Download Italy

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Political psychology wikipedia , lookup

Politico-media complex wikipedia , lookup

Music and politics wikipedia , lookup

Political spectrum wikipedia , lookup

State (polity) wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Aldo Moro and his idea of
Europe
By Stefano Mangini and Stefano Mangini
To remember Aldo Moro on occasion of his
30th anniversary of death, an International
Conference was held in Rome in November 2008
‘‘The Governance of Societies in the 21st Century
Thinking Back to Aldo Moro’’
The aims of the conference were:
•Discussing about changes linked to
‘‘post-modern society’’ and the
question of how to govern societies
that can no longer be governed by
means of the usual instruments;
• Focusing on the figure of Aldo Moro, who was the first
to foresee those changes.
The main séances were five:
Italy and Europe In International Relations
Change Processes;
Building Consensus In Contemporary
Societies;
Aldo Moro In Historiographic Research;
Religion and Democracy;
Constituent Processes and The Achieving of
Democracy.
• First Séance
Italy and Europe In International Relations Change Processes
The first séance focuses on the theme of the Role that Italy and Europe are called upon to play
within the intenational scenario.
Moro divided his ‘’foreign policy’’ into three counts:
•
The first concerns East-West Relations: he was one of the most careful promoters of the
‘‘strategy of detente’’, aiming to establish relations based on mutual trust that is taken as a single
effective guarantee for peace.
•
The second aspect is the Construction of a United Europe: he tried to make Europe unite starting
from simplest bonds, such as social, cultural and economic cooperation on an equal footing.
This is a “high” idea of Europe that contrasted with the prevailing interpretation of Europe as a
common economic space or as a political tool mainly geared to safeguarding the interests of the
member states.
•
The third one concerns North-South Relations: he wanted to strengthen the instruments of
international cooperation, as well as the safeguarding of human rights.
• Second Séance
Building Consensus In Contemporary Societies
The second séance focused on the theme of Consensus-Building around the
great political decisions since the fragmentation among different political
parties was getting more and more complex
Even though Moro lived during the first years of the so called post modern
period, he could understand both pros and cons of this new society: not by
chance, he repeatedly stressed the weakness of politics, the fragility of the
political parties and the risks linked to them.
• Third Séance
Aldo Moro In Historiographic Research
The third séance was about the Historiographic Research On Aldo Moro. The aim was to promote a
debate on Three Important Issues:
•
The first focuses on the availability and quality of historiographic sources used to analyze Aldo
Moro.
•
The second question is about the research strategy for approaching this complex figure : since he
was a great stateman and he had an important impact on his country’s development it will also be
important to grasp the weight the events connected to his death have had. Indeed, the last days of
Moro’s life have been the object of many publications that have contributed to creating a sort of
“veil” on his overall political and human life or, worse still, have distorted its interpretation.
•
The third question deals with the risk in the Historiographic analysis of the entire period that saw
Moro among the leading figures. It was a particulary complex period, not only for the political
events but also for the rapid great changes.
• Fourth Seance
Religions and Democracy
The fourth séance focuses on a reflection the Relation Between Religions and Democracy. This
relation seems to be on at least three different levels, which are to some extent found also in
Moro’s political action and orientations.
•
•
•
The first level is defined by the relation established between Religion and Politics in the Sphere of
Personal Choice. It is evident how Moro had tried to put forward essential mediation elements
between the two
The second one is the relationship between Religions and Democracy in the latter half of the 20°
century. He linked this relationship to the affirmation of Pluralism. In Moro’s opnion, pluralism
should be nurtured on diversity. It could only came about if every religion and cultural opinion
were put in the condition to fully ‘‘give its best’’
The third one focuses on the relationship between faith and politics. With the emergence of
increasingly more multiethnic and multicultural societies, the influence of religions has certainly
progressively grown, not rarely leading to conflictual situations. For this reason, Moro mantained a
careful behaviour.
• Fifth Séance
Constituent Processes And The Achieving Of Democracy
The last séance focuses on what could be defined ‘‘ Costituent Processes’’.
This expression is usually used by observers to refer to social, cultural and economic type
phenomena that modify the relations between political institutions and citizens continuously
redefining their rights, duties, responsibilities and spheres of action .
• In many respects, Moro anticipated this Dynamic
and “Meta-Juridical” vision of processes: he
actually devised a peculiar approach to these
processes, geared to recognising the values
emerging in society (tolerance, equality, peace,
secularism, respect for individual freedom), in order
to go beyond nationalism and colonialism. As a
matter of fact democracy must not be viewed only
from a political point of view, but also in a social
sense recognising a link between the enjoyment of
democratic freedoms and the full manifestation of
each individual’s personality and orientations.