Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Effect of Static Compression on ATP Production of Intervertebral Disc 1 Wang, C.; 1,2 Yuan, T-Y, 2 Travascio, F.; 1Helbig, M. W.; 1Khoury, K.; 2 Gu, WY; 1 Huang, C.-Y.C. 1 Stem Cell and Mechanobiology Lab, 2Tissue Biomechanics Lab, Dept of Biomedical Engineering, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL [email protected] MATERIALS AND METHODS Lumbar spines of 4–6 month-old pigs were obtained within 2 - 8 h of sacrifice. Functional spinal units (FSUs) were isolated from L1-L5 levels of the spine by making parallel transverse cuts through the vertebrae at 0.5mm above and below the disc. The FSUs were placed in custom made compression chambers and cultured in high glucose Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM, Invitrogen Corp., Carlsbad, CA) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Invitrogen Corp) and 1% antibiotic-antimycotic (Invitrogen Corp) in an incubator at 37°C overnight. The medium was continuously circulated at 0.37ml/min, which is about twice the rate of blood flow to the disc in vivo. For the whole disc compression test, the disc height was measured at 5 locations on the disc surface. For the compression group, the discs were subjected to 15% compressive strain for 2 hours. The control group was left undisturbed in the incubator for the duration of the experiment. After the experiment, a transverse cut was made on each unit to expose the annulus fibrosus (AF) and nucleus pulposus (NP). The tissue samples (~10 mm3) were harvested from the locations shown in Figure 1. The samples obtained from AF and NP regions were used to determine the lactate, ATP, and DNA contents. ATP and lactate were released from tissue samples using perchloric acid treatment [2] and then determined using the Luciferin-luciferase method (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) and an enzymatic assay (Sigma), respectively. The DNA content was measured based on the protocol described in a previous study [6]. The lactate and ATP contents were normalized by the DNA content. A student t-test was performed to examine differences in ATP and lactate contents between AF and NP regions and two experimental groups of each region using Excel (Microsoft Inc, Redmond, WA). AF ATP content (nmol/ mg DNA) 10 * (a) Loading Control 8 6 4 2 0 AF NP 2 Lactacte content ( mmol/mg DNA) INTRODUCTION Degenerative disc disease is considered to be one of the most common causes of low back pain. This poses a major socio-economic problem in the US. Since the intervertebral disc (IVD) is the largest avascular tissue in the human body, steep gradients in the concentration of nutrients (e.g., glucose and oxygen) may strongly influence the production of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) [1]. Intracellular ATP serves as essential cellular energy for the biosynthesis of extracellular matrix [2], which is important for maintaining the integrity of tissue structure of IVD. A previous theoretical study demonstrated that mechanical loading may mediate cellular glucose consumption within IVD by altering the transport of oxygen and lactate [3]. In addition, extracellular ATP released from cells has been shown to mediate a wide variety of biological responses by binding purinergic receptors [4]. Therefore, the regulation of ATP production may play an important role in maintaining normal disc function. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of static compression on ATP production in the IVD. (b) Loading ** Control 1.5 1 0.5 0 AF NP Figure 2 Comparison of a) ATP and b) lactate contents between the loading and control groups of AF and NP regions (n=9). *: p=0.043. **: p=0.037. DISCUSSION To our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the effect of static compression on the ATP content in the IVD. This study demonstrated that static compression affects cellular ATP metabolism in the IVD. Lower ATP content and higher lactate content was found in the loading AF group. A decrease in solute diffusivity (or tissue permeability) caused by static compression [3] may increase extracellular lactate accumulation and reduce local concentrations of oxygen and glucose. This may result in a decrease in ATP production. The increase in lactate accumulation in the AF region may decrease pH, creating a hazardous condition for cells [1]. A significant increase in ATP content of the NP loading group suggests that static compression may intrisically promote ATP production in NP cells (Figure 2a). In concurrence with our previous study [6], a significant difference was found in ATP content between two anatomical regions, indicating that NP and AF cells may produce ATP via different major pathways. Furthermore, extracellular ATP can cause tissue calcification [7]. Significantly high ATP content in the NP region may be a potential factor causing endplate calcification and facilitating disc degeneration . ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors would like to thank Mr. Andre Castillo for his help with making the apparatus. This study was supported by the grants from NIH NIAMS (AR056101 and AR050609). NP Figure 1 Harvest sites of AF and NP RESULTS Static compression significantly increased the ATP content of NP tissues (p=0.043), but the ATP content of AF tissues tended to be lower under static compression (Figure 2a). The lactate content of AF tissue was significantly increased by static compression (p=0.037) (Figure 2b). However, no significant difference was found in the lactate content of NP tissues between the loading and control groups. Without static loading, the lactate content of AF tissue was not significantly different from that of NP tissue. With static compression, the lactate content of AF tissue tended to be higher than that of NP tissue (p=0.09). The ATP content of NP tissue was significantly higher than that of AF tissue for both loading conditions (p<0.001). REFERENCES 1. Bibby SR, Jones DA, Ripley RM, Urban JP, Spine 30:487-96, 2005. 2. Lee RB, Urban JP, Biochem J, 321: 95-102, 1997. 3. Huang CY, Gu WY, J Biomechanics, 41, 1184-96, 2008. 4. Burnstock G. Pharmacol Rev 58: 58-86, 2006. 5. Downs TR, Wilfinger WW. Anal Biochem. 131,538-547, 1983. 6. Czamanski J, Yuan T-Y, Gu WY, Huang C-YC. The 56th Annual ORS Meeting, 2010. 7. Ryan LM, Kurup IV, Derfus BA, Kushnaryov VM. Arthritis Rheum 35: 1520-5, 1992. Poster No. 723 • ORS 2011 Annual Meeting