent Data Entry Improves Data Quality • only appropriate fields appear (if … then “pop-ups”) • few text fields (check boxes or choice fields) • range checks • logic checks – e.g. only correct sequence allowed • data completeness checks • double entry of critical fields • display of time intervals, age for reality checks Characteristics of a high quality clinical database completeness of recruitment completeness of data use of explicit definitions of variables data validation Black N, Barker M and Payne M. BMJ 328:1478, 2004 Data Transfer Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES) • Established by provincial government to perform research related to equity, access and quality of health care • Administrative data housed there by special agreement • Strict data security measures RCSN phases 1 and 2: 2001-2003 • 21 stroke centres across Canada • Consent-based with 6-month follow-up interviews for functional status and quality of life • Problems with consent led to biased sample RCSN “Prescribed” in PHIPA 2004 • The RCSN is one of only four registries in Ontario that have been granted 'prescription' in the regulations of the Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care under s.39(1)(c )of the Personal Health Information Privacy Act 2004. • RCSN collects data without consent, “for the purposes of facilitating or improving the provision of health care” • RCSN is the primary means of monitoring and evaluating acute stroke care and outcomes in Ontario RCSN Phase 3: 2003 onwards • DataProvince-wide collected without Clinics consent, “for the purposes of audit facilitating or improving the provision of health care” Stroke centers • All patients at 11 Ontario stroke centres (core RCSN) – N > 40,000 • Population-based audit (RCSN Ontario Stroke Audit) – 15-20% of all Ontario stroke cases at all 150 hospitals (n~5,000/year) • Patients at secondary prevention clinics Data Security • laptop computers use finger print readers for password protection • data encrypted using BestCrypt ® software • personal patient information stripped before data sent to ICES (encrypted health card number sent separately) • encrypted data uploaded to ICES by direct unpublished telephone line • data kept on a secure server without connections to Internet or Intranet • ICES has physical security barriers • data security and privacy policies www.ices.on.ca Investigative Reports Marked variations in tPA by hospital type, 2002/03 and 2004/05 Regional variation in stroke unit admissions Overall rate 18.4% Publications Why link registry to administrative data? Rationale for linkage to administrative data Pre-stroke conditions, care, drugs RCSN stroke cohort Characterize based on geographic and area factors Follow up for readmissions, medications, deaths Advantages of linked registry and administrative data • Registry creates well-characterized cohort of stroke patients, with detailed baseline clinical data • Long-term follow up through administrative data – Less expensive than clinical follow up – Minimal loss to follow up • For evaluation of stroke systems and regionalized care, permits evaluation of association between interventions and outcomes (mortality, readmissions, patterns of care) Administrative data sources in Ontario Database Variables Registered Persons/Vital Statistics Mortality CIHI Discharge Abstract DB Hospital separations CIHI National Ambulatory Care Emergency department and ambulatory visits Drug Benefits Database Prescription claims for those aged > 65 Canada Census Area-level income, education Physician Claims Outpatient visits, procedures Population-based, comprehensive, validated Process for linkages • Need unique patient identifier: health card number • Considered most sensitive piece of personal health information – need stringent data security procedures • Health card number collected in RCSN database • Not transferred with other data; sent on separate disc to specific data custodian at ICES • Scrambled to create a new unique ID number; kept on a separate server with no connection to Internet in an area with restricted access Challenges in using linked data • Collection of unique patient identifier necessitates stringent, time-consuming and expensive data security measures – Development of protocols and procedures – Personnel to implement – Programming and software – Security of data facility • Cannot export or share linked dataset Challenges in using administrative data • Population-based data sources not always available • Not all variables of interest available in existing databases – Functional status, quality of life, laboratory data, biomarkers, genetic tests • Coding/miscoding • Claims may not reflect reality • Experience required for proper use and interpretation Conclusions • Linked registry and administrative data ideal for studying both processes and outcomes of stroke care • Should be considered for jurisdictions that are establishing regionalized systems of stroke care, to allow evaluation of return on investment • Main challenges are – Availability of appropriate databases – Data security – Expertise in linkages and analyses • Worthwhile investment for policy-makers and government Advertisement for RCSN database • AVAILABLE TO YOU for research projects • Analyses done on-site at ICES and funded by RCSN grant • Need to collaborate with RCSN investigator • Project request forms available at www.rcsn.org Thanks and questions